Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a novel progesterone intravaginal ring in sheep.

The objectives of this work were to evaluate the in vitro release and in vivo pharmacokinetics and local tolerability of a novel, segmented ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) intravaginal ring (IVR) delivering progesterone (P) in drug-naïve ovariectomized female Dorset crossbred sheep. Following preparation and assessment of in vitro release of P, animals were randomized into one of six treatment groups: group 1 Crinone® 8% gel (90 mg); group 2 Prometrium® 200-mg capsules; group 3 placebo IVR; group 4 progesterone (P) IVR 4 mg/day; group 5 P IVR 8 mg/day; or group 6 P IVR 12 mg/day. Crinone 8% gel and Prometrium capsules were administered once daily for 28 days. IVRs were inserted vaginally on day 1 and remained in place through day 14; a new ring was administered on day 15 and was removed at day 28. Animals underwent daily examinations to confirm ring placement, and vaginal irritation was scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). Blood samples were taken at scheduled times for pharmacokinetic analysis. Postmortem examinations performed on all IVR groups included vaginal irritation, macroscopic, and microscopic evaluations, including irritation scoring and histopathology. Intravaginal rings were retained over 28 days in all animals. Clinical observations showed no significant abnormal findings in any group. Pharmacokinetic analysis in animals showed sustained release of P over from days 0 through 14 of ring use. Irritation scores and microscopic assessments were consistent with the IVRs being well tolerated. These results will guide future human clinical studies to ultimately develop an IVR for use in women for the prevention of preterm birth.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Novel 17ß-Estradiol and Progesterone Intravaginal Ring in Sheep.

This study reports the preparation, in vitro release, pharmacokinetics, and local tolerability of novel ethylene-vinyl acetate intravaginal rings (IVRs) delivering 17ß-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P), in drug-naïve ovariectomized female Dorset crossbred sheep. After preparation and assessment of in vitro release of E2 and P, animals were randomized to treatment groups 1 or 2 (comparator rings releasing 50 or 100 µg/d E2, respectively), groups 3 or 4 (ethylene-vinyl acetate IVRs, 160 µg/d E2 with 4 [160/4 IVR] or 8 mg/d P [160/8 IVR], respectively), or group 5 (160 µg E2 and 10 mg P administered intravenously). IVRs were placed on day 1 and remained in place through day 29. Animals underwent daily examinations to confirm ring placement, and vaginal irritation was scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). Blood samples were taken at scheduled times for pharmacokinetic analysis. Postmortem examinations performed on groups 1-4 were macroscopic and microscopic evaluations, including irritation scoring and histopathology. IVRs were retained over 28 days in all but 1 animal (group 4). In all animal groups, clinical observations showed no significant abnormal findings. Pharmacokinetic analysis in the animals showed sustained release of E2 and P over a 28-day period. Irritation scores and microscopic assessments were consistent with foreign object placement. A novel 2-drug IVR delivery system was well tolerated in a sheep model and pharmacokinetic release was as expected over a 28-day release period. These results will guide future human clinical studies.

Screening and treatment for short cervical length in pregnancy: a physician survey in the United States.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how physicians in the United States (US) screen for, define, and treat a short cervix to prevent preterm birth. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, web-based survey of 500 physicians treating pregnant patients with a short cervix in the US. Respondents' geographic region was monitored to ensure balance across the nine US Census divisions. RESULTS: Respondents were predominantly obstetrician/gynecologists (86%, 429/500; mean age 49 years). Physicians reported that a median of 90% of their pregnant patients undergo cervical length screening; 81% (407/500) use transvaginal ultrasound. Physicians consult multiple evidence sources to inform their patient care, most commonly clinical guidelines (83%; 413/500) and published research (70%; 349/500). Most physicians (98%; 490/500) reported treating pregnant patients with a short cervix; 95% (474/500) use synthetic and/or natural progestogen, alone or in combination with other treatment modalities. If reimbursement was not a concern, 47% of physicians (230/500) would choose vaginal progesterone as their preferred treatment to prevent preterm birth in all patients with a short cervix, and 45% (218/500) would choose a synthetic progestogen. CONCLUSION: US guidelines recommend transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length screening; 81% of physicians in this study reported using this method. Most physicians surveyed use progestogens to treat a short cervix, with approximately half choosing a synthetic progestin (45%) and half choosing natural progesterone (47%) as their preferred treatment, despite national guidelines recommending only vaginal natural progesterone for this indication. Additional physician education is required to implement current and best practices.

