Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Chronic Postoperative Pain Severity in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Up to 56% of patients develop chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CPSP can affect patients' moods and decrease daily activities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate CPSP severity in patients following off-pump (OP) CABG using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This was a prospective cohort study conducted in a cardiac surgery department of a teaching hospital. Patients undergoing OP-CABG were enrolled in an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group (n = 27) or a control (CON) group (n = 24). Before the induction of general anesthesia, ESPB was performed on both sides under ultrasound guidance using 0.375% ropivacaine. The secondary outcomes included cumulative oxycodone consumption, acute pain intensity, mechanical ventilation time, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. CPSP intensity was lower in the ESPB group than in the CON group 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were also observed in other outcomes, including postoperative pain severity, opioid consumption, mechanical ventilation time, and hospital length of stay, in favor of the ESPB group. Preemptive ESPB appears to decrease the risk of CPSP development in patients undergoing OP-CABG. Reduced acute pain severity and shorter mechanical ventilation times and hospital stays should improve patients' satisfaction and reduce perioperative complications.

The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed in a university hospital. We randomly allocated patients to one of three groups: ESP, SHAM, and control (CON). Procedures in the ESP and SHAM blocks were performed ipsilaterally with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline (0.4 mL/kg). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the patient's improvement with quality-of-recovery 40 (QoR-40) a day after surgery. Other outcome assessments included postoperative pain evaluation on the visual analog scale (VAS), 24-hour opioid consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), time to the first opioid demand, and global satisfaction with perioperative treatment. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the ESP group had improved QoR-40 compared to the CON group, 186 [177-193] vs. 175 [165-183] (medians and interquartile ranges). Pain severity was significantly higher in the CON group compared to the ESP group at hours 2 (38 [23-53] vs. 20 [7-32]) and 4 (30 [18-51] vs. 19 [7-25]). Moreover, we observed lower oxycodone consumption after 24 hours with the PCA pump between the ESP (4 [2-8] mg) and the CON (9.5 [5-19]) groups. Patients in the CON group used PCA sooner than those in the ESP group. Participants in the ESP group were more satisfied with treatment than those in the CON group. We found no statistical difference between SHAM and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CON group, the ESP block improved the quality of recovery, alleviated pain intensity, and lowered opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, we did not observe this superiority in comparison with the SHAM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04726878 .

Transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumborum block did not reduce the incidence or severity of chronic postsurgical pain following cesarean section: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Sparse data exist on the prevalence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following cesarean section. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in the prevention of CPSP after cesarean section. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital from June 2017 to July 2018 as a prospective, observational trial. We recruited 233 women with singleton pregnancies, above 18 years of age, ≥ 36 weeks of gestation, undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The patients received either TAP block or QLB as the primary analgesia technique following cesarean section. The control group consisted of patients without any postsurgical plane block. The incidence and characteristics of chronic pain were evaluated using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory at the first, third, and sixth months after surgery. RESULTS: Fewer patients in the control group perceived CPSP than in TAP or QLB groups one and three months after cesarean section, but not after six months. Accordingly, CPSP severity was significantly lower in the control group than after plane blocks at the first and third month. No difference in the risk of CPSP was found between different indications for cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: CPSP is highly prevalent following cesarean section. The studied plane blocks did not reduce the incidence or severity of CPSP after cesarean section when compared to the standard analgesic regimen.

Job satisfaction among anesthetic and intensive care nurses - multicenter, observational study.

BACKGROUND: It is known that job satisfaction has an important impact on efficacy or burnout syndrome of medical personnel. Many studies have concerned job satisfaction among critical care nurses. Not as many have focused on anesthesia nurses working in operating theaters. In Poland, anesthesia and intensive care is a combined specialty for nurses. However, nurses work in an intensive care unit (ICU) or in an operating room (OR), and very rarely in both settings. We would like to compare satisfaction between ICU and OR nurses. METHODS: It was a multicenter cross-sectional study. 406 nurses from thirteen hospitals participated in this study. All respondents filled in the questionnaire that contained fifteen Likert-like questions reflecting different aspects of job satisfaction. Demographic data were also collected. RESULTS: We did not find a significant difference between ICU and OR nurses in the overall job satisfaction. Furthermore, the type of hospital did not significantly influence satisfaction of our study participants. The most important factor which differentiated the level of satisfaction among nurses was the region of Poland in which they worked. Interestingly, nurses who worked in ICUs were significantly younger in comparison to their colleagues from ORs. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the region of the country in which nurses work might play a very important role in their satisfaction.