Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgeon-Physician Co-management Models on Short Term Outcomes for Vascular Surgery Inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: As the population ages, vascular surgeons are treating progressively older, multimorbid patients at risk of peri-operative complications. An embedded physician has been shown to improve outcomes in general and orthopaedic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon-physician co-management models on morbidity and mortality in vascular inpatients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, conference abstract listings, and clinical trial registries. REVIEW METHODS: Studies comparing adult vascular surgery inpatients under co-management with "standard of care" were eligible. The relative risks (RRs) of mortality, medical complications, and 30 day re-admission between co-management and standard care were calculated. The effect of co-management on the mean length of stay was calculated using weighted means. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies, and certainty assessment with the GRADE analysis tools. RESULTS: No randomised trials were identified. Eight single institution studies between 2011 and 2020 with 7 410 patients were included. All studies were observational using before-after methodology. Studies were of high to moderate risk of bias, and outcomes were of very low GRADE certainty of evidence. Co-management was associated with a statistically significantly lower relative risk of mortality (RR 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 - 0.92; p = .02), cardiac complications (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25 - 0.87; p = .02), and infective complications (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35 - 0.67; p < .001) in vascular inpatients. No statistically significant differences in length of stay (MD -0.6 days, 95% CI -1.44 - 0.24 days; p = .16) and 30 day re-admission (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.08; p = .49) were noted. CONCLUSION: Early results of physician and surgeon co-management for vascular surgery inpatients showed promising results from very low certainty data. Further well designed, prospective studies are needed to determine how to maximise the impact of physicians within a vascular service to improve patient outcomes while effectively using hospital resources.

Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for VTE Post-Endovenous Ablation of Varicose Veins: Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous ablation has revolutionized treatment of varicose vein surgery but is associated with a risk of venous thromboembolism. There is no consensus regarding anticoagulation protocols for these patients. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to identify which anticoagulant is optimal in this cohort for clot prevention with minimal risk of adverse bleeding events. METHODS: Library databases were searched for studies where patients were treated with one or more anticoagulants following endovenous ablation for varicose veins. The methodological quality of included studies was quantified using the Risk of Bias (ROB) assessment tools. Findings were reported using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. Statistical analysis was carried out using metainsight (rpackage). RESULTS: Observational data on just under 1500 patients prescribed post ablation anticoagulation (Rivaroxaban, Enoxaparin, Fondaparinux) were analyzed. Patient characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. 81 thrombotic and 40 minor bleeding events occurred in total. Overall rivaroxaban is found to be superior to the other agents. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA indicates that prophylactic rivaroxaban is the highest ranked anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis in patients post endovenous ablation for varicose veins, with a low risk of adverse bleeding. The choice whether to anticoagulate these patients is likely to remain at the discretion of the treating clinician.

Role of Adipose Derived Stem Cells in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Few studies to date have investigated the role of adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). We aimed to conduct a systematic search of the literature to explore the available evidence behind ADSCs application in patients with DFU to establish if it has any added benefit regarding healing rate and healing time in this cohort of patients. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies. Only randomised controlled trials which investigated the impact of ADSCs alone on the healing of DFU were considered eligible and were included for the review. Reported healing rates, time to healing and procedure related complications were collected and analysed. The initial search resulted in 160 papers. Following duplicate removal, 131 papers were screened for eligibility. Only four trials met the study criteria and were included for the final review and analysis. 97 out of 189 patients who were included in the four studies received ADSCs for treatment of DFU whereas the remaining 92 patients received standard measures (control). The median participant age was 62, predominantly male (72.5%). Complete healing was achieved in 83.5% (n = 81) of patients in the ADSC group compared to 52% (n = 48) for patients in the control group at 12 months (OR = 4.8, 95%CI = 2.25 to 10.24, P < 0.0001). Mean healing time in the ADSC group ranged from 31 to 85 days whereas mean healing time in the control group ranged from 42 to 85 days (Pooled weighted mean difference = -10.832856, 95%CI = -22.44 to 0.77, P = 0.0673). No significant procedure related complications were reported in either group. The use of ADSCs in patients with DFU appears to demonstrate improved healing rates. The procedure of ADSC harvest and administration appears to be safe based on the initial reports. Large, randomised trials are needed to establish its role in patients with diabetic foot wounds.

