State of the art review. Complications after carpal tunnel release.

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is the most performed surgery of the upper extremity. It is effective but not without complications. This state-of-the-art review covers most common intra- and postoperative complications after CTR. As endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) has developed over time, severe complications, such as nerve lesions, have diminished. ECTR still has a higher risk on transient nerve lesions. Open CTR on the other hand has a higher incidence of wound-related problems, including scar tenderness, irrespective of incision used. Most complications, such as pillar pain and infection, are ill-defined in the literature, leaving the exact incidence unknown and proposing challenges in treatment. The same is true for failure of treatment. Optimizing the length and location of incisions has played a vital role in reducing intra- and postoperative complications in CTR. It is expected that technical advances, such as ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release, will continue to play a role in the future.Level of evidence: V.

Does Revision Carpal Tunnel Release Result in Long-Term Outcomes Equivalent to Single Carpal Tunnel Release? A Matched Case-Control Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after revision carpal tunnel release (CTR); compare these outcomes with those of patients who had a single CTR and a comparable age, sex, race, type of initial surgery, and follow-up time; and assess which factors are associated with worse patient-reported outcomes after revision CTR. METHODS: The authors retrospectively identified 7351 patients who had a single CTR and 113 patients who had a revision CTR for carpal tunnel syndrome between January of 2002 and December of 2015 at five academic urban hospitals. Of these 113 revision CTR cases, 37 patients completed a follow-up questionnaire including the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity, and satisfaction score. Those who completed the follow-up questionnaire were randomly matched to five controls (patients who had a single CTR) based on age, sex, race, type of initial surgery, and follow-up time. Of these 185 matched controls, 65 completed the follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: A linear mixed effects model using matched sets as a random effect showed that patients who had a revision CTR had a higher total BCTQ score, Numerical Rating Scale for Pain Intensity score, and a lower satisfaction score at time of follow-up than patients who had a single CTR. Multivariable linear regression showed that thenar muscle atrophy before the revision surgery was independently associated with more pain after revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients improve after revision CTR, but generally have more pain, have a higher BCTQ score, and are less satisfied at long-term follow-up compared with patients who had a single CTR.

Gunshot Injuries of the Hand: Incidence, Treatment Characteristics, and Factors Associated With Healthcare Utilization.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the demographics, injury patterns, and treatment characteristics of patients who sustained a gunshot injury (GSI) of the hand; and (2) examine the utilization of healthcare resources in patients with a GSI of the hand. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 148 adult patients who were treated for a GSI of the hand between January 2000 to December 2017 using multiple International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Edition (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. We used bivariate and multivariable analysis to identify which factors are associated with unplanned reoperation, length of hospitalization, and number of operations. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression showed that fracture severity was associated with unplanned reoperation. Multivariable linear regression showed that fracture severity is associated with a higher number of hand operations after a GSI of the hand, and that a retained bullet (fragment) and patients having gunshot injuries in other regions than the hand had a longer length of hospitalization. Seventy (47%) patients had sensory or motor symptoms in the hand after their GSI, of which 22 (15%) patients had a transection of the nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory and motor nerve deficits are common after a GSI of the hand. However, only 31% of patients with symptoms had a transection of the nerve. A retained bullet (fragment), having more severe hand fractures, and GSI in other regions than the hand are associated with a higher number of operation and a longer period of hospitalization.

Transhumeral amputation in brachial plexus lesion patients: A multicenter case series.

BACKGROUND: A flail limb can be the result of a traumatic complete brachial plexus lesion. Some patients prefer retaining the flail limb, however some patients feel that a flail limb negatively affects daily life. In these circumstances an elective amputation is sometimes elected, however long-term follow-up, with respect to satisfaction and function is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of this rare and life changing operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 8 patients with a transhumeral amputation performed in 2 specialized medical centers were included. Postoperatively, the functional- and psychological outcome and the quality of life were evaluated with standardized patient reported outcome measures (PROMs; DASH, SIP-68, EQ-5D-5L and HADS). RESULTS: After a median of 9.4 (range 7.5 - 12.8) years follow-up, 7 patients (88%) stated that they would undergo the operation again and were satisfied with the results. At latest follow-up the median DASH score was 37.3 (range 8.3-61.7), the median SIP-68 score was 6.5 (range 0-43) and the median HADS score was 3.0 (range 0-14) for anxiety and 3.0 (range 1-19) for depression. In the EQ-5D-5L patients had most difficulties in self-care, usual activities and pain/discomfort. The median overall health status was 69 (range 20-95). DISCUSSION: With the right indication a transhumeral amputation is a reasonable option for traumatic complete brachial plexus lesion with satisfying long-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, multicenter case series.

