An Overview of Renal Cell Carcinoma Hallmarks, Drug Resistance, and Adjuvant Therapies.

Renal neoplasms are highlighted as one of the 10 most common types of cancer. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of renal cancer, considered the seventh most common type of cancer in the Western world. The most frequently altered genes described as altered are VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, KDM5C, PTEN, BAP1, mTOR, TP53, TCEB1 (ELOC), SMARCA4, ARID1A, and PIK3CA. RCC therapies can be classified in three groups: monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and mTOR inhibitors. Besides, there are targeted agents to treat RCC. However, frequently patients present side effects and resistance. Even though many multidrug resistance mechanisms already have been reported to RCC, studies focused on revealing new biomarkers as well as more effective antitumor therapies with no or low side effects are very important. Some studies reported that natural products, such as honey, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), curcumin, resveratrol, and englerin A showed antitumor activity against RCC. Moreover, nanoscience is another strategy to improve RCC treatment and reduce the side effects due to the improvement in pharmacokinetics and reduction of toxicities of chemotherapies. Taking this into account, we conducted a systemic review of recent research findings on RCC hallmarks, drug resistance, and adjuvant therapies. In conclusion, a range of studies reported that RCC is characterized by high incidence and increased mortality rates because of the development of resistance to standard therapies. Given the importance of improving RCC treatment and reducing adverse effects, nanoscience and natural products can be included in therapeutic strategies.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Integrated Analysis.

Vericiguat, a novel stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), is indicated for the treatment of patients following a hospitalization for heart failure or need for outpatient intravenous diuretics, with symptomatic chronic heart failure and ejection fraction less than 45%. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the phase II trial SOCRATES-REDUCED (Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator in Heart Failure Study) and the phase III trial VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) were used to characterize vericiguat PK. A total of 8,092 concentration records from 2,321 participants (362 from SOCRATES-REDUCED and 1,959 from VICTORIA) were utilized for the development of the population PK model. The final PK model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination. Baseline body weight and time-varying body weight were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution, respectively. Age, sex, race, bilirubin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and albumin did not affect vericiguat PK. Baseline disease-related factors, such as left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, also did not influence vericiguat PK. Since vericiguat is a titrated drug, the impact of vericiguat PK on the titration to and maintenance of the target dose in VICTORIA was assessed. The distribution of steady-state doses in VICTORIA was similar across CL/F quartiles, suggesting that the ability to reach and maintain dosing at the target 10-mg dose was not related to vericiguat exposure.

Clinical Pharmacology Worldwide: A Global Health Perspective.

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have the highest rates of mortality and morbidity globally, but lag behind high-income countries in the number of clinical trials and trained researchers, as well as research data pertaining to their populations. Lack of local clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics expertise, limited training opportunities, and lack of local genomic data may contribute to health inequalities and limit the application of precision medicine. Continuing to develop health care infrastructure, including well-designed clinical pharmacology training and data collection in LMICs, can help address these challenges. International collaboration aimed at improving training and infrastructure and encouraging locally driven research and clinical trials will be of benefit. This review describes several examples where clinical pharmacology expertise could be leveraged, including opportunities for pharmacogenomic expertise that could drive improved recommendations for clinical guidelines. Also described are clinical pharmacology and pharmacometrics training programs in Africa, and the personal experience of a Tanzanian researcher currently on a training sabbatical in the United States, as illustrative examples of how training in clinical pharmacology can be effectively implemented in LMICs. These training efforts will benefit from advocacy for employment opportunities and career development pathways for clinical pharmacologists that are gradually being recognized and developed in LMICs. Clinical pharmacologists have a key role to play in global health, and development of training and research infrastructure to advance this expertise in LMICs will be of tremendous benefit.

