Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP): an underestimated problem after incisional hernia treatment.

BACKGROUND: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a potential long-term problem following open incisional hernia repair which may affect the quality of life of patients despite successful anatomical repair of the hernia. The aim of this manuscript was to identify the incidence and outcome of patients following open incisional hernia repair in respect of risk factors to develop CPSP. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent open incisional hernia repair between 2015 and 2021 was performed. Pre-existing conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus and malignancy), hernia complexity, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain medication were analyzed using the local database. Quality of life and CPSP were assessed using the EuraHS Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 182 cases were retrospectively included in a detailed analysis based on the complete EuraHS (QoL) questionnaire. During the average follow-up period of 46 months, this long-term follow-up revealed a 54.4% incidence of CPSP and including a rate of 14.8% for severe CPSP (sCPSP) after open incisional hernia surgery. The complexity of the hernia and the demographic variables were not different between the group with and without CPSP. Patients with CPSP reported significantly reduced QoL. The analgesics score which includes the need of pain medication in the initial days after surgery was significantly higher in patients with CPSP than in those without (no CPSP: 2.86 vs. CPSP: 3.35; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The presence of CPSP after open incisional hernia repair represents a frequent and underestimated long-term problem which has been not been recognized to this extent before. CPSP impairs QoL in these patients. Patients at risk to develop CPSP can be identified in the perioperative setting by the need of high doses of pain medication using the analgesics score. Possibly timely adjustment of pain medication, even in the domestic setting, could alleviate the chronicity or severity of CPSP.

Postoperative Analgesics Score as a Predictor of Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Lessons Learned From a Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is a common complication after inguinal hernia surgery and occurs in up to 10-14% of cases. CPIP has a significant impact on daily life, work ability and thus compromises quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study was an in-depth analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair to further refine the prediction of the onset of CPIP reliably. METHODS: A single center retrospective analysis of patients with who underwent open or minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair from 2016 to 2021 was carried out. Complication rates, detailed analysis of postoperative pain medication and quality of life using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 596 consecutive procedures, 344 patients were included in detailed analyses. While patient cohorts were different in terms of age and co-morbidities, and the prevalence of CPIP was 12.2% without differences between the surgical procedures (Lichtenstein: 12.8%; TEP 10.9%; TAPP 13.5%). Postoperative pain was evaluated using a newly developed analgesic score. Patients who developed CPIP later had a significant higher consumption of analgesics at discharge (p = 0.016). As additional risk factors for CPIP younger patient age and postoperative complications were identified. CONCLUSION: The prospective use of the analgesic score established here could be helpful to identify patients that are at risk to develop CPIP. These patients could benefit from a structured follow-up to allow early therapeutic intervention to prevent chronification and restore the quality of life.

Predictive value of computed tomography on surgical resectability in locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with multiagent induction chemotherapy: Results from a prospective, multicentre phase 2 trial (NEOLAP-AIO-PAK-0113).

PURPOSE: To assess the role of current imaging-based resectability criteria and the degree of radiological downsizing in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) after multiagent induction chemotherapy (ICT) in multicentre, open-label, randomized phase 2 trial. METHOD: LAPC patients were prospectively treated with multiagent ICT followed by surgical exploration within the NEOLAP trial. All patients underwent CT scan at baseline and after ICT to assess resectability status according to national comprehensive cancer network guidelines (NCCN) criteria and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) at the local study center and retrospectively in a central review. Imaging results were compared in terms of local and central staging, downsizing and pathological resection status. RESULTS: 83 patients were evaluable for central review of baseline and restaging imaging results. Downstaging by central review was rarely seen after multiagent ICT (7.7%), whereas tumor downsizing was documented frequently (any downsizing 90.4%, downsizing to partial response (PR) according to RECIST: 26.5%). Patients with any downsizing showed no significant different R0 resection rate (37.3%) as patients that fulfilled the criteria of PR (40.9%). The sensitivity of any downsizing for predicting R0 resection was 97% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.88. ROC-analysis revealed that tumor downsizing was a predictor of R0 resection (AUC 0.647, p = 0.028) with a best cut-off value of 22.5% downsizing yielding a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 61%. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging-based tumor downsizing and not downstaging can guide the selection of patients with a realistic chance of R0-resection in LAPC after multi-agent ICT.

[Surgical strategies for hereditary colorectal cancer]. / Operative Strategien bei hereditären kolorektalen Karzinomen.

