Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 216(3): 263-70, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23078914

RESUMEN

In the mid-1940s, the United States began producing atomic weapon components at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). In an attempt to better understand historical exposure to nearby residents, this study evaluates plutonium activity in human tissue relative to residential location and length of time at residence. Data on plutonium activity in the lung, vertebrae, and liver of nearby residents were obtained during autopsies as a part of the Los Alamos Tissue Program. Participant residential histories and the distance from each residence to the primary plutonium processing buildings at LANL were evaluated in the analysis. Summary statistics, including Student t-tests and simple regressions, were calculated. Because the biological half-life of plutonium can vary significantly by organ, data were analyzed separately by tissue type (lung, liver, vertebrae). The ratios of plutonium activity (vertebrae:liver; liver:lung) were also analyzed in order to evaluate the importance of timing of exposure. Tissue data were available for 236 participants who lived in a total of 809 locations, of which 677 were verified postal addresses. Residents of Los Alamos were found to have higher plutonium activities in the lung than non-residents. Further, those who moved to Los Alamos before 1955 had higher lung activities than those who moved there later. These trends were not observed with the liver, vertebrae, or vertebrae:liver and liver:lung ratio data, however, and should be interpreted with caution. Although there are many limitations to this study, including the amount of available data and the analytical methods used to analyze the tissue, the overall results indicate that residence (defined as the year that the individual moved to Los Alamos) may have had a strong correlation to plutonium activity in human tissue. This study is the first to present the results of Los Alamos Autopsy Program in relation to residential status and location in Los Alamos.


Asunto(s)
Hígado/química , Pulmón/química , Plutonio/análisis , Contaminantes Radiactivos/análisis , Columna Vertebral/química , Autopsia , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Femenino , Humanos , Laboratorios , Masculino , New Mexico , Monitoreo de Radiación
2.
J Environ Monit ; 13(10): 2735-47, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21904770

RESUMEN

From 1999 through 2010, a team of scientists and engineers systematically reviewed approximately eight million classified and unclassified documents at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) that describe historical off-site releases of radionuclides and chemicals in order to determine the extent to which a full-scale dose reconstruction for releases is warranted and/or feasible. As a part of this effort, a relative ranking of historical airborne and waterborne radionuclide releases from LANL was established using priority index (PI) values that were calculated from estimated annual quantities released and the maximum allowable effluent concentrations according to The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC). Chemical releases were ranked based on annual usage estimates and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) toxicity values. PI results for airborne radionuclides indicate that early plutonium operations were of most concern between 1948 and 1961, in 1967, and again from 1970 through 1973. Airborne releases of uranium were found to be of most interest for 1968, from 1974 through 1978, and again in 1996. Mixed fission products yielded the highest PI value for 1969. Mixed activation product releases yielded the highest PI values from 1979 to 1995. For waterborne releases, results indicate that plutonium is of most concern for all years evaluated with the exception of 1956 when (90)Sr yielded the highest PI value. The prioritization of chemical releases indicate that four of the top five ranked chemicals were organic solvents that were commonly used in chemical processing and for cleaning. Trichloroethylene ranked highest, indicating highest relative potential for health effects, for both cancer and non-cancer effects. Documents also indicate that beryllium was used in significant quantities, which could have lead to residential exposures exceeding established environmental and occupational exposure limits, and warrants further consideration. In part because of the close proximity of residents to LANL, further study of historical LANL releases and the potential impact to public health is recommended for those materials with the largest priority index values; namely, plutonium, uranium, and selected chemicals.


Asunto(s)
Liberación de Peligros Químicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Contaminantes Ambientales/análisis , Contaminación Ambiental/estadística & datos numéricos , Liberación de Radiactividad Peligrosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Agencias Gubernamentales , Humanos , New Mexico , Radioisótopos/análisis , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
3.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 37(2): 147-58, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20941467

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Benzene is a natural constituent of crude oil and natural gas (0.1-3.0% by volume). Materials that are refined from crude oil and natural gas contain some residual benzene. Few datasets have appeared in the peer-reviewed literature characterizing exposures to benzene at specific refineries or during specific tasks. In this study, historical samples of airborne benzene collected from 1977-2005 at the ExxonMobil Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, docks were evaluated. METHODS: Workers were categorized into 11 job titles, and both non-task (≤180 min sample duration) and task-related (<180 min) benzene concentrations were assessed. Approximately 800 personal air samples (406 non-task and 397 task-related) were analyzed. RESULTS: Non-task samples showed that concentrations varied significantly across job titles and generally resulted from exposures during short-duration tasks such as tank sampling. The contractor - tankerman job title had the highest average concentration [N=38, mean 1.4 parts per million (ppm), standard deviation (SD) 2.6]. Task-related samples indicated that the highest exposures were associated with the disconnection of cargo loading hoses (N=134, mean 11 ppm, SD 32). Non-task samples for specific job categories showed that concentrations have decreased over the past 30 years. Recognizing the potential for benzene exposure, this facility has required workers to use respiratory protective equipment during selected tasks and activities; thus, the concentrations measured were likely greater than those that the employee actually experienced. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a job title- and task-focused analysis of occupational exposure to benzene during dock facility operations that is insightful for understanding the Baton Rouge facility and others similar to it over the past 30 years.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Benceno/análisis , Industria Química , Exposición Profesional , Petróleo , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/efectos adversos , Benceno/efectos adversos , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Louisiana , Dispositivos de Protección Respiratoria
4.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 213(4): 285-301, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20494616

