Risk factors for esophageal cancer in a high-incidence area of Malawi.

PURPOSE: To explore associations of nutritional, infectious, and lifestyle factors with esophageal cancer (EC) occurrence in a high-risk area of Malawi. METHODS: This case-control study was performed with 227 patients undergoing endoscopy for dysphagia or other upper gastrointestinal complaints. Data on clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors were collected using a questionnaire developed for this study specifically. Ninety-eight blood samples were collected and the prevalence of antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, and Helicobacter pylori were determined serologically. RESULTS: The tumor and control groups comprised 157 (69.2%) and 70 (31.8%) patients, respectively. Patients with tumors were significantly older than controls (55.5 vs. 43.5 years, p < 0.001). The male/female ratio did not differ between groups (59% and 54% male, respectively; p = 0.469). EC was associated with smoking (p < 0.001), and alcohol consumption (p = 0.020), but 43% of patients with tumors did not smoke or drink. EC was associated with the consumption of hot food and tea (p = 0.003) and smoked fish (p = 0.011). EC was not associated with any serologically investigated infectious agents. In an age adjusted binary logistic regression analysis of all nutritive factors, only locally made alcohol was significant [odds ratio (OR), 9.252; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.455-58.822; p = 0.018]. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from alcohol consumption and smoking, the consumption of hot food or tea and smoked fish are associated with EC. Locally distilled alcohol consumption increases the EC risk in Malawi.

Influence of Clinical pathways on treatment and outcome quality for patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy? A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic surgery demands complex multidisciplinary management. Clinical pathways (CPs) are a tool to facilitate this task, but evidence for their utility in pancreatic surgery is scarce. This study evaluated the effect of CPs on quality of care for pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: Data of all consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy before (n = 147) or after (n = 148) CP introduction were evaluated regarding catheter and drain management, postoperative mobilization, pancreatic enzyme substitution, resumption of diet and length of stay. Outcome quality was assessed using glycaemia management, morbidity, mortality, reoperation and readmission rates. RESULTS: Catheters and abdominal drainages were removed significantly earlier in patients treated with CP (p < 0.0001). First intake of liquids, nutritional supplement and solids was significantly earlier in the CP group (p < 0.0001). Exocrine insufficiency was significantly less common after CP implementation (47.3% vs. 69.7%, p < 0.0001). The number of patients receiving intraoperative transfusion dropped significantly after CP implementation (p = 0.0005) and transfusion rate was more frequent in the pre-CP group (p = 0.05). The median number of days with maximum pain level >3 was significantly higher in the CP group (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in mortality, morbidity, reoperation and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a CP for pancreatoduodenectomy, several indicators of process and outcome quality improved, while others such as mortality and reoperation rates remained unchanged. CPs are a promising tool to improve quality of care in pancreatic surgery.

Clinical Pathways For Pancreatic Surgery: Are They A Suitable Instrument For Process Standardization To Improve Process And Outcome Quality Of Patients Undergoing Distal And Total Pancreatectomy? - A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic surgery demands complex multidisciplinary management, which is often cumbersome to implement. Clinical pathways (CPs) are a tool to facilitate this task, but evidence for their utility in pancreatic surgery is scarce. This study evaluated if CPs are a suitable tool for process standardization in order to improve process and outcome quality in patients undergoing distal and total pancreatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent distal or total pancreatectomy before (n=67) or after (n=61) CP introduction were evaluated regarding catheter management, postoperative mobilization, pancreatic enzyme substitution, resumption of diet and length of stay. Outcome quality was assessed using glycaemia management, morbidity, mortality, reoperation and readmission rates. RESULTS: The usage of incentive spirometers for pneumonia prophylaxis increased. The median number of days with hyperglycemia decreased significantly from 2.5 to 0. For distal pancreatectomy, the incidence of postoperative diabetes dropped from 27.9% to 7.1% (p=0.012). The incidence of postoperative exocrine pancreatic insufficiency decreased from 37.2% to 11.9% (p=0.007). There was no significant difference in mortality, morbidity, reoperation and readmission rates between groups. CONCLUSION: Following implementation of a pancreatic surgery CP, several indicators of process and outcome quality improved, while others such as mortality and reoperation rates remained unchanged. CPs are a promising tool to improve quality of care in pancreatic surgery.

The Clavien-Dindo Classification in Pancreatic Surgery: A Clinical and Economic Validation.