Magnesium sulfate pharmacokinetics after intramuscular dosing in women with preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Current intramuscular magnesium dosing regimens in low and middle-income countries are based on indirect absorption parameters to inform pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response. OBJECTIVE: To determine if therapeutic serum magnesium levels are obtained in women with severe preeclampsia receiving intramuscular administration of magnesium sulfate using the Pritchard regimen and to compare the key pharmacokinetic variables to those previously published. STUDY DESIGN: Serum magnesium levels were obtained at multiple time points at baseline and after magnesium sulfate administration from women with severe preeclampsia receiving the standard Pritchard regimen for seizure prophylaxis at Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria. The pharmacokinetic profiles were constructed for the study cohort and the updated pharmacokinetic model was compared with the one that was previously published. RESULTS: A total of 80 blood samples were collected from 20 women with severe preeclampsia (45 collected before childbirth and 35 collected after childbirth). After 11.5 hours of magnesium sulfate administration, 63% of women in the cohort had serum magnesium levels of ≥2.0 mmol/L. Data from women receiving the Pritchard regimen combined with data from women previously modeled after the receipt of intravenous magnesium sulfate were adequately described using a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination from the central compartment. All structural pharmacokinetic parameters including clearance, central volume of distribution, peripheral volume of distribution, and intercompartment clearance were adjusted for maternal weight, and the clearance was further adjusted for serum creatinine level and antepartum or postpartum status. The simulated pharmacokinetic profiles of the updated pharmacokinetic model and the previously published pharmacokinetic model are similar. In previously published pharmacokinetic modeling, absorption rate constant=0.32 and absolute bioavailability=0.86. In the updated pharmacokinetic model, absorption rate constant=0.45 and absolute bioavailability=0.91. CONCLUSION: These data support the use of the Pritchard regimen as acceptable to achieve therapeutic serum magnesium levels and support the reported simulation of serum magnesium levels and eclampsia response associated with different intramuscular regimens.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Doravirine and Its Major Metabolite to Support Dose Adjustment With Rifabutin.

Doravirine, a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), is predominantly cleared by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and metabolized to an oxidative metabolite (M9). Coadministration with rifabutin, a moderate CYP3A4 inducer, decreased doravirine exposure. Based on nonparametric superposition modeling, a doravirine dose adjustment from 100 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily during rifabutin coadministration was proposed. However, M9 exposure may also be impacted by induction, in addition to the dose adjustment. As M9 concentrations have not been quantified in previous clinical studies, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to investigate the change in M9 exposure when doravirine is coadministered with CYP3A inducers. Simulations demonstrated that although CYP3A induction increases doravirine clearance by up to 4.4-fold, M9 exposure is increased by only 1.2-fold relative to exposures for doravirine 100 mg once daily in the absence of CYP3A induction. Thus, a 2.4-fold increase in M9 exposure relative to the clinical dose of doravirine is anticipated when doravirine 100 mg twice daily is coadministered with rifabutin. In a subsequent clinical trial, doravirine and M9 exposures, when doravirine 100 mg twice daily was coadministered with rifabutin, were found to be consistent with model predictions using rifampin and efavirenz as representative inducers. These findings support the dose adjustment to doravirine 100 mg twice daily when coadministered with rifabutin.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of the Novel HIV-1 Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Doravirine: An Assessment of the Effect of Patient Characteristics and Drug-Drug Interactions.

Doravirine (MK-1439) is a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the combination treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection. The recommended dose is 100 mg once daily. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics of doravirine, the influence of intrinsic factors, and its drug-drug interaction (DDI) profile. Following oral administration, doravirine is rapidly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration, 1-4 h) and undergoes cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A-mediated oxidative metabolism. Steady-state geometric means for AUC0-24, C24, and Cmax in individuals with HIV-1 following administration of doravirine 100 mg once daily are 37.8 µM·h, 930 nM, and 2260 nM, respectively. Age, gender, severe renal impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment have no clinically meaningful effect on doravirine pharmacokinetics, and there is limited potential for DDIs. No dose adjustment is necessary when doravirine is co-administered with strong CYP3A inhibitors. However, doravirine is contraindicated with strong CYP3A inducers (e.g., rifampin), and dose adjustment of doravirine is recommended for co-administration with the moderate CYP3A inducer, rifabutin. Included in this review are clinical trial data from phase I pharmacokinetic trials, including DDI trials and trials in participants with renal and hepatic disease but without HIV-1 infection (N = 326), as well as phase I, II, and III safety and efficacy trials in participants living with HIV-1 (N = 991). Based on these data, the pharmacokinetic profile of doravirine supports its use in diverse populations living with HIV-1 and allows co-administration with various antiretroviral agents and treatments for commonly occurring co-morbidities.

Exposure-response characterisation of tildrakizumab in chronic plaque psoriasis: Pooled analysis of 3 randomised controlled trials.

