Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective technique for the prevention and management of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) among amputees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptomatic neuroma recurrence and neuropathic pain outcomes between cohorts undergoing TMR at the time of amputation (ie, acute) versus TMR following symptomatic neuroma formation (ie, delayed). METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review was conducted using patients undergoing TMR between 2015 and 2020. Symptomatic neuroma recurrence and surgical complications were collected. A subanalysis was conducted for patients who completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, interference, and behavior scales and an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) form. RESULTS: A total of 105 limbs from 103 patients were identified, with 73 acute TMR limbs and 32 delayed TMR limbs. Nineteen percent of the delayed TMR group had symptomatic neuromas recur in the distribution of original TMR compared with 1% of the acute TMR group ( P < 0.05). Pain surveys were completed at final follow-up by 85% of patients in the acute TMR group and 69% of patients in the delayed TMR group. Of this subanalysis, acute TMR patients reported significantly lower PLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05), RLP PROMIS pain intensity ( P < 0.05), and RLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05) scores in comparison to the delayed group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent acute TMR reported improved pain scores and a decreased rate of neuroma formation compared with TMR performed in a delayed fashion. These results highlight the promising role of TMR in the prevention of neuropathic pain and neuroma formation at the time of amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A National Survey of Perspectives of Physician Assistants in Academic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

Physician assistants (PAs) are an essential part of the healthcare team who improve access and efficiencies in patient care. A better understanding of the impact and current utilization of PAs in plastic and reconstructive surgery is needed. The purpose of this national survey was to evaluate the role and scope of practice of PAs in academic plastic surgery, as well as characterize current trends of PA utilization, compensation, and perceived value from a PA perspective. Methods: A voluntary, anonymous 50-question survey was distributed via SurveyMonkey to practicing PAs at 98 academic plastic surgery programs. The survey included questions about employment characteristics, involvement in clinical research and academic work, structural organization, academic benefits, compensation, and position held. Results: Ninety-one PAs from 35 plastic surgery programs completed the survey and were included (overall program response rate = 36.8%, participants response rate = 30.4%). Practice environments included outpatient clinics, the operating room, and inpatient care. Most commonly, respondents supported multiple surgeons as opposed to one surgeon's practice. For 57% of respondents, compensation is based on a tiered system that accounts for specialty and experience. The reported mode base salary range corroborates national averages and most reported annual bonuses based on merit. The majority of respondents felt valued in their role. Conclusions: Through this national survey, we provide granularity as to how PAs are utilized and compensated in academic plastic surgery. We offer insight into the overall perceived value from a PA perspective that helps define the role and will ultimately help strengthen collaboration.

Multiple Concurrent Decompressions for the Treatment of Upper Extremity Pain.

Purpose: Neuropathic pain can be life altering and difficult to treat. Nerves can be compressed along their path in the upper extremities, resulting in chronic neuropathic pain. This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of multiple concomitant distal nerve decompressions for the treatment of upper extremity nerve pain. Methods: A retrospective review of patients from a single surgeon's academic practice was performed to identify those undergoing nerve decompressions for an indication of "pain" as the referring diagnosis between April 2020 and June 2021. The primary outcomes included patient-reported severity of pain using the Visual Analog Scale and quality-of-life measures, including level of frustration, depression, and impact on quality of life attributable to pain on a similar 0-10 Likert scale. Complications, if any, were also determined. Results: Eleven patients were identified to have undergone multiple concurrent nerve decompressions for the indication of upper extremity pain. All sites chosen for decompression were found to be provocative, ie, elicited increased pain on examination with compression. The median number of decompressions performed was 5 (interquartile range, 4-6), ranging from 3 to 7. The mean follow-up time was 5 months (SD, 3.43 months). The average pain over the last month and the average pain over the past week had significant improvement at the final follow-up, and there was a statistically significant decrease in the patient-reported mean impact of pain on quality of life following decompressions (preoperative, 5.8; postoperative, 3.6; P = .017; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-4.3). No complications were identified. Conclusions: Performing multiple concomitant nerve decompressions of the upper extremities is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain following upper extremity trauma. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Promoting Nerve Regeneration: Electrical Stimulation, Gene Therapy, and Beyond.

Peripheral nerve injuries often result in life-altering functional deficits even with optimal management. Unlike the central nervous system, peripheral nerves have the ability to regenerate lost axons after injury; however, axonal regeneration does not equate to full restoration of function. To overcome this physiological shortcoming, advances in nerve regeneration and repair are paramount, including electrical stimulation, gene therapy, and surgical technique advancements.