Hereditary colorectal cancer (hCRC) represents a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In addition to the usual diagnostic methods, the family history, histological confirmation and mutation analysis play an important role in identifying the type of hereditary CRC. The diagnosis and classification of hCRC are carried out based on the anamnesis, clinical presentation and histology and the further treatment is determined depending on the underlying type of hCRC. For familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) coloproctomucosectomy after the end of puberty is always recommended, whereas the treatment recommendations for other forms, such as attenuated FAP (aFAP), MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome), range from close surveillance and endoscopic control, through segmental resection up to colectomy. Irrespective of the type of hCRC, the treatment regimens necessitate an individualized approach and require close interdisciplinary cooperation. When colorectal resection is performed, minimally invasive procedures should principally be prioritized and some studies could demonstrate a potential benefit of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopy.

[Ileal pouch after restorative coloproctectomy]. / Dünndarmpouch nach restaurativer Proktokolektomie.

The continuous development of pouch surgery has enabled continence-preserving treatment after coloproctectomy. The ileoanal J­pouch is nowadays the standard reconstruction after restorative coloproctectomy with excellent functional long-term results. Taking the relative contraindications and a suitable patient selection into consideration, pouch placement can be indicated not only for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, but also for patients with nonfistular Crohn's disease. Due to a high treatment density with immunosuppressants, the surgical treatment regimen should be subdivided into a multistage procedure, whereby according to current data a modified two-stage procedure should be favored.

Optimizing laparoscopic training efficacy by 'deconstruction into key steps': a randomized controlled trial with novice medical students.

BACKGROUND: Simulator training is an effective way of acquiring laparoscopic skills but there remains a need to optimize teaching methods to accelerate learning. We evaluated the effect of the mental exercise 'deconstruction into key steps' (DIKS) on the time required to acquire laparoscopic skills. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with undergraduate medical students was implemented into a structured curricular laparoscopic training course. The intervention group (IG) was trained using the DIKS approach, while the control group (CG) underwent the standard course. Laparoscopic performance of all participants was video-recorded at baseline (t0), after the first session (t1) and after the second session (t2) nine days later. Two double-blinded raters assessed the videos. The Impact of potential covariates on performance (gender, age, prior laparoscopic experience, self-assessed motivation and self-assessed dexterity) was evaluated with a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS: Both the IG (n = 58) and the CG (n = 68) improved their performance after each training session (p < 0.001) but with notable differences between sessions. Whereas the CG significantly improved their performance from t0 -t1 (p < 0.05), DIKS shortened practical exercise time by 58% so that the IG outperformed the CG from t1 -t2, (p < 0.05). High self-assessed motivation and dexterity associated with significantly better performance (p < 0.05). Male participants demonstrated significantly higher overall performance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Mental exercises like DIKS can improve laparoscopic performance and shorten practice times. Given the limited exposure of surgical residents to simulator training, implementation of mental exercises like DIKS is highly recommended. Gender, self-assessed dexterity, and motivation all appreciably influence performance in laparoscopic training.

[Indications for surgical treatment of diverticular disease]. / Indikationsstellung zur chirurgischen Therapie der Divertikelkrankheit.

BACKGROUND: The correct medical indications are the fundamental decision process for the surgical treatment and ensuring the quality. OBJECTIVE: Description of the indications for surgical treatment of the various types of diverticular disease according to the current level of evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The narrative review is based on current national and international guidelines and a selective literature search. RESULTS: There are basically three main indications for resection of the sigmoid colon. 1) Prophylactic for avoidance of complications after successful conservative treatment of acute complicated diverticulitis with macroabscess formation and high risk of recurrence (classification of diverticular disease, CDD, type 2b). 2) In patients with persistent symptoms and impaired quality of life resection of the sigmoid colon of various types (CDD types 1-3) can effectively enable a significant improvement in the quality of life and is therefore to be recommended in cases of individually acceptable perioperative risks. 3) Indications for urgent resection of the sigmoid colon are present for free perforation or failure of conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: The indications for surgery should be defined by the type of diverticular disease, the aim of surgical treatment, the evaluation of the efficacy of surgical treatment in comparison to conservative treatment and an individual appraisal of the risks.

Hospital volume following major surgery for gastric cancer determines in-hospital mortality rate and failure to rescue: a nation-wide study based on German billing data (2009-2017).