AIMS: In this exposure-response analysis, the dosing regimen for tildrakizumab, an antibody for treating moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, was determined using data from 3 randomised controlled trials (P05495/NCT01225731: phase 2b, n = 355; reSURFACE 1/NCT01722331: phase 3, n = 772; reSURFACE 2/NCT01729754: phase 3, n = 1090). METHODS: A maximum drug effect (Emax ) logistic-regression exposure-efficacy model was used to describe the week 12 Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses with average concentration of tildrakizumab during weeks 1-12 (Cavg12 ) as exposure metric. The impact of covariates (e.g., body weight, region) was tested. Exposure-safety, longitudinal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic and risk-benefit analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: At week 12, Emax was estimated at 62.2, 37.9 and 14.6% of responders for PASI75/90/100, respectively. Exposure-response curves plateaued at exposures >5 µg mL-1 . Heavier subjects had a lower response rate to placebo as measured by PASI75/90/100 than lighter subjects. PASI100 placebo response was less in subjects with higher baseline PASI score and older age. Simulated week 12 PASI75 increased by ≤4% on increasing the dose from 100 to 200 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W). The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model adequately described the time course of PASI change after treatment in the entire population and in each subject. Risk-benefit profiles were favourable for the 100- and 200-mg doses in different weight subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis should receive 100-mg subcutaneous tildrakizumab Q12W. Patients with high body weight (>90 kg) may benefit from a higher dose (200-mg Q12W).

Fine-Needle Aspiration for the Evaluation of Hepatic Pharmacokinetics of Vaniprevir: A Randomized Trial in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for serial hepatic sampling may be an efficient and less invasive alternative to core needle biopsy (CNB), the current standard for liver tissue sampling. In this randomized, open-label trial in 31 participants with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (NCT01678131/Merck protocol PN048), we evaluated the feasibility of using FNA to obtain human liver tissue samples appropriate for measuring hepatic pharmacokinetics (PK), using vaniprevir as a tool compound. The primary end point was successful retrieval of liver tissue specimens with measurable vaniprevir concentrations at two of three specified FNA time points. Twenty-nine patients met the primary end point and, therefore, were included in the PK analyses. Hepatic vaniprevir concentrations obtained with FNA were consistent with known vaniprevir PK properties. The shape of liver FNA and CNB concentration-time profiles were comparable. In conclusion, FNA may be effective for serial tissue sampling to assess hepatic drug exposure in patients with liver disease.

ICH M9 Guideline in Development on Biopharmaceutics Classification System-Based Biowaivers: An Industrial Perspective from the IQ Consortium.

In October 2016, the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) ICH began efforts to provide recommendations to harmonize guidances for biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS)-based biowaivers. Topics to be addressed included consideration of the dose used to classify solubility, tests, and criteria for establishing highly permeable, dissolution conditions, the influence of excipients, and aspects of product strength. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development (IQ) is a technically focused organization of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with a mission of advancing science and technology to augment the capability of member companies to develop transformational solutions that benefit patients, regulators, and the broader R&D community. Its members have substantial expertise in all scientific domains associated with BCS-based waivers and drug product quality, as well as considerable experience in the application of BCS-based biowaivers. The ICH process recognizes that harmonization is achieved through the development of guidelines via a process of scientific consensus with regulatory and industry experts working side-by-side. Thus, to facilitate these efforts and to encourage open and transparent discussion of other perspectives that may exist, IQ offers their perspective on these and related topics.

Maternal-Neonatal Raltegravir Population Pharmacokinetics Modeling: Implications for Initial Neonatal Dosing.

Raltegravir readily crosses the placenta to the fetus with maternal use during pregnancy. After birth, neonatal raltegravir elimination is highly variable and often extremely prolonged, with some neonates demonstrating rising profiles after birth despite removal from the source of extrinsic raltegravir. To establish an appropriate dosing regimen, an integrated maternal-neonatal pharmacokinetics model was built to predict raltegravir plasma concentrations in neonates with in utero raltegravir exposure. Postnatal age and body weight were used as structural covariates. The model predicted rising or decreasing neonatal elimination profiles based on the time of maternal drug administration relative to time of birth and degree of in utero drug disposition into the central and peripheral compartments. Based on this model, it is recommended to delay the first oral dose of raltegravir until 1-2 days of age in those neonates born to mothers who received raltegravir during pregnancy, labor, and delivery.

Alternative Magnesium Sulfate Dosing Regimens for Women With Preeclampsia: A Population Pharmacokinetic Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation Study.