Hyperbaric Oxygen as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Venous Ulcers: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) in diabetic wounds has been studied extensively. Even though venous insufficiency is the most common cause of lower limb ulceration, there is comparatively little evidence regarding the use of HBOT for Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU). We performed a systematic-review to evaluate and synthesise available evidence, to evaluate whether patients with VLU, when treated with HBOT, had greater rates of (i) complete VLU healing or (ii) reduction in VLU area, than controls. METHODS: In keeping with PRISMA guidelines, database searches of PubMed, Scopus and Embase was performed. After removal of duplicates, titles were screened for relevance by two authors, then abstracts, and in turn full text manuscripts. Data were extracted from relevant sources including one published abstract. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies (ROBINS-I) tools. RESULTS: Six studies were included. There was significant heterogeneity across the studies, with no standard control intervention, method of outcome reporting, or duration of follow up. Two studies reported 12 week follow up results and pooled analysis of complete ulcer healing showed no statistically significant difference between HBOT and controls for the outcome of complete ulcer healing OR 1.54 (95%CI = .50-4.75) P = .4478. A similar non-signifiacnt result was seen in four studies reporting 5-6 week follow up; OR 5.39 (95%CI = .57-259.57) P = .1136. Change in VLU area was reported in all studies, and pooled standardised mean difference was 1.70 (95%CI = .60 to 2.79) P = .0024, indicating a statistically significant benefit of HBOT in reducing ulcer area. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence suggests that HBOT does not significantly affect complete healing of VLU. There is a statistically significant benefit in terms of reducing ulcer size, though in the absence of ulcer healing the clinical significance of this is not established. Current evidence does not justify widespread use of HBOT for VLU.

Systematic review of the relationship between Hollenhorst plaques and cerebrovascular events.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the association between asymptomatic cholesterol emboli on fundoscopy (known as Hollenhorst plaque) and the subsequent risk of stroke or death.1. AIM: To evaluate the association between the presence of asymptomatic cholesterol retinal emboli and the risk of cerebrovascular events, with assessment of the need for carotid intervention. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using appropriate terms. The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Initial search revealed 43 in Medline and 46 in Embase databases. Twenty-four potentially eligible studies were included after duplicate and non-related studies were excluded based on title and abstract. Three more studies were identified from reference lists. Seventeen studies were included in the final analysis. Asymptomatic cholesterol emboli were present in 1343 patients. Approximately 17.8% (n = 181) had history of either cerebro-vascular Accident (CVA) or transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) at presentation (more than 6 months). Nine studies mentioned the incidence of cerebrovascular events during follow-up. Of 780 patients, 93 evolved to stroke, TIAs, or death from a major carotid event during the follow-up period (6-86 m), an incidence of about 12%. Death due to stroke was documented in 3 studies (n = 12). CONCLUSION: The presence of asymptomatic retinal emboli indicates a risk of a cerebrovascular event when compared to patients with no plaques seen on fundoscopy. The evidence suggests that these patients warrant referral for medical optimization of cardiovascular risk factors. Currently, there is no recommendation to support carotid endarterectomy in patients with Hollenhorst plaques, or retinal emboli, and further studies are needed to assess this.

A Report of Penile Mondor's Disease After Mechanochemical Ablation and Adjunct Foam Sclerotherapy of Bilateral Lower Extremity Truncal Incompetence.

INTRODUCTION: Mondor's disease of the penis, or superficial thrombophlebitis affecting penile veins, is a rare condition. Common causes include prothombotic states, venous stasis or excessive manipulation. The literature includes one case report of Mondor's Disease after endovenous laser ablation and foam sclerotherapy and a case series after open saphenofemoral junction ligation. However, there have been no noted cases of this rare complication after mechanochemical ablation of the GSV. CASE DETAILS: A 50-year-old man with bilateral great saphenous venous incompetence had truncal mechanochemical ablation of both above-knee GSV segments with the ClariveinTM device with adjunctive 1% Fibrovein foam to varicose tributaries. Day three post-operatively he began experiencing suprapubic pain and noted tender "cord-like" veins along the penile shaft. Duplex investigation of the penis demonstrated occlusive thrombus in the superficial veins draining into the dorsal vein of the penis. The patient was treated with 75 mg oral Clopidogrel for four weeks and his symptoms resolved without functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons should be aware that this rare albeit self-limiting thrombotic complication can occur after endovenous mechanochemical ablation of the great saphenous vein with adjunct foam sclerotherapy, particularly as this procedure is performed very frequently. Interestingly, the majority of reported cases have occurred after bilateral interventions. The patients can be reassured that their symptoms will likely settle and the use of anti-thrombotic therapy is largely at the surgeon's discretion.

