Acute pyelonephritis in cats is frequently caused by Escherichia coli resistant to potentiated penicillins but has a better prognosis than other causes of acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical findings, microbiological data, treatment, and outcome of a population of cats with suspected acute pyelonephritis (APN). ANIMALS: 32 client-owned cats. CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND PROCEDURES: Retrospective case series from 2 veterinary teaching hospitals between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Cats were included if they had a positive bacterial urine culture and a clinical diagnosis of acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Older female cats with underlying chronic kidney disease have a higher probability to develop bacterial culture-positive acute kidney injury or APN. Escherichia coli was the most commonly cultured bacterial species, and E coli isolates with susceptibility testing were resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanate but susceptible to fluoroquinolones or third-generation cephalosporins. Of the 20 cats with available follow-up information in the medical record, 14 were alive at 3 months after hospital discharge. Markers of renal function including creatinine (P = .008), BUN (P = .005), and phosphorus (P < .001) at the time of presentation were all higher in nonsurvivors compared with survivors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The survival rate with feline APN is higher than previous reports of acute kidney injury when all etiologies are considered. Nonsurvivors had more pronounced azotemia upon initial presentation. Amoxicillin-clavulanate was a poor empirical antimicrobial in this cohort based on the microbiological data.

A clinically utilized intravenous continuous rate infusion of diltiazem does not significantly decrease systolic function in healthy dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if left ventricular systolic function on echocardiography, systemic blood pressure, and electrocardiography change with a clinically accepted intravenous (IV) diltiazem constant rate infusion (CRI) compared to a control. ANIMALS: 10 healthy client-owned adult dogs. PROCEDURES: Prospective, masked, crossover study from May 27, 2021, to August 22, 2021. Dogs were randomized to receive diltiazem (loading dose of 240 µg/kg, IV followed by a CRI of 6 µg/kg/min for 300 minutes) or the same volume of 5% dextrose in water (D5W) administered IV followed by the opposite intervention after a 7-day washout. Blood pressure was monitored during each CRI, and echocardiographic and electrocardiographic studies were performed immediately before the CRI and during the last hour of the CRI. RESULTS: Postdiltiazem systolic time interval (STI) (median, 0.30; range, 0.16 to 0.34) was significantly lower than post-D5W STI (median, 0.32; range, 0.22 to 0.40; P = .046). All other echocardiographic parameters did not differ significantly between each of the groups after receiving diltiazem or D5W. Systemic blood pressure did not change significantly with either diltiazem (P = .450) or D5W (P = .940), and none of the dogs became hypotensive at any point in the study. Expectedly, negative dromotropy was observed with diltiazem. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A significant decrease in left ventricular systolic function was not appreciated in healthy dogs receiving diltiazem at a clinically accepted intravenous infusion rate at this dosing regimen. Further studies are needed in dogs with cardiac disease.

Effects of an intravenous infusion of diltiazem on glomerular filtration rate, electrolyte excretion, and urine output in healthy dogs.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in dogs has a high case fatality rate. Diltiazem might improve renal function, but effect of intravenous infusion has not been adequately studied in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine if an intravenous infusion of diltiazem improves renal function through changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), and urine output (UOP) in healthy dogs. ANIMALS: Ten healthy adult dogs. METHODS: Prospective, unmasked, crossover study. Dogs were randomized to receive diltiazem (loading dose of 240 µg/kg followed by 6 µg/kg/min for 300 min) or the same volume of 5% dextrose in water (D5W). The opposite treatment was given after a 7-day washout period. GFR and FENa were obtained at baseline and after infusion. UOP was measured starting 1 hour before diltiazem administration. RESULTS: GFR did not significantly increase from baseline with diltiazem (before diltiazem median = 2.371 mL/min/kg, range = 1.605-4.359; after diltiazem median = 2.305 mL/min/kg, range = 1.629-4.387; median difference = 0.080 mL/min/kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.417 to 0.757; P = .85), and there was no difference in D5W GFR before and after diltiazem (median = 2.389 mL/min/kg, range = 1.600-3.557; median difference = 0.036 mL/min/kg, 95% CI = -0.241 to 1.112; P = .69). FENa did not increase from baseline after administration of diltiazem (median difference = 0%, 95% CI = -0.1 to 0.1; P = .81), and there was no difference in D5W FENa (median difference = 0.1%, 95% CI = -0.1 to 0.2; P = .26). UOP did not increase with diltiazem (P = .06). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Intravenous administration of diltiazem does not improve markers of renal function in healthy dogs. Further studies are needed in dogs with AKI.

Detecting and quantifying marijuana metabolites in serum and urine of 19 dogs affected by marijuana toxicity.

Veterinarians diagnose marijuana toxicity based on clinical signs and history, or in conjunction with an over-the-counter (OTC) human urine drug screen. With the legalization of recreational marijuana use becoming more prevalent in the United States, a more accurate test to aid in the diagnosis of canine marijuana toxicity is needed. We collected urine and serum samples from 19 dogs with confirmed or suspected marijuana toxicosis from multiple veterinary hospitals and analyzed them with a novel UPLC-MS/MS method. Calibrations from 0.1 to 100 ng/mL and QC materials were prepared. Samples were extracted, purified, and eluted with solid-phase extraction. Urine samples were tested with an OTC human urine drug screen. The limit of detection (LOD) and lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) ranges for marijuana metabolites in serum were 0.05-0.25 ng/mL and 0.1-0.5 ng/mL, respectively. In urine, the LOD and LLOQ ranges for the metabolites were 0.05-0.1 ng/mL and 0.1-0.5 ng/mL, respectively. In serum, median and range of metabolite concentrations (ng/mL) detected included: THC, 65.0 (0.14-160); 11-OH-Δ9-THC, 4.78 (1.15-17.8); 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC, 2.18 (0.71-7.79); CBD, 0.28 (0.11-82.5); and THC-glucuronide, 2.05 (0.72-18.3). In the 19 urine samples, metabolite: creatinine (ng: mg) values detected included: THC, 0.22 (0.05-0.74); 11-OH-Δ9-THC, 0; 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC, 1.32 (0.16-11.2); CBD, 0.19 (0.12-0.26); THC-COOH-glucuronide, 0.08 (0.04-0.11); and THC-glucuronide, 0.98 (0.25-10.7). Twenty of 21 urine samples tested negative for THC on the urine drug screen. All 19 serum samples contained quantifiable concentrations of THC using our novel UPLC-MS/MS method. Utilizing a UPLC-MS/MS method can be a useful aid in the diagnosis of marijuana toxicosis in dogs, whereas using an OTC human urine drug test is not a useful test for confirming marijuana exposure in dogs because of the low concentration of THC-COOH in urine.