Background/Aims: In 2004 P. A. Clavien and D. Dindo published the well-known grading system of postoperative complications. It is established in several surgical disciplines. The aim of this study was to assess its validity in pancreatic surgery. The impact of complication grade on economic resources was investigated as well. Methods: From a prospective database, we retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2009 and December 2014 at our department. 309 patients received pancreatic head resection (pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) or Kausch-Whipple), total pancreatectomy or left resection. We performed a univariate analysis of the correlation between the Clavien-Dindo classification-grade (CDC-grade) with length of postoperative stay (LOS) and DRG-related (diagnosis related groups) remuneration using Kruskal-Wallis test. Furthermore, we performed a subgroup analysis (chi-square test and Fishers-test) of demographic, clinical, and perioperative data. Results: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.0014), operation time (p = 0.0229) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.0016) showed significant correlation with CDC-grade. Increasing LOS and DRG-related remuneration correlated significantly with increasing CDC-grade (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The CDC-grading system shows high correlation to clinical outcome and case-related remuneration in pancreatic surgery. Therefore, it is a valid tool for evaluation and comparison of surgical techniques and surgical centers.

Clinical evaluation of the M-ANNHEIM classification: Development of the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a new tool to monitor patients with chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis (CP) stratifies degrees of disease severity according to the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score. We aimed to demonstrate the clinical usefulness of the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score in quantifying and predicting the frequency of pancreatic surgery, and to establish the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a simplified system for patient surveillance regarding the demand of pancreatic surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study with 741 CP patients (Mannheim/Germany, n = 537; Gießen/Germany, n = 100; Donetsk/Ukraine, n = 104) categorized according to the M-ANNHEIM classification. RESULTS: We observed a significantly higher M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score in patients that were classified within 7 days preceding pancreatic surgery than in individuals that did not require surgery (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney-U-test). Using a logistic regression analysis with all variables of the M-ANNHEIM-Severity-Score, we established the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score as a simplified new tool to identify patients that may require surgery. A receiver operating characteristic-analysis revealed a cut-off-value of 9 points within the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score to identify these individuals (sensitivity 78.7 %, specificity 91 %). Based on the M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score, we defined three categories for demand of surgery with frequencies of pancreatic operations of 1.6 % (n = 7/440) in the "Baseline-Demand"-category, 7 % (n = 12/172) in the "Low-Demand"-category (p < 0.0001, Chi-square-test, OR 4.6, Confidence Interval (CI) 1.8 - 12), and 54 % (n = 70/129) in the "High-Demand"-category (p < 0.0001, OR 73, CI 32 - 167). Patients that were categorized for the "High-Demand"-category, but were not operated on, had a significantly increased ratio of clinical features that hamper performance of surgery (p < 0.001, Chi-square-test). CONCLUSIONS: The M-ANNHEIM-Surgery-Score represents a useful tool to monitor patients with CP and to estimate the demand of surgery in CP.

Chronic pancreatitis and resectable synchronous pancreatic carcinoma: A survival analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer (PDAC). CP and PDAC are characterized by an abundance of desmoplastic tissue. The effect of this pancreatic desmoplastic tissue on PDAC is poorly understood. In literature, negative and positive effects on the natural course of PDAC have been discussed. The present analysis aims to assess the impact of CP on patients with resectable synchronous PDAC regarding short- and long-term survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatic resection at our institution from January 2005 to January 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Definition of CP was based on clinical and radiological aspects and histological confirmation as used previously. We identified patients with CP, CP and PDAC, and PDAC without CP and compared perioperative course and survival. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney-U and Breslow survival analysis. P-values <0.05 were defined as statistically significant. RESULTS: 159 patients met our inclusion criteria for CP. 49 of them (30.8%) had synchronous PDAC. 145 patients had PDAC without a history of CP. There was a more advanced nodal involvement in PDAC patients with CP. Perioperative outcome and long-term survival of PDAC patients with and without CP did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: In a large clinical series CP had no impact on survival of patients with PDAC after resection with curative intent.

Detection of HPV16 in Esophageal Cancer in a High-Incidence Region of Malawi.