BACKGROUND: For many cancer resections, a hospital volume-outcome relationship exists. The data regarding gastric cancer resection-especially in the western hemisphere-are ambiguous. This study analyzes the impact of gastric cancer surgery caseload per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue in Germany. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from 2009 to 2017 who underwent gastric resection were identified from nation-wide administrative data. Hospitals were grouped into five equal caseload quintiles (I-V in ascending caseload order). Postoperative deaths and failure to rescue were determined. RESULTS: Forty-six thousand one hundred eighty-seven patients were identified. There was a significant shift from partial resections in low-volume hospitals to more extended resections in high-volume centers. The overall in-house mortality rate was 6.2%. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 7.9% in quintile I to 4.4% in quintile V, with a significant trend between volume categories (p < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, quintile V hospitals (average of 29 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0.50 (95% CI 0.39-0.65), compared to the baseline in-house mortality rate in quintile I (on average 1.5 interventions/year) (p < 0.001). In an analysis only evaluating hospitals with more than 30 resections per year mortality dropped below 4%. The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue (FtR) decreased significantly with increasing caseload. CONCLUSION: Patients who had gastric cancer surgery in hospitals with higher volume had better outcomes and a reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications.

Surgery in times of COVID-19-recommendations for hospital and patient management.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has escalated rapidly to a global pandemic stretching healthcare systems worldwide to their limits. Surgeons have had to immediately react to this unprecedented clinical challenge by systematically repurposing surgical wards. PURPOSE: To provide a detailed set of guidelines developed in a surgical ward at University Hospital Wuerzburg to safely accommodate the exponentially rising cases of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients without compromising the care of emergency surgery and oncological patients or jeopardizing the well-being of hospital staff. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic prioritization of SARS-CoV-2 infected and surgical patient groups is key to preserving life while maintaining high surgical standards. Strictly segregating patient groups in emergency rooms, non-intensive care wards and operating areas prevents viral spread while adequately training and carefully selecting hospital staff allow them to confidently and successfully undertake their respective clinical duties.

Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hospital volume after rectal cancer surgery is seldom investigated. This study aimed to analyse the impact of annual rectal cancer surgery cases per hospital on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and who had a rectal resection procedure code from 2012 to 2015 were identified from nationwide administrative hospital data. Hospitals were grouped into five quintiles according to caseload. The absolute number of patients, postoperative deaths and failure to rescue (defined as in-hospital mortality after a documented postoperative complication) for severe postoperative complications were determined. RESULTS: Some 64 349 patients were identified. The overall in-house mortality rate was 3·9 per cent. The crude in-hospital mortality rate ranged from 5·3 per cent in very low-volume hospitals to 2·6 per cent in very high-volume centres, with a distinct trend between volume categories (P < 0·001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis using hospital volume as random effect, very high-volume hospitals (53 interventions/year) had a risk-adjusted odds ratio of 0·58 (95 per cent c.i. 0·47 to 0·73), compared with the baseline in-house mortality rate in very low-volume hospitals (6 interventions per year) (P < 0·001). The overall postoperative complication rate was comparable between different volume quintiles, but failure to rescue decreased significantly with increasing caseload (15·6 per cent after pulmonary embolism in the highest volume quintile versus 38 per cent in the lowest quintile; P = 0·010). CONCLUSION: Patients who had rectal cancer surgery in high-volume hospitals showed better outcomes and reduced failure to rescue rates for severe complications than those treated in low-volume hospitals.

ANTECEDENTES: El impacto del volumen hospitalario en los resultados de la cirugía del cáncer de recto ha sido poco investigado. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el impacto de los casos anuales de cirugía de cáncer de recto por hospital en la mortalidad postoperatoria (postoperative mortality, POM) y el fracaso en el rescate (failure to rescue, FtR). MÉTODOS: Todos los casos de pacientes hospitalizados con un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto y un código de procedimiento de resección rectal, tratados de 2012 a 2015, se identificaron a partir de datos hospitalarios administrativos a nivel nacional. Los hospitales se agruparon en cinco quintiles según el volumen de casos. Se determinó el número absoluto de pacientes, la POM y el FtR por complicaciones postoperatorias graves. El FtR se definió como la mortalidad hospitalaria después de una complicación postoperatoria documentada. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 64.349 casos entre 2012 y 2015. La tasa de mortalidad hospitalaria global fue del 3,89% (n = 2.506). Las tasas brutas de mortalidad hospitalaria variaron de 5,34% (n = 687) en hospitales de muy bajo volumen a 2,63% (n = 337) en centros de muy alto volumen, con una tendencia distinta entre las categorías de centros (P < 0,001). En el análisis de regresión logística multivariante utilizando el volumen hospitalario como efecto aleatorio, los hospitales de muy alto volumen (53 intervenciones/año) tenían una razón de oportunidades (odds ratio, OR) ajustada por riesgo de 0,58 (i.c. del 95%: 0,47-0,73) en comparación con la tasa basal de mortalidad hospitalaria en hospitales de muy bajo volumen (6 intervenciones/año) (P < 0,001). La tasa global de complicaciones postoperatorias fue comparable entre los diferentes quintiles de volumen, pero el FtR disminuyó significativamente con el aumento del volumen de casos (15,63% FtR tras una embolia pulmonar en el quintil más alto versus 38,4% en el hospital del quintil más bajo, P = 0,01). CONCLUSIÓN: Los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer de recto en hospitales de gran volumen presentaron mejores resultados y una disminución de las tasas de fracaso en el rescate por complicaciones graves en comparación con los pacientes tratados en hospitales de bajo volumen.

