Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors With EGFR-Mutant Metastatic NSCLC.

Introduction: Characteristics of long-term survivors in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC are not fully understood. This retrospective analysis evaluated a multi-institution cohort of patients with EGFRm NSCLC treated in the pre-osimertinib era and sought to describe characteristics of long-term survivors. Methods: Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC who started first-line therapy before 2015. Demographics and comutations were compared between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival and the odds of death within 5 years, respectively. Results: Overall, 133 patients were greater than or equal to 5-year survivors; 127 were less than 5-year survivors. Burden of pathogenic comutations including TP53 and PIK3CA was similar between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Receipt of first-line chemotherapy rather than EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor was similar between the groups (22% of <5-y versus 31% of ≥5-y). Baseline brain metastasis and history of smoking were associated with higher odds of death within 5 years (odds ratio = 2.16, p = 0.029 and odds ratio = 1.90, p = 0.046, respectively). Among patients without baseline brain metastases, cumulative incidence of brain metastases at 5 years was 42.3%. Both baseline and post-baseline brain metastasis were associated with worse overall survival compared with no brain metastasis (hazard ratio = 3.26, p < 0.001 and hazard ratio = 4.99, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Within patients treated for EGFRm metastatic NSCLC before 2015, absence of brain metastasis and nonsmoking status were predictive of 5-year survival. Our findings help to define a subset of patients with EGFRm NSCLC with excellent survival outcomes who may not require intensification of initial therapy.

The age-specific microbiome of children with milk, egg, and peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Immune regulation by gut microbiota is affected by dysbiosis and may precede food allergy onset. Prior studies lacked comparisons stratified by age and clinical phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To assess the microbiome of children with food allergy (<3 years, 3-18 years) compared with similar aged children without food allergy. METHODS: A real-world prospective cross-sectional study performed from 2014 to 2019 recruited children highly likely to have milk, egg, or peanut allergy defined by history and serum IgE or confirmed by food challenge. 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing identified stool microbial DNA. Alpha and beta diversity was compared between groups with food allergy and healthy controls stratified by age. Differential abundance for non a priori taxa was accepted at absolute fold-change greater than 2 and q value less than 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included (56 with food allergy and 14 healthy controls). Groups were not significantly different in age, gender at birth, race, mode of delivery, breastfeeding duration, or antibiotic exposure. Younger children with food allergy had similar alpha diversity compared with controls. Beta diversity was significantly different by age (P = .001). There was differential abundance of several a priori (P < .05) taxa (including Clostridia) only in younger children. Both a priori (including Coprococcus and Clostridia) and non a priori (q < 0.05) Acidobacteria_Gp15, Aestuariispira, Tindallia, and Desulfitispora were significant in older children with food allergy, especially with peanut allergy. CONCLUSION: Dysbiosis associates with food allergy, most prominent in older children with peanut allergy. Younger children with and without food allergy have fewer differences in gut microbiota. This correlates with clinical observations of persistence of peanut allergy and improved efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy in younger children. Age younger than 3 years should be considered when initiating therapeutic interventions.

The impact of myelosuppression on quality of life of patients treated with chemotherapy.

Side effects from chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression can negatively affect patients' quality of life (QoL). Neutropenia increases infection risk, and anemia frequently results in debilitating fatigue. Additionally, the bleeding risk associated with thrombocytopenia can lead to fear and anxiety. However, traditional interventions for myelosuppression fall short of the ideal. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors reduce the risk of severe neutropenia but commonly lead to bone pain. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are not always effective and may cause thromboembolic events, while transfusions to correct anemia/thrombocytopenia are associated with transfusion reactions and volume overload. Trilaciclib, which is approved for reducing myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, together with several investigational agents in development for managing myelosuppression have the potential to improve QoL for patients on chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy can cause side effects by killing blood-forming cells in the bone marrow. This is known as myelosuppression and leads to neutropenia (decreased neutrophils [white blood cells]), anemia (decreased red blood cells) and thrombocytopenia (decreased platelets). Neutropenia can increase the risk of getting an infection, and severe cases might result in patients being hospitalized. Both neutropenia and anemia can cause fatigue, which is often reported by patients as being the most draining symptom of chemotherapy. Thrombocytopenia increases the risk of bleeding and can cause patients with cancer to become even more scared and anxious. Myelosuppression due to chemotherapy is usually managed with delays or reductions in the amount of chemotherapy that patients receive, but this may worsen the disease. Other treatments, known as supportive care interventions, include growth factors, which stimulate the production of blood cells and red blood cell or platelet transfusions. However, having these treatments in addition to chemotherapy can be a burden to patients, and they can cause side effects such as bone pain and blood clots. A treatment called trilaciclib is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients receiving certain types of chemotherapy for advanced small-cell lung cancer. Trilaciclib has been shown to reduce neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia in these patients and improve their quality of life. Other drugs are also being assessed in clinical trials for preventing or treating myelosuppression in patients with different cancer types. In the future, these drugs may improve quality of life for patients on chemotherapy.

Outcomes in biomarker-selected subgroups from the KESTREL study of durvalumab and tremelimumab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Selective biomarkers may improve outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We investigated three independent biomarkers for association with efficacy in the randomized, phase III KESTREL study (NCT02551159) of first-line durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen: programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) via circulating tumor DNA, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). METHODS: Tumor or blood samples from patients enrolled in the KESTREL study were analyzed for PD-L1, bTMB, and NLR. Associations with overall survival (OS) or objective response rates (ORRs) were evaluated based on prespecified cut-offs for PD-L1 (tumor cell [TC] ≥ 50%/immune cell ≥ 25% or TC ≥ 25%), bTMB (≥ 16 mutations [mut] per megabase [Mb]), and NLR (≤ 7). Ad hoc analyses of exploratory cut-offs were performed. RESULTS: Prespecified or exploratory cut-offs for PD-L1 did not enrich for ORR or OS for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME. In the bTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup, OS hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME were 0.90 (0.48-1.72) and 0.69 (0.39-1.25), respectively. Complete response rates were 8.6% with durvalumab plus tremelimumab and 4.3% with EXTREME (≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup). No improvement in OS was observed for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME at prespecified or exploratory NLR cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS: bTMB demonstrated potential utility for selecting patients with R/M HNSCC who benefited from durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus EXTREME. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02551159.