Open reduction and internal fixation of the proximal humerus with femoral head allograft augmentation "the French fry technique".

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 4%-8% of injuries to the appendicular skeleton. Most are stable, minimally displaced osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, and are the result of low-energy falls. A large majority of these patients regain adequate shoulder function without operative intervention. Surgery is considered in approximately 20% of patients because they require improved shoulder function for their activities of daily living or because of the significant deformity of their fracture and the need to restore functional alignment, length, and rotation in active, higher demand individuals. However, fixation of these fractures can pose a challenge due to poor bone quality and displacing forces of the rotator cuff. This is especially true in 3-part and 4-part fractures. These factors lead to the high failure rates seen with early attempts at osteosynthesis. In the last 2 decades, locking plate technology has been an innovation in treating these complex fractures. Despite the improvements in torsional strength and rigidity, outcome studies on locking plate technology demonstrate equivocal results with complication rates as high as 20%-30% and a revision rate of 10%. Specifically, these complications include avascular necrosis, varus collapse, intra-articular screw penetration, and postoperative stiffness. Varus collapse occurs when the weak osteoporotic bone fails around the implant. In turn, fibular strut endosteal augmentation was introduced to provide additional support and decrease implant failure rates in displaced fractures with varus coronal malalignment and significant metaphyseal bone loss. Although clinically successful and biomechanically superior to plate-only constructs, a few concerns remain. In turn, we introduce a novel technique of creating individual cancellous femoral head allograft struts or "French fries" that provides structural support for the humeral head but does not have the potential problems of a cortical fibular strut.

A review of the New Zealand National Joint Registry to evaluate the survivorship and revision rates of Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an appropriate surgical treatment option for a variety of conditions ranging from inflammatory arthritis to trauma. Because of a high complication profile, implant companies have attempted to improve patient outcomes with evolving design mechanics and philosophy. However, the Nexel TEA prosthesis has been criticized for its unacceptably high revision rate by other research groups in the literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship and revision rates of the Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey TEA implant systems in New Zealand. METHODS: Prospectively collected National Joint Registry data were used to compare the survival rates of these prostheses. Underlying diagnoses, reasons for revision, and patient demographics were all recorded. Statistical analysis included survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and comparison between groups using independent t tests. RESULTS: Over the 23-year study interval, the Nexel and Coonrad-Morrey prostheses showed similar survivorship and revision rates. The revision rates at 5 years were 7.3% for Nexel and 4.5% for the Coonrad-Morrey cohorts. The average time to revision for those who are revised was 3.13 ± 1.74 years in the Nexel group and 4.93 ± 4.13 years in the Coonrad-Morrey population. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a lower revision rate of the Nexel TEA compared to other studies in the literature. Additionally, the Nexel TEA implant performs comparably to its predecessor, the Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis in New Zealand. Although it is difficult to explain the discrepancy in results with the study by Morrey et al, future studies should focus on investigating postoperative radiographs and a deep analysis of the specific surgical technique used for this implant.

Imaging in an academic orthopedic shoulder service: a report on incidental lung pathology findings.

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) is often utilized for both diagnostic and pre-operative planning purposes in shoulder arthroplasty. Our study reports on the incidence of pulmonary findings in our pre-operative shoulder arthroplasty population over 14 years at our institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all "shoulder CT" exams ordered by two orthopedic upper extremity surgeons between the years of 2008 and 2021. These exams were then further analyzed to include only those ordered for the purpose of pre-operative "shoulder arthroplasty" planning. All incidental findings were documented and those with pulmonary findings were then further analyzed. A detailed chart review was then performed on these patients to determine the impact on their planned shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS: A total of 363 shoulder pre-operative CTs were ordered by our two upper extremity orthopedic surgeons at our institution between the years of 2008 and 2021. Primary lung cancer in the form of adenocarcinoma (n = 3) had an incidence of 0.8% of all CT scans and 1.4% of all pulmonary incidental findings. Fifteen patients (4% of all CT scans and 7% of all pulmonary incidental findings) had no concern for malignancy and were appropriately evaluated with further imaging based on their initial shoulder CT. CONCLUSION: While shoulder arthroplasty and pre-operative planning with CT imaging continue to become more common, so too is the incidence of reported pulmonary findings. From a patient care standpoint, it is important that these findings are accurately identified, appropriately triaged, and communicated clearly to our patients.

Adjuvant Medial Collateral Ligament Release at the Time of Knee Arthroscopy: A Controlled Percutaneous Technique.