Additional Treatment after Collagenase Injections and Needle Fasciotomy for Dupuytren's Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the rate of additional treatment after collagenase injection and needle fasciotomy, and what factors are associated with additional procedures for recurrence. Materials and Methods We retrospectively identified 201 adult patients who underwent collagenase injection and 19 patients who underwent needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren's disease from 2012 to 2014. Outcomes included additional treatment of the same ray for either recurrence or persistence of contracture. To evaluate associated factors, we performed a bivariate analysis. Results Additional treatment after collagenase injection for recurrence was performed in 24% of fingers at a median of 23 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.8-36.1) and was associated with bilateral disease ( p = 0.008). Additional treatment for persistence was performed in 5.6% at a median of 1.9 months (IQR: 1.1-3.2). Additional treatment for recurrence after needle fasciotomy was performed in 13% of fingers at a median of 28.2 months (IQR: 27.5-28.2) and 4.2% for persistence at 1.1 months. Fingers treated with needle fasciotomy were more likely to undergo secondary open fasciectomy (13% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.022). Conclusion Additional treatment after collagenase injections was performed in 29% of fingers, mostly another collagenase injection, and was associated with bilateral disease. After needle fasciotomy, 17% of patients underwent additional treatment, primarily open partial fasciectomy.

Long-Term Opioid Use Following Surgery for Symptomatic Neuroma.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at risk for prolonged opioid use following surgery for symptomatic neuroma would be beneficial for perioperative management. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with postoperative opioid use of >4 weeks in patients undergoing neuroma surgery. METHODS: After retrospective identification, 77 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic neuroma of the upper or lower extremity were enrolled. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, and a custom medication questionnaire at a median of 9.7 years (range: 2.5-16.8 years) following surgery. Neuroma excision followed by nerve implantation (n = 39, 51%), nerve reconstruction/repair (n = 18, 23%), and excision alone (n = 16, 21%) were the most common surgical treatments. RESULTS: Overall, 27% (n = 21) of patients reported opioid use of more than 4 weeks postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (30%) reported preoperative opioid use of which 11 (48%) did not report opioid use for >4 weeks, postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, preoperative opioid use was independently associated with opioid use of >4 weeks, postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-14.3, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Neuroma surgery reduces opioid use in many patients but patients who are taking opioids preoperatively are at risk for longer opioid use. Almost one-third of patients reported opioid use longer than 4 weeks, postoperatively.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Partial Hand Amputations.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery has been shown to aid in prevention and treatment of neuropathic pain. Technical and anatomical descriptions of TMR surgery for upper extremity amputees (including transradial, transhumeral, and forequarter amputations) have been reported, yet such descriptions of TMR surgery for partial hand amputations are currently lacking. Herein we outline the technique of different types of partial hand amputation TMR surgeries to serve as a reference and guide. A retrospective review was performed by our multi-institutional team to identify clinical cases where partial hand TMR surgeries were performed. Patient demographics, characteristics, amputation subtype, nerve transfer, pain score, pain outcome, and functional outcome data were collected and analyzed. From January 2018 to September 2019, 13 patients underwent partial hand TMR procedures. Eight cases resulted from trauma, and 6 were secondary to oncologic procedures. The amputations consisted of 8 ray, 2 trans-metacarpal, 2 radial-sided hand, and 1 index finger amputation with recurrent painful neuromas. Twelve patients were weaned off narcotics completely and only 3 remained on a neuromodulator for ongoing pain control. Technical considerations for partial hand TMR surgery have been outlined, with early pilot data showing beneficial pain control outcomes.

