RESUMEN
Cerebral sinus thrombosis, although uncommon, can be lethal if not recognized and treated quickly. Systemic heparin has become the treatment standard of care; however, some patients' conditions continue to deteriorate even while taking heparin. Endovascular techniques for thrombolysis have continued to evolve. The authors present a case of cerebral sinus thrombosis treated with a combination of mechanical and chemical intrasinus thrombolysis.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/terapia , Succión , Terapia Trombolítica , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Angiografía Cerebral , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Tirofibán , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tirosina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of VLGUIA remains a challenge. To reduce mass effect and achieve complete occlusion, open surgery has been our favored treatment. However, endovascular therapy is preferred for lesions in the cavernous sinus or for older patients with complicating medical problems. The goal of this study is to investigate outcome of stent and/or coil treatment of VLGUIA. METHODS: Beginning in 2002, the neuroform stent has been available to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. Since then until 2006, 15 patients were treated for VLGUIA with stenting and/or coiling at this institution. These 15 patients were used for a retrospective analysis in this study. RESULTS: Median patient age was 65 years, median aneurysm size was 27 mm (20-37 mm), and median follow-up time was 22 months. Eight aneurysms were localized in the cavernous sinus and 7 at the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery. Four aneurysms were completely occluded (100%); 3 aneurysms, nearly complete (90%-99%); and 8 aneurysms, partial (<90% occlusion). Twelve patients required retreatment. Final GOS was 1 (good recovery) in 11 patients, 2 (moderate disability) in 3 patients, and 3 (severely disabled) in 1 patient. No patient died or deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: Stent/coil management of VLGUIA is constantly evolving. Current treatment results are promising, with very low morbidity/mortality. Disadvantage is the frequent persistence of residual aneurysm.
Asunto(s)
Seno Cavernoso/cirugía , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Seno Cavernoso/patología , Angiografía Cerebral , Niño , Ojo/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Escala de Consecuencias de Glasgow , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/patología , Masculino , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECT: Patients with very large or giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms present with ischemic stroke and progressive disability. The aneurysm rupture risk in these patients is extreme-up to 50% in 5 years. In this study the authors investigated the outcome of surgical treatment for these very large aneurysms in the anterior circulation. METHODS Clinical data on 62 patients who underwent surgery for unruptured aneurysms (20-60 mm) between 1998 and 2006 were reviewed. RESULTS: Complete aneurysm occlusion (100%) was achieved in 90% of cases, near complete occlusion (90-99%) in 5%. The surgical risk in patients younger than 50 years of age was 8% (Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1 or 3 within 1 year after surgery). In older patients, the risk increased with advancing age. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of very large or giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms is hazardous and complex and thus best performed only at major cerebrovascular centers with an experienced team of neurosurgeons, interventional neuroradiologists, neurologists, and neuroanesthesiologists. Surgery, with acceptable risks and excellent occlusion rates, is typically the treatment of choice in patients younger than 50 years of age. In older patients, the benefits of endovascular treatment versus surgery versus no treatment must be carefully weighed individually. Minimizing temporary occlusion and the consequent use of intraoperative angiography may help reduce surgical complications.