The posterior horn of the medial meniscus can be challenging to view during arthroscopy because the medial femoral condyle obstructs vision, especially in tight medial compartments. Previous studies have described techniques for improving access, one being a percutaneous medial collateral ligament (MCL) release. This technique allows for increased medial compartment space, which offloads a tight medial compartment, minimizes iatrogenic chondral injury, incomplete meniscal resection, uncontrolled MCL rupture, and allows for accurate diagnosis and management. Studies have proven the safety of the controlled percutaneous MCL release, with no significant postoperative MCL laxity on stress views, no subjective patient instability, fewer iatrogenic cartilage lesions, and no saphenous neurovascular injury. Furthermore, retrospective studies have shown improved postoperative patient-reported outcomes with a controlled percutaneous MCL release in comparison to standard of care without a release. We hypothesize that a controlled percutaneous release of the MCL effectively alleviates some of the pressure within the medial compartment, which could potentially explain the improved postoperative clinical outcomes. This technique also facilitates improved visualization, a decreased risk of iatrogenic chondral injury, and a more complete meniscal resection. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our surgical technique and provide surgical pearls for a controlled percutaneous MCL release during knee arthroscopy.

Single and double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield comparable clinical and functional outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and compare the functional and objective outcomes after single-bundle (SB) vs. double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR). Where possible to pool outcomes and arrive at summary estimates of treatment effect for DB PCLR vs. SB PCLR via an embedded meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) literature search identified 13 eligible studies evaluating clinical outcomes of both techniques for PCLR. Clinical outcome measures included in the meta-analysis were functional outcomes (Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale) and objective measurements of posterior laxity of the operated knee (arthrometer and stress radiographs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 603 patients. Three hundred and fifteen patients were treated with SB and two hundred and eighty-eight patients with DB PCLR. There were no significant differences between SB and DB PCLR in postoperative functional Lysholm Scores (CI [- 0.18, 0.17]), Tegner Activity Scales (CI [- 0.32, 0.12]) and IKDC objective grades (CI [- 0.13, 1.17]). Regarding posterior stability using KT-1000 and Kneelax III arthrometer measurements, there were no differences between the SB and DB group. However, double-bundle reconstruction provided better objective outcome of measurement of posterior laxity (CI [0.02, 0.46]) when measured with Telos stress radiography. CONCLUSION: A systematic review was conducted to identify current best evidence pertaining to DB and SB PCLR. An embedded meta-analysis arrived at similar summary estimates of treatment effect for motion, stability and overall function for both techniques. There is no demonstrable clinically relevant difference between techniques based on the currently available evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effects of Blood Flow Restriction in Patients Undergoing Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has been shown to have beneficial effects in reducing quadriceps muscle atrophy and improving strength in patients with various knee pathologies. Furthermore, the effectiveness of BFR training in patients undergoing knee surgery has been investigated to determine if its use can improve clinical outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of BFR training in patients undergoing knee surgery. We hypothesized that BFR, before or after surgery, would improve clinical outcomes as well as muscle strength and volume. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed literature was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 1980 to present. Search results were limited to those assessing BFR training in patients undergoing knee surgery published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal in English. Selected studies subsequently underwent data extraction, methodological quality assessment, and data analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies were eligible, including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (n = 10) and knee arthroscopy (n = 1). Two studies specifically assessed BFR use in the preoperative time frame. For the meta-analysis, including 4 studies, the primary outcome variables included the cross-sectional area of the quadratus femoris muscle group assessed with magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography, and patient-reported outcome measure scores. The results demonstrated that BFR use in the postoperative time period can lead to a significant improvement in the cross-sectional area when quantifying muscle atrophy. However, there were no significant differences found for patient-reported outcome measures between the included studies. It should be noted that 4 of the included papers in this review reported increases in clinical strength when using BFR in the postoperative setting. Last, preoperative BFR training did not show any significant clinical benefit between the 2 studies. CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to study the effects of BFR in patients undergoing knee surgery. The results of this analysis show that BFR in the postoperative period after knee surgery can improve quadriceps muscle bulk compared with a control group. However, future research should examine the effects of preconditioning with BFR before surgery. Lastly, BFR protocols need to be further investigated to determine which provide the best patient outcomes. This will help standardize this type of treatment modality for future studies.

Systematic Arthroscopic Treatment of Synovial Chondromatosis of the Knee.

Synovial chondromatosis is a benign metaplastic disease of the synovial joints, characterized by the development of cartilaginous nodules in the synovium. Treatment generally includes open or arthroscopic loose body removal combined with a synovectomy. An all-arthroscopic approach has been described to minimize complications and reduce morbidity while providing adequate control of local disease. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our techniques and technical pearls that allow for adequate excision of disease while minimizing complications and disease recurrence. The combination of patient positioning, the establishment of multiple arthroscopic portals to ensure optimal visualization and freedom of instruments, the use of a leg holder, and the use of a variety of surgical instruments to facilitate loose body removal and synovectomy is critical to optimize clinical outcomes and minimize complications. Although technically demanding, our described technique can help facilitate extensive loose body removal and complete synovectomy.