An Economic Analysis of Direct Costs of Distal Radius Fixation and the Implications of a Disposable Distal Radius Kit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the direct costs of distal radius fracture volar plate (VP) fixation and to create a model to examine the effect of these cost drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 744 distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were identified. The outcomes assessed included (1) the direct costs related to distal radius ORIF and (2) if a VP alone was amenable. Costs were represented as a cost ratio relative to the average cost of distal radius ORIF, where the average value is set as 1.0. Simulation models were run with all cost drivers (sex, age, open fracture, intra-articular fracture, and ancillary fixation) and with only ancillary fixation as a cost driver. RESULTS: The cost ratio ranged from 0.61 to 1.81 and ancillary fixation was associated with increased implant costs in multivariable analysis. In the simulations, the cost ratio ranged from 0.96 to 1.23 when all cost drivers were included and from 0.99 to 1.20 if only ancillary fixation was included as a cost driver, a reduction of the range by 22.2%. Older patients, females, closed fractures, and extra-articular fractures were more amenable to VP fixation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-three percent of the surgically treated distal radius fractures were treated with VP fixation alone. A disposable kit could help limit cost variance per case by roughly 22%, as only ancillary fixation varies these costs. Closed fractures and extra-articular fractures in older patients or female patients are more amenable to VP fixation alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Radial Sensory Nerve Neuromas: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Rate of Secondary Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) describe long-term patient-reported outcomes of surgically treated symptomatic radial sensory nerve neuromas on function, pain interference, pain intensity, and satisfaction; (2) assess which factors were associated with worse function, higher pain intensity, and more pain interference; and (3) describe the secondary surgery rate and factors associated with secondary surgery. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients surgically treated for radial sensory nerve neuroma from 2002 to 2016 (n = 54). Twenty-five of these 54 patients completed a follow-up survey including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity, pain interference, and depression scales; numerical rating scale pain and satisfaction instruments; and the global rating scale of change, at a mean period of 10.7 ± 4.3 years after neuroma surgery. RESULTS: The mean PROMIS scores were 45.0 ± 12.1 for upper extremity, 55.5 ± 10.3 for pain interference, and 49.9 ± 10.2 for depression, and were within 1 SD of the general population. Eight patients (32 percent) reported symptoms as unchanged or worse following neuroma surgery. The median numerical rating scale pain was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 6) and the global rating scale of change satisfaction was 10 (interquartile range, 7 to 10). Older patients (p = 0.002) and patients with higher PROMIS pain interference (p < 0.001), higher numerical rating scale for pain (p = 0.012), and lower global rating scale of change scores (p = 0.01) had worse PROMIS upper extremity scores. The secondary surgery rate was 20 percent and was associated with the presence of multiple neuromas (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radial sensory nerve neuromas remain difficult to treat. They have a high secondary surgery rate (20 percent), with only 68 percent of patients reporting improvement after surgical intervention. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery are similar to conditions of the general population; however, the range of outcomes is wide.

Factors associated with revision surgery for olecranon bursitis after bursectomy.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of our study was to identify the factors associated with revision surgery after bursal excision in patients with olecranon bursitis. The secondary aims were to describe the revision rate after bursectomy and to assess which factors are associated with flap surgery after bursectomy and describe the most common complications after bursectomy of the olecranon bursa. METHODS: We included 191 adult patients with olecranon bursitis who underwent olecranon bursa excision between January 2002 and October 2018. Patients who were pregnant, patients with incomplete records of the primary surgical procedure, and patients who underwent bursectomy during elbow arthroplasty were excluded. After manual chart review, we found that 22 patients had undergone revision surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between revision surgery and patient characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we collected data regarding postoperative complications and intraoperative variables such as the use of drains, vacuum assisted closure therapy, and flap surgery. RESULTS: The overall revision rate in our cohort was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Bivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent revision surgery were more frequently women (P = .004), more often had a history of ipsilateral (P = .020) or contralateral (P = .012) olecranon bursitis, and more often received a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (P = .001) or diabetes mellitus (P = .019). The most common complications were delayed wound healing (n = 8, 4.2%) and osteomyelitis (n = 8, 4.2%). Flap surgery was performed in 5 patients (2.6%). Bivariate analysis showed that patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery more frequently (P = .011). CONCLUSION: The revision rate after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, or a history of ipsilateral and contralateral olecranon bursitis and female patients underwent revision surgery after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis more frequently. In addition, patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery after bursectomy more frequently.

