Forces Exerted in Craniofacial Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for quantifying linear forces of distraction osteogenesis, and thereafter apply this methodology to measure and compare distraction force magnitudes between cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (CVDO) and mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). METHODS: Patients undergoing CVDO or MDO as inpatients had distraction forces acquired with a digital torque-measuring screwdriver. Torque measurements were then converted into linear distraction force values, which were then compared across distraction types and protocols with appropriate statistics. RESULTS: CVDO was performed on 7 patients (41.2%), and MDO was performed on 10 patients (58.8%). Across the entire cohort, the average maximum force per activation was 27.0 N, and the average elastic force was 10.7 N. Maximum force (CVDO: 52.9 N versus MDO: 12.9 N; P < 0.001) and elastic force (CVDO: 22.0 N versus MDO: 4.5 N; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients undergoing CVDO than MDO. Multivariate regression demonstrated that maximum activation force was significantly associated with sequential days of distraction (B= + 1.1 N/day; P < 0.001), distraction rate (B= + 8.9 N/mm/day; P = 0.016), distractor hardware failure (B= + 10.3 N if failure; P = 0.004), and distraction type (B= + 41.4 N if CVDO; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cranial vault distraction requires significantly more linear distraction force than mandibular distraction. Maximum forces increase with each day of distraction, as well as with increased distraction rates. Linear distraction force methodology from this study may provide the foundation for future development of optimized procedure-specific or patient-specific distraction protocols.

Long Term Speech Outcomes Following Midface Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Midface advancement by distraction osteogenesis (DO) is commonly performed in patients with craniosynostosis for indications including midface hypoplasia, exorbitism, obstructive sleep apnea, class III malocclusion, and overall aesthetic facial deficiency. There is evidence to suggest that maxillary LeFort I advancement increases the risk of velopharyngeal dysfunction in the cleft palate population, yet few studies have investigated changes in speech following LeFort III or monobloc midface advancement in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of midface DO on speech as indicated by the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score in patients with Apert, Crouzon, and Pfeiffer Syndrome. Among 73 midface advancement cases performed during the study period, 19 cases met inclusion criteria. Overall, the highest post-advancement Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score (PWSS) was significantly higher than the pre-advancement PWSS (0.52 versus 2.42, P = 0.01), indicating an acute worsening of VPI post-advancement. Specifically, the PWSS components nasal emission and nasality were significantly higher post-advancement than pre-advancement (nasal emission: 1.16 versus 0.21, P = 0.02) (nasality: 0.68 versus 0.05, P = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between pre-advancement PWSS and the latest post-advancement PWSS (P = 0.31). Midface distraction is associated with an acute worsening of VPI post-operatively that is followed by improvement, and often resolution over time. Future work with additional patient accrual is needed to determine the effect of different advancement procedures and syndromes on VPI rates and profundity.

A Craniometric Analysis of the Posterior Cranial Base After Posterior Vault Distraction.

BACKGROUND: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) has been demonstrated to effectively increase intracranial volume, treat increased intracranial pressure, and improve head shape in syndromic patients. The purpose of this study is to compare changes along the posterior cranial base before and after distraction. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed of subjects who underwent PVDO with computed tomography scans at 2 time-points: within 3 months preoperatively and 1 to 6 months postoperatively. Using Mimics software, craniometric landmarks were identified and surface area of the foramen magnum was calculated. A comparison of pre- to postoperative measurements was completed using Wilcoxon matched-paired signed rank tests and linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 65 PVDO subjects were identified, 12 subjects met inclusion criteria. Mean operative age was 3.0 ±â€Š4.0 years. The cranial vault was distracted on average 25.0 ±â€Š6.0 mm, with those < 12 months of age distracted 29.5 ±â€Š4.9 mm and >12 months of age distracted 22.0 ±â€Š4.9 mm (P = 0.0543). There was a significant increase in pre- to postoperative foramen magnum surface area (52.1 ±â€Š63.2 mm, P = 0.002), length (0.9 ±â€Š1.4 mm, P = 0.050), and width (0.6 ±â€Š1.0 mm, P = 0.050). Similarly, linear distances between nasion and posterior cranial base landmarks such as foramen magnum (3.4 ±â€Š4.2 mm, P = 0.010), and occipital protuberance (9.1 ±â€Š9.6 mm, P = 0.003) were increased. Subjects under 12 months had a greater percentage increases in posterior vault length than those over 12 months. CONCLUSION: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis is associated with an increase in size of the foramen magnum, and lengthening of the posterior cranial base, both of which may be beneficial in patients with turribrachycephaly.

