Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 84
Filtrar
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738586

RESUMEN

Chronic pruritus (CP) is frequent in general medicine and the most common complaint in general dermatology. The prevalence of CP is expected to rise in the future due to the ageing population. The clinical presentation, underlying aetiology and treatment strategy of CP are heterogeneous. Also, individual treatment aims and physical, psychic and economic burdens of patients might vary. Chronic prurigo (CPG) is the most severe disease in the chronic pruritus spectrum, being associated with long-standing scratch-induced skin lesions and a therapy refractory itch-scratch-cycle. It is thus important to raise disease awareness for CP and CPG in the general public and among decision-makers in the health system. Further, there is a need to support a rational clinical framework to optimize both diagnostics and therapeutics. Currently, there is still a shortcoming regarding approved therapies and understanding CP/CPG as severe medical conditions. Therefore, the EADV Task Force Pruritus decided to publish this white paper based on several consensus meetings. The group consented on the following goals: (a) ensure that CP is recognized as a serious condition, (b) increase public awareness and understanding of CP and CPG as chronic and burdensome diseases that can greatly affect a person's quality of life, (c) clarify that in most cases CP and CPG are non-communicable and not caused by a psychiatric disease, (d) improve the support and treatment given to patients with CP to help them manage their disease and (e) publicize existing therapies including current guidelines. We aim to point to necessary improvements in access and quality of care directed to decision-makers in health policy, among payers and administrations as well as in practical care.

3.
Dermatologie (Heidelb) ; 74(10): 799-808, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721562

RESUMEN

Stigmatization of patients with skin diseases has only recently attracted more attention in research. However, both external stigmatization by society and self-stigmatization by the affected patients are widespread in patients with skin diseases. Many studies show that in this group of patients, the experience of both kinds of stigmatization is associated with psychosocial burden, such as social anxiety. This is often independent of the visibility of skin lesions. The psychosocial burden of affected individuals may lead to psychological comorbidities, such as depression or anxiety disorders, making it important to screen patients in dermatologic settings for the presence of these conditions. Interventions to reduce external and self-stigmatization have been developed, but more randomized controlled trials are needed to test the effects of such interventions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Piel , Estereotipo , Humanos , Pacientes , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Ansiedad
5.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(7): 1396-1405, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36950901

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a very common skin disease among the European population. It causes itch and pain and, in more severe cases, seriously impairs hand functioning at work and in private life. OBJECTIVES: To explore perspectives of people with lived experience on CHE-related problems, wishes and goals. METHODS: Following a qualitative approach, we conducted topic-guided interviews in five European countries and applied template analysis to identify recurrent themes among patients with CHE. RESULTS: We interviewed 60 patients in seven outpatient dermatological and occupational medicine clinics in Croatia, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain. Five main themes were identified: (1) knowledge about the disease and its course, (2) preventive behaviour, (3) hand eczema therapy, (4) impact on everyday life and (5) attitudes towards CHE and healthcare. Participants did not feel well informed about CHE, especially about causes, triggers and treatment options. Preventive measures were experienced as more or less effective but also cumbersome. Experiences with therapy were diverse. Treatment satisfaction depended on the results and on the perceived support from the treatment teams. Participants found it important to be taken seriously, to receive practical advice, to try out additional treatments or examinations, find new hope and have occupational perspectives. They wished that others could better understand the physical and emotional burden of CHE. Patient support groups were not mentioned. Participants found it important to learn to take care of themselves and accept life with CHE. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its annoying symptoms, high visibility and impaired functioning at work and in private life, CHE has a high emotional and social impact. Some people may require support to learn coping with CHE and its prevention. Patients wish for information about causes and triggers. They value physicians who listen to them and keep looking for solutions.