Effect of Extended 30 µg Ethinyl Estradiol with Continuous Low-Dose Ethinyl Estradiol and Cyclic 20 µg Ethinyl Estradiol Oral Contraception on Adolescent Bone Density: A Randomized Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density after 12 months of a 91-day extended regimen or 28-day combined oral contraceptive with those in a healthy reference group not using hormonal contraceptives. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Forty-five academic centers, clinical research centers, and community practices in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred twenty-nine postmenarcheal adolescent girls aged 12-18 years. INTERVENTIONS: Adolescents were randomly assigned to 91-day levonorgestrel (LNG)/ethinyl estradiol (EE) extended regimen (84 days of LNG 150 µg/EE 30 µg with 7 days of EE 10 µg [LNG/EE extended regimen]) or 28 days of LNG/EE (21 days of LNG 100 µg/EE 20 µg with 7 days of placebo [LNG/EE 21/7]) for 12 months. A reference group not seeking hormonal contraception was also evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mean percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Of 1361 adolescents randomized/enrolled, 829 were included in the primary analysis. Mean changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density were +2.26% with LNG/EE extended regimen, +1.45% with LNG/EE 21/7, and +2.50% in the reference group. Noninferiority of the LNG/EE extended regimen compared with the reference group was shown. A statistically significant treatment difference was found between LNG/EE 21/7 and the reference group (1.05%; 95% confidence interval, 0.61%-1.49%) but not between LNG/EE extended regimen and the reference group (0.23%; 95% confidence interval, -0.20% to 0.67%). No new safety signals were noted. CONCLUSION: Compared with the reference group, bone accrual was statistically significantly lower among LNG/EE 21/7 users but not among LNG/EE 30-µg extended regimen users. Additional research is needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these findings.

Differences in reporting Pearl Indices in the United States and Europe: Focus on a 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive with low-dose ethinyl estradiol supplementation.

BACKGROUND: Regulatory agencies in the United States (US) and Europe differ in requirements for defining pregnancies after the last dose of oral contraceptive, sometimes resulting in discrepant Pearl Indices (PIs) for the same product despite identical clinical data. This brief report highlights one such example, a 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive (COC). METHODS: The US- and European-based PI methodologies were compared for a 91-day extended-regimen COC consisting of 84 days of active levonorgestrel/EE 150 µg/30 µg tablets, followed by seven days of EE 10 µg tablets in place of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: At the times of approval of the 91-day extended-regimen COC in the US and Europe, the requirements for defining 'on-treatment' pregnancies differed (14-day vs. 2-day rule, respectively). This difference resulted in a higher PI in the US- vs. European-based calculation (1.34 and 0.76, respectively). The differences in the PI should not be interpreted as the extended-regimen COC being less effective in preventing pregnancy in the US compared with Europe.

Efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active combined oral contraceptive with continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol.

OBJECTIVE: Substituting low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) for the hormone-free interval in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may enhance ovarian suppression and improve tolerability. This noncomparative phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of desogestrel (DSG)/EE followed by 7days of EE. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study enrolled sexually active women aged 18-40years at risk for pregnancy. Women received up to 1year, or 13 consecutive 28-day cycles, of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg for 21days and EE 10mcg alone for 7days. Participants kept diaries to record compliance, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index (PI) and life-table approach. Safety and tolerability were assessed primarily through reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 2858 women enrolled and 1680 completed the study. Forty-six pregnancies in 2401 women aged 18-35years occurred after COC initiation and up to 7days after last DSG/EE or EE-only tablet was taken. When cycles in which another contraceptive method was used were excluded, the PI was 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-3.57]. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 1year of treatment was 2.47% (95% CI, 1.85-3.29) for all users aged 18-35years. When only cycles during which women considered compliant were included, the PI was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39-2.80). AEs were similar to those seen with other oral contraceptives. CONCLUSIONS: This 21/7-active DSG/EE COC with 7days of low-dose EE was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: This phase 3 open-label study demonstrated that a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg and 7days of EE 10mcg was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