Quality of Life in Adults with Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have analyzed quality of life in children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, to date nobody has investigated long-term quality of life in adults with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life in adult nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients with a cohort of unaffected controls. METHODS: The authors queried their institution's prospectively maintained craniofacial registry for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients aged 18 years and older, and administered the validated World Health Organization Quality of Life Biomedical Research and Education Foundation questionnaire. Responses were compared, using a two-sample t test, to an age-matched U.S. normative database provided by the World Health Organization. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one adults met inclusion criteria: 52 were successfully contacted and 32 completed the questionnaire. Average age of respondents was 23.0 ± 6.1 years (range, 18.1 to 42.1 years). Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients had a superior quality of life compared with comparative norms in all domains: physical health (17.8 ± 2.7 versus 15.5 ± 3.2; p < 0.001), psychological (16.3 ± 2.9 versus 13.8 ± 3.2; p < 0.001), social (16.9 ± 2.6 versus 13.2 ± 3.6; p < 0.001), and environmental (17.2 ± 2.5 versus 11.7 ± 2.7; p < 0.001). Comparison between single-suture subtypes revealed no difference in any quality-of-life domain (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients previously treated for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis perceive their quality of life to be high, superior to that of a normative U.S. SAMPLE: Future work will seek to analyze additional patients and better understand the reasons behind these findings.

Craniometric Analysis of Frontal Cranial Morphology Following Posterior Vault Distraction.

BACKGROUND: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) is believed to improve frontal contour in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis and turribrachycephaly. This study provides an objective craniometric analysis to determine how PVDO affects anterior cranial morphology. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent PVDO was performed. Inclusion criteria included pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans within 3 months before surgery and another 1 to 6 months after device removal. Volumetric and craniometric data were derived using Mimics software and compared using paired t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: About 65 patients underwent PVDO, and 13 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at intervention was 3.4 ±â€Š4.2 years. Total cranial volume increased 249 ±â€Š159 cm in all patients (P = 0.0001) and 380 ±â€Š128 cm in patients younger than 1 year of age (n = 6, P =0 .0008). Supraorbital retrusion decreased from 5.44 ±â€Š3.89 to 4.54 ±â€Š3.91 mm postoperatively (P = 0.0004), decreasing significantly in patients without previous frontal surgery and not in those with previous frontal surgery (P = 0.2115; comparison P = 0.0047). Basofrontal angle decreased by 2.92 ±â€Š2.16 degrees (P = 0.0004) with a greater decrease of 3.33±2.68 degrees in those younger than 12 months (P = 0.0289) and 2.58±1.74 degrees in those older (P = 0.0079). No change was found in anterior cranial height and anterofrontal angle (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PVDO improves frontal contour by decreasing supraorbital retrusion and reducing frontal bossing in syndromic craniosynostosis patients with turribrachycephaly. When combined with its demonstrated efficacy for cranial expansion, these frontal changes likely reinforce PVDO's ability to influence the timing of, and to a degree, the need for frontal surgery in this group.

