A Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Supervised Hand Therapy After Carpal Tunnel Surgery.

Background: The objective of this investigation is to examine the effect of postoperative therapy after routine carpal tunnel release. Our hypothesis was that supervised hand therapy does not improve outcomes after routine carpal tunnel release. Methods: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups based on the last digit of their medical record numbers to one of 3 groups: standard 6-week postoperative rehabilitation (standard therapy), expedited one-session postoperative rehabilitation group (expedited therapy), and no postoperative rehabilitation group (no therapy). The primary outcome measures were Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and return to work. The outcome questionnaire was completed preoperatively, at the 2-week follow-up visit, and monthly to 6 months after surgery. Results: All 3 treatment groups had similar mean QuickDASH scores preoperatively. At 1- to 6-month follow-up, all 3 groups had similar QuickDASH scores at each visit, and all showed a significant decline from baseline (preoperative) QuickDASH score. Overall, QuickDASH score decreased significantly from a preoperative visit mean of 42.7 to a final postoperative (visit 8) mean of 6.69. There was no significant difference in the mean QuickDASH score among all 3 groups at 6-month follow-up. There was no significance in the time of return to work among the 3 groups (standard therapy, 21.8 days; expedited therapy, 20.9 days; no therapy, 16.6 days). Conclusions: This investigation adds evidence that supervised hand therapy does not improve the outcomes of routine carpal tunnel surgery as measured by QuickDASH and return to work.

What Patient-related Factors are Associated with an Increased Risk of Surgery in Patients with Stenosing Tenosynovitis? A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Numerous patient-related risk factors have been identified as contributors to patient progression to operative treatment of stenosing tenosynovitis (STS). Identifying patients most at risk of undergoing surgery after receiving a corticosteroid injection would enable health care providers to identify patients most likely to benefit from nonsurgical treatment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of prospectively enrolled patients with a new diagnosis of STS did not require further intervention after a first, second, or third injection when offered up to three corticosteroid injections? (2) Which identifiable risk factors present at the initial evaluation in patients with STS are associated with the patient opting for surgical release after a trial of one, two, or three corticosteroid injections? METHODS: One hundred ninety-six patients with a presumed diagnosis of STS were evaluated between March 2014 and June 2015, and 160 patients with 186 affected fingers were prospectively enrolled after a new diagnosis of STS was made during the study period. STS was diagnosed by assessing for tenderness at the A1 pulley, passive or active triggering, and the absence of other confounding diagnoses. Only the affected finger received a corticosteroid injection, and these patients were followed up during the study period. Patients were followed for 2 years, and 135 of the 160 patients (84%) completed the final followup. Patients with recurrent symptoms were treated with up to three corticosteroid injections before undergoing A1 pulley release, although patients could elect to undergo surgery at any time. Bivariate comparisons and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for independent fingers (one per participant) to identify independent variables associated with progression to surgery after injection. The time between treatments (between injection and subsequent injection or between injection and surgery) for those with recurrent symptoms was also calculated. Information collected from the last time the patient could be contacted was carried forward in the analysis for all 160 patients. RESULTS: No further treatment was sought after the first, second, and third injections by 81 of 160 (51%), 16 of 45 (37%), and three of 10 patients (30%), respectively; 100 of 160 patients (63%) did not pursue further intervention. After the first, second, and third injections, 36 of 160 patients (23%), 17 of 43 patients (40%), and seven of 10 of patients, respectively, did not respond to treatment. After controlling for 21 potentially confounding patient- and disease-related variables, we found that only two risk factors at the initial presentation were protective against eventual progression to surgery: osteoarthritis in the fingers (odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% CI, 0.085-0.786]; p = 0.017) and a longer duration of symptoms (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.89]; p = 0.012). There was no association between progression to surgery and hand dominance, finger type (thumb or other), whether the patient had diabetes, or whether the affected finger was one of multiple affected fingers. Patients who presented again for intervention (injection or surgery) did so at a mean of 153 ± 94 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients should be counseled that their risk of progressing to surgery after an initial corticosteroid injection is lower than for subsequently administered injections for recurrent symptoms, nonoperative treatment should not be bypassed for patients with any of the studied risk factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis.

PURPOSE: Most studies have demonstrated little difference in the outcome of the various techniques proposed for the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. However, the difficulty and time required to perform each technique vary widely. In addition, the introduction of recent implants has increased the cost of the overall procedure. We hypothesize that using a simple, yet stable, suture suspension technique without tendon interposition or ligament reconstruction yields similar results to conventional approaches with less operative time. METHODS: Three hundred twenty consecutive patients underwent thumb CMC arthroplasty by trapezial excision and metacarpal suspension using #2 high-strength orthopedic suture locked weave alone passed from the distal most abductor pollicis longus and flexor carpi radialis insertions without K-wire fixation or tendon transfer. Average duration of preoperative symptoms was 17.8 months. Patient radiographs were graded for arthritis severity and a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (scale 0-10) obtained. Postoperative clinical and radiological follow-up averaged 5.4 years (minimum, 24 months). RESULTS: The average age at surgery was 57.3 years and there were 221 women (243 procedures) and 65 men (77 procedures). Average total operative time was 23.4 minutes. The dominant hand was involved in 52% of patients. All had prior treatment including orthoses and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with 312 having had at least 1 steroid injection. Five patients had stage 1, 134 had stage 2, 164 had stage 3, and 17 had stage 4 disease on radiographs. Average trapezial space height on final follow-up radiographs was 0.8 cm. Two patients had complete trapezial space collapse and required a revision procedure. The average VAS score was 0.6 with pain eliminated in 269 thumbs, minimal in 49, and unchanged/worse in 2. All patients that were employed at the time of surgery returned to work at an average of 2.3 months (range, 3-16 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Suture suspension thumb CMC arthroplasty provides comparable clinical results and several advantages over many current techniques that are described in the literature. The advantages include shortened operative time, inherent stability of the thumb metacarpal height, and no necessity for K-wire fixation, tendon transfers, or implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Making it "More Real": Using Personal Narrative in Faculty Feedback to a Medical Student's Reflective Writing - An Illustrative Exemplar.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Reflective capacity is an essential characteristic of professionally competent clinical practice. Use of interactive reflective writing (IRW), ie. student writer/faculty feedback provider dyad and/or collaborative reflection in small group, to augment reflective practice instruction is well documented. IRW-enhanced reflection on experience contributes to meaning-making, leading to transformative learning within professional identity formation. Written formative feedback to trainees' reflective writings can include personal anecdotes from faculty to enrich the educational value of feedback, used judiciously and subjected to a "filtering" process. We provide an exemplar of a third year Family Medicine clerkship student's reflective writing about a clinical care experience that "mattered" as well as the faculty written feedback which included sharing a personal narrative resonating with themes emerging from the student's reflective writing. Dual, mutually reinforcing identities/roles of medical educator and family cancer caregiver as educator emerged within the feedback.We include some post-IRW exercise student and educator reflections on the experience and impact of such sharing within an educational context. In this example, faculty drawing from both personal and professional experience to craft feedback supporting the becoming of a physician was experienced by the student writer as making the feedback more "real" and engaging, leading to perceived enhanced value of the educational exercise.