Retrospective cohort analysis of weight changes during the COVID-19 pandemic in a pediatric asthma population.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the BMI trajectories of children attending a tertiary asthma clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on children and young people with asthma who attended the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People (RHCYP) before March 2020 (pre-COVID-19) and after August 2021 (the lifting of national restrictions). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in weight, height, and BMI Z score measured between 13/03/2019 and 13/03/2020 (timepoint 1) and then again during the period 01/08/2021 to 01/10/2022 (timepoint 2); changes in lung function parameters (FEV1) between the timepoints; proportion of study sample classed as obese and overweight at both timepoints; interaction analyses according to deprivation indices (SIMD decile), the use of high dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, and the presence of atopy. RESULTS: Eighty-nine children aged 5-18 years were studied. Weight and height Z scores significantly increased between timepoint 1 and 2 [weight Z score: +0.19 (0.08, +0.30), height Z score: +0.15 (+0.07, +0.23)], such that no significant change was observed in the BMI Z score [+ 0.07 (-0.05, +0.20)] or BMI centile [+0.5 (-3.1, +4.1)]. There was also no change in FEV1%predicted [-0.1 (-3.8, +3.6)] between the timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: No changes in BMI were observed in children with asthma before and after COVID-19 lockdowns. Improved linear growth was noted, implying an improvement in the overall physical health of our study cohort. This may suggest improved asthma control, which may reflect avoidance of viral triggers and/or improved adherence to treatment.

Once daily combined inhaled steroid and ultra long-acting bronchodilator prescribing in pediatric asthma: a dual Center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: A high proportion of children and adolescents who have "difficult" or therapy-resistant asthma, are found to have poor adherence to maintenance therapies. Such individuals are thus difficult asthmatics (for reasons of poor adherence) rather than being young people with true difficult asthma. In our centers, once daily ICS/ULABA (Relvar™) is considered if there is an increase in reported interval symptoms, asthma attacks requiring hospital attendance or rescue oral prednisolone, or persistently low lung function despite reported regular use of a twice daily ICS/LABA preparation. In the majority of these young people, a clinical history of overt non-adherence or a clinical suspicion of covert non-adherence will be noted. METHODS: The aim of our retrospective cohort study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of Relvar™ in a selected adolescent asthma population. RESULTS: In a pre-selected group of adolescents with likely poor prior adherence to inhaled therapies, a change to Relvar™ (once daily combined ICS/ULABA) led to improvements in asthma control, as assessed by ED attendances and oral steroid burden. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective study to verify these findings and also explore the effects on quality of life, asthma control, and adherence is warranted.