5000 Free Flaps and Counting: A 10-Year Review of a Single Academic Institution's Microsurgical Development and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The establishment of an effective clinical and academic culture within an institution is a multifactorial process. This process is cultivated by dynamic elements such as recruitment of an accomplished and diverse faculty, patient geographic outreach, clinical outcomes research, and fundamental support from all levels of an institution. This study reviews the academic evolution of a single academic plastic surgery practice, and summarizes a 10-year experience of microsurgical development, clinical outcomes, and academic productivity. METHODS: A 10-year retrospective institutional review was performed from fiscal years 2006 to 2016. Microsurgical flap type and operative volume were measured across all microsurgery faculty and participating hospitals. Microvascular compromise and flap salvage rates were noted for the six highest volume surgeons. Univariate and multivariable predictors of flap salvage were determined. RESULTS: The 5000th flap was performed in December of 2015 within this institutional study period. Looking at the six highest volume surgeons, free flaps were examined for microvascular compromise, with an institutional mean take-back rate of 1.53 percent and flap loss rate of 0.55 percent across all participating hospitals. Overall, 74.4 percent of cases were breast flaps, and the remaining cases were extremity and head and neck flaps. CONCLUSIONS: Focused faculty and trainee recruitment has resulted in an academically and clinically productive practice. Collaboration among faculty, staff, and residents contributes to continual learning, innovation, and quality patient care. This established framework, constructed based on experience, offers a workable and reproducible model for other academic plastic surgery institutions. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Nonsyndromic Patients: An Evaluation of Indications and Safety.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications, safety, and short-term outcomes of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) in patients with no identified acrocephalosyndactyly syndrome (study) and to compare those to a syndromic cohort (controls). METHODS: Demographic and perioperative data were recorded and compared across the study and control groups for those who underwent PVDO between January 2009 and December 2016. Univariate analysis was conducted using χ and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Sixty-three subjects were included: 19 in the nonsyndromic cohort, 44 in the syndromic cohort. The cohorts had similar proportion of subjects exhibiting pansynostosis (42.1% of nonsyndromic versus 36.4% of syndromic, P = 0.667). The nonsyndromic cohort was significantly older (4.04 ±â€Š3.66 years versus 2.55 ±â€Š3.34 years, P = 0.046) and had higher rate of signs of raised intracranial pressure (68.4% versus 25.0%, P = 0.001) than the syndromic cohort. There was no significant difference in perioperative variables or rate of complications (P > 0.05). The mean total advancement distance achieved was similar, 27 ±â€Š6 mm in the nonsyndromic versus 28 ±â€Š8 mm in the syndromic cohort (P = 0.964). All nonsyndromic subjects with signs of raised intracranial pressure demonstrated improvement at an average follow-up of 22 months. CONCLUSION: As in the syndromic patient, PVDO is a safe and, in the short-term, effective modality for cranial vault expansion in the nonsyndromic patient. The benefits and favorable perioperative profile of PVDO may therefore be extended to patient populations other than those with syndromic craniosynostosis.

Spring-Mediated Cranioplasty in Sagittal Synostosis: Does Age at Placement Affect Expansion?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of timing of surgery and spring characteristics on correction of scaphocephalic deformity in patients undergoing spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) for sagittal craniosynostosis. METHODS: The authors conducted a review of patients with sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent SMC at a tertiary referral center between July 2011 and March 2017, with a primary outcome measure of head shape, both preoperatively and postoperatively, determined by cephalic index (CI). Patient demographics and operative details including timing of surgery and spring characteristics were collected. Differences in CI preoperation and postoperation were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Ordinary least-squares linear regression was used to assess the impact of timing, number of springs, maximum single spring force, and total spring force on postoperative change in CI. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects (12 males and 24 females) were included in the study. Mean age at spring placement was 3.9 months (range: 1.9-9.2) with a mean follow-up of 1.4 years (range: 0.3-5.2). The mean number of springs used was 3 (range: 2-4). The mean maximum single spring force was 9.9 Newtons (N) (range: 6.9-13.0) and the mean total spring force was 24.6 N (range: 12.7-37.0). Mean CI increased from 70 ±â€Š0.9 preoperatively to 77 ±â€Š1.0 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Age at spring placement was significantly associated with change in CI: for every month increase in age, the change in CI decreased by 1.3 (P = 0.03). The number of springs used, greatest single spring force, and total spring force did not correlate with changes in CI (P = 0.85, P = 0.42, and P = 0.84, respectively). CONCLUSION: In SMC, earlier age at time of surgery appears to correlate with greater improvement in CI, at least in the short-term. While spring characteristics did not appear to affect head shape, it is possible that the authors were underpowered to detect a difference, and spring-related variables likely deserve additional study.

Cleft-Palate Repair: Does Hospital Case-Volume Impact Outcomes or Cost?