Evaluating hip disarticulation outcomes in a 51-patient series.

Background: Hip disarticulations are proximal lower extremity amputations with high postoperative complication and mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to evaluate hip disarticulation outcomes at our institution. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical technique shown to reduce pain in amputees. A secondary goal of the study was to evaluate the impact of implementing TMR on this patient population. Methods: A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent hip disarticulation with and without TMR between 2009 and 2020. Information on one-year mortality, thirty-day complication rates, operation times, surgical charges, and pain scores was collected. Results: Fifty-one patients underwent hip disarticulation, eight of which had TMR performed at the time of their hip disarticulation. The one-year mortality rate was 37% with 30-day infection, readmission, reoperation, and rates of 37%, 39%, and 27% respectively. The thirty-day major complication rate was 47% overall but not statistically significantly different between groups. There were no differences between groups with regard to 30-day readmission, reoperation, and infection rates. Conclusions: Our results represent one of the largest series of hip disarticulation outcomes. Performing TMR at the time of hip disarticulation did not negatively affect outcomes and may be a beneficial adjunct to improve pain. Further research is warranted.

Longitudinal Durability of Patient-Reported Pain Outcomes after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) are debilitating sequelae of major limb amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), when performed at the time of amputation, has been shown to be effective for management of this pain; however, its long-term effects and the longitudinal trend of patient-reported outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the longitudinal patient-reported outcomes of pain and quality of life following TMR at the time of initial amputation. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective case series of patients undergoing major limb amputation with TMR performed at the time of amputation were followed from October 2015 to December 2020 with outcomes measured 3, 6, 12, and 18 months or longer after amputation and TMR. Outcomes included patient-reported severity of PLP and RLP as measured by the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Pain Behavior Questionnaires. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with 83 treated limbs were included in the study, and 23 patients completed surveys at 18 months or later, with an average follow-up time of 2.4 years. By 3 months after operation, all patient-reported outcomes for PLP and RLP were consistent with previously reported data that demonstrated superiority to non-TMR amputees. Mixed-model linear regression analysis showed that PLP NRS severity scores continued to improve over the study period (p = 0.022). The remaining outcomes for RLP severity and PROMIS quality-of-life measures demonstrated that these scores remained stable over the study period (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: TMR is an effective surgical procedure that improves the chances of having reduced RLP and PLP when performed at the time of amputation, and our study demonstrates the long-term durability of its efficacy.

Surgical Innovations to Restore Function in Pediatric Peripheral Nerve Conditions.

Peripheral nerve injuries in children can result in devastating lifelong deficits. Because of the time-sensitive nature of muscle viability and the limited speed of nerve regeneration, early recognition and treatment of nerve injuries are essential to restore function. Innovative surgical techniques have been developed to combat the regenerative length and speed; these include nerve transfers. Nerve transfers involve transferring a healthy, expendable donor nerve to an injured nerve to restore movement and sensation. Nerve transfers are frequently used to treat children affected by conditions, including UE trauma, brachial plexus birth injury, and acute flaccid myelitis. Pediatricians play an important role in the outcomes of children with these conditions through early diagnosis and timely referrals. With this review, we aim to provide awareness of state-of-the-art surgical treatment options that significantly improve the function of children with traumatic nerve injuries, brachial plexus birth injury, and acute flaccid myelitis.

Lower Extremity Nerve Transfers in Acute Flaccid Myelitis Patients: A Case Series.

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is characterized by flaccid paralysis following prodromal symptoms. Complete recovery is rare, and patients typically have residual extremity weakness. This study aimed to describe the technique and outcomes of lower extremity nerve transfers for children with AFM. METHODS: A retrospective review of eight children who developed AFM in 2016 and had lower extremity nerve transfers was performed. Principles of nerve transfer were applied to develop novel nerve transfer procedures to restore function for this patient population. Pre- and postoperative muscle strength grades were reviewed, and qualitative improvements in function were recorded. RESULTS: A variety of nerve transfers were utilized in eight patients with average time to surgery from AFM diagnosis of 15.7 months. Restoration of gluteal, femoral, hamstring, and gastrocnemius function was attempted. Variable MRC grade improvement was achieved (range MRC grade 0-4). All patients reported subjective improvements in function. Four of five patients with follow-up who underwent nerve transfers for restoration of gluteal function transitioned from wheelchair use to walking with assistive devices as their primary modes of ambulation. No donor site complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The unique needs of this patient population and variable patterns of residual weakness require meticulous assessment and development of individualized surgical plans. With appropriate goals and expectations in mind, functional improvement may be achieved, including return to ambulation.