This study was designed to explore the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Fifty-five patients receiving diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Zomba Central Hospital or Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Blantyre (Malawi) in 2010, were included in our study. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies were collected for histopathological diagnosis. HPV DNA was detected using multiplex Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH). p16INK4a staining served as a surrogate marker for HPV oncogene activity. Cell proliferation was determined by Ki-67 staining. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status was evaluated by serology. Data on the consumption of alcohol and tobacco, and history of tuberculosis (TBC), oral thrush, and Herpes zoster, were obtained by questionnaire. Forty patients displayed ESCC, three displayed dysplastic epithelium, and 12 displayed normal epithelium. HPV16 was detected in six ESCC specimens and in one dysplastic lesion. Among HPV-positive patients, viral load varied from 0.001 to 2.5 copies per tumor cell. HPV DNA presence could not be confirmed by ISH. p16INK4a positivity correlated with the presence of HPV DNA (p = 0.03). Of particular note is that the Ki-67 proliferation index, in areas with diffuse nuclear or cytoplasmatic p16INK4a staining ≥50%, was significantly higher in HPV-positive tumors compared to the corresponding p16INK4a stained areas of HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.004). HPV infection in ESCC was not associated with the consumption of tobacco or alcohol, but there were significantly more patients drinking locally brewed alcohol among HPV-positive tumor patients compared to non-tumor patients (p = 0.02) and compared to HPV-negative tumor patients (p = 0.047). There was no association between HIV infection, history of TBC, Herpes zoster, oral thrush, or HPV infection, in ESCC patients. Our indirect evidence for viral oncogene activity is restricted to single tumor cell areas, indicative of the role of HPV16 in the development of ESCC. The inhomogeneous presence of the virus within the tumor is reminiscent of the "hit and run" mechanism discussed for ß-HPV types, such as HPV38.

Partial pancreatoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind ChroPac trial.

BACKGROUND: There is substantial uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical treatment for chronic pancreatitis. Short-term outcomes have been found to be better after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) than after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Therefore, we designed the multicentre ChroPac trial to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with chronic pancreatitis within 24 months after surgery. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, superiority trial was done in 18 hospitals across Europe. Patients with chronic pancreatitis who were planned for elective surgical treatment were randomly assigned to DPPHR or partial pancreatoduodenectomy with a central web-based randomisation tool. The primary endpoint was mean quality of life within 24 months after surgery, measured with the physical functioning scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Primary analysis included all patients who underwent one of the assigned procedures; safety analysis included all patients who underwent surgical intervention (categorised into groups as treated). Patients and outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. The trial was registered, ISRCTN38973832. Recruitment was completed on Sept 3, 2013. FINDINGS: Between Sept 10, 2009, and Sept 3, 2013, 250 patients were randomly assigned to DPPHR (n=125) or partial pancreatoduodenectomy (n=125), of whom 226 patients (115 in the DPPHR group and 111 in the partial pancreatoduodenectomy group) were analysed. No difference in quality of life was seen between the groups within 24 months after surgery (75·3 [SD 16·4] for partial pancreatoduodenectomy vs 73·0 [16·4] for DPPHR; mean difference -2·3, 95% CI -6·6 to 2·0; p=0·284). The incidence and severity of serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. 70 (64%) of 109 patients in the DPPHR group and 61 (52%) of 117 patients in the partial pancreatoduodenectomy group had at least one serious adverse event, with the most common being reoperations (for reasons other than chronic pancreatitis), gastrointestinal problems, and other surgical morbidity. INTERPRETATION: No differences in quality of life after surgery for chronic pancreatitis were seen between the interventions. Results from single-centre trials showing superiority for DPPHR were not confirmed in the multicentre setting. FUNDING: German Research Foundation (DFG).

Prevalence and Incidence of Autoimmune Pancreatitis in the Population Living in the Southwest of Germany.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prevalence and incidence of autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) in those living in western countries are largely unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of AiP among patients with pancreatitis presenting to our tertiary referral center in Mannheim, Germany; and to estimate the incidence of AiP in the Southwest of Germany. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis and determined the prevalence of AiP in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP). Patients (n = 704; alcoholic pancreatitis n = 373, nonalcoholic pancreatitis n = 331) were stratified into the Retrospective-Pancreas-Cohort (RPC, period 1998-2008, n = 534) and the Pancreas-Clinic-Cohort (PCC, periods 2008-2010 and 2013-2014, n = 170, with detailed investigation for features of AiP). Diagnosis of AiP was established by International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria and Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria. RESULTS: In the RPC, the prevalence of AiP was 5.9% (n = 13/221) among individuals with nonalcoholic pancreatitis (n = 1/61 with AP, 1.6%; n = 12/160 with CP, 7.5%). In the PCC, the prevalence of AiP was 9.1% (n = 10/110) among patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis (n = 2/24 with AP, 8.3%; n = 8/86 with CP, 9.3%), and 1.7% (n = 1/60) among subjects with alcoholic pancreatitis. We estimated the incidence of AiP with 0.29 per 100,000 population each year. CONCLUSION: The prevalence rate of AiP may account for 9% of patients with nonalcoholic pancreatitis but is almost never observed in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis. The incidence of AiP in Germany appears lower than 1 per 100,000 population.