Asunto(s)
Eccema , Humanos , Eccema/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Alemania , Dolor , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente
7.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(3): 453-461, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34780095

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of prurigo nodularis (PN) is challenging and new treatment options are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two oral doses of the kappa opioid agonist and mu opioid antagonist nalbuphine extended release (NAL-ER) tablets in a phase 2, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, 50-week extension phase. METHODS: Subjects with moderate-to-severe PN were randomized to NAL-ER 81 mg (NAL-ER81) or 162 mg (NAL-ER162) tablets twice-daily or placebo for 8 weeks of stable dosing following a 2-week titration period. Subjects completing Week 10 with a Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥5 at the time of rollover (or during the observation period) were eligible for open-label treatment. RESULTS: Of 63 randomized subjects, 62 were treated and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (MITT), 50 completed 10 weeks of treatment. In the MITT analysis, 8 subjects (44.4%) treated with NAL-ER162 (P = 0.32) and 6 (27.3%) treated with NAL-ER81 (P = 0.78) achieved ≥30% reduction from baseline in 7-day WI-NRS at Week 10 (primary efficacy endpoint) vs. 8 (36.4%) in the placebo group. Itch reduction was significant among 8/12 (66.7%) subjects completing Week 10 treated with NAL-ER162 vs. placebo (8/20, 40.0%; P = 0.03). Additionally, 6 subjects (33.3%) treated with NAL-ER162 and 3 (13.6%) treated with NAL-ER81 achieved ≥50% reduction from baseline in 7-day WI-NRS at Week 10 (coprimary endpoint). Extended open-label treatment was associated with further improvements in itch reduction and favourable changes in PN lesion activity as assessed by Prurigo Activity Score. Adverse events occurred predominantly during dose titration and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The safety profile did not change with extended open-label treatment. CONCLUSION: In adult subjects with PN, oral treatment with NAL-ER 162 mg twice daily provided measurable anti-pruritic efficacy in subjects completing ≥10 weeks of treatment and was well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02174419).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nalbufina , Prurigo , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Nalbufina/efectos adversos , Prurigo/complicaciones , Prurigo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/inducido químicamente , Prurito/complicaciones , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(3): 413-421, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743344

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a multifactorial genesis including genetic predispositions and environmental risk and trigger factors. One of the latter possibly is smoking, indicated by an increased prevalence of AD in adults and children that are actively or passively exposed to cigarette smoke. OBJECTIVES: In this study, AD characteristics and its atopic comorbidities are compared in smoking and non-smoking AD patients. METHODS: TREATgermany is a non-interventional clinical registry which includes patients with moderate to severe AD in Germany. Baseline data of patients included in TREATgermany from inception in June 2016 to April 2020 in 39 sites across Germany was analysed comparing AD disease characteristics and comorbidities in smokers vs. non-smokers. RESULTS: Of 921 patients, 908 (male: 58.7%) with a mean age of 41.9 ± 14.4 reported their smoking status. The objective Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (oSCORAD) did not differ between smokers (n = 352; 38.8%) and non-smokers, however, lesions' intensity of oozing/crusts and excoriations as well as patient global assessment scores (PGA) of AD severity were higher in smoking as opposed to non-smoking patients. Smokers reported a lower number of weeks with well-controlled AD and more severe pruritus than non-smokers. Total IgE levels were more elevated in smokers and they displayed a younger age at the initial diagnosis of bronchial asthma. After adjustment for potential confounders, the increased intensity of oozing/crusts, the reduced number of weeks with well-controlled AD and the greater pruritus remained different in smokers compared to non-smokers. In addition, smoking patients with adult-onset AD showed a 2.5 times higher chance of involvement of the feet. CONCLUSIONS: German registry data indicate that AD patients who smoke have a higher disease burden with a different distribution pattern of lesions in adult-onset AD.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Adulto , Niño , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prurito , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Hautarzt ; 71(7): 525-527, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32468293