Ovulatory effects of three oral contraceptive regimens: a randomized, open-label, descriptive trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes ovarian activity suppression of a 21/7-active low-dose combined oral contraceptive (COC) regimen that included only ethinyl estradiol (EE) during the traditional hormone-free interval (HFI) and two commercially available 28-day regimens, a 24/4 and a 21/7 regimen. STUDY DESIGN: The randomized, open-label, parallel-group descriptive study was conducted at two US sites. Healthy, reproductive-aged women (n=146) were randomized to one of three groups for three consecutive 28-day cycles, as follows: treatment 1 (n=39 completed): 21/7-active COC [21 days of 150 mcg desogestrel (DSG)/20 mcg EE, followed by 7 days of 10 mcg EE (DSG/EE+7 days EE)], treatment 2 (n=39 completed): 24 days of 3mg drospirenone (DRSP)/20 mcg EE, followed by 4 placebo (PBO)-pill days (DRSP/EE+4 days PBO) and treatment 3 (n=42 completed): 21 days of 100 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG)/20 mcg EE, followed by 7 PBO-pill days (LNG/EE+7 days PBO). The primary outcome was ovarian activity suppression assessed by transvaginal ultrasound and serum hormone concentrations and classified using the Hoogland and Skouby (H/S) method. RESULTS: Ovarian activity rate (H/S grade 4 or 5) was low for all three treatments: 0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-2.8] for DSG/EE+7 days EE, 1% (95% CI 0.2-5.2) for DRSP/EE+4days PBO and 1% (95% CI 0-3.9) for LNG/EE+7 days PBO. All three treatments showed similar suppression of serum progesterone, 17ß-estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels. CONCLUSIONS: The 21/7-active low-dose COC regimen (DSG/EE+7 days EE) showed ovarian activity suppression that was similar to the 24/4 (DRSP/EE+4 days PBO) and 21/7 (LNG/EE+7days PBO) regimens. IMPLICATIONS: The 21/7-active low-dose COC regimen (DSG/EE+7 days EE) that included only EE during the traditional HFI showed suppression of ovarian follicular activity that was similar to the 24/4 (DRSP/EE+4days PBO) and the 21/7 (LNG/EE+7 days PBO) comparator regimens.

A phase 1, multicentre, open-label study to evaluate ovarian follicular activity and hormone levels with an extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive with low-dose ethinyl estradiol supplementation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect on ovarian follicular activity of the 91-day extended-regimen combined oral contraceptive (COC), consisting of 84 days of levonorgestrel (LNG)/ethinylestradiol (EE) 150 µg/30 µg tablets plus seven days of EE 10 µg tablets in place of placebo. METHODS: This was a phase 1, open-label study. Ovarian follicular activity was classified via the Hoogland and Skouby method. Safety and tolerability as well as return to ovulation were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 35 subjects included in the efficacy analysis, luteinized, unruptured follicles, or ovulation were detected in 0 of 35 cycles during the first 28-day interval; 1 of 35 cycles (2.9%) in the second 28-day interval; and 2 of 35 cycles (5.7%) in the final 35-day interval. The ovarian activity rate over the entire 91-day treatment period was 2.9%. There was a low incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Ovulation returned in most subjects (77.1%, 27/35) within 32 days following the last dose of COC. CONCLUSIONS: The 91-day extended-regimen COC with low-dose EE supplementation was found to be effective in suppressing ovarian activity and inhibiting ovulation and was well tolerated. Return to ovulation was rapid, occurring within approximately one month after discontinuation of COC.

Multinational, multicentre, randomised, open-label study evaluating the impact of a 91-day extended regimen combined oral contraceptive, compared with two 28-day traditional combined oral contraceptives, on haemostatic parameters in healthy women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a 91-day extended regimen combined oral contraceptive (150 µg levonorgestrel [LNG]/30 µg ethinylestradiol [EE] for 84 days, followed by 10 µg EE for seven days [Treatment 1]) compared with two traditional 21/7 regimens (21 days 150 µg LNG/30 µg EE [Treatment 2] or 150 µg desogestrel [DSG]/30 µg EE [Treatment 3], both with seven days' hormone free), on several coagulation factors and thrombin formation markers. METHODS: Randomised, open-label, parallel-group comparative study involving healthy women (18-40 years). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) levels over six months. RESULTS: A total of 187 subjects were included in the primary analysis. In all groups, mean F1 + 2 values were elevated after six months of treatment. Changes were comparable between Treatments 1 and 2 (least squares mean change: 170 pmol/L and 158 pmol/L, respectively) but noticeably larger after Treatment 3 (least squares mean change: 592 pmol/L). The haemostatic effects of Treatment 1 were comparable to those of Treatment 2 and noninferior to those of Treatment 3 (lower limit of 95% confidence interval [- 18.3 pmol/L] > - 130 pmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: The LNG/EE regimens had similar effects on F1 + 2. Noninferiority was demonstrated between extended regimen LNG/EE and DSG/EE.

Efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen (ADER) combined oral contraceptive consisting of levonorgestrel (LNG) 150 mcg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20 mcg for 42 days, LNG 150 mcg/EE 25 mcg for 21 days, LNG 150 mcg/EE 30 mcg for 21 days and EE 10 mcg for 7 days. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study. Sexually active women aged 18-40 years were enrolled and received ADER for up to 1 year (4 consecutive 91-day cycles). Participants kept diaries to record adherence, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index and the life-table method; safety and tolerability were assessed through reported adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 3701 women were enrolled and 2144 completed the study. The Pearl Index was 3.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.49-4.03], based on 70 pregnancies that occurred after ADER initiation and ≤ 7 days after the last LNG/EE or EE-only pill in women aged 18-35 years, excluding cycles in which another contraceptive method was used. Life-table pregnancy rate was 2.82% (95% CI, 2.23%-3.57%) for all users aged 18-35 years. Unscheduled bleeding/spotting decreased with increasing EE doses within each cycle and decreased after cycle 1. No unexpected AEs or changes in laboratory parameters were reported. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ADER effectively prevented pregnancy with a favorable safety and tolerability profile.

A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, efficacy and safety study of oxybutynin vaginal ring for alleviation of overactive bladder symptoms in women.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a once monthly oxybutynin vaginal ring in women with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, 12-week phase 2 study compared oxybutynin vaginal ring (4 or 6 mg daily) to a placebo vaginal ring in women with well-defined overactive bladder symptoms. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to week 12 in the total weekly number of incontinence episodes (stress and urge). Safety was measured in terms of treatment emergent adverse events, laboratory, physical, gynecologic examinations, electrocardiogram and vital signs. RESULTS: After a 3-week post-randomization placebo run-in phase (sample size 720) 445 women entered the treatment phase (safety population). Of these women 323 met all 3 overactive bladder specific baseline characteristics of 10 or more urinary urge incontinence episodes weekly, urinary frequency 8 or more voids per 24 hours and voided volume 3 L or less per 24 hours) (analysis population). Women treated with 4 and 6 mg daily oxybutynin vaginal ring had significantly fewer incontinence episodes weekly (p = 0.036 and p = 0.018, respectively), lower daily urinary frequency (p = 0.014, p = 0.002) and a higher proportion had no incontinence episodes at week 12 (p = 0.026, p = 0.027) compared with placebo. The change in severity of urgency and voided volume was similar for all groups (p >0.05). Except for a higher incidence of dry mouth and urinary tract infections that were not always culture confirmed, the oxybutynin vaginal ring was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of the placebo vaginal ring. CONCLUSIONS: The oxybutynin vaginal ring appears to be an effective and safe once monthly treatment option for women with overactive bladder characterized primarily by urinary urge incontinence that merits further evaluation in a phase 3 study.

Progesterone vaginal ring versus vaginal gel for luteal support with in vitro fertilization: a randomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of luteal phase support in IVF with a progesterone (P) vaginal ring or gel (VR or VG). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter, phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00615251). SETTING: Nineteen private and three academic high-volume U.S. IVF centers. PATIENT(S): One thousand two hundred ninety-seven infertile patients were randomized to a weekly P VR (n = 646) or a daily P 8% VG (n = 651). INTERVENTION(S): IVF was performed per site-specific protocols. The day after egg retrieval, patients were randomized and began VR or VG therapy, which continued for up to 10 weeks' gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rates at 8 and 12 weeks of pregnancy; rates of biochemical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and cycle cancellation; and safety and tolerability were secondary measures. RESULT(S): Clinical pregnancy rates at 8 and 12 weeks were high and comparable between groups: 48.0% for VR and 47.2% for VG at week 8 and 46.4% (VR) and 45.2% (VG) at week 12. Live-birth rates were 45% (VR) and 43% (VG). Adverse event profiles were similar between groups. CONCLUSION(S): The weekly P VR provided similar pregnancy rates to the daily VG, with no major differences in safety.