Task-shifting of orthopaedic surgery to non-physician clinicians in Malawi: effective and safe?

There is a shortage of orthopaedic surgeons in Malawi. Orthopaedic clinical officers (OCOs) treat trauma patients and occasionally perform major orthopaedic surgery. No studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of their work. The aim of this study was to evaluate their contribution to major orthopaedic surgery at Zomba Central Hospital. Data about orthopaedic procedures during 2006-2010 were collected from theatre books. We selected major amputations and open reductions and plating for outcome analysis and collected details from files. We compared patients operated by OCOs alone ('OCOs alone' group) and by surgeons or OCOs assisted by surgeons ('Surgeon present' group). OCOs performed 463/1010 major (45.8%) and 1600/1765 minor operations (90.7%) alone. There was no difference in perioperative outcome between both groups. OCOs carry out a large proportion of orthopaedic procedures with good clinical results. Shifting of clinical tasks including major orthopaedic surgery can be safe. Further prospective studies are recommended.

Long-term results after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC) are collections of fluid encapsulated within a well-defined inflammatory wall that develop during pancreatic inflammation. Internal drainage represents the standard of care in lesions that persist and lead to symptoms and complications. Only limited data are available on long-term results and recurrence of PPC after drainage procedures. Thus, the aim of the present study was to analyse the long-term outcome after endoscopic drainage of PPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patient data were retrospectively collected by review of clinical records of the University Medical Center Mannheim. We assessed the clinical short-term outcome (results in the first 30 days after initial drainage procedure), medium-term outcome (results 6 months after initial drainage procedure) and long-term outcome (results after stent removal). We performed statistical analysis to identify possible risk factors for recurrence of PPC. RESULTS: We identified 51 patients with initially successful endoscopic drainage of the PPC (n = 51/53, 96%). Among this cohort, 43 patients were available for assessment of medium-term results. In 82.9% of these 43 patients the drainage could be removed after successful treatment of the PPC. Thirty patients were available for long term follow-up with a mean observation period of 42.2 months (SD 32.8 months). Among these patients, seven (n = 7/30, 23.3%) had recurrent PPC. Approximately half of the recurrent cysts arose in different anatomical regions and most patients with recurrence had chronic pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic drainage represents an effective treatment for PPC. Approximately one quarter of the patients developed recurrent PPC. Half of recurrent PPC developed in different pancreatic regions than the initial PPC.

Diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis with the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We had developed the Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria (U-AIP) to diagnose autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) within the M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis. In 2011, International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria (ICDC) to diagnose AiP have been published. We had applied the U-AIP long before the ICDC were available. The aims of the study were, first, to describe patients with AiP diagnosed by the U-AIP; second, to compare diagnostic accuracies of the U-AIP and other diagnostic systems; third, to evaluate the clinical applicability of the U-AIP. METHODS: From 1998 until 2008, we identified patients with AiP using U-AIP, Japanese-, Korean-, Asian-, Mayo-HISORt-, Revised-Mayo-HISORt- and Italian-criteria. We retrospectively verified the diagnosis by ICDC and Revised-Japanese-2011-criteria, compared diagnostic accuracies of all systems and evaluated all criteria in consecutive patients with pancreatitis (2009 until 2010, Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, n = 84). We retrospectively validated our diagnostic approach in consecutive patients with a pancreatic lesion requiring surgery (Surgical-Cohort, n = 98). RESULTS: Overall, we identified 21 patients with AiP. Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria and ICDC presented the highest diagnostic accuracies (each 98.8%), highest Youden indices (each 0.95238), and highest proportions of diagnosed patients (each n = 20/21, U-AIP/ICDC vs. other diagnostic systems, p < 0.05, McNemar test). In the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort, seven patients were diagnosed with AiP (n = 6 by U-AIP, n = 1 by Asian-criteria). International-Consensus-Diagnostic-Criteria confirmed the diagnosis in these individuals. Based on partial fulfillment of U-AIP, AiP was initially suspected in 13% (n = 10/77) of remaining patients from the Pancreas-Outpatient-Clinic-Cohort. In the Surgical-cohort, we identified one patient with AiP by U-AIP and ICDC. CONCLUSIONS: Unifying-Autoimmune-Pancreatitis-Criteria revealed a satisfactory clinical applicability and offered an additional approach to diagnose AiP.