Magnesium sulfate is the anticonvulsant of choice for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment; however, the recommended dosing regimens are costly and cumbersome and can be administered only by skilled health professionals. The objectives of this study were to develop a robust exposure-response model for the relationship between serum magnesium exposure and eclampsia using data from large studies of women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate, and to predict eclampsia probabilities for standard and alternative (shorter treatment duration and/or fewer intramuscular injections) regimens. Exposure-response modeling and simulation were applied to existing data. A total of 10 280 women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate or placebo were evaluated. An existing population pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate individual serum magnesium exposure. Logistic regression was applied to quantify the serum magnesium area under the curve-eclampsia rate relationship. Our exposure-response model-estimated eclampsia rates were comparable to observed rates. Several alternative regimens predicted magnesium peak concentration < 3.5 mmol/L (empiric safety threshold) and eclampsia rate ≤ 0.7% (observed response threshold), including 4 g intravenously plus 10 g intramuscularly followed by either 8 g intramuscularly every 6 hours × 3 doses or 10 g intramuscularly every 8 hours × 2 doses and 10 g intramuscularly every 8 hours × 3 doses. Several alternative magnesium sulfate regimens with comparable model-predicted efficacy and safety were identified that merit evaluation in confirmatory clinical trials.

Population-Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Tildrakizumab (MK-3222), an Anti-Interleukin-23-p19 Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects with Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Tildrakizumab is an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody recently approved for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This analysis characterizes the population pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous tildrakizumab and identifies covariates influencing exposure in 2098 healthy volunteers and subjects with psoriasis. Tested covariates included body weight, formulation type, sex, age, race, serum albumin, creatinine clearance, Japanese origin, prior treatment with a biologic agent, subject status (subjects with psoriasis vs. healthy volunteers), and ethnicity. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics was described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination kinetics, and inter-individual variability on clearance, volume of distribution, and absorption rate constant. The pharmacokinetics was characterized by low clearance and limited volume of distribution. In subjects with psoriasis, the geometric mean clearance (coefficient of variation) was 0.32 L/day (38%), volume of distribution was 10.8 L (24%), and absorption and elimination half-life were 1.5 days (18%) and 23.4 days (23%), respectively, with an absorption lag time of 1.2 h. For the 100-mg dose, steady-state area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve for one dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration were 305 µg*day/mL (41%) and 8.1 µg/mL (34%), respectively. Steady state was achieved by 16 weeks with the clinical regimen (dosing on week 0 and week 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter) with 1.1-fold accumulation in maximum plasma concentration. Healthy subjects had 31% higher bioavailability than subjects with psoriasis. Subjects with increased body weight had a lower area under the plasma concentration-time curve at steady state vs. those with lower body weight. The modeled exposures were contained within clinical comparability bounds for all covariates including body weight. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of tildrakizumab behaves like a typical monoclonal antibody without requiring dosage adjustment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01729754, NCT01225731, NCT01722331.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Doravirine and Exposure-Response Analysis in Individuals with HIV-1.

Doravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for doravirine using pooled data from densely sampled phase 1 trials and from sparsely sampled phase 2b and phase 3 trials evaluating doravirine administered orally as a single entity or as part of a fixed-dose combination of doravirine-lamivudine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. A one-compartment model with linear clearance from the central compartment adequately described the clinical PK of doravirine. While weight, age, and healthy versus HIV-1 status were identified as statistically significant covariates affecting doravirine PK, the magnitude of their effects was not clinically meaningful. Other intrinsic factors (gender, body mass index, race, ethnicity, and renal function) did not have statistically significant or clinically meaningful effects on doravirine PK. Individual exposure estimates for individuals in the phase 2b and 3 trials obtained from the final model were used for subsequent exposure-response analyses for virologic response (proportion of individuals achieving <50 copies/ml) and virologic failure. The exposure-response relationships between these efficacy endpoints and doravirine PK were generally flat over the range of exposures achieved for the 100 mg once-daily regimen in the phase 3 trials, with a minimal decrease in efficacy in individuals in the lowest 10th percentile of steady-state doravirine concentration at 24 h values. These findings support 100 mg once daily as the selected dose of doravirine, with no dose adjustment warranted for the studied intrinsic factors.

Pharmacokinetics of elbasvir and grazoprevir in subjects with end-stage renal disease or severe renal impairment.

