Characterization of FAMPAC, a newly identified human pancreatic carcinoma cell line with a hereditary background.

BACKGROUND: A novel pancreatic carcinoma cell line, FAMPAC, was identified from investigation of poorly differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells found in a patient with a familial predisposition to pancreatic carcinoma. A gene responsible for familial pancreatic carcinoma has not been identified to date. METHODS: The FAMPAC cell line was characterized by its morphology, growth rate, tumorigenicity, and chromosomal analysis. Three known tumor suppressor genes, p16/CDKN2, BRCA2, and p53, all of which are important in the development of pancreatic carcinoma and frequently are involved in a variety of cancer syndromes, were analyzed. RESULTS: FAMPAC cells grew as an adhering monolayer in culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and formed tumors rapidly in nude mice. The doubling time ranged from 24 to 48 hours. Karyotype analysis demonstrated the complexity of chromosomal deletions and rearrangements. The cells were negative for ductal differentiation markers such as cytokeratin 7 and MUC1, indicating poor differentiation. Analysis of FAMPAC cells revealed overexpression of the mutated p53 gene (exon 5, codon 175: CGC --> CAC), the presence of a homozygous deletion in the p16 gene, and the presence of wild-type BRCA2 in the tested hot spots. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, FAMPAC is the first established human pancreatic carcinoma cell line associated with a familial background. FAMPAC is a tumorigenic cell line with a complex molecular pattern of mutations. These findings may be useful in understanding the mechanisms responsible for the development of sporadic or hereditary forms of pancreatic carcinoma.

Frequent methylation-associated silencing of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 gene in pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Molecular mechanisms contributing to the tumorigenesis of pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are still not well understood. Allelic deletions at chromosome 22q12.3 were detected in about 30-60% of PETs, suggesting that inactivation of one or more tumor suppressor genes on this chromosomal arm is important for their pathogenesis. Because the putative tumor suppressor gene tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3) has been located at 22q12.3, we undertook a genetic analysis of TIMP-3 to determine its role in the tumorigenesis of PETs. Single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis, methylation-specific PCR, RNA expression analysis, and immunohistochemistry of TIMP-3 were performed in 21 sporadic PETs. Thirteen of 21 PETs (62%) revealed TIMP-3 alterations, including promoter hypermethylation and homozygous deletion. The predominant TIMP-3 alteration was promoter hypermethylation, identified in 8 of 18 (44%) PETs. It was tumor-specific and corresponded to loss or strong reduction of TIMP-3 protein expression. Notably, 11 of 14 (79%) PETs with metastases had TIMP-3 alterations, compared with only 1 of 7 (14%) PETs without metastases (P < 0.02). These data suggest a possibly important role of TIMP-3 in the tumorigenesis of human PETs, especially in the development of metastases, which has to be further evaluated in large-scale studies.

Tumor-suppressing pathways in cystic pancreatic tumors.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Serous and mucinous cystic pancreatic tumors have different clinical behavior. We evaluated whether they also have genotypic differences by analyses of the tumor suppressor genes, p16INK4a, p53, and DPC4. METHODOLOGY: Seven serous cystadenomas (SCA) and seven malignant mucinous cystadenocarcinomas (MCC) were analyzed for alterations in the tumor suppressor genes p16INK4a, p53, and DPC4 by single-strand conformational variant analysis, direct sequencing, and immunohistochemical analysis. Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed to identify p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation. Clinical data were compared with genetic data. RESULTS: None of the seven patients with SCAs but five of the seven patients with MCCs died of the tumor after a median follow-up of 44.5 months (range, 4-169 months). All seven MCCs had alterations in at least one tumor suppressor gene compared with none of the seven SCAs. Of the seven MCCs, three had inactivating p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation, five had p53 alterations, and three had DPC4 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: The tumor suppressor genes p16INK4a, p53, and appear to play an important role in the tumorigenesis of MCCs but not SCAs. These molecular data underscore the clinical and histologic differences of serous and mucinous cystic pancreatic tumors.