Pancreatitis, panniculitis and polyarthritis (PPP-) syndrome caused by post-pancreatitis pseudocyst with mesenteric fistula. Diagnosis and successful surgical treatment. Case report and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatitis, panniculitis and polyarthritis syndrome is a very rare extra-pancreatic complication of pancreatic diseases. PRESENTATION OF CASE: While in most cases this syndrome is caused by acute or chronic pancreatitis, we report a case of a 62-year-old man presenting with extensive intraosseous fat necrosis, polyarthritis and panniculitis caused by a post-pancreatitis pseudocyst with a fistula to the superior mesenteric vein and extremely high blood levels of lipase. This became symptomatic 2.5 years after an episode of acute pancreatitis and as in most cases abdominal symptoms were absent. Treatment by surgical resection of the pancreatic head with the pseudocyst and mesenteric fistula led to complete remission of all symptoms. DISCUSSION: A review of the literature revealed that all publications are limited to case reports. Most authors hypothesize that an unspecific damage can cause a secretion of pancreatic enzymes to the bloodstream leading to a systemic lipolysis and fat tissue necrosis, especially of subcutaneous tissue, bone marrow, inducing panniculitis, polyarthritis and osteonecrosis. Even if caused by an acute pancreatitis abdominal symptoms are often mild or absent in most cases leading to misdiagnosis and poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: While symptomatic treatment with NSAR and cortisone showed poor to moderate response, causal treatment can be successful depending on the underlying pancreatic disease.

Retrospective analysis of survival after resection of pancreatic renal cell carcinoma metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Previous reports showed an excellent survival for patients after resection of pancreatic metastases from renal cell cancer (pRCC) and reported several predictive factors. This study aims to give more evidence to reported risk factors by analyzing a large cohort of patients with pancreatic resection due to pRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all pancreatic resections due to pRCC between January 1993 and October 2014 in two German pancreatic surgery centers. Predictive factors were analyzed using the chi square test. RESULTS: Surgery was performed in 40 patients. Mean survival after resection was 147.9 months (SD 25.6 months). No predictive factors for survival were identified. Pathological examination showed that five out of 21 patients with examined peripancreatic lymph nodes had lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Although our analysis comprised the biggest cohort of patients with pRCC it rendered no significant predictor for survival. This might be due to the overall excellent prognosis of study patients and the relatively rare condition with a limited number of patients. Several patients had lymph node metastases. Therefore lymphadenectomy should be considered in pRCC resection if the health condition of the patient permits this. By this more aggressive approach to pRCC, a better prognosis after resection might be achieved.

A Retrospective, Unicentric Evaluation of Complicated Diverticulosis Jejuni: Symptoms, Treatment, and Postoperative Course.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the diverticulosis of the colon, jejunal diverticulosis is a rare condition. The incidence is 0.06-5% in large autopsy series. Complicated diverticulosis jejuni (CDJ) often presents with unspecific symptoms. Therefore, diagnosis is often a challenging process and due to the clinical rarity generally valid recommendation of perioperative management does not exist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We considered only patients who were operated in our center between April 2007 and August 2014. Patients were identified by data bank search via International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems diagnosis code K57.10. Data were manually screened, and patients with Meckel's and duodenal diverticula were excluded from this study. Eleven consecutive patients with CDJ were finally included in this study. We analyzed symptoms, diagnostic procedures, surgical treatment, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The median age of our patients was 76 years (range: 34-87). CDJ presented most frequently as intestinal bleeding or as diverticulitis. Clinical symptoms were unspecific abdominal pain, hematemesis or melena, ileus, nausea, and emesis as well as patients with acute abdomen. Esophagogastroduodenoscopies confirmed CDJ in two of the three patients. An abdominal computed tomography scan only helped to diagnose CDJ in two of the 10 patients. Eight (72.7%) patients received an open segmental resection with primary anastomosis. In three (27.3%) cases, a reoperation was necessary. Overall morbidity rate was 45.5%, and perioperative mortality was 9.1%. CONCLUSION: Due to the acute character of the disease, patients with CDJ are seriously ill. To diagnose patients with CDJ remains challenging as diagnostic investigations are usually not helpful in confirming the diagnosis. Still, diagnosis of CDJ is most frequently confirmed intraoperatively.

