Serum uric acid: A risk factor for right ventricular dysfunction and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Background: Hyperuricemia and right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) are both widespread in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. RVD is associated with a poor prognosis in HFpEF. The correlation between serum uric acid (UA) levels and right ventricular function is unclear. The prognostic performance of UA in patients with HFpEF needs further validation. Methods and results: A total of 210 patients with HFpEF were included in the study and divided into two groups according to UA level: the normal UA group (≤7 mg/dl) and the high UA group (>7 mg/dl). The variables examined included clinical characteristics, echocardiography, and serum biochemical parameters. Right ventricular function was assessed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity (TAPSV). Baseline characteristics were compared between the two groups, and the correlation between baseline UA and RVD was assessed using multifactorial binary logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission. Results showed that right ventricular function parameters were worse in the high UA group. After adjusting for UA, left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), atrial fibrillation (AF), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), UA (odds ratio = 2.028; p < 0.001) was independently associated with RVD, and UA >7 mg/dl (HR = 2.98; p < 0.001) was associated with heart failure readmission in patients with HFpEF. Conclusion: Elevated serum UA is closely associated with RVD and significantly associated with the heart failure readmission rate in patients with HFpEF.

Short-term/long-term prognosis with or without beta-blockers in patients without heart failure and with preserved ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The role of beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction patients without heart failure and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) is unknown. Our study aimed to retrospectively analyze the associations of beta-blockers on such patients. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study. After screening 5,332 acute myocardial infarction patients, a total of 2519 patients without heart failure and with LVEF ≥ 50% were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the prescribed (n = 2049) and unprescribed (n = 470) beta-blockers group. The propensity score inverse probability treatment weighting was used to control confounding factors. We analyzed the associations between beta-blockers and outcomes in the short-term (1-year) and long-term (median, 3.61 years). RESULTS: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were all-cause rehospitalization, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, new-onset heart failure rehospitalization. This study shows no statistically significant association between discharged with beta-blockers and all-cause mortality, either in the short-term [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.02; 95%CI 0.43-2.40; P = 0.966] or long-term [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.17; 95%CI 0.70-1.94; P = 0.547]. Discharged with beta-blockers was significantly associated with a reduced risk of short-term recurrent myocardial infarction [IPTW Adjusted, HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.20-0.97; P = 0.043], but there was no long-term relationship [IPTW Adjusted, HR 1.11; 95%CI 0.61-2.03; P = 0.735]. Other outcomes, such as new-onset heart failure rehospitalization and all-cause rehospitalization, were not observed with meaningful differences in either the short- or long-term. The results of sensitivity analysis were consistent with this. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers might be associated with a reduced risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure and with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction, in the short term. Beta-blockers might not be related to all-cause mortality in those patients, either in the short-term or long-term. Clinical trial registration Influence of Beta-blockers on Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Normal Ejection Fraction, NCT04485988, Registered on 24/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.

The duration of beta-blocker therapy and outcomes in patients without heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The duration of beta-blocker therapy in patients without heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Continuous beta-blocker therapy is associated with an improved prognosis. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, cohort study. One thousand four hundred and eighty-three patients eventually met the inclusion criteria. The study groups included the continuous beta-blocker therapy group (lasted ≥6 months) and the discontinuous beta-blocker therapy group (consisting of the no-beta-blocker therapy group and the beta-blocker therapy <6 months group). The inverse probability treatment weighting was used to control confounding factors. The study tried to learn the role of continuous beta-blocker therapy on outcomes. The median duration of follow-up was 13.0 months. The primary outcomes were cardiac death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The secondary outcomes were all-cause death, stroke, unstable angina, rehospitalization for HF, and recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: Compared with discontinuous beta-blocker therapy, continuous beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduced risk of unstable angina, recurrent MI, and MACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.32-0.82; p = 0.006); but this association was not available for cardiac death (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.24-1.36; p = 0.206). When compared to the subgroups of no-beta-blocker therapy and beta-blocker therapy <6 months, respectively, continuous beta-blocker therapy was still observed to be associated with a reduced risk of unstable angina, recurrent MI, and MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduced risk of unstable angina or recurrent MI or MACE in patients without HF or left ventricular systolic dysfunction after AMI.

Clinical characteristics and predictive value of lower CD4+T cell level in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei, China. Moreover, it has become a global pandemic. This is of great value in describing the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients in detail and looking for markers which are significant to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this multicenter, retrospective study, 476 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled from a consecutive series. After screening, a total of 395 patients were included in this study. All-cause death was the primary endpoint. All patients were followed up from admission till discharge or death. RESULTS: The main symptoms observed in the study included fever on admission, cough, fatigue, and shortness of breath. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Patients with lower CD4+T cell level were older and more often male compared to those with higher CD4+T cell level. Reduced CD8+T cell level was an indicator of the severity of COVID-19. Both decreased CD4+T [HR:13.659; 95%CI: 3.235-57.671] and CD8+T [HR: 10.883; 95%CI: 3.277-36.145] cell levels were associated with in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients, but only the decrease of CD4+T cell level was an independent predictor of in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets were common in COVID-19 patients, especially in severe cases of COVID-19. It was the CD8+T cell level, not the CD4+T cell level, that reflected the severity of the patient's disease. Only reduced CD4+T cell level was independently associated with increased in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prognostic Factors of Patients With COVID-19, NCT04292964 . Registered 03 March 2020. Retrospectively registered.

Combination of eosinophil percentage and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts in-hospital major adverse cardiac events in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophil levels predict prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Both eosinophils and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) play a major role in the acute inflammatory response of myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate eosinophil percentage (EOS%) and hs-CRP as prognostic markers for in-hospital adverse events in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 518 patients. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as cardiac rupture, cardiac arrest, malignant arrhythmia, and cardiac death. Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, all patients were regrouped into 3 groups (None, One, and Two) according to cutoff EOS% value (≤0.3%) and hs-CRP value (>11.8 mg/L). Both Cox regression analyses and the KM (Kaplan-Meier) survival curve were used to examine the prognostic role of combined hs-CRP and EOS% in cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Of the 518 STEMI patients, 50 of them developed MACEs. Patients who developed MACEs had a significantly lower EOS% and higher hs-CRP than patients who remained MACE-free. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the highest risk of in-hospital MACEs was constantly observed in patients with a combined low EOS% and elevated hs-CRP. Patients with reduced EOS% and high hs-CRP had significantly higher incidence rates of cardiac rupture (P = .001), cardiac arrest (P = .001), and malignant arrhythmia (P < .001); furthermore, they had the worst cumulative survival compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Combined reduced EOS% and elevated hs-CRP were valuable tools for identifying patients at risk of in-hospital MACEs.

Prognostic value of NT-proBNP in patients with severe COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China has been declared a public health emergency of international concern. The cardiac injury is a common condition among the hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, whether N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicted outcome of severe COVID-19 patients was unknown. METHODS: The study initially enrolled 102 patients with severe COVID-19 from a continuous sample. After screening out the ineligible cases, 54 patients were analyzed in this study. The primary outcome was in-hospital death defined as the case fatality rate. Research information and following-up data were obtained from their medical records. RESULTS: The best cut-off value of NT-proBNP for predicting in-hospital death was 88.64 pg/mL with the sensitivity for 100% and the specificity for 66.67%. Patients with high NT-proBNP values (> 88.64 pg/mL) had a significantly increased risk of death during the days of following-up compared with those with low values (≤88.64 pg/mL). After adjustment for potential risk factors, NT-proBNP was independently correlated with in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: NT-proBNP might be an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in patients with severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials, NCT04292964. Registered 03 March 2020.