RESUMEN

Because crude oil and refined petroleum products can contain benzene and benzene is considered a known carcinogen by numerous independent and governmental agencies, including the International Agency for Cancer Research, the petroleum industry has implemented exposure control programs for decades. As part of the benzene control programs, significant exposure assessments have been performed; both qualitatively and through quantitative measurements. In this study, we evaluated the airborne concentrations of benzene and their variability over time at the ExxonMobil refinery in Beaumont, TX between 1976 and 2007. The results of 5854 personal air samples are included in this analysis; 3761 were considered non-task (> or =180 min) personal samples, and 2093 were considered task-related (<180 min) personal samples. Dock and loading rack samples were analyzed separately from the refinery samples because in addition to refinery products, employees at the dock and loading rack also handled chemical plant products. In general, the non-task personal refinery air samples indicated that exposures of the past 30 years were generally below the occupational exposure limit of 1 ppm (mean=0.30 ppm, SD=3.1), were higher during routine (mean=0.32 ppm, SD=3.3) than turnaround operations (mean=0.16 ppm, SD=0.87), and decreased slightly over time. The job sampled most frequently during routine operations was that of process technician, and, as broken down by area, resulted in the following mean benzene air concentrations: coker (n=146, mean=0.014 ppm, SD=0.036), lube extraction unit (n=31, mean<0.070 ppm), pipestills (n=136, mean=0.12, SD=0.47), waste treatment (n=107, mean=0.20, SD=0.28), and all other areas (n=1115, mean=0.059 ppm, SD=0.36). Task-based samples indicated that the highest exposures resulted from the tank cleaning tasks, although the overall task mean benzene air concentration was 1.4 ppm during routine operations. The most frequently sampled task during routine operations was blinding and breaking, and the mean benzene air concentrations associated with this task were statistically higher in the reformer area of the refinery (n=311, mean=3.2 ppm, SD=7.9) than in all other areas (n=200, mean=0.92 ppm, SD=3.1). However, task-related exposures were found to be statistically similar across job categories for a given task. This study thus provides a task-focused analysis for occupational exposure to benzene during refinery operations, and will be useful for understanding exposures at this refinery.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Benceno/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Petróleo , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción , Humanos , Texas
5.
Health Phys ; 98(3): 480-97, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20147790

RESUMEN

The world's first atomic bomb was tested in New Mexico on 16 July 1945. From 1999 through 2008, scientists working for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gathered information relevant to past releases from Los Alamos activities, including the Trinity test. Detonation on a 30.5 m tower enhanced radioactive fallout, and terrain and wind patterns caused "hot spots" of deposition. Several ranchers reported that fallout resembling flour was visible for 4 to 5 d after the blast, and residents living as close as 19 km from ground zero collected rain water from metal roofs for drinking. Pressures to maintain secrecy and avoid legal claims led to decisions that would not likely have been made in later tests. Residents were not warned before the test or informed afterward about potential protective actions, and no evacuations were conducted. Occupied homes were overlooked on the day of the blast. Exposure rates in residential areas were recorded as high as 1.4 microC kg s (20 R h) using instruments that were crude, ill suited to field use, and incapable of effectively measuring alpha contamination from about 4.8 kg of unfissioned plutonium that was dispersed. Vehicle shielding and contamination were recognized but not corrected for. To date, the post-shot field team measurements have not been rigorously evaluated, cross-checked, adjusted, or subjected to uncertainty analysis. Evaluations of Trinity fallout published to date have not addressed internal doses to members of the public following intakes of contaminated air, water, or foods. The closing of these data gaps appears feasible with the information that has been assembled and would support placement of the Trinity event in perspective as a source of public radiation exposure and more defensible evaluation of the potential for human health effects.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Explosiones , Armas Nucleares , Salud Radiológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/análisis , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Aire/historia , Toma de Decisiones , Demografía , Revelación , Documentación , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/historia , Explosiones/historia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , New Mexico , Armas Nucleares/historia , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica/historia , Ceniza Radiactiva/efectos adversos , Ceniza Radiactiva/historia , Ceniza Radiactiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Radiológica/historia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA