[Video head impulse test or caloric irrigation?. Contemporary diagnostic tests for vestibular schwannoma]. / Video-Kopfimpulstest oder thermische Prüfung? Zeitgemäße Funktionsdiagnostik des Vestibularisschwannoms.

The video head impulse test (vHIT) is a new method for investigating vestibular function that is currently poorly studied in terms of its value for clinical diagnosis in otolaryngology. Both the caloric irrigation and vHIT serve to evaluate the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex. In the present study, caloric irrigation and vHIT were compared in 46 patients with vestibular schwannoma. Caloric irrigation exhibits a higher sensitivity than vHIT (72% versus 41%) and both tests show only a moderate correlation. Tumor size and hearing level was significantly correlated with caloric abnormalities but not with vHIT findings. Since caloric irrigation and vHIT measure the hVOR in low and high frequency ranges, respectively, these tests have to be considered complementary and are valuable in both diagnostics and therapeutic decisions.

[The video head impulse test: first clinical experiences]. / Der Video-Kopfimpulstest: Erste klinische Erfahrungen.

BACKGROUND: Side-specific test procedures are mandatory in order to assess the function of peripheral vestibular receptors. Semicircular canals (SCC) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) can be tested by the Halmagyi and Curthoy head impulse test (HIT) and recently by means of the video head impulse test (vHIT). The vHIT procedure is a new method to measure eye and head velocity during brief and rapid head impulses. This method provides objective information of VOR and detects both overt and covert catch-up saccades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As clinical experiences with vHIT are limited, in this study the horizontal VOR (hVOR) was examined by means of the vHIT in 142 consecutive patients with acute or chronic vestibular syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 20 healthy volunteers served as a control group and exhibited a normal average VOR gain of 0.97 ± 0.09 without re-fixation saccades. In patients, 47.6% showed a pathological vHIT whereas 52.4% revealed a normal test result. Covert catch-up saccades could be revealed in 13.7% by means of vHIT whereas in 86.3% overt catch-up saccades alone or in combination with covert catch-up saccades were found in the majority of catch-up saccades in peripheral vestibular disorders. CONCLUSIONS: By means of the vHIT it is possible to obtain a side-specific and quantitative assessment of hVOR. Video-head impulse test is a reliable tool for vestibular testing even in bedside examinations of patients suffering from dizziness.