Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pest Manag Sci ; 80(3): 1446-1453, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37946692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Soil seedbanks have been recognized as one of the crucial components of agricultural ecosystems. However, studies on the shift in structure and biodiversity of soil seedbanks in herbicide-resistant crop systems are limited, and a functional trait perspective of the soil seedbank is often overlooked. RESULTS: A 6 years experiment was conducted to investigate the roles of region, crop system, and weed management strategy on species richness, functional trait diversity, and composition of the weed seedbank. Species richness was different across the interaction of region and crop system, while functional trait diversity only showed difference across regions. Species and functional trait compositions were affected by the interaction of region and crop system. Specifically, the compositional difference among crop systems was mainly determined by the significant heterogeneity of group dispersion. CONCLUSION: Growers and practitioners should consider weed functional traits in developing lasting agricultural management strategies. Long-term weed research should draw attention to the impact of transgenic crop systems and specific management tactics on weed dispersal, functional composition, and resistance evolution of weed species in such agroecosystems. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Herbicidas , Estados Unidos , Herbicidas/farmacología , Control de Malezas , Banco de Semillas , Malezas , Ecosistema , Productos Agrícolas , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Suelo
2.
Pest Manag Sci ; 74(5): 1071-1078, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28266132

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Glyphosate-resistant (GR) Ambrosia trifida is now present in the midwestern United States and in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Two distinct GR phenotypes are known, including a rapid response (GR RR) phenotype, which exhibits cell death within hours after treatment, and a non-rapid response (GR NRR) phenotype. The mechanisms of resistance in both GR RR and GR NRR remain unknown. Here, we present a description of the RR phenotype and an investigation of target-site mechanisms on multiple A. trifida accessions. RESULTS: Glyphosate resistance was confirmed in several accessions, and whole-plant levels of resistance ranged from 2.3- to 7.5-fold compared with glyphosate-susceptible (GS) accessions. The two GR phenotypes displayed similar levels of resistance, despite having dramatically different phenotypic responses to glyphosate. Glyphosate resistance was not associated with mutations in EPSPS sequence, increased EPSPS copy number, EPSPS quantity, or EPSPS activity. CONCLUSION: These encompassing results suggest that resistance to glyphosate in these GR RR A. trifida accessions is not conferred by a target-site resistance mechanism. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Ambrosia/efectos de los fármacos , Muerte Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/farmacología , Malezas/efectos de los fármacos , Ambrosia/genética , Ambrosia/fisiología , Glicina/farmacología , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Ontario , Malezas/fisiología , Tennessee , Glifosato
3.
Pest Manag Sci ; 74(5): 1079-1088, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28276187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The glyphosate-resistant rapid response (GR RR) resistance mechanism in Ambrosia trifida is not due to target-site resistance (TSR) mechanisms. This study explores the physiology of the rapid response and the possibility of reduced translocation and vacuolar sequestration as non-target-site resistance (NTSR) mechanisms. RESULTS: GR RR leaf discs accumulated hydrogen peroxide within minutes of glyphosate exposure, but only in mature leaf tissue. The rapid response required energy either as light or exogenous sucrose. The combination of phenylalanine and tyrosine inhibited the rapid response in a dose-dependent manner. Reduced glyphosate translocation was observed in GR RR, but only when associated with tissue death caused by the rapid response. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies indicated that glyphosate enters the cytoplasm and reaches chloroplasts, and it is not moved into the vacuole of GR RR, GR non-rapid response or glyphosate-susceptible A. trifida. CONCLUSION: The GR RR mechanism of resistance is not associated with vacuole sequestration of glyphosate, and the observed reduced translocation is likely a consequence of rapid tissue death. Rapid cell death was inhibited by exogenous application of aromatic amino acids phenylalanine and tyrosine. The mechanism by which these amino acids inhibit rapid cell death in the GR RR phenotype remains unknown, and it could involve glyphosate phytotoxicity or other agents generating reactive oxygen species. Implications of these findings are discussed. The GR RR mechanism is distinct from the currently described glyphosate TSR or NTSR mechanisms in other species. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.


