Timing of Anticoagulation Resumption and Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients With ICH and Mechanical Heart Valves.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with mechanical heart valves and recent intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), clinicians need to balance the risk of thromboembolism during the period off anticoagulation and the risk of hematoma expansion on anticoagulation. The optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption is unknown. We aimed to investigate the relationship between reversal therapy and ischemic stroke, between duration off anticoagulation and risk of ischemic strokes or systemic embolism and between timing of anticoagulation resumption and risk of rebleeding and ICH expansion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study in 3 tertiary hospitals. Consecutive adult patients with mechanical heart valves admitted for ICH between January 1, 2000, and July 13, 2022, were included. The primary end points of our study were thromboembolic events (cerebral, retinal, or systemic) while off anticoagulation and ICH expansion after anticoagulation resumption (defined by the following criteria: increase by one-third in intracerebral hematoma volume, increase by one-third in convexity subdural hemorrhage diameter, or visually unequivocal expansion of other ICH locations to the naked eye). RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with mechanical heart valves who experienced ICH were included in the final analysis. Most of the patients (79.5%) received reversal therapy for anticoagulation. Patients who received anticoagulation reversal therapy did not have increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Time off anticoagulation was not associated with risk of ischemic stroke; only 2 patients had a stroke within 7 days of the ICH, and both had additional major risk factors of thromboembolism. The rate of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack while off anticoagulation was lower than the rate of ICH expansion once anticoagulation was resumed (6.4% vs 9.9%). Furthermore, patients who developed ICH expansion had higher mortality compared with patients who had ischemic stroke while being off anticoagulation (41% vs 9%). Use of intravenous heparin bridging upon resumption of warfarin was strongly associated with increased risk of ICH expansion as compared with restarting warfarin without a heparin bridge. DISCUSSION: Withholding anticoagulation for at least 7 days after ICH may be safe in patients with mechanical heart valves. Heparin bridging during anticoagulation resumption may be associated with increased risk of bleeding.

The Language of the UDDA is Sufficiently Precise and Pragmatic.

We have a reason to value the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA). Since enactment, the UDDA has been of paramount importance to US citizens, families of comatose patients, and the health care professionals who care for them. The UDDA sets forth two standards for determining death and leaves to the medical community to elaborate criteria by which physicians can determine when those standards have been met. Neurologists and neurocritical care experts always have been center stage in this effort. Perfectly established, why change it? What ignited the recent review of the UDDA were lawsuits questioning medical (neurological) authority leading to the wording and accuracy of the UDDA being revisited. The major objections to the language of the UDDA by several groups led a committee appointed by the Uniform Law Commission to consider several substantial changes in the Act. After several years of discussion without reaching a consensus, the committee's chair suspended the effort. Upending the UDDA will lead to a legal crisis and confusion across the states. We present our main arguments against revising this statute and argue that the committee's failure to revise the UDDA should actually be seen as a necessary success.

Improving Outcome in Severe Myasthenia Gravis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

When progressive and severe, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome may have the potential for fatal and unfavorable clinical outcomes. Regardless of important differences in their clinical course, the development of weakness of oropharyngeal muscles and respiratory failure with requirement of mechanical ventilation is the main driver of poor prognosis in both conditions. The need for prolonged mechanical ventilation is particularly relevant because it immobilizes the patient and care becomes extraordinarily complex due to daily risks of systemic complications. Additionally, patients with myasthenia gravis often require long-term immunosuppressive treatments with associated toxicity and infectious risks. Unlike myasthenia gravis, the recovery period is prolonged in Guillain-Barré syndrome, but often favorable, even in the more severely affected patients. Outcome, for a large part, is determined by expert neurocritical care.

Clinical observations in acute neurology: A historical explanation of the present.

BACKGROUND: The history of the development of acute neurologic disease as a biologic mechanism is of interest. Equally important is how it translated to the bedside and how the clinical examination differentiated itself. METHODS: This paper reviews primary sources pertaining to acute neurologic conditions described mostly in the 19th and 20th century. A review of monographs, treatises, textbooks, and peer-reviewed articles was conducted. RESULTS: The evolution of clinical signs and syndromes associated with dynamic intracranial pathologies was predicated on the idea that animal studies informed clinicians, who then linked clinical signs to these observations. A dominant theme is that innovative technologies could trace acute processes through all their various stages, affording a complete picture of the disease process. Just as clinical descriptors of central nervous system processes evolved, the presentation of acute neuromuscular respiratory failure became better defined. Once practices incorporated these acute clinical signs, textbooks cemented their "gold standard" status with relative impunity. CONCLUSIONS: The practise of acute neurology and neurocritical care must find out what, historically, others were seeking but could not find. Patterns of clinical presentation in acute neurology are sufficiently recognizable to guide practise decisions. Although, the currently well-documented clinical syndromes of acute neurologic conditions (at presentation and during deterioration) have been taught for generations, practitioners have noted that they lack consistency and predictability. History also taught us that part of this improved knowledge came with designated units-a clear example of how protean systems (not always innovative neurologists or neuroscientists or technologies) shaped the history of neurology.