Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
J Med Ext Real ; 1(1): 4-12, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505474

RESUMEN

Medical extended reality (MXR) has emerged as a dynamic field at the intersection of health care and immersive technology, encompassing virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications across a wide range of medical disciplines. Despite its rapid growth and recognition by regulatory bodies, the field lacks a standardized taxonomy to categorize its diverse research and applications. This American Medical Extended Reality Association guideline, authored by the editorial board of the Journal of Medical Extended Reality, introduces a comprehensive taxonomy for MXR, developed through a multidisciplinary and international collaboration of experts. The guideline seeks to standardize terminology, categorize existing work, and provide a structured framework for future research and development in MXR. An international and multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened, selected based on publication track record, contributions to MXR, and other objective measures. Through an iterative process, the panel identified primary and secondary topics in MXR. These topics were refined over several rounds of review, leading to the final taxonomy. The taxonomy comprises 13 primary topics that jointly expand into 180 secondary topics, demonstrating the field's breadth and depth. At the core of the taxonomy are five overarching domains: (1) technological integration and innovation; (2) design, development, and deployment; (3) clinical and therapeutic applications; (4) education, training, and communication; and (5) ethical, regulatory, and socioeconomic considerations. The developed taxonomy offers a framework for categorizing the diverse research and applications within MXR. It may serve as a foundational tool for researchers, clinicians, funders, academic publishers, and regulators, facilitating clearer communication and categorization in this rapidly evolving field. As MXR continues to grow, this taxonomy will be instrumental in guiding its development and ensuring a cohesive understanding of its multifaceted nature.

2.
Simul Healthc ; 17(4): 226-233, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34381007

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare institutions to rapidly adapt practices for patient care, staff safety, and resource management. We evaluated contributions of the simulation center in a freestanding children's hospital during the early stages of the pandemic. METHODS: We reviewed our simulation center's activity for education-based and system-focused simulation for 2 consecutive academic years (AY19: 2018-2019 and AY20: 2019-2020). We used statistical control charts and χ 2 analyses to assess the impact of the pandemic on simulation activity as well as outputs of system-focused simulation during the first wave of the pandemic (March-June 2020) using the system failure mode taxonomy and required level of resolution. RESULTS: A total of 1983 event counts were reported. Total counts were similar between years (994 in AY19 and 989 in AY20). System-focused simulation was more prevalent in AY20 compared with AY19 (8% vs. 2% of total simulation activity, P < 0.001), mainly driven by COVID-19-related simulation events. COVID-19-related simulation occurred across the institution, identified system failure modes in all categories except culture, and was more likely to identify macro-level issues than non-COVID-19-related simulation (64% vs. 44%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Our simulation center pivoted to deliver substantial system-focused simulation across the hospital during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experience suggests that simulation centers are essential resources in achieving safe and effective hospital-wide improvement.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Atención a la Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Atención al Paciente
4.
Life Sci ; 257: 118113, 2020 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687919

RESUMEN

AIMS: To create a low-cost ventilator that could be constructed with readily-available hospital equipment for use in emergency or low-resource settings. MAIN METHODS: The novel ventilator consists of an inspiratory limb composed of an elastic flow-inflating bag encased within a non-compliant outer sheath and an expiratory limb composed of a series of two, one-way bidirectional splitter valves derived from a self-inflating bag system. An Arduino Uno microcontroller controls a solenoid valve that can be programmed to open and close to produce a set respiratory rate and inspiratory time. Using an ASL 5000 Lung Simulator, we obtained flow, pressure, and volume waveforms at different lung compliances. KEY FINDINGS: At a static lung compliance of 50 mL/cm H2O and an airway resistance of 6 cm H2O/L/s, ventilated at a PIP and PEEP of 16 and 5 cm H2O, respectively, tidal volumes of approximately 540 mL were achieved. At a static lung compliance of 20 mL/cm H2O and an airway resistance of 6 cm H2O/L/s, ventilated at a PIP and PEEP of 38 and 15 cm H2O, respectively, tidal volumes of approximately 495 mL were achieved. SIGNIFICANCE: This novel ventilator is able to safely and reliably ventilate patients with a range of pulmonary disease in a simulated setting. Opportunities exist to utilize our ventilator in emergency situations and low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Respiración Artificial/instrumentación , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Resistencia de las Vías Respiratorias/fisiología , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiología , Pandemias , Frecuencia Respiratoria/fisiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar/fisiología , Ventiladores Mecánicos/provisión & distribución
5.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 21(8): e485-e490, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32459793