Asunto(s)
Ambrosia/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/metabolismo , Malezas/efectos de los fármacos , Ambrosia/metabolismo , Cloroplastos/metabolismo , Glicina/metabolismo , Hojas de la Planta/metabolismo , Malezas/metabolismo , Vacuolas/metabolismo , Glifosato
4.
Pest Manag Sci ; 72(4): 692-700, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25974869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shifts in weed species composition and richness resulting from near-exclusive reliance on herbicides in glyphosate-resistant (GR) cropping systems has necessitated the implementation of alternative weed management tactics to reduce selection pressures of herbicides. We contrasted the response of the weed soil seedbank to effects of weed management strategy, comparing grower practices with academic recommendations for best management practices (BMPs) over 6 years and across five weed hardiness zones in the US Midwest at sites subject to GR cropping systems. RESULTS: Total weed population density and species richness varied according to cropping system, location and prior year's crop, but less so to weed management strategy. The seedbank population density for 11 of the 14 most frequent weed species was affected by weed management strategy either alone or in an interaction with hardiness zone or year, or both. In only 29% of comparisons was weed population density lower following academic recommendations, and this depended upon prior crop and cropping system. The population density of high-risk weed species was reduced by academic recommendations, but only in two of six years and under continuous GR maize. Overall, the weed population density was decreasing in field halves subject to the BMPs in the academic recommendations relative to grower practices. CONCLUSION: The soil seedbank is slow to respond to academic recommendations to mitigate glyphosate-resistant weeds, but represents a biological legacy that growers need to keep in mind even when management practices reduce emerged field weed population densities.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas , Banco de Semillas , Suelo , Control de Malezas/métodos , Benchmarking , Biodiversidad , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/farmacología , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/farmacología , Malezas/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Glifosato
5.
Ecol Evol ; 5(18): 4161-73, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26445665

RESUMEN

Agricultural environments allow study of evolutionary change in plants. An example of evolution within agroecological systems is the selection for resistance to the herbicide glyphosate within the weed, Conyza canadensis. Changes in survivorship and reproduction associated with the development of glyphosate resistance (GR) may impact fitness and influence the frequency of occurrence of the GR trait. We hypothesized that site characteristics and history would affect the occurrence of GR C. canadensis in field margins. We surveyed GR occurrence in field margins and asked whether there were correlations between GR occurrence and location, crop rotation, GR crop trait rotation, crop type, use of tillage, and the diversity of herbicides used. In a field experiment, we hypothesized that there would be no difference in fitness between GR and glyphosate-susceptible (GS) plants. We asked whether there were differences in survivorship, phenology, reproduction, and herbivory between 2 GR and 2 GS populations of C. canadensis in agrestal and ruderal habitats. We found that geographic location was an important factor in the occurrence of GR C. canadensis in field margins. Although not consistently associated with either glyphosate resistance or glyphosate susceptibility, there were differences in phenology, survivorship, and herbivory among biotypes of C. canadensis. We found equal or greater fitness in GR biotypes, compared to GS biotypes, and GR plants were present in field margins. Field margins or ruderal habitats may provide refugia for GR C. canadensis, allowing reproduction and further selection to occur as seeds recolonize the agrestal habitat. Agricultural practices may select for ecological changes that feed back into the evolution of plants in ruderal habitats.

