QQ-SNV: single nucleotide variant detection at low frequency by comparing the quality quantiles.

BACKGROUND: Next generation sequencing enables studying heterogeneous populations of viral infections. When the sequencing is done at high coverage depth ("deep sequencing"), low frequency variants can be detected. Here we present QQ-SNV (http://sourceforge.net/projects/qqsnv), a logistic regression classifier model developed for the Illumina sequencing platforms that uses the quantiles of the quality scores, to distinguish true single nucleotide variants from sequencing errors based on the estimated SNV probability. To train the model, we created a dataset of an in silico mixture of five HIV-1 plasmids. Testing of our method in comparison to the existing methods LoFreq, ShoRAH, and V-Phaser 2 was performed on two HIV and four HCV plasmid mixture datasets and one influenza H1N1 clinical dataset. RESULTS: For default application of QQ-SNV, variants were called using a SNV probability cutoff of 0.5 (QQ-SNV(D)). To improve the sensitivity we used a SNV probability cutoff of 0.0001 (QQ-SNV(HS)). To also increase specificity, SNVs called were overruled when their frequency was below the 80(th) percentile calculated on the distribution of error frequencies (QQ-SNV(HS-P80)). When comparing QQ-SNV versus the other methods on the plasmid mixture test sets, QQ-SNV(D) performed similarly to the existing approaches. QQ-SNV(HS) was more sensitive on all test sets but with more false positives. QQ-SNV(HS-P80) was found to be the most accurate method over all test sets by balancing sensitivity and specificity. When applied to a paired-end HCV sequencing study, with lowest spiked-in true frequency of 0.5%, QQ-SNV(HS-P80) revealed a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 40-60% for the existing methods) and a specificity of 100% (vs. 98.0-99.7% for the existing methods). In addition, QQ-SNV required the least overall computation time to process the test sets. Finally, when testing on a clinical sample, four putative true variants with frequency below 0.5% were consistently detected by QQ-SNV(HS-P80) from different generations of Illumina sequencers. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and successfully evaluated a novel method, called QQ-SNV, for highly efficient single nucleotide variant calling on Illumina deep sequencing virology data.

ViVaMBC: estimating viral sequence variation in complex populations from illumina deep-sequencing data using model-based clustering.

BACKGROUND: Deep-sequencing allows for an in-depth characterization of sequence variation in complex populations. However, technology associated errors may impede a powerful assessment of low-frequency mutations. Fortunately, base calls are complemented with quality scores which are derived from a quadruplet of intensities, one channel for each nucleotide type for Illumina sequencing. The highest intensity of the four channels determines the base that is called. Mismatch bases can often be corrected by the second best base, i.e. the base with the second highest intensity in the quadruplet. A virus variant model-based clustering method, ViVaMBC, is presented that explores quality scores and second best base calls for identifying and quantifying viral variants. ViVaMBC is optimized to call variants at the codon level (nucleotide triplets) which enables immediate biological interpretation of the variants with respect to their antiviral drug responses. RESULTS: Using mixtures of HCV plasmids we show that our method accurately estimates frequencies down to 0.5%. The estimates are unbiased when average coverages of 25,000 are reached. A comparison with the SNP-callers V-Phaser2, ShoRAH, and LoFreq shows that ViVaMBC has a superb sensitivity and specificity for variants with frequencies above 0.4%. Unlike the competitors, ViVaMBC reports a higher number of false-positive findings with frequencies below 0.4% which might partially originate from picking up artificial variants introduced by errors in the sample and library preparation step. CONCLUSIONS: ViVaMBC is the first method to call viral variants directly at the codon level. The strength of the approach lies in modeling the error probabilities based on the quality scores. Although the use of second best base calls appeared very promising in our data exploration phase, their utility was limited. They provided a slight increase in sensitivity, which however does not warrant the additional computational cost of running the offline base caller. Apparently a lot of information is already contained in the quality scores enabling the model based clustering procedure to adjust the majority of the sequencing errors. Overall the sensitivity of ViVaMBC is such that technical constraints like PCR errors start to form the bottleneck for low frequency variant detection.

VirVarSeq: a low-frequency virus variant detection pipeline for Illumina sequencing using adaptive base-calling accuracy filtering.

MOTIVATION: In virology, massively parallel sequencing (MPS) opens many opportunities for studying viral quasi-species, e.g. in HIV-1- and HCV-infected patients. This is essential for understanding pathways to resistance, which can substantially improve treatment. Although MPS platforms allow in-depth characterization of sequence variation, their measurements still involve substantial technical noise. For Illumina sequencing, single base substitutions are the main error source and impede powerful assessment of low-frequency mutations. Fortunately, base calls are complemented with quality scores (Qs) that are useful for differentiating errors from the real low-frequency mutations. RESULTS: A variant calling tool, Q-cpileup, is proposed, which exploits the Qs of nucleotides in a filtering strategy to increase specificity. The tool is imbedded in an open-source pipeline, VirVarSeq, which allows variant calling starting from fastq files. Using both plasmid mixtures and clinical samples, we show that Q-cpileup is able to reduce the number of false-positive findings. The filtering strategy is adaptive and provides an optimized threshold for individual samples in each sequencing run. Additionally, linkage information is kept between single-nucleotide polymorphisms as variants are called at the codon level. This enables virologists to have an immediate biological interpretation of the reported variants with respect to their antiviral drug responses. A comparison with existing SNP caller tools reveals that calling variants at the codon level with Q-cpileup results in an outstanding sensitivity while maintaining a good specificity for variants with frequencies down to 0.5%. AVAILABILITY: The VirVarSeq is available, together with a user's guide and test data, at sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtools/?source=directory.

Data mining of public SNP databases for the selection of intragenic SNPs.

Different strategies to search public single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) databases for intragenic SNPs were evaluated. First, we assembled a strategy to annotate SNPs onto candidate genes based on a BLAST search of public SNP databases (Intragenic SNP Annotation by BLAST, ISAB). Only BLAST hits that complied with stringent criteria according to 1) percentage identity (minimum 98%), 2) BLAST hit length (the hit covers at least 98% of the length of the SNP entry in the database, or the hit is longer than 250 base pairs), and 3) location in non-repetitive DNA, were considered as valid SNPs. We assessed the intragenic context and redundancy of these SNPs, and demonstrated that the SNP content of the dbSNP and HGBASE/HGVbase databases are highly complementary but also overlap significantly. Second, we assessed the validity of intragenic SNP annotation available on the dbSNP and HGVbase websites by comparison with the results of the ISAB strategy. Only a minority of all annotated SNPs was found in common between the respective public SNP database websites and the ISAB annotation strategy. A detailed analysis was performed aiming to explain this discrepancy. As a conclusion, we recommend the application of an independent strategy (such as ISAB) to annotate intragenic SNPs, complementary to the annotation provided at the dbSNP and HGVbase websites. Such an approach might be useful in the selection process of intragenic SNPs for genotyping in genetic studies. Hum Mutat 20:162-173, 2002.