RESUMEN

Antihistamines, mostly H1 antihistamines, administered both topically and systemically, are among the most widely used drugs. While systemically applicable antihistamines are usually taken orally or administered intravenously, while local therapy is used on the eye, nose or skin. Systemic antihistamines are most frequently used during the pollen season (hay fever, asthma) or are used all year round, e.g., for house dust and animal hair allergies. Furthermore, urticaria is a major indication for the use of H1 antihistamines, also as long-term treatment. Although H1 antihistamines are not licensed for pruritus and prurigo, they are frequently used in these diseases. However, since in many diseases with pruritus and prurigo the histamine receptor does not play a decisive role in the pathogenesis of pruritus, they show limited efficacy. Two Cochrane reviews have not shown any significant antipruritic effects of H1 antihistamine treatment in atopic eczema as single therapy or in combination, e.g., with topical glucocorticosteroid therapy. A retrospective case series with a so-called high-dose antihistamine therapy with non-sedating antihistamines was effective in treating chronic pruritus. This article summarizes the possibilities of systemic antihistamines in pruritus, especially with regard to limitations and future prospects.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapéutico , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Dermatitis Atópica , Prurito/diagnóstico , Urticaria
10.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(12): 2871-2876, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32274874

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical hand eczema trials measure a variety of outcome domains to determine the success of interventions. This considerably limits the comparability and overall confidence in the study results, and thereby the strength of recommendations for clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the standardized evaluation of interventions in future hand eczema trials and reviews. This COS will define the minimum that should be measured and reported in controlled and randomized-controlled trials of therapeutic hand eczema interventions. The objective of this protocol is to specify the methods to develop a core domain set. METHODS: In Phase 1, a list of candidate domains will be derived from a systematic literature review concerning previously measured outcomes in hand eczema trials, from qualitative patient interviews and from expert interviews. In Phase 2, a consensus study about core domains will be conducted by an online 3-round Delphi survey and a face-to-face meeting, applying predefined consensus criteria. HECOS involves hand eczema and methods experts as well as patients and further stakeholders with an interest in the initiative. OUTLOOK: When a set of core domains has been defined, HECOS is going to identify appropriate outcome measurement instruments in a development process that will be detailed in another protocol. The COS will considerably enhance the methodological quality, comparability and usefulness of hand eczema trials for clinical decision-making and the development of new therapeutic options for hand eczema, and also reduce the effort of planning, conducting, and reporting individual hand eczema studies, reviews and meta-analyses.


Asunto(s)
Eccema , Proyectos de Investigación , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Determinación de Punto Final , Humanos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(10): 2373-2383, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32078192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG) is a condition characterized by chronic itch, a prolonged scratching behaviour and the presence of pruriginous nodules. A comprehensive understanding of this condition, especially regarding its clinical characteristics and impact on quality of life is still lacking. OBJECTIVES: Aim of this pan-European multicentre cross-sectional study was to establish the clinical profile of CNPG, including its associated burden. METHODS: Fifteen centres from 12 European countries recruited CNPG patients presenting at the centre or using the centres' own databases. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire in paper or electronic format. Demography, current co-morbidities, underlying disease, itch intensity, additional sensory symptoms, quality of life, highest burden and emotional experience of itch were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients (210 male, median age: 64 years [52; 72]) were enrolled. Of these, 406 reported itch and CNPG lesions in the previous 7 days and qualified to complete the whole questionnaire. We recorded moderate to severe worst itch intensity scores in the previous 24 h. Scores were higher in patients with lower educational levels and those coming from Eastern or Southern Europe. Most patients experience itch often or always (71%) and report that their everyday life is negatively affected (53%). Itch intensity was considered to be the most burdensome aspect of the disease by 49% of the patients, followed by the visibility of skin lesions (21%) and bleeding of lesions (21%). The majority of patients was unaware of an underlying condition contributing to CNPG (64%), while psychiatric diseases were the conditions most often mentioned in association with CNPG (19%). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre cross-sectional study shows that itch is the dominant symptom in CNPG and reveals that the profile of the disease is similar throughout Europe.