[Selection criteria for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer : Neoadjuvant therapy even for locally advanced colon cancer?] / Selektionskriterien zur neoadjuvanten Radiochemotherapie beim Rektumkarzinom : Neoadjuvante Therapie auch beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Kolonkarzinom?

During the last two decades a neoadjuvant treatment concept has been established for an increasing number of malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract; however, these concepts are still subject to a constant change concerning the indications and type of treatment. A prime example for this is rectal cancer. The rate of local recurrence in particular was significantly reduced by neoadjuvant therapy but until now it has not been possible to validly show an improvement in overall or disease-free survival. At the beginning of the millennium it was recommended to treat every rectal carcinoma in UICC stages II and III with neoadjuvant therapy, independent of the height localization. In the meantime this has increasingly been relativized and only locally advanced tumors of the middle and lower thirds of the rectum should be pretreated, whereas tumors of the upper third of the rectum should basically be treated in the same way as colon cancer. It is to be expected that there will be further differentiation concerning the indications in this context in the future mainly based on a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. At the same time, initial studies for colon cancer show that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be beneficial and that an optimized computed tomography (CT) scan can be a worthwhile tool with respect to pretherapeutic stratification of patients.

Validation and educational impact study of the NANEP high-fidelity simulation model for open preperitoneal mesh repair of umbilical hernia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop, validate and analyze the educational impact of a high-fidelity simulation model for open preperitoneal mesh repair of an umbilical hernia. The number of surgical simulators available for training residents is limited. Primary for ethical reasons and secondary for the emerging pay-per-quality policies, practicing-on simulators rather than patients is considered gold standard. Validated full-procedural surgical models will become more and more important in training residents. Such models may assure that evidence-based standards regarding technical aspects of the procedures become integral part of the curriculum. Furthermore, they can be employed as a quality control of residents' skills (Fonseca et al. in J Surg Educ 70:129-137, 2013). METHODS: In a repeated measures design, medical students, residents in their last year of training and attending surgeons performed an open preperitoneal mesh repair on the NANEP model [NANEP stands for the German acronym Nabelhernien-Netzimplatation-Präperitonal (English: Umbilical hernia mesh implantation preperitoneal)]. Subjects were categorized as "Beginners" (internship students) or "Experts" (residents and surgeons). Content validity was analyzed by criteria of subject-matter-experts. Blinded raters assessed surgical skills by means of the Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) using the online platform "CATLIVE". Differential validity was measured by group differences. Proficiency gain was analyzed by monitoring the learning curve (Gallagher et al. in Ann Surg 241:364-372, 2005). Post-operative examination of the simulators shed light on criterion validity. RESULTS: The NANEP model-proofed content and construct-valid significant Bonferroni-corrected differences were found between beginners and experts (p < 0.05). Beginners showed a significant learning increase from the first to the second surgery (p < 0.05). Post-operative examination data confirmed criterion validity. CONCLUSION: The NANEP model is an inexpensive, simple and efficient simulation model. It has highly realistic features, it has been shown to be of high-fidelity, full-procedural and benchtop-model. The NANEP model meets the main needs of surgical educational courses at the beginning of residency.