PURPOSE: To describe the phase 1 and population pharmacokinetic investigations that support dosing recommendations for elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in hepatitis C virus-infected people with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS: This was an open-label, two-part, multiple-dose trial (MK-5172 PN050; NCT01937975) in 24 non-HCV-infected participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or severe renal impairment who received once-daily EBR 50 mg and GZR 100 mg for 10 days. Population pharmacokinetic analyses from the phase 3 C-SURFER study (PN052, NCT02092350) were also conducted. RESULTS: When comparing haemodialysis (HD) and non-HD days in participants with ESRD, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for EBR and GZR AUC0-24 were 1.14 (1.08-1.21) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09). When comparing ESRD and healthy participants, GMRs (90% CIs) for EBR and GZR AUC0-24 were 0.99 (0.75-1.30) and 0.83 (0.56-1.22) on HD days, and 0.86 (0.65-1.14) and 0.85 (0.58-1.25) on non-HD days. GMRs (90% CIs) for AUC0-24 in participants with severe renal impairment relative to healthy controls were 1.65 (1.09-2.49) for GZR and 1.86 (1.38-2.51) for EBR. In population modelling of data from C-SURFER, absolute geometric means of steady-state EBR AUC0-24 were 2.78 and 3.07 µM*h (HD and non-HD recipients) and GZR AUC0-24 were 1.80 and 2.34 µM*h (HD and non-HD recipients). CONCLUSIONS: EBR/GZR represents an important treatment option for HCV infection in people with severe renal impairment and those with ESRD. No dosage adjustment of EBR/GZR is required in people with any degree of renal impairment, including those receiving dialysis.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Evaluate Standard Magnesium Sulfate Treatments and Alternative Dosing Regimens for Women With Preeclampsia.

Magnesium sulfate is the standard therapy for prevention and treatment of eclampsia. Two standard dosing regimens require either continuous intravenous infusion or frequent, large-volume intramuscular injections, which may preclude patients from receiving optimal care. This project sought to identify alternative, potentially more convenient, but similarly effective dosing regimens that could be used in restrictive clinical settings. A 2-compartment population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to characterize serial PK data from 92 pregnant women with preeclampsia who received magnesium sulfate. Body weight and serum creatinine concentration had a significant impact on magnesium PK. The final PK model was used to simulate magnesium concentration profiles for the 2 standard regimens and several simplified alternative dosing regimens. The simulations suggest that intravenous regimens with loading doses of 8 g over 60 minutes followed by 2 g/h for 10 hours and 12 g over 120 minutes followed by 2 g/h for 8 hours (same total dose as the standard intravenous regimen but shorter treatment duration) would result in magnesium concentrations below the toxic range. For the intramuscular regimens, higher maintenance doses given less frequently (4 g intravenously + 10-g intramuscular loading doses with maintenance doses of 8 g every 6 hours or 10 g every 8 hours for 24 hours) or removal of the intravenous loading dose (eg, 10 g intramusculary every 8 hours for 24 hours) may be reasonable alternatives. In addition, individualized dose adjustments based on body weight and serum creatinine were proposed for the standard regimens.

Leveraging model-informed approaches for drug discovery and development in the cardiovascular space.

Cardiovascular disease remains a significant global health burden, and development of cardiovascular drugs in the current regulatory environment often demands large and expensive cardiovascular outcome trials. Thus, the use of quantitative pharmacometric approaches which can help enable early Go/No Go decision making, ensure appropriate dose selection, and increase the likelihood of successful clinical trials, have become increasingly important to help reduce the risk of failed cardiovascular outcomes studies. In addition, cardiovascular safety is an important consideration for many drug development programs, whether or not the drug is designed to treat cardiovascular disease; modeling and simulation approaches also have utility in assessing risk in this area. Herein, examples of modeling and simulation applied at various stages of drug development, spanning from the discovery stage through late-stage clinical development, for cardiovascular programs are presented. Examples of how modeling approaches have been utilized in early development programs across various therapeutic areas to help inform strategies to mitigate the risk of cardiovascular-related adverse events, such as QTc prolongation and changes in blood pressure, are also presented. These examples demonstrate how more informed drug development decisions can be enabled by modeling and simulation approaches in the cardiovascular area.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single-Dose Elbasvir in Participants with Hepatic Impairment.