Genetic Risk of Trigger Finger: Results of a Genomewide Association Study.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger, or stenosing tenosynovitis, is one of the most common conditions affecting the hand, yet its pathophysiology remains poorly understood, and genetic association studies of trigger finger are lacking. The purpose of this study was to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with trigger finger through a genomewide approach. METHODS: The authors performed a case-control genomewide association study in the Partners HealthCare Biobank. Single-nucleotide polymorphism- and gene-based association analyses were carried out after quality control, imputation, and filtering. RESULTS: Among 942 trigger finger cases and 24,472 controls, the authors tested 7,846,471 single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association with trigger finger. In the single-nucleotide polymorphism-based analysis, a single locus on chromosome 13 corresponding to KLHL1 met the genomewide significance threshold (lead single-nucleotide polymorphism rs59988404; OR, 1.74; 95 percent CI, 1.47 to 2.07; p = 1.99 × 10). After mapping, gene-based analysis demonstrated a significant association with POLE2 (p = 7.53 × 10) on chromosome 14. Among trigger finger cases, rs59988404 genotype was significantly associated with the total number of trigger finger procedures performed (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In the first reported genomewide association study of trigger finger, the authors report significant associations of KLHL1 and POLE2 with risk of trigger finger. The authors' results may help to elucidate the pathophysiology of trigger finger and facilitate an individualized, precision-medicine treatment approach. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Combined with a Vascularized Pedicled Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface.

Symptomatic neuromas and pain caused by nerve transection injuries can adversely impact a patient's recovery, while also contributing to increased dependence on opioid and other pharmacotherapy. These sources of pain are magnified following amputation surgeries, inhibiting optimal prosthetic wear and function. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) represent modern advances in addressing amputated peripheral nerves. These techniques offer solutions by essentially providing neuromuscular targets for transected peripheral nerves "to grow into and reinnervate." Recent described benefits of these techniques include reports on pain reduction or ablation (eg, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, and/or neuroma pain).1-6 We describe a technical adaptation combining TMR with a "pedicled vascularized RPNI (vRPNI)." The TMR with the vRPNI surgical technique described offers the advantage of having a distal target nerve and a target muscle possessing deinnervated motor end plates which may potentially enhance nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation, while also decreasing amputated nerve-related pain.