Incisional hernia repair in a high-fidelity silicone model for open retro-muscular mesh implantation with preparation of the fatty triangle: validation and educational impact study.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair requires detailed anatomic knowledge. Regarding median subxiphoidal hernias, the proper preparation of the fatty triangle is challenging. To foster proficiency-based training, a cost-efficient model for open median retromuscular mesh repair resembling the human body was developed, including the main anatomical structures related to the procedure. The aim is to create and validate a high-fidelity model on open retromuscular mesh repair suitable for "training before doing". MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different types of fabrics for imitation of connective tissue and 2-component silicones were used to construct the incisional hernia model. Sample size for validation of the model was determined by a triangular testing approach. Operations from six beginners and six experts were assessed by three blinded-raters. Reliability and construct-validity were evaluated on a behaviorally anchored rating scale (highest score: 4) for the criteria: "instrument use", "tissue handling", "near misses and errors", and "end-product quality". RESULTS: The model authentically mimicked an open median retromuscular mesh repair. Participants considered the procedure realistic. Reliability was excellent, ranging from 0.811 to 0.974 for "end-product quality", and "tissue handling" respectively. Construct-validity was confirmed with experts significantly outperforming beginners in the "use of instruments" (Mbeg. = 2.33, Mexp. = 3.94, p < 0.001), "tissue handling" (Mbeg. = 2.11, Mexp. = 3.72, p < 0.001), "near misses and errors" (Mbeg. = 2.67, Mexp. = 3.67, p < 0.001), and "end-product quality" (Mbeg. = 2.78, Mexp. = 3.72, p < 0.001). Criterion-validity revealed a paradox effect: beginners performed significantly better than experts (p < 0.05) when preparing the fatty triangle. CONCLUSIONS: The model covers all relevant aspects involved in median-open retromuscular incisional hernia mesh repair. Performance differences between beginners and experts confirm construct-validity and thereby realism of the model. It enables to efficiently improve and practice technical skills of the demanding surgery.

Targeting bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) inhibits MYC expression in colorectal cancer cells.

The transcriptional regulator BRD4 has been shown to be important for the expression of several oncogenes including MYC. Inhibiting of BRD4 has broad antiproliferative activity in different cancer cell types. The small molecule JQ1 blocks the interaction of BRD4 with acetylated histones leading to transcriptional modulation. Depleting BRD4 via engineered bifunctional small molecules named PROTACs (proteolysis targeting chimeras) represents the next-generation approach to JQ1-mediated BRD4 inhibition. PROTACs trigger BRD4 for proteasomale degradation by recruiting E3 ligases. The aim of this study was therefore to validate the importance of BRD4 as a relevant target in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and to compare the efficacy of BRD4 inhibition with BRD4 degradation on downregulating MYC expression. JQ1 induced a downregulation of both MYC mRNA and MYC protein associated with an antiproliferative phenotype in CRC cells. dBET1 and MZ1 induced degradation of BRD4 followed by a reduction in MYC expression and CRC cell proliferation. In SW480 cells, where dBET1 failed, we found significantly lower levels of the E3 ligase cereblon, which is essential for dBET1-induced BRD4 degradation. To gain mechanistic insight into the unresponsiveness to dBET1, we generated dBET1-resistant LS174t cells and found a strong downregulation of cereblon protein. These findings suggest that inhibition of BRD4 by JQ1 and degradation of BRD4 by dBET1 and MZ1 are powerful tools for reducing MYC expression and CRC cell proliferation. In addition, downregulation of cereblon may be an important mechanism for developing dBET1 resistance, which can be evaded by incubating dBET1-resistant cells with JQ1 or MZ1.

Nationwide in-hospital mortality following colonic cancer resection according to hospital volume in Germany.

Background: Colonic cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to determine mortality rates following colonic cancer resection and the effect of hospital caseload on in-hospital mortality in Germany. Methods: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of colonic cancer undergoing colonic resection from 2012 to 2015 were identified from a nationwide registry using procedure codes. The outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Hospitals were ranked according to their caseload for colonic cancer resection, and patients were categorized into five subgroups on the basis of hospital volume. Results: Some 129 196 colonic cancer resections were reviewed. The overall in-house mortality rate was 5·8 per cent, ranging from 6·9 per cent (1775 of 25 657 patients) in very low-volume hospitals to 4·8 per cent (1239 of 25 825) in very high-volume centres (P < 0·001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis the risk-adjusted odds ratio for in-house mortality was 0·75 (95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 0·84) in very high-volume hospitals performing a mean of 85·0 interventions per year, compared with that in very low-volume hospitals performing a mean of only 12·7 interventions annually, after adjustment for sex, age, co-morbidity, emergency procedures, prolonged mechanical ventilation and transfusion. Conclusion: In Germany, patients undergoing colonic cancer resections in high-volume hospitals had with improved outcomes compared with patients treated in low-volume hospitals.

Correction to: Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

This article was updated to include the middle initial of author L. N. Jorgensen's name.

Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B.

In 2014 the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias". Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based-Medicine. For the present update all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne) the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite still insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initially guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.

Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

In 2014, the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias." Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines, all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For the present update, all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne), the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques, it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initial guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.