RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A positive test result from universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has been suspected to cause maternal concern. However, findings so far are inconclusive. Against the background of a 2-stage UNHS protocol, we investigated the extent of maternal concern in 2 different situations: 1) mothers' immediate reactions after a positive result at the first-stage test and 2) maternal concern during a 1-month period while waiting for the infant's hearing assessment after the infant also failed the retest (ie, the screening). In addition, we checked whether mothers who are informed by an audiologist about the low predictive validity of positive test results in hearing screening are less concerned about a positive result than mothers who are not informed. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted over a 1-year period, in which all mothers whose infants tested positive in the first stage or failed the screening were questioned about their level of concern attributable to the positive test result. RESULTS: Of 85 mothers whose infants tested positive in the first-stage test (situation 1), 34 (40%) did not know the result. Of the remaining 51 mothers, 59% were not at all concerned and 27% were only slightly concerned about the result, whereas 14% stated that they were highly concerned. In an additional sample of 43 mothers whose infants failed the screening (situation 2), 42% reported not being worried and 37% only slightly worried, whereas 21% were highly concerned about the positive screening result. No effect of information about the low predictive validity of positive test results on the extent of maternal concern could be ascertained. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study contradict the findings of some previous surveys that reported considerably higher levels of maternal concern after a positive test in UNHS. The failure to demonstrate the impact of information on maternal concern might be attributable to the fact that the number of uninformed mothers was too small to affect our results perceptibly.
Asunto(s)
Actitud , Pruebas Auditivas/psicología , Madres/psicología , Tamizaje Neonatal/psicología , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is effective in increasing the number of children whose hearing impairment is detected early, i.e. within the first 6 months of life. It also investigated whether UNHS contributes most to the early detection of moderately and severely hearing-impaired newborns, as suggested by a recently published report. METHODS: The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of the data of all children born in Tyrol between 1980 and 1999 and having an at least moderate permanent hearing loss in the better ear. RESULTS: The findings are that since UNHS was introduced in some newborn nurseries in 1995, a substantially higher number of hearing-impaired children has been detected early. For the whole sample, the increase of the early detection rate is 39.9%, with a 95% confidence interval of 33.2-46.8% (P<0.0001). For moderate hearing loss the increase is 49.2 with a 95% confidence intervall of 39.6-58.8% (P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: On the whole, our findings lend support to the view that UNHS is effective in early detection of congenital hearing impairment. We conclude that UNHS provides the greatest benefit for moderately hearing-impaired children who, otherwise, would have been detected last.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Audición , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos de la Audición/congénito , Trastornos de la Audición/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Audición/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Bienestar del Lactante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
In order to improve the acceptability of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) among parents, several authors have proposed that information about hearing screening be provided to them. The purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis that mothers who are informed about their baby's hearing test are more likely to have a positive attitude towards hearing screening than are mothers who are not informed. Information given to mothers was assessed by three items concerning their involvement in their baby's hearing test. Subjects were 90 mothers who were interviewed during their stay at the maternity unit after delivery. Mothers' attitudes towards the screening were assessed through their answer to the following question: 'Should UNHS be performed despite the possibility that parents become worried by false-positive test results?' Mothers who answered 'Yes' were categorized as advocates of UNHS, whereas those who answered 'No' or 'Undecided' were categorized as sceptics. The great majority of mothers (84%) turned out to be advocates. In keeping with the hypothesis, among advocates a significantly higher proportion of mothers were well-informed about the hearing test (78% versus 50%; p = 0.016), were present at the hearing test (51% versus 14%; p<0.01) or knew the result of the hearing test (71% versus 29%; p<0.01). These findings support the view that providing information about the hearing test will positively affect parental attitude towards UNHS.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Trastornos de la Audición/diagnóstico , Conducta Materna , Tamizaje Neonatal , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Bienestar del Lactante , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
The objective of this study is to correlate in children with chronic secretory otitis media the extent of pneumatization with morphological and functional end results after therapy. For this purpose we examined 82 children and adolescents (147 ears), who 5 to 8 years previously were treated with insertion of ventilating tubes for chronic secretory otitis media. We evaluated the morphological and functional end results with otomicroscopy, pure tone audiometry, tympanometry and stapedial reflex testing. Roentgenograms of the temporal bones in a lateral projection were taken initially in 96 ears and at time of control in 145 ears. We judged the size of the mastoid air cell system by visual estimation and classified the mastoids according to the extent of pneumatization into three groups: large, middle-sized and small (sclerotic). Twenty-five percent of the ears had sclerotic mastoids at time of control. Statistically significant correlations exist between arrested pneumatization (sclerotic mastoids), major morphological changes in the tympanic membranes and unfavorable functional results. Also the correlation between sclerotic mastoids and the number of tube insertions required in the course of the disease is statistically significant. But no correlation can be established between the physical properties of secretions and the extent of pneumatization. Arrest of pneumatization leading to a small mastoid air cell system constitutes an unfavorable prognostic factor for the final outcome of chronic secretory otitis media.