Nerve transfers to restore femoral nerve function following oncologic nerve resection.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in the care of soft-tissue tumors, including imaging capabilities and adjuvant radiation therapy, have broadened the indications and opportunities to pursue surgical limb salvage. However, peripheral nerve involvement and femoral nerve resection can still result in devastating functional outcomes. Nerve transfers offer a versatile solution to restore nerve function following tumor resection. METHODS: Two cases were identified by retrospective review. Patient and disease characteristics were gathered. Preoperative and postoperative motor function were assessed using the Medical Research Council Muscle Scale. Patient-reported pain levels were assessed using the numeric rating scale. RESULTS: Nerve transfers from the obturator and sciatic nerve were employed to restore knee extension. Follow up for Case 1 was 24 months, 8 months for Case 2. In both patients, knee extension and stabilization of gait without bracing was restored. Patient also demonstrated 0/10 pain (an average improvement of 5 points) with decreased neuromodulator and pain medication use. CONCLUSION: Nerve transfers can restore function and provide pain control benefits and ideally are performed at the time of tumor extirpation. This collaboration between oncologic and nerve surgeons will ultimately result in improved functional recovery and patient outcomes.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Upper-Extremity Amputation for the Treatment of Pain Severity and Symptoms.

PURPOSE: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a technique for the management of peripheral nerves in amputation. Phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) trouble many patients after amputation, and TMR has been shown to reduce this pain when performed after the initial amputation. We hypothesize that TMR at the time of amputation may improve pain for patients after major upper-extremity amputation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent major upper-extremity amputation with TMR performed at the time of the index amputation (early TMR). Phantom limb pain and RLP intensity and associated symptoms were assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS), the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Short-Form 3a, the Pain Behavior Short-Form 7a, and the Pain Interference Short-Form 8a. The TMR cohort was compared with benchmarked data from a sample of upper-extremity amputees. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent early TMR and were compared with 55 benchmark patients. More than half of early TMR patients were without PLP (62%) compared with 24% of controls. Furthermore, half of all patients were free of RLP compared with 36% of controls. The median PROMIS PLP intensity score for the general sample was 47 versus 38 in the early TMR sample. Patients who underwent early TMR reported reduced pain behaviors and interference specific to PLP (50 vs 53 and 41 vs 50, respectively). The PROMIS RLP intensity score was lower in patients with early TMR (36 vs 47). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that early TMR is a promising strategy for treating pain and improving the quality of life in the upper-extremity amputee. Early TMR may preclude the need for additional surgery and represents an important technique for peripheral nerve surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation in Traumatic Amputees: Early Experience of an Effective Treatment Strategy to Improve Pain.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic trauma etiologies are a common cause for amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a technique aimed at reducing or preventing pain and improving function. The purpose of this study was to examine postoperative phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following TMR in orthopaedic trauma amputees. In addition, postoperative rates of opioid and neuromodulator medication use were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (60% male) prospectively enrolled in a single-institution study and underwent TMR at the time of major limb amputation (48% nonmilitary trauma, 32% infection secondary to previous nonmilitary trauma, and 20% other, also secondary to trauma). Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain scores, pain temporality, prosthetic use, and unemployment status were assessed at the time of follow-up. The use of opioid and neuromodulator medications both preoperatively and postoperatively was also examined. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 14.1 months, phantom limb pain and residual limb pain scores were low, with 92% of the patients reporting no pain or brief intermittent pain only. Pain scores were higher overall for male patients compared with female patients (p < 0.05) except for 1 subscore, and higher in patients who underwent amputation for infection (odds ratio, 9.75; p = 0.01). Sixteen percent of the patients reported opioid medication use at the time of the latest documented follow-up. Fifty percent of the patients who were taking opioids preoperatively discontinued use postoperatively, while 100% of the patients who were not taking opioids preoperatively discontinued postoperative use. None of the patients who were taking neuromodulator medication preoperatively discontinued use postoperatively (0 of 5). The median time to neuromodulator medication discontinuation was 14.6 months, with female patients taking longer than male patients (23 compared with 7 months; p = 0.02). At the time of the latest follow-up, the rate of reported prosthetic use was 85% for lower-extremity and 40% for upper-extremity amputees, with a rate of unemployment due to disability of 36%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TMR in orthopaedic trauma amputees was associated with low overall pain scores at 2-year follow-up, decreased overall opioid and neuromodulator medication use, and an overall high rate of daily prosthetic use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Targeted muscle reinnervation for the management of pain in the setting of major limb amputation.