6.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 741-6, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21674750

RESUMEN

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop technology has dramatically impacted agriculture. The adoption of GR systems in canola, maize, cotton, soybean and sugar beets has been widespread in the United States. However, weed scientists are concerned that growers' current herbicide programs and weed management tactics will affect their sustainability and effectiveness. Without proper management, the potential for weed populations to express a high degree of resistance to glyphosate will adversely impact the utility of glyphosate. In 2005, weed scientists from six universities initiated a long-term research study to assess the sustainability of GR technology. This paper introduces five other articles in this series. Over 150 fields of at least 10 ha were selected to participate in a long-term field-scale study, and each field was split in half. On one-half the grower continued using the current weed management program; on the other half the grower used academic-recommended herbicide resistance best management practices. Field data were collected in 2006-2008 to determine the impact of the two weed management programs on weed populations, diversity, seedbank, crop yields and economic returns. This long-term study will provide invaluable data for determining the sustainability and profitability of diversified weed management programs designed to lower the risk of evolving weed resistance to glyphosate.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/farmacología , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/farmacología , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estados Unidos , Control de Malezas , Glifosato
7.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 758-70, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21567887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted with nearly 1200 growers in US states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska and North Carolina) in 2005 with the objective in part of determining the awareness of the potential for development of glyphosate resistance, the experience with glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds and the sources of information that growers had utilized for information on glyphosate resistance. Growers were asked a series of questions to determine the level of glyphosate resistance awareness and to list the sources of information used to learn about glyphosate resistance issues. RESULTS: The majority of the growers (88%) were aware of a weed's potential to evolve resistance to herbicide, while 44% were aware of state-specific documented cases of GR weeds, and 15% reported having had personal experience with GR weeds. Among sources of information concerning glyphosate resistance issues, farm publications, dealers/retailers and university/extension were the most frequent responses (41, 17 and 14% respectively). Based on a 1-10 effectiveness scale, growers ranked tillage the least effective practice (5.5) and using the correct label rates of herbicides at the proper timing for the size and type of weeds present the most effective practice (8.6) with respect to how effectively the practices mitigated the evolution of GR weeds. CONCLUSION: Results from this survey can be used by researchers, extension specialists and crop advisors further to bridge the information gap between growers and themselves and better to disseminate information concerning glyphosate resistance and glyphosate resistance management practices through more targeted information and information delivery methods.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura , Concienciación , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/farmacología , Agricultura/métodos , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Glicina/farmacología , Humanos , Servicios de Información , Entrevistas como Asunto , Aprendizaje , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Estados Unidos , Control de Malezas , Glifosato
8.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 785-9, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21548001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops in the late 1990s made weed control in maize, cotton and soybean simple. With the rapid adoption of GR crops, many growers began to rely solely on glyphosate for weed control. This eventually led to the evolution of GR weeds. Growers are often reluctant to adopt a weed resistance best management practice (BMP) because of the added cost of additional herbicides to weed control programs which would reduce short-term revenue. This study was designed to evaluate when a grower that is risk neutral (profit maximizing) or risk averse should adopt a weed resistance BMP. RESULTS: Whether a grower is risk neutral or risk averse, the optimal decision would be to adopt a weed resistance BMP when the expected loss in revenue is greater than 30% and the probability of resistance evolution is 0.1 or greater. However, if the probability of developing resistance increases to 0.3, then the best decision would be to adopt a weed resistance BMP when the expected loss is 10% or greater. CONCLUSION: Given the scenarios analyzed, risk-neutral or risk-averse growers should implement a weed resistance BMP with confidence that they have made the right decision economically and avoided the risk of lost revenue from resistance. If the grower wants to continue to see the same level of return, adoption of BMP is required.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/economía , Agricultura/métodos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/farmacología , Control de Malezas/economía , Control de Malezas/métodos , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/farmacología , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Glifosato
9.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 781-4, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21538796