BACKGROUND: How hospital case-volume affects operative outcomes and cost continues to grow in importance. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of case volume with operative outcomes and cost in cleft palate repair. METHODS: Subjects undergoing cleft palate repair between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System. Outcomes were compared between two groups: those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution, and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution. Primary outcomes were as follows: any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost. RESULTS: Over 20,000 patients (n = 20,320) from 49 institutions met inclusion criteria. On univariate analysis, those subjects who underwent treatment at a high-volume institution had a lower rate of overall complications (3.4 percent versus 5.1 percent; p < 0.001), and lower rates of prolonged length of stay (4.5 percent versus 5.8 percent; p < 0.001) and increased total cost (48.6 percent versus 50.9 percent; p = 0.002). In multivariate regression analyses, subjects treated in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complication (OR, 0.678; p < 0.001) and were less likely to have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.82; p = 0.005). Subjects undergoing palate repair at a high-volume institution were no less likely to incur increased total cost (OR, 1.01; p = 0.805). CONCLUSION: In institutions performing a high volume of cleft palate repairs, subjects had significantly decreased odds of experiencing a complication or prolonged length of stay. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

More Than Meets the Eye: The Effect of Intercanthal Distance on Perception of Beauty and Personality.

In judging normalcy, surgeons rely on established facial anthropometric measures and proportions. However, there exists a range of "normal," and a degree of disproportion may be considered more attractive. The authors set out to determine how changes in only intercanthal distance affect the layperson's perception of beauty and personality traits of a face. The authors used Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing tool, to determine how changes in intercanthal distance affect overall perception of beauty and personality. MTurk respondents provided demographic information and were asked to survey 16 female subjects, each digitally edited to be hypoteloric or hyperteloric. Data were collected from 490 MTurk crowd raters. Paired t test analysis found that respondents perceived subjects to be more submissive, friendly, and attractive with increased intercanthal distance (P < 0.05). Women respondents were less likely to perceive change in regards to how unthreatening and how intelligent the subject appeared upon intercanthal widening (P < 0.05). Compared with Caucasian respondents, minorities (Asian- and African-American) were more likely to perceive difference in submissiveness, threat, intelligence, and attractiveness with increased intercanthal distance (P < 0.05). All respondents >46 years of age were less likely to perceive a change in any of the 7 traits upon intercanthal widening, compared with respondents between 18 and 25 years of age (P < 0.05). The layperson perceives significant increases in a female subject's submissivness, friendliness, and attractiveness with an intercanthal distance increase of 10% from normal. Surgeons should be aware of this when correcting hypertelorism, given the potential positive impact of a slightly increased intercanthal distance on perceived beauty and personality.

Orthognathic Surgery Has a Significant Effect on Perceived Personality Traits and Emotional Expressions.

BACKGROUND: The effects of orthognathic surgery go beyond objective cephalometric correction of facial and dental disproportion and malocclusion, respectively. The authors hypothesized that there is tangible improvement following surgery that alters publicly perceived personality traits and emotions. METHODS: The authors used Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing tool, to determine how preoperative and postoperative images of orthognathic surgery patients were perceived on six personality traits and six emotional expressions based on posteroanterior and lateral photographs. Blinded respondents provided demographic information and were randomly assigned to one of two sets of 20 photographs (10 subjects before and after surgery). RESULTS: Data on 20 orthognathic surgery patients were collected from 476 individuals. The majority of participants were female (52.6 percent), 18 to 39 years old (67.9 percent), Caucasian (76.6 percent), had some college or technical training or graduated college (72.7 percent), and had an annual income between $20,000 and $99,999 (74.6 percent). A paired t test analysis found that subjects were perceived significantly more favorably after orthognathic surgery in 12 countenance categories: more dominant, trustworthy, friendly, intelligent, attractive, and happy; and also less threatening, angry, surprised, sad, afraid, and disgusted (p < 0.05). Raters with the highest annual income perceived a greater magnitude of dominance after surgery than those earning less (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant improvement in the countenance of patients after orthognathic surgery, with both perceived personality traits and emotions deemed more favorable. Additional work is needed to better understand the physiologic underpinnings of such findings. Crowdsourcing technology offers a unique opportunity for surgeons to gather data regarding laypeople's perceptions of surgical outcomes in areas such as orthognathic surgery.

Craniosynostosis Surgery: Does Hospital Case Volume Impact Outcomes or Cost?