Varicose veins as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in arthroplasty patients: Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis to determine if patients with varicose veins are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) when undergoing major lower limb arthroplasty. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using appropriate terms for studies that reported post-operative VTE in patients who had lower limb arthroplasty with any history of varicose veins. Methodological quality of included studies was quantified using the Risk of Bias (ROB) assessment tools. Findings were reported using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. RESULTS: A total of 129 studies were identified with 11 observational studies being eligible for inclusion. This consisted of 265,194 patients who underwent lower limb arthroplasty, 2188 of which had pre-existing varicose veins. Overall, VTE occurred in 1845 patients, and 122 cases had varicose veins present at time of arthroplasty. Meta-analysis indicates that patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty with varicose veins are at increased risk of having a VTE, OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.54-3.63, (p < 0.001). One study evaluated if previous varicose veins surgery influenced the risk of VTE in arthroplasty patients, OR 0.96 (95% CI 0.7-1.28), p = 0.429. CONCLUSIONS: Varicose veins and lower limb arthroplasty are known independent risk factors for VTE. There is a paucity of data regarding the risk of VTE in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty who have co-existing varicose veins. This meta-analysis shows that patients with varicose veins are at an increased risk of VTE when undergoing major lower limb arthroplasty. Further studies are required in order to determine if such patients should undergo varicose vein surgery before undertaking major lower limb joint replacement.

Adipose-derived stem cells in patients with venous ulcers: Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have reported on the safety and durability of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) to support healing in patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU). To establish if there is any evidence to support ADSC use in VLU patients, a systematic review was conducted. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant papers. References from retrieved papers were reviewed to identify any extra eligible studies. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 950 papers were screened for eligibility of which 932 were excluded based on title and abstract. Four papers were included in the final analysis (one randomised study and three non-randomised studies). 66 patients in total received ADSCs for VLU treatment. The only randomised paper reported 6-month healing rates of 75% with ADSCs compared to 50% in controls. 100% healing was achieved in one study. The remaining 2 studies reported 25% and 58% healing; however, they included patients with relatively large VLUs. Pain scores decreased after ADSCs application where reported. No serious procedure related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: ADSCs may enhance ulcer healing in patients with chronic VLU and appears safe based on initial reports. Large, randomised trials are needed to definitively establish the technique's role in VLU patients.

A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform.

Robotic-assisted surgery is evolving, with improving clinical and cancer outcomes. The aim of this study was to present the clinical and cancer outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RAS-CR) at University Hospital Limerick (UHL) since its introduction to the 100th case, using the daVinci Xi dual-console surgical system. The RAS-CR programme at UHL commenced in June 2016 and the 100th case was performed in July 2019. All patient-related data were recorded prospectively during the perioperative period by the RAS-CR team. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 22. One hundred patients were operated on, comprising of 47 males and 53 females. The median age was 65 years (IQR 13.0; range 25-84) with 69% of cases performed for cancer [N = 39 rectal cancer, N = 30 colon cancer], 20% for benign disease and 11% for dysplasia. Median length of stay for cancer operations was 6.5 days for colon cancer cases (5.0 days when cases with complications were excluded) and 7.0 days for rectal cancer cases. Median operative time was 255 mins (IQR 130 min; all cases), median docking time was 33 mins (IQR 20 mins) and median intra-operative blood loss was 80 ml (IQR 70 ml). Thirty-one patients developed a post-operative complication (5% anastomotic leak; 13% SSI). In cancer cases, median nodal harvest was 14 nodes (IQR10) and an R0 resection was achieved in 98.6% (n = 68) of cancer cases. Three patients (4.3%) developed metastatic disease at a median interval of 16.5 months. Clinical and operative outcomes remained stable over time from case 1 to 100. Structured introduction of a RAS-CR programme with appropriate governance and continuous audit results in favourable clinical and cancer outcomes and provides an excellent training opportunity for surgical residents.