CDKN2A germline mutations in familial pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of mutations in the CDKN2A gene encoding p16 and p14 in familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The genetic basis of FPC is still widely unknown. Recently, it has been shown that germline mutations in the p16 tumor suppressor gene can predispose to pancreatic cancer. The presence of p14 germline mutations has yet not been determined in this setting. METHODS: Eighteen families with at least two first-degree relatives with histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer and five families with at least one patient with pancreatic cancer and another first-degree relative with malignant melanoma of the German National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer were analyzed for CDKN2A germline mutations including p16 and p14 by direct DNA sequencing. All participating family members were genetically counseled and evaluated by a three-generation pedigree. RESULTS: None of 18 FPC families without malignant melanoma revealed p16 mutations, compared to 2 of 5 families with pancreatic cancer and melanoma. Truncating p16 germline mutations Q50X and E119X were identified in the affected patients of pancreatic cancer plus melanoma families. None of the 23 families revealed p14 germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: CDKN2A germline mutations are rare in FPC families. However, these data provide further evidence for a pancreatic cancer-melanoma syndrome associated with CDKN2A germline mutations affecting p16. Thus, all members of families with combined occurrence of pancreatic cancer and melanoma should be counseled and offered screening for p16 mutations to identify high-risk family members who should be enrolled in a clinical screening program.

Chromosome 22q in pancreatic endocrine tumors: identification of a homozygous deletion and potential prognostic associations of allelic deletions.

OBJECTIVE: A variety of human tumors frequently show allelic deletions of chromosome 22q, suggesting that inactivation of one or more tumor suppressor genes in this region is important for their tumorigenesis. METHODS: In this study, 23 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs), including gastrinomas, VIPomas and non-functioning islet cell carcinomas, were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 22q with 12 microsatellite and 7 sequence tagged site markers. RESULTS: LOH on chromosome 22q was identified in 22 of 23 (96%) PETs. Markers in the chromosomal region 22q12.1 revealed LOH rates up to 85%. Notably, one tumor revealed a homozygous deletion in a second region at 22q12.3. LOH at this locus occurred more frequently in tumors with distant metastases (10 of 11) compared with tumors without distant metastases (3 of 12; P=0.0057) and, overall, allelic loss of 22q is positively correlated with distant metastases (r=0.78; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are suggestive for novel tumor suppressor gene loci at chromosome 22q that might contribute to the pathogenesis of PETs, especially to the development of distant metastases.

p16INK4a is a prognostic marker in resected ductal pancreatic cancer: an analysis of p16INK4a, p53, MDM2, an Rb.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prognostic relevance of the G1/S cell cycle regulator genes p16INK4a, p53, MDM2, and Rb in patients with resected ductal pancreatic cancer (PC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The tumor suppressor genes p16INK4a, p53, and Rb are altered in PC in 27% to 95%, 40% to 70%, and 5%, respectively. The role of MDM2 is not clearly defined in PC. The prognostic value of these cell cycle regulators has not been clarified. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with PC with complete follow-up who underwent potentially curative resections were included in the study. An extreme group analysis was performed including the 20 patients with the shortest survival and the 20 patients with the longest survival. Protein expression of p16, p53, MDM2, and Rb was investigated, and mutation analysis of p16INK4a and p53 was performed. p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation was examined by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Significantly more tumors in the shortest-surviving patients had p16INK4a alterations compared with tumors of the longest-surviving patients. In contrast, the frequency of p53 alterations was not significantly higher in the shortest-surviving versus the longest-surviving groups. Stabilization of MDM2 and loss of Rb expression were identified in a minority of tumors, independent of survival length. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of p16INK4a alterations in resected tumors of patients with PC is connected with a worse prognosis, indicating patients that might benefit from adjuvant therapy regimens. p53 alterations, MDM2 overexpression, and loss of Rb expression could not be identified as prognostic markers from this study, but a larger study with greater statistical power might show a different result with regard to p53.