The life altering nature of major limb amputations may be further complicated by neuroma formation in up to 60% of the estimated 2 million major limb amputees in the United States. This can be a source of pain and functional limitation of the residual limb. Pain associated with neuromas may limit prosthetic limb use, require reoperation, lead to opioid dependence, and dramatically reduce quality of life. A number of management options have been described including excision alone, excision with repair, excision with transposition, and targeted muscle reinnervation. Targeted muscle reinnervation has been shown to reduce phantom limb and neuroma pain for patients with upper and lower extremity amputations. It may be performed at the time of initial amputation to prevent pain development or secondarily for the treatment of established pain. Encouraging outcomes have been reported, and targeted muscle reinnervation is emerging as a leading surgical technique for pain prevention in patients undergoing major limb amputations and pain management in patients with pre-existing amputations.

Instillation negative pressure wound therapy: An effective approach for hardware salvage.

Wound infection involving hardware can be notoriously difficult to treat, often requiring the removal of the infected implant. The goal of this study was to determine the utility of instillation negative pressure wound therapy to help eradicate infection and allow for definitive wound closure in patients without removing the infected hardware. A retrospective review was performed on the outcomes of 28 patients who presented with open wounds with exposed or infected hardware and who were treated with a combination of surgical debridement and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi). Eleven patients were treated for infected spinal hardware, 12 for extremity, and 5 for sternal hardware. Twenty-five of 28 (89%) patients had successful retention or replacement of hardware, with clearance of infection and healed wounds. Original hardware was maintained in 17 of 28 (61%) patients. In 11 patients, original hardware was removed, with subsequent replacement in eight of those patients after a clean wound was achieved. Average time to definitive closure was 12.6 days. Average follow-up was 135 days. This series supports NPWTi as an effective adjunct therapy to help expeditiously eradicate hardware infection, allowing for hardware retention.

Instillation Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Role for Infected LVAD Salvage.

Objective: To determine the utility of instillation negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in achieving eradication of infection and definitive wound closure in patients with infected left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Approach: A retrospective review was performed in a series of patients with infected and exposed LVADs who were treated with instillation NPWT in conjunction with surgical debridement. Results: Three consecutive patients were included who developed periprosthetic infection subsequent to LVAD implantation. In all cases, the utilization of a vacuum-assisted closure with instillation (VACi) along with surgical debridement and IV antibiotics eradicated infection resulting in successful retention of hardware. Cases 1 and 2 received definitive wound closure within 3 and 12 days of starting treatment, respectively. Case 3 initially deferred surgery in favor of local wound care. Eventually the patient elected for surgical treatment and underwent closure 164 days after initial presentation. All three patients healed completely without residual evidence of infection. Flap reconstruction with a pedicled rectus flap was used to achieve definitive closure in all patients. One patient subsequently required pump replacement secondary to thrombosis and mechanical pump failure. Innovation: LVAD infections are met with high morbidity and mortality rates, and timely salvage is critical. In this initial series, VACi has proven a viable therapy option to help control and eradicate infection without LVAD removal. Conclusion: This series illustrates the value of newer techniques such as VACi in combination with surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy in effectively salvaging LVADs that were infected.

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: An Effective Tool for Major Limb Amputation and Amputation Revision Site Closure.

Objective: To evaluate our institutional experience of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) applied immediately after major limb amputation closure or amputation revision closure. Approach: A retrospective review was performed on 25 patients who underwent major limb amputation or amputation revision and had iNPWT placed intraoperatively upon incision closure. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent lower extremity amputation and four underwent upper extremity amputation. Seventeen were primary amputations and eight were amputation revisions. No patients developed dehiscence, seroma, or hematoma. One patient developed a surgical site infection (4%) that was treated with oral antibiotics. The average time to eligibility for prosthetic fitting for lower extremity amputations was 6.3 weeks. Innovation: Amputee patients have increased wound healing demands that can impact prosthetic wear and ambulation status. Stump incisions are located at the distal end of their extremities and often are in areas that have had prior surgical procedures performed. Thus, blood supply to the incision site may not be optimal. iNPWT is an effective incision management technique to promote healing and decrease postoperative complications in this patient population, which can lead to increased mortality. Conclusion: iNPWT is an effective technique of minimizing wound complications in the amputee and should be considered in this high-risk patient population.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in oncologic amputees: Early experience of a novel institutional protocol.