Asunto(s)
Prurigo , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prurigo/epidemiología , Prurito/epidemiología , Prurito/etiología , Calidad de Vida
13.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(9): 2086-2095, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003071

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic significance of the atopy patch test for the management of dermatitis possibly triggered by aeroallergens is still controversial. However, sufficiently large studies with routinely tested standardized aeroallergen patch test preparations in dermatitis patients are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reaction frequency and the reaction profiles of 10 until mid-2015 commercially available, standardized aeroallergen patch test preparations of the 'Stallerpatch' test series (Stallergenes, Antony Cedex, France) in a large multicentre patient cohort. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of patients with suspected aeroallergen-dependent eczematous skin lesions was performed, who were patch tested in 15 Information Network of Departments of Dermatology-associated clinics between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified according to their atopic dermatitis (AD) status. RESULTS: The study group included 3676 patients (median age 41 years, 34.8% males, 54.5% AD). The most common aeroallergens causing positive patch test reactions were Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (19.6%), Dermatophagoides farinae (16.9%), birch (6.2%), timothy grass (6.0%), cat dander (5.4%), mugwort (4.9%) and dog dander (4.6%). Reactions to other pollen allergen preparations, that is 5 grasses (3.2%), cocksfoot (2.1%) and plantain (1.6%), were less common. Positive patch test reactions to aeroallergens were consistently more frequent in patients with AD. These patients showed proportionally less dubious, follicular, irritant and weak positive reactions. Independent of AD status, a patient history of past or present allergic rhinitis was associated with an increased chance of a positive aeroallergen patch test reaction to pollen allergens. CONCLUSION: The aeroallergen patch test is a useful add-on tool in clinical routine, especially in patients with AD and/or respiratory allergy. A patch test series comprising Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, birch, timothy grass, cat dander and mugwort seems to be suitable. Controlled studies with specific provocation and elimination procedures are required to further evaluate the diagnostic significance of the proposed screening series.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Animales , Gatos , Perros , Femenino , Francia , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suiza/epidemiología
14.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(2): 222-229, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660659

RESUMEN

The special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch previously defined sensitive skin as a syndrome defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations. This additional paper focuses on the pathophysiology and the management of sensitive skin. Sensitive skin is not an immunological disorder but is related to alterations of the skin nervous system. Skin barrier abnormalities are frequently associated, but there is no cause and direct relationship. Further studies are needed to better understand the pathophysiology of sensitive skin - as well as the inducing factors. Avoidance of possible triggering factors and the use of well-tolerated cosmetics, especially those containing inhibitors of unpleasant sensations, might be suggested for patients with sensitive skin. The role of psychosocial factors, such as stress or negative expectations, might be relevant for subgroups of patients. To date, there is no clinical trial supporting the use of topical or systemic drugs in sensitive skin. The published data are not sufficient to reach a consensus on sensitive skin management. In general, patients with sensitive skin require a personalized approach, taking into account various biomedical, neural and psychosocial factors affecting sensitive skin.


Asunto(s)
Opinión Pública , Enfermedades de la Piel , Humanos , Dolor , Parestesia , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 34(6): 1263-1272, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31721316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Atopic Dermatitis (AD) TREATgermany registry was initiated by the German Society for Dermatology (DDG) in 2011 to evaluate the 'real-life' situation of health care for patients with AD. OBJECTIVES: Interim data analysis on baseline characteristics as well as current and prescribed systemic treatments of the TREATgermany registry patients. METHODS: Patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD [objective (o)SCORAD > 20], or with current or previous anti-inflammatory systemic treatment for AD within 24 months, were included and are followed up over at least 24 months. To assess clinical signs, the eczema area severity index (EASI, 0-72), the oSCORAD (0-83) and the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA; 6-point scale) were used. The disease severity was globally scored by the patients [Patient Global Assessment (PGA); six-step Likert scale]. Disease symptoms were assessed by the patient-oriented eczema measure (POEM, 0-28) and numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10). Health-related quality of life was measured using the dermatological life quality index (DLQI, 0-30). RESULTS: A total of 612 patients were recruited across 32 sites between 06/2016 and 01/2019 (mean age: 42.6 ± 14.2 years; mean oSCORAD: 40.8 ± 16.3). The mean POEM score was 16.3 ± 7.5. Pruritus was rated highest among subjective symptoms (NRS: 5.4 ± 2.7). The mean DLQI value was 11.3 ± 7.5. The frequency of arterial hypertension was lower (20.8%) compared with the general population, whilst this was higher for depression (10%). More than 60% of the patients had received systemic glucocorticosteroids, and 36.8% had received cyclosporine A prior to inclusion. Dupilumab was the leading substance documented as either 'current' (12.1%) or 'prescribed' (31.4%) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: These 'real-life' data clearly demonstrate the substantial disease burden. Most of TREATgermany patients were already treated with or prescribed dupilumab at baseline. Moreover, current findings indicate the urgent need for further alternative agents in order to achieve a perceptible improvement of quality of life of patients with moderate-to-severe AD.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Adulto , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
16.
Hautarzt ; 70(10): 790-796, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515578