BACKGROUND: The relationships between hospital/surgeon characteristics and operative outcomes and cost are being scrutinized increasingly. In patients with craniosynostosis specifically, the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes has yet to be characterized. METHODS: Subjects undergoing craniosynostosis surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System. Outcomes were compared between two exposure groups, those undergoing treatment at a high-volume institution (>40 cases per year), and those undergoing treatment at a low-volume institution (40 cases per year). Primary outcomes were any complication, prolonged length of stay, and increased total cost. RESULTS: Over 13,000 patients (n = 13,112) from 49 institutions met inclusion criteria. In multivariate regression analyses, subjects treated in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complication (OR, 0.764; p < 0.001), were less likely to have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.624; p < 0.001), and were less likely to have increased total cost (OR, 0.596; p < 0.001). Subjects undergoing strip craniectomy in high-volume centers were also less likely to have any complication (OR, 0.708; p = 0.018) or increased total cost (OR, 0.51; p < 0.001). Subjects undergoing midvault reconstruction in high-volume centers were less likely to experience any complications (OR, 0.696; p = 0.002), have an extended length of stay (OR, 0.542; p < 0.001), or have increased total cost (OR, 0.495; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In hospitals performing a high volume of craniosynostosis surgery, subjects had significantly decreased odds of experiencing a complication, prolonged length of stay, or increased total cost compared with those undergoing treatment in low-volume institutions. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A Volumetric and Craniometric Analysis of Cranial Base Differences in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesized that patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) have deviation of the vault, cranial base, and face resulting in significant differences in skull base morphology and segmental cranial vault volume relative to nonaffected controls. METHODS: Unicoronal craniosynostosis patients were collected from the authors' IRB-approved, prospective, craniofacial registry; controls were from a trauma registry. Mimics software was used to compare those with UCS to controls for a series of standardized craniometric angles and distances. A segmented volumetric analysis of anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae was performed, as well. RESULTS: The study included 18 patients with UCS and 19 controls. Nearly all angles measured were statistically different in UCS versus controls. Overall cranial vault volume did not differ between UCS and controls (P = 0.250). Three volumetric ratios comparing the synostosed side to the contralateral were significantly less than controls: anterior (0.44 ±â€Š0.03 versus 0.5 ±â€Š0.01, P < 0.001), middle (0.45 ±â€Š0.02 versus 0.5 ±â€Š0.02, P < 0.001), posterior (0.46 ±â€Š0.02 versus 0.50 ±â€Š0.02, P < 0.001). The ratio of total middle volume to total cranial volume was larger in UCS patients versus controls, but the posterior ratio was smaller: anterior (0.13 ±â€Š0.02 versus 0.12 ±â€Š0.02, P = 0.545), middle (0.50 ±â€Š0.05 versus 0.42 ±â€Š0.04, P = 0.001), posterior (0.37 ±â€Š0.05 versus 0.45 ±â€Š0.03, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides quantitative evidence of the degree of angulation and torsion of the cranial base in UCS and its profound effect on volumetric differences in the cranial vault, with significant restriction on the synostosed side and compensatory expansion on the nonsynostosed side. Future work will focus on the effects of volumetric differences on cerebral architecture and postoperative volumetric changes.

Nasal Root Deviation in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: A Craniometric Analysis of Early and Late Postoperative Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Current operative techniques for correcting unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) leave the nasal bones untouched, resulting in an unclear long-term impact on nasal root deviation. The purpose of this study is to quantify nasal root deviation in the preoperative and late postoperative setting in patients who have undergone conventional single-staged UCS correction. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective, craniometric analysis of nasal root deviation comparing preoperative computed tomography scans, with those of the early, and late postoperative period. Three vectors were analyzed to measure nasal root deviation, one extending from the nasion to the rhinion (nasal bone vector), the second from the rhinion to the anterior nasal spine (nasal aperture vector), and the third from the nasion to the anterior nasal spine (nasal longitudinal vector). RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects were included in the study. Average ages at the time of preoperative, early, and late postoperative imaging were 0.6 ±â€Š0.3, 0.9 ±â€Š0.6, and 9.3 ±â€Š2.7 years, respectively. Improvement of angular deviation of both the nasal aperture vector and nasal longitudinal vector was observed. Mean angular deviation of the nasal aperture vector was 6.0 ±â€Š1.9 degrees preoperatively, 6.0 ±â€Š2.1 degrees early postoperatively (P = 0.952), and 2.4 ±â€Š2.1 in the late postoperative period (P = 0.013). Mean angular deviation of the nasal longitudinal vector was 5.7+2.0 degrees preoperatively, 5.8 ±â€Š2.3 degrees early postoperatively (P = 0.948), and 3.7 ±â€Š1.6 degrees in the late postoperative period (P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Nasal root deviation decreased significantly only in the late postoperative period, lending credence to the notion that though UCS correction does not directly address nasal root deviation, this pathology improves significantly over time.