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops have changed the way growers manage weeds and implement control strategies. Since the introduction of GR crops, growers in many instances have relied on glyphosate almost exclusively to control a broad spectrum of weeds. This over-reliance on glyphosate has resulted in the evolution of glyphosate resistance in some weed species. Growers and scientists are concerned about the sustainability of GR crops and glyphosate. When a grower is making decisions about weed control strategies, economic costs and benefits of the program are primary criteria for selection and implementation. Studies across six states were initiated in 2006 to compare the economics of using a weed resistance best management practice (BMP) system with a grower's standard production system. RESULTS: Resistance BMP systems recommended by university scientists were more costly but provided similar yields and economic returns. Rotation of GR crops resulted in a higher net return (maize and soybean) compared with continuous GR crop (cotton or soybean) or rotating a GR crop with a non-GR crop (maize). CONCLUSION: Growers can implement weed resistance BMP systems with the confidence that their net returns will be equivalent in the short run, and, in the long term, resistance BMP systems will prevent or delay the evolution of GR weeds in their fields, resulting in substantial savings.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/economía , Productos Agrícolas/economía , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/farmacología , Control de Malezas/economía , Agricultura/métodos , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/farmacología , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estados Unidos , Control de Malezas/métodos , Glifosato
10.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(12): 1486-92, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21538801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Horseweed is a weed commonly found in agronomic crops, waste areas and roadsides. Resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in horseweed was first reported in 1993 in a population from Israel. Resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in horseweed is now widespread, but, as of now, the resistance mechanism has not been reported. RESULTS: Two of three populations evaluated (P116 and P13) were found to be uniform for resistance (>98% of individuals survived 8.8 g AI ha(-1) of cloransulam), whereas a third population, P525, contained about 85% resistant individuals. Cross-resistance to cloransulam, chlorimuron, imazethapyr and bispyribac was observed in the P116 population. P525 and P13 were both sensitive to imazethapyr but resistant to chlorimuron, imazethapyr and bispyribac. Enzyme activity assays indicated that resistance in P13 was due to an altered target site. Southern blot analysis indicated that the ALS target site is encoded by a single copy gene. Overlapping ALS gene regions were amplified and sequenced from each population. Amino acid substitutions of Ser for Pro at position 197 (P197S) was detected from P13, Ala for Pro (P197A) was identified from P525 and substitution of Glu for Asp (D376E) at position 376 was found in P116. Molecular markers were developed to differentiate between wild-type and resistant codons at positions 197 and 376 of horseweed ALS. CONCLUSION: Resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in horseweed is conferred by target-site mutations that have also been identified in other weed species. Identification of the mutations within horseweed ALS gene sequence enables molecular assays for rapid detection and resistance diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Conyza/efectos de los fármacos , Conyza/genética , Herbicidas/farmacología , Malezas/efectos de los fármacos , Malezas/genética , Control de Malezas , Acetolactato Sintasa/genética , Acetolactato Sintasa/metabolismo , Sustitución de Aminoácidos , Benzoatos/farmacología , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Southern Blotting , Codón/genética , Codón/metabolismo , Conyza/metabolismo , Activación Enzimática , Pruebas de Enzimas , Genes de Plantas , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Mutación , Ácidos Nicotínicos/farmacología , Malezas/metabolismo , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Especificidad de la Especie
11.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 747-57, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21452168

RESUMEN

A six-state, 5 year field project was initiated in 2006 to study weed management methods that foster the sustainability of genetically engineered (GE) glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop systems. The benchmark study field-scale experiments were initiated following a survey, conducted in the winter of 2005-2006, of farmer opinions on weed management practices and their views on GR weeds and management tactics. The main survey findings supported the premise that growers were generally less aware of the significance of evolved herbicide resistance and did not have a high recognition of the strong selection pressure from herbicides on the evolution of herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds. The results of the benchmark study survey indicated that there are educational challenges to implement sustainable GR-based crop systems and helped guide the development of the field-scale benchmark study. Paramount is the need to develop consistent and clearly articulated science-based management recommendations that enable farmers to reduce the potential for HR weeds. This paper provides background perspectives about the use of GR crops, the impact of these crops and an overview of different opinions about the use of GR crops on agriculture and society, as well as defining how the benchmark study will address these issues.