What Factors Are Associated With Response Rates for Long-term Follow-up Questionnaire Studies in Hand Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up studies are an important tool in the evaluation of orthopaedic illness and its treatment options. However, a patient's participation in a follow-up study may be affected by several factors, leading to variability in response rates and the risk of selection bias. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies? (2) What factors are associated with higher and lower response rates to research questionnaires? (3) What factors are associated with higher and lower contact, initial participation, and completion rates? METHODS: We included 798 adult patients who were enrolled in one of 12 questionnaire follow-up studies in the hand and upper extremity service of our institution. All included studies evaluated patient-reported outcomes for the surgical treatment of upper extremity conditions using questionnaires and all used the same enrollment design. Patients were invited by letter to ask if they would be willing to participate, and we informed them that they would be contacted by telephone at least three times if they did not respond to the letter. Patients were contacted at a median of 6.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7 to 11) after surgery. The successful response rate was 49% (390 of 798 patients). We manually reviewed records to collect data on patient characteristics, and we performed bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the contact rate (percentage of patients reached by either mail, phone, or email), initial response rate (percentage of reached patients who initiated participation), completion rate (percentage of patients who initiated participation and completed the entire follow-up questionnaire), and our primary outcome successful response rate (percentage of patients who were contacted and who completed the entire questionnaire). RESULTS: The average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies was 49% (390 of 798 patients). In the multivariable analysis, enrollment of women (odds ratio 1.43 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.97]; p = 0.031) was independently associated with higher response rates. On the contrary, a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99]; p = 0.015) and multiple researchers contacting patients (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.71]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower response rates. The contact rate was higher for women (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.03 to 2.06]; p = 0.034) and patients with higher income (OR 1.000007 [95% CI 1.000001 to 1.000013]; p = 0.019). The contact rate was lower in patients with a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.97]; p = 0.001). The initial participation rate was lower when patients were contacted by multiple researchers (OR: 0.34 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.52]; p < 0.001). Studies with a lower number of questions (36; IQR 22 to 46) were completed more frequently than studies with a higher number of questions (51; IQR 39 to 67; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing long-term outcomes that have a large proportion of men and longer follow-up time tend to have lower response rates. When performing a follow-up study, it seems beneficial to have one researcher contact the patients and use a shorter questionnaire. Results of this study can help clarify the response rates in hand surgery follow-up questionnaire studies and help with the planning of future follow-up studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Revision Carpal Tunnel Release: Risk Factors and Rate of Secondary Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The first aim of this study was to determine the rate of revision carpal tunnel release in five urban hospitals over a period of 14 years. The secondary aim was to assess what demographic, condition-related, and treatment-related factors are associated with revision carpal tunnel release. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2015, 7464 patients underwent carpal tunnel release. After manually reviewing the medical records, the authors identified 113 patients who underwent revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to study association with demographics (age, sex, and race), unilateral or bilateral treated wrist(s) (including carpal tunnel release performed simultaneously and separately), and type of surgery (open or endoscopic). To gain further insight into these factors, a matched case-control analysis in a 1:3 ratio was performed. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen of 7464 patients (1.5 percent) underwent revision carpal tunnel surgery. The median (interquartile range) time to revision surgery was 1.23 years (0.47 to 3.89 years). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age, male sex, bilateral carpal tunnel release, and endoscopic carpal tunnel release were independently associated with higher odds for revision surgery. Multivariable conditional logistic regression of the matched case-control cohort showed that smoking and rheumatoid arthritis were independently associated with revision carpal tunnel release. Splint treatment before the initial surgery was independently associated with single carpal tunnel release. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic release, male sex, smoking, rheumatoid arthritis, and undergoing staged or simultaneous bilateral carpal tunnel release are risk factors for revision surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Factors Associated with Primary and Secondary Amputation following Limb-Threatening Upper Extremity Trauma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with primary and secondary amputation in patients with limb-threatening trauma to the upper extremity, describe the incidence of these injuries, and describe the procedures involved in the treatment of these difficult injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study of 49 cases (in 47 patients) with acute limb-threatening trauma of the upper extremity proximal to the carpometacarpal joint level treated with either amputation or limb salvage was performed in two urban level I trauma centers between January of 2001 and January of 2018. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis demonstrated that cases of primary amputation more frequently had a higher Injury Severity Score, higher Abbreviated Injury Scale score, more proximal fractures, more severe muscle injuries, and a larger number of major nerve injuries. Secondary amputation, compared with limb salvage, was more frequently performed in patients who were younger, in cases with a higher Injury Severity Score, where there was more proximal soft-tissue injury, in case of nonsharp mechanism of injury, and in cases that required local flap procedures for wound closure. The authors found a yearly incidence of 62 cases of acute limb-threatening upper extremity trauma per 100,000 trauma admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influence the surgical decision to perform primary amputation or to attempt a salvage procedure following limb-threatening upper extremity trauma. Knowing which patients will have the most favorable outcomes of a salvage procedure is important, because salvage procedures impose a greater burden on the health care system and the patient, even more so in the case of secondary amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Nerve Diameter in the Hand: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Nerve injuries in the hand are common and often pose a challenge for the upper extremity surgeon. A range of reconstructive options exist for nerve repair, but proper matching of nerve diameter is important for many of these techniques. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the nerve diameters of the hand and their relative differences and (2) investigate whether there is a relationship between nerve diameter and external hand dimensions or body mass index. METHODS: We utilized 18 freshly frozen cadaveric hands from adult donors aged 20-86 of both sexes for this study. Two independent observers measured each nerve diameter to the nearest 0.1 mm using a digital caliper. RESULTS: Using the flexor zones as boundaries, a total of 33 nerve measurements were performed for each cadaveric hand. Nerve diameter increased from the distal to the proximal flexor zones. The internal common digital nerves in flexor zone 3 were larger than the external digital nerves. The median nerve was found to be nearly 2 times larger than the ulnar nerve at 2 locations within the wrist. There was a positive correlation between body mass index, hand span, hand width, and nerve diameter at several measured locations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides reference values for nerve diameters of the hand and wrist and describes their relative differences. It is important for surgeons to be aware of these differences and to consider this information as we advance our efforts to reconstruct the hand and develop technologies for nerve repair.

Distal Radius Fractures: Evaluation of Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Pinning.

