Demographic and pathologic factor regression to a growth rate model of p16-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Objectives: The current study aims to quantify the growth rate of p16-negative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, characterize causative relationships between demographic risk factors and tumor growth, and examine pathologic findings associated with the tumor growth rate at a tertiary care institution. It is hypothesized that causative relationships will be drawn between the individual sociodemographic and pathologic factors and oral cavity p16-negative squamous cell carcinoma growth rate. Methods: Prospectively recruited participants, receiving surgical intervention only, were followed from initial staging CT scan to surgical resection. Interval growth was calculated in cm3/week. Demographic information including age, sex, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, previous all-type malignancy, previous chemotherapy treatment, previous head or neck radiation exposure, and time interval elapsed between diagnosis and surgery was collected from each participant, and regression analysis was applied to determine causality. Results: Summary statistics revealed a mean growth rate for the study sample of 1.385cm3/week. Statistically significant regression correlations were detected between tumor growth and alcohol consumption, origination at the retromolar trigone, and clinical nodal stage. Conclusions: Through a small prospective cohort sample, the current study suggests clinical associations between alcohol consumption, origination at the retromolar trigone, and clinical nodal stage with rate of tumor growth. Future work will validate these relationships in a larger patient cohort, and against stronger modeling techniques. Level of Evidence: Prospective non-random cohort design.

Thematic Analysis of Canadian Patient-Reported Outcomes in Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Combined Interpretive Description and Modified Delphi Approach.

Background: In facial nerve dysfunction literature, subjective reporting tools lack essential construct validity arising from a patient-driven design process. Objective: Elicit patient-identified themes of importance pertaining to disease course in facial nerve dysfunction from a variety of etiologies. Methods: Twenty participant interviews were conducted from a standardized script and analyzed using a thematic analysis framework. Subsequently, four participants participated in a modified Delphi focus group for consensus of relative theme and domain importance. Results: Upon thematic analysis of 315 codable phrases, 33 codes were sorted into six domains. In descending order: smiling, facial symmetry, surgical access, self-consciousness, eye care, eating, lip movement, eye closure, beverage consumption, speech, chewing, drooling, eyebrow raise, mouth closure, and ptotic vision limitations were identified as the most important aspects of disease course. Care experience, defined as areas of interaction with the health care system in which patients felt strongly about their care or outcome, was the most important domain to participants. Conclusion: Patients with facial nerve dysfunction identified care experience as the highest domain of importance, and value smiling, facial symmetry, and access to surgical treatments.

Validity of functional patient-reported outcomes in head and neck oncology: A systematic review.

Malignancy and treatment effects in head and neck oncology can be devastating to functional aspects of patient life such as swallowing, blinking, speech, salivation, and facial expression. Historically, the subjective nature of patient experience has resulted in difficulty with quantification and measurement of functional outcomes. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are questionnaires developed with patient input, forming the new gold standard for clinician assessment of subjective functional outcomes. The current review aims to identify and characterize the validation of PROs pertaining to four critical functional outcomes in head and neck oncology: swallowing, speech, dry mouth, and chewing. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for published, English language, peer-reviewed abstracts involving patients ≥ 18 years of age. Of 708 results, 705 were excluded at abstract or full text screening for not meeting inclusion criteria, exclusion of head and neck SCC patients in development, or absence of a functional domain measurement. The three reviewed studies-Xerostomia Questionnaire, Swallowing Outcomes After Laryngectomy, and Edmonton 33-exhibited strong reliability and construct and content validity, though two applied only to individual functional outcomes within specific patient populations receiving radiation or laryngectomy. While many PROs have been developed in head and neck oncology, very few properly employed extensive patient input in the development process. Further work must be committed to increasing head and neck cancer patient input in PRO development, particularly in the functional domains of speech and chewing.