RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the pulmonary arteries (PA) is a marker of vascular stiffening. Currently, only phase-contrast (PC) MRI-based options exist to measure PA-PWV. PURPOSE: To test feasibility, repeatability, and correlation to clinical data of Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI-based calculation of PA-PWV. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: 79 (26 female) healthy subjects (age range 19-78), 58 (24 female) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, age range 40-77), 60 (33 female) patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH, age range 28-85). SEQUENCE: 2D spoiled gradient echo, 1.5T. ASSESSMENT: PA-PWV was measured from PREFUL-derived cardiac cycles based on the determination of temporal and spatial distance between lung vasculature voxels using a simplified (sPWV) method and a more comprehensive (cPWV) method including more elaborate distance calculation. For 135 individuals, PC MRI-based PWV (PWV-QA) was measured. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to test repeatability. Nonparametric tests were used to compare cohorts. Correlation of sPWV/cPWV, PWV-QA, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1 ) %predicted, residual volume (RV) %predicted, age, and right heart catheterization (RHC) data were tested. Significance level α = 0.05 was used. RESULTS: sPWV and cPWV showed no significant differences between repeated measurements (P-range 0.10-0.92). CoV was generally lower than 15%. COPD and PH patients had significantly higher sPWV and cPWV than healthy subjects. Significant correlation was found between sPWV or cPWV and FEV1 %pred. (R = -0.36 and R = -0.44), but not with RHC (P-range -0.11 - 0.91) or age (P-range 0.23-0.89). Correlation to RV%pred. was significant for cPWV (R = 0.42) but not for sPWV (R = 0.34, P = 0.055). For all cohorts, sPWV and cPWV were significantly correlated with PWV-QA (R = -0.41 and R = 0.48). DATA CONCLUSION: PREFUL-derived PWV is feasible and repeatable. PWV is increased in COPD and PH patients and correlates to airway obstruction and hyperinflation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-contrast-enhanced 1 H magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with full lung coverage shows promise for assessment of regional lung ventilation but a comparison with direct ventilation measurement using 19 F MRI is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare ventilation parameters calculated using 3D phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI with 19 F MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Fifteen patients with asthma, 14 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease, and 13 healthy volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3D gradient-echo pulse sequence with golden-angle increment and stack-of-stars encoding at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT: All participants underwent 3D PREFUL MRI and 19 F MRI. For 3D PREFUL, static regional ventilation (RVent) and dynamic flow-volume cross-correlation metric (FVL-CM) were calculated. For both parameters, ventilation defect percentage (VDP) values and ventilation defect (VD) maps (including a combination of both parameters [VDPCombined ]) were determined. For 19 F MRI, images from eight consecutive breaths under volume-controlled inhalation of perfluoropropane were acquired. Time-to-fill (TTF) and wash-in (WI) parameters were extracted. For all 19 F parameters, a VD map was generated and the corresponding VDP values were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: For all parameters, the relationship between the two techniques was assessed using a Spearman correlation (r). Differences between VDP values were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. For regional comparison of VD maps, spatial overlap and Sørensen-Dice coefficients were computed. RESULTS: 3D PREFUL VDP values were significantly correlated to VDP measures by 19 F (r range: 0.59-0.70). For VDPRVent , no significant bias was observed with VDP of the third and fourth breath (bias range = -6.8:7.7%, P range = 0.25:0.30). For VDPFVL-CM , no significant bias was found with VDP values of fourth-eighth breaths (bias range = -2.0:12.5%, P range = 0.12:0.75). The overall spatial overlap of all VD maps increased with each breath, ranging from 61% to 81%, stabilizing at the fourth breath. DATA CONCLUSION: 3D PREFUL MRI parameters showed moderate to strong correlation with 19 F MRI. Depending on the 3D PREFUL VD map, the best regional agreement was found to 19 F VD maps of third-fifth breath. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influences of gadolinium-based contrast agents, field-strength and different sequences on perfusion quantification in Phase-Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four cohorts of different subjects were imaged to analyze influences on the quantified perfusion maps: 1) at baseline and after 2 weeks to obtain the reproducibility (26 COPD patients), 2) before and after the administration of gadobutrol (11 COPD, 2 PAH and 1 asthma), 3) at 1.5T and 3T (12 healthy, 4 CF), and 4) with different acquisition sequences spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) (11 COPD, 7 healthy). Wilcoxon-signed rank test, Bland-Altman plots, voxelwise Pearson correlations, normalized histogram analyses with skewness and kurtosis and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In all cohorts, linear correlations of the perfusion values were significant with correlation coefficients of at least 0.7 considering the entire lung (P<0.01). The reproducibility cohort revealed stable results with a similar distribution. In the gadolinium cohort, the quantified perfusion increased significantly (P<0.01), and no significant change was detected in the histogram analysis. In the field-strength cohort, no significant change of the quantified perfusion was shown, but a significant increase of skewness and kurtosis at 3T (P = 0.01). In the sequence cohort, the quantified perfusion decreased significantly in the bSSFP sequence (P<0.01) together with a significant decrease of skewness and kurtosis (P = 0.02). The field-strength and sequence cohorts had differing probability distribution in the two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. CONCLUSION: We observed a high susceptibility of perfusion quantification to gadolinium, field-strength or MRI sequence leading to distortion and deviation of the perfusion values. Future multicenter studies should strictly adhere to the identical study protocols to generate comparable results.