RESUMEN

The treatment of hand eczema represents a great challenge in the daily clinical practice for dermatologists. There are various forms of local, physical and systemic treatment, such as alitretinoin which is the only registered systemic treatment option for severe chronic hand eczema. In 2017 dupilumab was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and can theoretically also be applied for atopic hand eczema. The first and most important step in treatment is to identify the underlying etiology of the hand eczema with the appropriate diagnostic measures, ranging from skin biopsy to allergy testing including occupational products. An important component of treatment is the basic treatment in the form of consistent and stage-adapted skin care. Treatment of hand eczema should follow a step by step procedure whereby the basic treatment should be maintained and, depending on the etiology and clinical type, should be supplemented by topical, systemic and physical treatment forms, also often used in parallel. Mild to moderate forms of hand eczema are usually treated with the basic treatment, emollients and topical glucocorticoids according to various guidelines. In moderate to severe forms of hand eczema UV phototherapy and systemic treatment should be implemented. This article summarizes the most important treatment modalities based on case reports and series, clinical studies, guidelines and expert recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Eccema/terapia , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Dermatosis de la Mano/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Ultravioleta , Alitretinoína/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/prevención & control , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Eccema/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Hautarzt ; 70(10): 766-772, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407026

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of epidemiological data describing patterns of hand eczema with reference to the general German population. OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological data were extracted from all internationally published clinical studies which investigated hand eczema in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was carried out for all clinical studies performed in Germany in the previous 10 years involving hand eczema patients. Inclusion criteria were that at least one author was listed with a German affiliation, that the study included original data and was published in an international journal with peer review. RESULTS: This review included 39 studies, which were performed based on 29 original data sets. The median proportion of women was 53.7% and the median age 45.1 years. The 1­year prevalence of hand eczema varied depending on the sample and type of data collection from 0.24% to 9.2%. The lifetime prevalence was estimated to be 2.6-16.0% and the point prevalence in dermatological practice was 6.7 %. In studies assessing the impact of hand eczema in specific occupations, women were underrepresented, large studies were carried out for metal workers but only a few small studies for nursing personnel. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of knowledge concerning the epidemiology of hand eczema in the general German population. While international studies found the first occurrence of hand eczema to be between the ages of 26 and 28 years, the mean age of patients seen in private dermatological practice in Germany was 20 years higher. These findings suggest that patients do not consult a dermatologist when hand eczema first appears, which can lead to a more severe course of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Eccema/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Prevalencia
18.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 33(7): 1429-1435, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30742721

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic itch (CI) is a frequent symptom in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous studies demonstrated great impairments of general well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as well as a higher mortality in those suffering from CI. OBJECTIVE: The German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study (GEHIS) is a representative cohort of HD patients in Germany. All patients were followed up 4 years later. The current analyses present data on the course of CI in HD patients, its associated factors including comorbidities, laboratory values and HRQOL. METHODS: We assessed sociodemographic data, routine laboratory values, comorbidities, HRQOL (SF-12), depression and anxiety (HADS), sleep (duration and quality) and in those suffering from CI characteristics, intensity of CI and itch-related quality of life (ItchyQoL). Those with CI were offered a dermatological examination and CI was classified according to the IFSI classification. Patients were asked if they had consulted a physician about CI. RESULTS: Of the patients who had suffered from CI in 2013 (n = 234), 90.5% (212) patients could be followed up. About 36.3% (n = 85) had died, 9.8% (n = 23) had received a kidney transplant in the meantime. A total of 52 HD patients still suffered from CI, in 52 CI had stopped. Those patients still suffering from CI (n = 52) reported a higher mean itch intensity, lower ItchyQoL, higher levels of anxiety and a lower mean sleeping time in 2013. On the other hand, those who did not suffer from CI anymore showed a significant increase of HRQOL compared to 2013. There was no significant difference in dialysis characteristics and laboratory values except for albumin. Only a minority of patients in HD had consulted a dermatologist because of CI (29.9%). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that CI is a persisting symptom in 50% of the HD patients and when it disappears HRQOL recovers. We confirm that CI is a disregarded symptom in HD patients.