The Whitaker Classification of Craniosynostosis Outcomes: An Assessment of Interrater Reliability.

BACKGROUND: The Whitaker classification is a simple and widely used system for describing aesthetic outcomes after craniosynostosis surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate its interrater reliability for patients who have undergone fronto-orbital surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with craniosynostosis who underwent surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center was conducted. Inclusion criteria were as follows: single-suture craniosynostosis, surgical intervention before age 2 years, and photographs taken before revisions between 5 and 20 years of age. Thirteen craniofacial surgeons independently reviewed the subjects' photographs and assigned Whitaker classifications. Interrater reliability was assessed with the Cohen kappa statistic. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects were included. Average ages at surgery and at the time of postoperative photography were 0.8 year and 12.8 years, respectively. The κ value for all 13 raters was 0.1567 (p < 0.0001), indicating "slight agreement." Pairwise comparisons demonstrated κ values ranging from 0.0384 to 0.5492. The average rating for the set of 29 photographs differed significantly across the 13 raters (p = 0.0020) and ranged from 1.79 ± 0.68 to 2.79 ± 0.77. Finally, we found that average Whitaker classification did not differ significantly between subjects who subsequently underwent cranioplasty and/or fronto-orbital advancement and those who did not (subsequent procedures, 2.45 ± 0.55; no subsequent procedures, 1.88 ± 0.78; p = 0.1087). CONCLUSIONS: The Whitaker classification exhibits low interrater reliability and does not predict future treatment. It may benefit craniofacial surgeons to create new evaluation tools with greater precision, to improve the quality of patient care and craniofacial outcomes research.

Assessing Risk Factors for Hospital-Based, Acute Care Within Thirty Days of Craniosynostosis Surgery Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project.

While in-hospital outcomes and long-term results of craniosynostosis surgery have been described, no large studies have reported on postoperative readmission and emergency department (ED) visits. The authors conducted this study to describe the incidence, associated diagnoses, and risk factors for these encounters within 30 days of craniosynostosis surgery.Using 4 state-level databases, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients <3 years of age who underwent surgery for craniosynostosis. The primary outcome was any hospital based, acute care (HBAC; ED visit or hospital readmission) within 30 days of discharge. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with this outcome.The final sample included 1120 patients. On average, patients were ages 4.6 months with the majority being male (67.3%) and having Medicaid (52%) or private (48.0%) insurance. Ninety-nine patients (8.8%) had at least 1 HBAC encounter within 30 days and 13 patients (1.2%) had 2 or more. The majority of encounters were managed in the ED without hospital admission (56.6%). In univariate analysis, age, race, insurance status, and initial length of stay significantly differed between the HBAC and non-HBAC groups. In multivariate analysis, only African-American race (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.98 [1.49-23.94]) and Hispanic ethnicity (AOR = 5.31 [1.88-14.97]) were associated with more frequent HBAC encounters.Nearly 10% of patients with craniosynostosis require HBAC postoperatively with ED visits accounting for the majority of these encounters. Race is independently associated with HBAC, the cause of which is unknown and will be the focus of future research.

Perioperative complications associated with intracranial procedures in patients with nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis.

Within the diagnosis "craniosynostosis," there is a subset of patients who present with isolated, nonsyndromic, single-suture involvement. This study evaluates perioperative complications in this specific subset of patients over 4 decades at a single institution. To do so, we performed a retrospective review on consecutive patients undergoing correction of single-suture synostosis from May 1977 to January 2013 at a tertiary pediatric craniofacial center. Demographic information, operative details, and perioperative course were collected. Complications were categorized as either major or minor. A χ(2) test and Fisher exact test were used to compare all categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests.Seven hundred forty-six patients underwent surgical correction of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Of these, there were 307 (41.2%) sagittal, 201 (26.9%) metopic, and 238 (31.9%) unicoronal. Thirty-four patients had complications (4.6%). Eight were considered major (1.1%), including one postoperative mortality in a patient with hypoplastic left-sided heart syndrome. Minor complications occurred in 26 patients (3.5%) and included subgaleal hematoma (n = 3), seroma (n = 4), and superficial wound infection (n = 5). Metopic and sagittal suture involvement was significantly associated with a higher complication rate (P = 0.04). A child with isolated single suture synostosis and any comorbidity had a significantly greater risk of any complication (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.8) and specifically an increased risk of major complication (P = 0.031; odds ratio, 6.0). Subclassification of patients by time period yielded no statistically significant changes in perioperative morbidity. To conclude, these data allow us to counsel families more accurately with regard to morbidity and mortality and may potentially serve as a benchmark for future quality improvement work.

