Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 6(4): 698-702, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33102991

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is seriously challenging the healthcare system globally. Endothelial damage and increased coagulation activity have been reported in some patients with COVID-19, resulting in a variety of thrombotic events. We report the cases of four patients with various severities of COVID-19 who had presented with acute arterial thrombosis. Although these are rare events, they carry high morbidity and mortality and require prompt diagnosis and treatment. These cases highlight the major life- and limb-threatening clinical sequelae of COVID-19 that frontline medical providers must be aware can occur even in the absence of previous cardiovascular disease.

2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 53: 262-265, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012453

RESUMEN

This series describes an innovative technique to deploy iliac branched endoprostheses (IBEs) in patients with preexisting endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). It demonstrates an alternative approach that may be preferred when brachial access is anatomically challenging or when access site complications are of concern. We detail a technique that uses transfemoral access to bring IBE device components up and over an infrarenal endograft bifurcation and into proper position. This series suggests that endovascular specialists should consider the advantages and disadvantages of a transfemoral approach when selecting the best method of repairing a patient's iliac artery aneurysm after prior EVAR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Femoral , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Punciones , Reoperación , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 66(1): 151-159, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28259571

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative inflammatory status, as determined by complete blood count test parameters, on 12- and 24-month patency of femoropopliteal stenting for peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed baseline clinical and angiographic data among 138 patients (median age, 73 years; 46% female) from 2005 to 2014 at our institution with preoperative complete blood count test values and information of patency for at least 12 months after first-time femoropopliteal stenting. Patients were stratified into tertiles on the basis of preoperative blood counts to evaluate associations with in-stent restenosis (ISR) leading to loss of primary patency, defined by a Doppler velocity ratio ≥2.5:1, computed tomography angiography demonstrating ≥50% luminal narrowing within the stent, or reintervention. RESULTS: Univariate analysis determined that the 81 patients (59%) who experienced ISR within 12 months had significantly higher preoperative white blood cell (WBC), platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts than the 57 patients (41%) whose stents remained patent for longer than 12 months (8.7 vs 6.7 [P < .001], 246 vs 184 [P < .001], 5.7 vs 4.7 [P = .001], and 1.8 vs 1.2 [P = .004], respectively). Compared with patients in the lower WBC tertile (n = 45) who had a median patency of 19.4 months, those in the upper WBC tertile (n = 44) had a median patency of only 7.0 months and a 3.3-fold increased risk for ISR after adjusting for age, sex, lesion type, TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II score, tibial vessel runoff, antiplatelet therapy, presence of diabetes, critical limb ischemia, adjunct procedures, hyperlipidemia, and end-stage renal disease in multivariate analysis (P < .001). Compared with patients in the lower platelet tertile (n = 45) who had a median patency of 16.9 months, those in the upper platelet tertile (n = 47) had a median patency of 7.1 months and a 2.7-fold increased adjusted risk (P = .001). Compared with patients in the lower neutrophil tertile (n = 33) who had a median patency of 14.3 months, those in the upper neutrophil tertile (n = 33) had a median patency of 6.2 months and a 3.2-fold increased adjusted risk (P = .001). After adjusting for covariates, patients divided into tertiles by lymphocyte counts exhibited no significant differences for ISR. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative tests that determine baseline inflammatory status may provide strong clinical utility in assessing potential risk stratification of patients for ISR after femoropopliteal stenting. Circulating WBCs, platelets, and neutrophils may be important inflammatory mediators of ISR.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Inflamación/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Plaquetas/inmunología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Inflamación/inmunología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Ciudad de Nueva York , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Recuento de Plaquetas , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
4.
J Vasc Surg ; 64(1): 63-74.e2, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27017100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown that a sizable percentage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is performed outside the instructions for use (IFU). We report our long-term outcomes after EVAR with respect to device-specific IFU. METHODS: Computed tomography angiography data from a cohort of 566 patients meeting inclusion criteria who underwent elective EVAR between 2003 and 2014 were examined. Preoperative anatomic measurements for each patient were taken and compared with device-specific IFU. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and AAA-related mortality. Secondary outcomes were late-onset rupture, need for reintervention, endoleaks, aneurysm sac enlargement, and intraoperative and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Nine different stent grafts were placed in this set of patients with a mean follow-up of 3.54 ± 2.65 years. Most patients (465; 82.2%) were male, and the mean age was 74.8 ± 8.70 years. Overall, 176 patients (31.1%) fit all IFU anatomic criteria, and 535 patients (94.5%) fit at least half of IFU criteria. In patients, iliac artery diameter was most commonly outside of IFU (253; 44.7%). A total of 1114 iliac arteries were treated, with 463 (41.6%) treated outside of iliac artery diameter IFU; the majority of these (374; 80.7%) were larger than IFU. Demographics and comorbidities were comparable between the groups within and outside of IFU. AAA-related mortality and all-cause mortality were similar between these two groups, as was late-onset rupture, need for reintervention, rates of endoleak, aneurysm sac enlargement, and major intraoperative and perioperative complications. The sole statistically significant difference in secondary outcomes was increased perioperative blood transfusion needed in those treated outside the IFU, 13.2% vs 6.2% in those treated within IFU (P = .02); however, this was not associated with decreased access vessel diameter or iliac artery rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Despite most EVAR patients being treated outside of IFU, there was no difference in outcomes with respect to all-cause mortality or aneurysm-related mortality. In addition, with the exception of perioperative blood transfusions, there was no association between IFU adherence and late-onset rupture, need for reintervention, rates of endoleak, aneurysm sac enlargement, or most other major complications.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Selección de Paciente , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Etiquetado de Productos , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...