BACKGROUND: We describe a multidisciplinary approach for comprehensive care of amputees with concurrent targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) at the time of amputation. METHODS: Our TMR cohort was compared to a cross-sectional sample of unselected oncologic amputees not treated at our institution (N = 58). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NRS, PROMIS) were used to assess postamputation pain. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent amputation with concurrent TMR during the study; 27 patients completed pain surveys; 15 had greater than 1 year follow-up (mean follow-up 14.7 months). Neuroma symptoms occurred significantly less frequently and with less intensity among the TMR cohort. Mean differences for PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference for phantom limb pain (PLP) were 5.855 (95%CI 1.159-10.55; P = .015), 5.896 (95%CI 0.492-11.30; P = .033), and 7.435 (95%CI 1.797-13.07; P = .011) respectively, with lower scores for TMR cohort. For residual limb pain, PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference mean differences were 5.477 (95%CI 0.528-10.42; P = .031), 6.195 (95%CI 0.705-11.69; P = .028), and 6.816 (95%CI 1.438-12.2; P = .014), respectively. Fifty-six percent took opioids before amputation compared to 22% at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary care of amputees including concurrent amputation and TMR, multimodal postoperative pain management, amputee-centered rehabilitation, and peer support demonstrates reduced incidence and severity of neuroma and PLP.

Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation.

BACKGROUND: A majority of the nearly 2 million Americans living with limb loss suffer from chronic pain in the form of neuroma-related residual limb and phantom limb pain (PLP). Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgically transfers amputated nerves to nearby motor nerves for prevention of neuroma. The objective of this study was to determine whether TMR at the time of major limb amputation decreases the incidence and severity of PLP and residual limb pain. STUDY DESIGN: A multi-institutional cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2018. Fifty-one patients undergoing major limb amputation with immediate TMR were compared with 438 unselected major limb amputees. Primary outcomes included an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, behavior, and interference. RESULTS: Patients who underwent TMR had less PLP and residual limb pain compared with untreated amputee controls, across all subgroups and by all measures. Median "worst pain in the past 24 hours" for the TMR cohort was 1 out of 10 compared to 5 (PLP) and 4 (residual) out of 10 in the control population (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Median PROMIS t-scores were lower in TMR patients for both PLP (pain intensity [36.3 vs 48.3], pain behavior [50.1 vs 56.6], and pain interference [40.7 vs 55.8]) and residual limb pain (pain intensity [30.7 vs 46.8], pain behavior [36.7 vs 57.3], and pain interference [40.7 vs 57.3]). Targeted muscle reinnervation was associated with 3.03 (PLP) and 3.92 (residual) times higher odds of decreasing pain severity compared with general amputee participants. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive surgical intervention of amputated nerves with TMR at the time of limb loss should be strongly considered to reduce pathologic phantom limb pain and symptomatic neuroma-related residual limb pain.

Instillation Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: An Effective Tool for Complex Spine Wounds.

Objective: Infection prevention in spinal surgeries involving implantation of hardware is of utmost priority. Furthermore, successful eradication of infection in hardware salvage is likewise critical in maintaining the long-term retention of the spinal hardware construct. Approach: We report a retrospective case series of three cases where the utilization of a VAC with instillation (VACi) in conjunction with surgical debridement aided in infection control and eradication for both preimplantation and hardware salvage spine patients. Results: Three patients were included. In case 1, VACi was utilized in conjunction with surgical debridement and IV antibiotics in the setting of acute preoperative infection to eradicate infection and enable necessary spinal hardware implementation. Cases 2 and 3 are representative of VACi for salvage of exposed spinal hardware in both the early and delayed infection presentation settings. In both cases, patients developed postoperative infections following spinal instrumentation VACi was utilized in conjunction with surgical debridement and IV antibiotics. Hardware removal was avoided in both cases. All three patients healed completely without residual evidence of infection. Innovation: VACi showed its effectiveness in timely infection eradication before spinal hardware instrumentation and with postoperative spine hardware salvage. Conclusion: This case series demonstrates that VACi can provide infection eradication both preoperatively in high-risk surgical sites, facilitating necessary hardware implementation and postoperatively in situations of hardware salvage.