Do Prior Abdominal Surgeries Increase Complications in Abdominally Based Breast Reconstructions?

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients presenting for autologous breast reconstruction have a history of prior abdominal surgeries such as obstetric, gynecologic, or general surgical procedures. The impact of prior abdominal wall violation on the ability to perform free tissue transfer from the abdomen needs to be explored and characterized. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of prior abdominal surgery on perfusion-related complications and donor-site morbidity in free tissue abdominal transfer. METHODS: All patients who underwent abdominally based free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2011 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were included. In addition to collecting data on standard patient past medical histories, comorbidities, and case characteristics, we also noted specific types of prior abdominal surgeries, number of prior surgeries, and if the rectus sheath was violated. Outcomes assessed included thrombotic complications, flap loss, major surgical complications, minor surgical complications, delayed wound healing, and subsequent hernia formation. RESULTS: Eight hundred twelve patients underwent 1257 free flap breast reconstructions during the study period. Four hundred seventeen (51.4%) women had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The most common prior abdominal surgeries included total abdominal hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (35.7%), cesarean delivery (33.8%), and appendectomy (12.7%). No significant differences were noted in the number of major intraoperative complications (P = 0.68), total thrombotic events (P = 0.339), or flap losses (P = 0.53). Patients who had undergone prior rectus sheath violation were found to experience a greater amount of delayed healing of the donor site (22.7% vs 16.5%, P = 0.03). Additionally, a higher rate of postoperative hernia formation was noted in patients who had undergone prior hernia repairs (13.6% vs 3.3%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of patients presenting for breast reconstruction have had prior abdominal surgeries. This study demonstrates that these prior procedures represent an acceptable level of risk; although this issue should still be addressed during preoperative patient counseling. In patients with prior hernia repairs, however, additional care should be given to the fascial closure as these patients may be at higher risk for subsequent hernia formation after abdominally based breast reconstruction.

Outcomes and Cost Analysis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction and Gynecologic Procedures.

BACKGROUND: For patients with BRCA mutations, a simultaneous procedure that combines risk-reducing operation of the ovaries with mastectomy and breast reconstruction is an attractive option. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and associated cost of performing simultaneous mastectomy, free flap breast reconstruction (FFR), and gynecologic procedure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent bilateral FFR from 2005 to 2012. Four hundred twenty-two patients were identified who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction without a simultaneous gynecologic procedure. Forty-two patients were identified who underwent simultaneous FFR and gynecologic procedure. Clinical outcomes, medical and surgical complications, and hospital costs were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 928 free flaps were performed on 464 patients. Forty-two patients had a simultaneous gynecologic procedure at the time of breast reconstruction. Twenty-three (54.8%) patients within the study group underwent simultaneous bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (BSO), whereas the other 19 (45.2%) underwent both total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO. Eighty-four free flaps were performed in this cohort (n = 48 muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, n = 28 deep inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 superficial inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 transverse upper gracilis). Mean operative time was 573 minutes. Mean hospitalization was 5.3 days. Postoperatively, 4 patients experienced an anastomotic thrombosis; 2 patients had an arterial thrombosis and 2 patients had a venous thrombosis. There were 2 flap failures, 2 patients with mastectomy skin flap necrosis, 11 patients who developed breast wound healing complications, and 6 patients who developed abdominal wound healing complications. Surgical and medical complication rates did not differ significantly between those who had simultaneous procedures, and those who did not. There was a statistically significant difference in the average total cost when comparing the group of patients receiving prophylactic mastectomy/FFR/total abdominal hysterectomy and/or BSO versus the patients who did not have combined gynecologic procedures at the time of reconstruction ($22,994.52 vs $21,029.23, P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: For the high-risk breast cancer patient, a combined mastectomy, free flap reconstruction, and gynecologic procedure represents an attractive and safe option.