Asunto(s)
Agricultura/métodos , Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/farmacología , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/farmacología , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estados Unidos , Control de Malezas , Glifosato
12.
Pest Manag Sci ; 67(7): 771-80, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21520485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Weed management in glyphosate-resistant (GR) maize, cotton and soybean in the United States relies almost exclusively on glyphosate, which raises criticism for facilitating shifts in weed populations. In 2006, the benchmark study, a field-scale investigation, was initiated in three different GR cropping systems to characterize academic recommendations for weed management and to determine the level to which these recommendations would reduce weed population shifts. RESULTS: A majority of growers used glyphosate as the only herbicide for weed management, as opposed to 98% of the academic recommendations implementing at least two herbicide active ingredients and modes of action. The additional herbicides were applied with glyphosate and as soil residual treatments. The greater herbicide diversity with academic recommendations reduced weed population densities before and after post-emergence herbicide applications in 2006 and 2007, particularly in continuous GR crops. CONCLUSION: Diversifying herbicides reduces weed population densities and lowers the risk of weed population shifts and the associated potential for the evolution of glyphosate-resistant weeds in continuous GR crops. Altered weed management practices (e.g. herbicides or tillage) enabled by rotating crops, whether GR or non-GR, improves weed management and thus minimizes the effectiveness of only using chemical tactics to mitigate weed population shifts.


Asunto(s)
Productos Agrícolas/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/farmacología , Malezas/efectos de los fármacos , Control de Malezas/métodos , Agricultura , Benchmarking , Productos Agrícolas/genética , Productos Agrícolas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Glicina/análisis , Glicina/farmacología , Resistencia a los Herbicidas , Herbicidas/análisis , Malezas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/efectos de los fármacos , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/genética , Plantas Modificadas Genéticamente/crecimiento & desarrollo , Suelo/análisis , Estados Unidos , Glifosato
13.
Plant J ; 35(5): 574-87, 2003 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12940951

RESUMEN

Verticillium dahliae Klebahn is a soil-borne fungal pathogen causing vascular diseases. The pathogen penetrates the host through the roots, spreads through the xylem, and systemically colonizes both resistant and susceptible genotypes. To elucidate the genetic and molecular bases of plant-Verticillium interactions, we have developed a pathosystem utilizing Arabidopsis thaliana and an isolate of V. dahliae pathogenic to both cruciferous and non-cruciferous crops. Relative tolerance (based on symptom severity) but no immunity was found in a survey of Arabidopsis ecotypes. Anthocyanin accumulation, stunting, and chlorosis were common symptoms. Specific responses of the more susceptible ecotype Columbia were induction of early flowering and dying. The more tolerant ecotype C-24 was characterized by pathogen-induced delay of transition to flowering and mild chlorosis symptoms. Genetic analysis indicated that a single dominant locus, Verticillium dahliae-tolerance (VET1), likely functioning also as a negative regulator of the transition to flowering, was able to convey increased tolerance. VET1 was mapped on chromosome IV. The differential symptom responses observed between ecotypes were not correlated with different rates of fungal tissue colonization or with differential transcript accumulation of PR-1 and PDF1.2 defense genes whose activation was not detected during the Arabidopsis-V. dahliae interaction. Impairment in salicylic acid (SA)- or jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent signaling did not cause hypersensitivity to the fungal infection, whereas ethylene insensitivity led to reduced chlorosis and ABA deficiency to reduced anthocyanin accumulation. The results of this study clearly indicated that the ability of V. dahliae to induce disease symptoms is also connected to the genetic control of development and life span in Arabidopsis.


Asunto(s)
Arabidopsis/genética , Enfermedades de las Plantas/microbiología , Verticillium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Ácido Abscísico/farmacología , Arabidopsis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Arabidopsis/microbiología , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Ciclopentanos/farmacología , Defensinas/genética , Defensinas/metabolismo , Etilenos/farmacología , Flores/genética , Flores/crecimiento & desarrollo , Flores/microbiología , Regulación del Desarrollo de la Expresión Génica , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Genes Dominantes/genética , Inmunidad Innata/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunidad Innata/genética , Oxilipinas , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Proteínas de Plantas/metabolismo , Ácido Salicílico/farmacología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...