Objective Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) is losing popularity as a treatment modality for distal radius fractures. However, in select cases, CRPP may have advantages relative to open reduction and internal reduction. We aimed to retrospectively assess the outcomes after CRPP for the treatment of distal radius fractures. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods We used billing records to identify all skeletally mature patients with a distal radius fracture who were treated with CRPP by a single surgeon at a level I trauma center in an urban city in the United States. We assessed the medical charts and recorded demographics, trauma and treatment characteristics, radiographic characteristics, and outcomes. Results All patients had a good or excellent range of motion regarding forearm rotation, and almost 80% had good or excellent range of motion regarding flexion or extension of their wrist. One patient had a concern for pin tract infection, and one had subcutaneous migration of a pin, which were both treated by pin removal. Conclusion CRPP is a good option in patients with few and sizeable fracture fragments in patients with a distal radius fracture, and it should be considered as an effective tool to restore radiographic parameters and functional outcomes.

Does a Brief Mindfulness Exercise Improve Outcomes in Upper Extremity Patients? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based interventions are useful in reducing psychologic distress and pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. However, most mindfulness-based interventions are resource-intensive, lengthy, and not feasible for busy orthopaedic surgical practices. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine if a 60-second personalized mindfulness-based video exercise is (1) associated with improved pain intensity, emotional distress, and state anxiety compared with an attention placebo control (a time-matched educational pamphlet about pain and stress); and (2) feasible and acceptable for patients with upper extremity injury in an orthopaedic practice. METHODS: This was a single-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial of the mindfulness-based video exercise (60 seconds duration, free online) versus an attention placebo control (an educational pamphlet about pain and stress presented to patients to read over 60 seconds). One hundred forty-nine patients presenting for a new or followup appointment at the office of one of two orthopaedic hand and upper extremity outpatient surgical practices at an urban academic hospital were invited to participate between September 2016 and December 2016. Of 149 patients screened, 125 patients were randomized and completed a demographic questionnaire, the Numeric Rating Scale to assess pain intensity, the State Anxiety subscale of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory to assess state anxiety, and Emotion Thermometers to assess anxiety, anger, and depression before and after the interventions. Postintervention, patients also completed the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire Scale-3 to assess the acceptability. A mean score of 21 or higher is considered acceptable. Feasibility was determined based on number of patients approached who refused participation. The intervention was defined as feasible if refusal rate was lower than 25%. Analysis of covariance was used to test comparative improved pain intensity on the NRS, psychologic distress on the Emotion Thermometers, and state anxiety on the State Anxiety Subscale of the State Trait Anxiety Index after controlling for respective baseline scores. A 1-point minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used on the NRS for pain intensity. RESULTS: Adjusted for the baseline means, compared with patients who received the attention placebo control, patients who participated in the mindfulness-based video exercise demonstrated improved pain intensity (mindfulness-based video exercise: 3.03 ± 0.12; control: 3.49 ± 0.12; mean difference: 0.46 [0.12-0.80]; p = 0.008); state anxiety (mindfulness-based video exercise: 32.35 ± 0.59; control: 35.29 ± 0.59; mean difference: 2.94 [1.29-4.59]; p = 0.001); anxiety symptoms (mindfulness-based video exercise: 1.49 ± 0.19; control: 2.10 ± 0.19; mean difference: 0.61 [0.08-1.14]; p = 0.024); depression (mindfulness-based video exercise: 1.03 ± 0.10; control: 1.47 ± 0.11; mean difference: 0.44 [0.15-0.73]; p = 0.004); and anger (mindfulness-based video exercise: 0.76 ± 0.12; control: 1.36 ± 0.12; mean difference: 0.60 [0.26-0.94]; p = 0.001). However, the observed differences in pain intensity were below 1 point on the NRS, which is the MCID established in patients with chronic pain. No MCID is available for the other measures. The mindfulness-based video exercise was feasible based on a dropout rate of 0%, and acceptability reached the medium range with similar scores in both groups (mindfulness-based video exercise: 20.70 ± 5.48; control: 20.52 ± 6.42). CONCLUSIONS: A 60-second mindfulness-based video exercise is feasible to implement and acceptable to patients in busy orthopaedic practices. This video exercise is also effective in improving momentary pain, anxiety, depression, and anger in this population, but it is unclear whether these improved pain and distress levels are meaningful to patients who present with low levels of pain and psychologic distress. Future studies should seek to discern whether the improved pain and distress levels we observed are clinically important or whether the intervention delivers larger effects in subgroups of patients experiencing greater pain intensity and if the improved pain and distress levels are durable. Such studies might also assess cost-effectiveness, because this mindfulness-based tool takes little time and few resources to use, and the effects and durability of multiple sessions of a mindfulness-based video exercise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.