BACKGROUND: The combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir is approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose elbasvir 50 mg in participants with hepatic impairment. METHODS: Participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment and age-, sex-, and weight-matched healthy controls were enrolled in a 3-part, open-label, sequential-panel, single-dose pharmacokinetic study. Blood samples were collected to assess pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants were enrolled: eight with mild hepatic impairment, 11 with moderate hepatic impairment, seven with severe hepatic impairment, and eight healthy matched controls. Participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment demonstrated a numeric, but not statistically significant, decrease in elbasvir exposure compared with controls, with a mean 39, 28, and 12% decrease in area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, as well as a 42, 31, and 42% decrease in maximum plasma concentration (C max), respectively. The observed median time to C max was similar in participants with hepatic impairment and controls. Single-dose administration of elbasvir was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of elbasvir after a single, oral 50-mg dose were not clinically meaningfully altered in non-HCV-infected participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic dysfunction. However, since elbasvir is currently available only as part of a fixed-dose combination with grazoprevir, the fixed-dose combination should not be administered to patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, due to the significantly increased plasma grazoprevir exposures in those populations.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Grazoprevir, a Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitor.

Grazoprevir (GZR) plus elbasvir is an approved treatment for chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 4. HCV infection complications include liver cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of multiple-dose GZR (200, 100, or 50 mg) in non-HCV participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (HI), respectively, and in healthy matched controls (protocol MK-5172_p013; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ). Participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI and controls (aged 18 to 65 years) matched for race, age, sex, and body mass index were enrolled in a 3-part, open-label, sequential-panel pharmacokinetic study. Participants received oral doses of GZR 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets), 100 mg (one 100-mg tablet), or 50 mg (two 25-mg tablets) once daily for 10 days. A total of 50 participants were enrolled: 8 with mild HI, 9 with moderate HI, 8 with severe HI, and a corresponding number of healthy matched controls for each hepatic cohort. Participants with HI demonstrated higher GZR exposure than healthy matched controls and showed an increase in exposure with increasing HI severity. The steady-state GZR AUC0-24 (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h) for participants with mild, moderate, or severe HI was ≈2-, ≈5-, or ≈12-fold higher, respectively, than that for healthy matched controls. GZR was generally well tolerated in participants with HI. No dose adjustment is required for GZR in people with HCV with mild HI. GZR is contraindicated for those with moderate or severe HI (Child-Pugh class B or C), since they may have significantly increased GZR exposures that may lead to an increased risk of transaminase elevation.

Raltegravir 1200 mg once daily versus raltegravir 400 mg twice daily, with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine, for previously untreated HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Once daily regimens are preferred for HIV-1 treatment, to facilitate adherence and improve quality of life. We compared a new once daily formulation of raltegravir to the currently marketed twice daily formulation. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, non-inferiority study, we enrolled participants aged 18 years or older with HIV-1 RNA of 1000 or more copies per mL and no previous antiretroviral treatment at 139 sites worldwide. We randomly assigned participants (2:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to raltegravir 1200 mg (two 600 mg tablets) orally once daily or raltegravir 400 mg (one tablet) orally twice daily, each with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine orally once daily, for up to 96 weeks. A computer-generated allocation schedule stratified randomisation by screening HIV-1 RNA value and co-infection with hepatitis B or C. Participants, sponsor personnel, investigators, and study site personnel involved in the treatment or evaluation of the participants were unaware of the treatment group assignments. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 40 copies per mL at week 48 assessed with the US Food and Drug Administration Snapshot algorithm. Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI was greater than -10%. We assessed efficacy and safety in all participants who received one dose or more of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02131233. FINDINGS: Between May 26, 2014, and Dec 5, 2014, 802 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 533 to once daily treatment and 269 to twice daily; 797 received study therapy, 531 once daily and 266 twice daily. At week 48, 472 (89%) of 531 once daily recipients and 235 (88%) of 266 twice daily recipients achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 40 copies per mL (treatment difference 0·5%, 95% CI -4·2 to 5·2). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 130 (24%) of 531 participants in the once daily group (one of which was serious; none led to treatment discontinuation) and 68 (26%) of 266 participants in the twice daily group (two of which were serious; two led to treatment discontinuation). The most common drug-related adverse events were nausea (39 [7%] vs 18 [7%]), headache (16 [3%] vs 12 [5%]), and dizziness (12 [2%] vs eight [3%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: A once daily raltegravir 1200 mg regimen was non-inferior compared with raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. These results support the use of raltegravir 1200 mg once daily for first-line therapy. FUNDING: Merck & Co, Inc.