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has required that hospitals rapidly adapt workflows and processes to limit disease spread and optimize the care of critically ill children. DESIGN AND SETTING: As part of our institution's coronavirus disease 2019 critical care workflow design process, we developed and conducted a number of simulation exercises, increasing in complexity, progressing to intubation wearing personal protective equipment, and culminating in activation of our difficult airway team for an airway emergency. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: In situ simulations were used to identify and rework potential failure points to generate guidance for optimal airway management in coronavirus disease 2019 suspected or positive children. Subsequent to this high-realism difficult airway simulation was a real-life difficult airway event in a patient suspected of coronavirus disease 2019 less than 12 hours later, validating potential failure points and effectiveness of rapidly generated guidance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A number of potential workflow challenges were identified during tabletop and physical in situ manikin-based simulations. Experienced clinicians served as participants, debriefed, and provided feedback that was incorporated into local site clinical pathways, job aids, and suggested practices. Clinical management of an actual suspected coronavirus disease 2019 patient with difficult airway demonstrated very similar success and anticipated failure points. Following debriefing and assembly of a success/failure grid, a coronavirus disease 2019 airway bundle template was created using these simulations and clinical experiences for others to adapt to their sites. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of tabletop planning, in situ simulations, and debriefing of real coronavirus disease 2019 cases can enhance planning, training, job aids, and feasible policies/procedures that address human factors, team communication, equipment choice, and patient/provider safety in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic era.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Flujo de Trabajo , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Capacitación en Servicio/métodos , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
7.
Pediatrics ; 138(6)2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27940682

RESUMEN

Pediatric Life Support (PLS) courses and instructional programs are educational tools developed to teach resuscitation and stabilization of children who are critically ill or injured. A number of PLS courses have been developed by national professional organizations for different health care providers (eg, pediatricians, emergency physicians, other physicians, prehospital professionals, pediatric and emergency advanced practice nurses, physician assistants). PLS courses and programs have attempted to clarify and standardize assessment and treatment approaches for clinical practice in emergency, trauma, and critical care. Although the effectiveness of PLS education has not yet been scientifically validated, the courses and programs have significantly expanded pediatric resuscitation training throughout the United States and internationally. Variability in terminology and in assessment components used in education and training among PLS courses has the potential to create confusion among target groups and in how experts train educators and learners to teach and practice pediatric emergency, trauma, and critical care. It is critical that all educators use standard terminology and patient assessment to address potential or actual conflicts regarding patient evaluation and treatment. This article provides a consensus of several organizations as to the proper order and terminology for pediatric patient assessment. The Supplemental Information provides definitions for terms and nomenclature used in pediatric resuscitation and life support courses.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/educación , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/organización & administración , Comités Consultivos , Niño , Preescolar , Consenso , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Pediatría/educación , Resucitación/educación , Estados Unidos
9.
Air Med J ; 34(3): 152-5, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25934241

RESUMEN

A mobile intensive care unit (MICU) was dispatched to transport a critically injured patient with a gunshot wound to the spine from a community hospital to a level I trauma center. The patient transported suffered from a gunshot wound to the left posterior midthoracic region. The patient experienced transient traumatic cardiac arrest before transfer. The MICU crew arrived at the emergency department and found the patient intubated and with a chest tube. Fluid resuscitation was continued, and the patient was transported. At the level I trauma center, the patient was admitted in critical condition. The patient was declared brain-dead on postinjury day 8. Spinal immobilization in penetrating trauma is a controversial topic. This patient met the historic clinical indication for spinal immobilization. The patient's injuries included multiple cervical vertebrae fractures and spinal cord disruption from the penetrating projectile, with the bullet remaining in the patient. Interfacility management by the MICU crew was focused on adequate ventilations and immobilization while continuing to address the patient's shock state. Penetrating injuries to the spinal cord can be devastating. Being aware of the pathophysiology of penetrating spinal injuries, along with current evidence-based practice, will assist providers in making sound clinical decisions for their patients.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Transferencia de Pacientes , Restricción Física , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adulto , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco , Hospitales Comunitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Centros Traumatológicos
14.
JEMS ; 38(8): 36-41, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24319883

RESUMEN

A variety of chronic pathologies often come along with the aging process and are experienced by many patients in late adulthood. EMS providers must be aware of the various challenges of transporting the geriatric population. And although an emphasis is often placed on the physical and medical issues associated with this population, it's also imperative to look at the whole picture to help prevent issues before they become an emegent problem. This includes being vigilant for elder abuse and neglect, as well as potential home hazards-including fall potentials and maintaining colder home temperatures-and dangerous cost-cutting measures, such as sharing medications. Prevention is key to helping older patients avoid potentially devastating situations, such as falls, medication errors and urban hyperthermia. But when those situations happen and providers are called to care for an older patient, compassion and demeanor are necessary to make this more vulnerable patient population comfortable and safe.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Evaluación Geriátrica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comunicación , Abuso de Ancianos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Polifarmacia , Factores de Riesgo , Medio Social , Transporte de Pacientes , Poblaciones Vulnerables
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...