Asunto(s)
Prurito/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Disomnias/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Prurito/epidemiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sueño
19.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 33(2): 263-266, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288812

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic prurigo (CPG) is a distinct disease characterized by chronic pruritus, history and/or signs of prolonged scratching and multiple pruriginous lesions. It may present with various clinical manifestations, including papules, nodules, plaques or umbilicated lesions. Some patients with chronic pruritus show pruriginous linear and scaring scratch lesions (LSSL) and it is unclear whether these lesions belong to the spectrum of CPG. OBJECTIVE: To achieve a consensus on the classification of pruriginous LSSL and establish criteria to differentiate them from similar appearing conditions of different nature. METHODS: Members of the Task Force Pruritus (TFP) of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology participated in the consensus conference, discussing representative clinical cases. Using the Delphi method, consensus was reached when ≥75% of members agreed on a statement. RESULTS: Twenty-one members of the TFP with voting rights participated in the meeting. It was consented that LSSL occurs due to chronic pruritus and prolonged scratching, and share common pathophysiological mechanisms with CPG. LSSL were thus considered as belonging to the spectrum of CPG and the term 'linear prurigo' was chosen to describe this manifestation. CONCLUSION: Considering linear prurigo as belonging to the spectrum of CPG has important clinical implications, since both the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of these patients should be performed as recommended for CPG. Importantly, linear prurigo should be differentiated from self-inflicted skin lesions as factitious disorders or skin picking syndromes. In the latter, artificial manipulation rather than pruritus itself leads to the development of cutaneous lesions, which can show clinical similarities to linear prurigo.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prurigo/clasificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Consenso , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prurigo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurigo/patología , Prurito/clasificación , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/patología
20.
Hautarzt ; 69(10): 815-824, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30191254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical registries may provide high-quality evidence on the use and effectiveness of therapeutic interventions under real-life conditions. Adults with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis [AD]) are enrolled into TREATgermany and prospectively followed over at least 2 years. This paper analyses the association between dermatological quality of life and work limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment modalities and a broad set of physician- and patient-reported outcome measures are documented using validated instruments to assess clinical disease severity (EASI [Eczema Area and Severity Index], objective SCORAD [objective-SCORing Atopic Dermatitis]), quality of life (DLQI [Dermatology Life Quality Index]), symptoms (POEM [Patient-oriented Eczema Measure]), global disease severity, as well as patient satisfaction and work limitations including presenteeism (WLQ [Work Limitation Questionnaire]). From 06/2016 until 12/2017, 241 individuals (mean age 43 ± 15 years, 38.6% female) were enrolled at 19 recruitment centers; 69% of the patients were employed. RESULTS: Employed persons had DLQI and WLQ scores of 10.6 ± 6.9 points and 17.7 ± 18.1%, respectively. Mean presenteeism was substantial accounting for 9.2%. With coefficients of 0.39 and 0.33 WLQ and presenteeism scores significantly correlate with DLQI (p < 0.000). Bootstrapped regression models showed that the limitations in coping with work requirements increase by 1.7% as DLQI increases by one point. Lower quality of life due to AD is most strongly associated with limitations in the area of physical and performance requirements in general. Presenteeism increases by 0.5% as DLQI increases by one point. CONCLUSION: Moderate-to-severe AD has substantial adverse economic impact with mean productivity loss of patients of almost 10%. Future analyses from TREATgermany will address the impact of innovative treatment modalities on quality of life and work productivity of patients with moderate-to-severe AD.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...