Relationship between free hemoglobin (hemolysis), potassium and ionized calcium in lithium heparin blood gas samples collected intraoperatively.

OBJECTIVE: Develop sample acceptability rules by determining the relationship between free hemoglobin level (hemolysis) and potassium or ionized calcium in blood gas samples collected intraoperatively. DESIGN AND METHODS: Hemolysis was assessed visually or by H index for lithium heparin blood gas samples collected intraoperatively. During periods one and three this was done using two different rules for visual assessment of centrifuged lithium heparin plasma. During period two H index was measured for all visually hemolyzed samples on a Roche Cobas c501 analyzer to determine acceptability. Potassium and ionized calcium were measured in 75 lithium heparin whole blood samples on a Radiometer ABL90 to correlate H index and potassium or ionized calcium. RESULTS: During period one 35 of 5808 (0.6%) blood gas samples had visual hemolysis levels exceeding tolerance for reporting of potassium. By switching to measured H index using a laboratory-established threshold, during period 2 we estimate that 171 of 5396 (3.2%) blood gas samples exceeded the H index threshold for reporting of potassium. In 75 intraoperative blood gas samples with H index and whole blood potassium and ionized calcium measured; we observed no relationship between H index and potassium or ionized calcium. During period 3 we switched to visual assessment of hemolysis with a greater tolerance for hemolysis; with only 3 of 5345 (0.06%) samples exceeding the new visual hemolysis threshold. CONCLUSION: For blood gas samples collected intraoperatively, there is no relationship between hemolysis and measured potassium or ionized calcium. The results suggest that only grossly hemolyzed intraoperative blood gas samples should be rejected for measurement of whole blood potassium and ionized calcium.

Local verification and assignment of mean normal prothrombin time and International Sensitivity Index values across various instruments: recent experience and outcome from North America.

Warfarin dosing relies on accurate measurements of international normalized ratio (INR), which is calculated from the prothrombin time (PT), International Sensitivity Index international sensitivity index (ISI) of the thromboplastin, and the geometric mean of normal PT (MNPT). However, ISI assignments of certain reagent/instrument combinations are frequently unavailable, especially when the reagent and instrument are not from the same manufacturer. The effort to be in compliance with widely endorsed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines by locally verifying or assigning an ISI to an unsupported reagent/instrument combination is further hindered by the lack of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved certified plasmas designated for a particular reagent/instrument combination. The objectives of the study include development of a process to verify/assign ISI and MNPT of a single thromboplastin reagent from one manufacturer across multiple instruments including several from another manufacturer and across several campuses of a single institution, the Mayo Clinic. In this study, RecombiPlasTin 2G (R2G), was evaluated on the ACL TOP 700 (IL), STA-R Evolution, STA Compact, and STA Satellite. Random normal donor samples (n = 25) were used to verify/assign MNPT. A subset of the normal donors (n = 8) and 13 warfarin pools (INR range: 1.3-3.9), created from stable warfarin patient plasma, were used for ISI verification/assignment. The manufacturer's assigned ISI was first verified on the ACL TOP 700 (reference method), then assigned on three unsupported instruments using orthogonal regression analysis. The MNPT and manufacturer assigned ISI (11.0, 0.95) were verified on the ACL TOP 700 and subsequently assigned on the STA-R Evolution (11.6, 1.04); STA Compact (11.5, 1.02); and STA Satellite (10.9, 0.99). Linear correlations of the INR results from all the four instruments demonstrated an r2 > 0.99. This process provides a reproducible approach to assigning ISIs on unsupported reagent/instrument combinations. Our data also confirm that ISIs of the same PT reagent differ significantly on different instruments, thus confirming the requirement for evaluations and validation of ISIs for different reagent/instrument combinations.