Redo Surgery After Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Chronic Pancreatitis: High Incidence in Long-Term Follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is a safe procedure with a more favorable short-term outcome compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, some patients develop mechanical complications or suspicion of malignancy during follow-up and need reoperation years after primary surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate incidence, techniques, and complication rates of redo operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed short- and long-term outcomes of 33 patients who underwent duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis from 1997 to 2010 at our department from a prospective database. RESULTS: Short-term outcome after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was comparable with previous data. Follow-up (mean 89 months) was achieved for 26 patients. Eight patients (30.1 %) needed a redo operation of which seven were performed. Indications were obstructive jaundice (four patients) and suspicion of cancer of pancreatic head (four patients; carcinoma confirmed in three patients). Mean interval between initial and redo operation was seven years for benign stenoses and 4 years for cancer. Three of seven operated patients needed revision. CONCLUSION: Need for redo operations after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is high and these operations have high complication rates. In most cases, redo operations can be avoided by performing pancreaticoduodenectomy as initial operation.

Evaluation of POSSUM for patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The POSSUM score is a predictive scoring system for postoperative morbidity. Although numerous studies have validated its application in major abdominal surgery, few have exclusively considered pancreatic resections, which have unique complications that are costly and problematic. We examined whether POSSUM could accurately reflect the clinical outcomes in pancreatic resection. METHODS: A total of 694 consecutive resections of the pancreatic head were performed between 1993 and 2010 at the Department of General, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery at the University Hospital Dresden. The POSSUM score calculated for each case was compared with the observed morbidity. Relevance and predictive performance of the score were assessed; in particular, because of the poor calibration of the POSSUM predictions on the Dresden data, a new score was created that was externally validated on patient cohorts from two different centers for pancreatic surgery. RESULTS: The goodness-of-fit analysis revealed that the POSSUM score was not well calibrated because the POSSUM-predicted morbidity rate was 58.9% on average whereas the observed morbidity rate was 43.4%. Discrepancies occurred particularly among the predicted high-risk patients, for whom the score actually overestimated the morbidity risk. Therefore, we adapted the score and complemented it with additional prognostic parameters. The new score was validated in a patient cohort from two other German centers and fitted better to the data. CONCLUSION: The new score, named PS-POSSUM (POSSUM in pancreatic surgery), fits the data better. However, the prediction ability remains rather poor. PS-POSSUM may still be helpful, as it draws attention to additional risk and protective factors in addition to those in the original POSSUM score.

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for patients with advanced esophageal cancer in Malawi: an effective palliative treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Esophageal cancer is common in Malawi and most patients are inoperable at time of diagnosis. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate palliative treatment with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in Malawi, a low-income country with limited medical resources. METHODS: Data of patients with advanced inoperable esophageal cancer were prospectively collected. Tumor and patient specifics, risk factors, dysphagia scores, complications, and survival were assessed. Follow-up data for 1 year or until death were collected from 118/143 patients (83%) during clinic visits, home visits, or via cell phone. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients were treated with 154 SEMS. Median survival was 210 days (95% CI: 150-262 days). Fourteen of 118 patients with complete follow-up (11.9%) survived more than 1 year with longest documented survival of 406 days. The median dysphagia score improved from 3 at the time of presentation to 0 at the time of death. Early complications occurred in 4.2% (6/143), late complications in 11.9% of patients (14/118). The procedure related mortality was 2.1% (3/143). CONCLUSIONS: SEMS is an appropriate palliative treatment in a resource-limited environment. For the vast majority of patients a single intervention provides lasting improvement of dysphagia.

Efficacy of major general surgery performed by non-physician clinicians at a central hospital in Malawi.

In some sub-Saharan African countries non-physician clinicians have to perform major general surgery without medical officers and surgeons. The safety of this practice has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of clinical officers (COs) to major general surgery at Zomba Central Hospital. We performed a retrospective five-year period study during 2003-2007. The perioperative outcome for three procedures was analysed. During the study 2931 major general surgical procedures were performed: 1437 (49%) by surgeons; 366 (12.5%) by COs assisted by surgeons; and 1128 (38.5%) by COs alone. COs performed 50% of prostatectomies, ventriculo-peritoneal-shuntings and strangulated hernia repairs with bowel resection alone. Baseline parameters and perioperative outcomes of the patients who underwent operations with surgeons present (as operator or assistant, 'surgeon group') or patients operated by COs alone ('CO group') were similar. COs can safely perform major general surgery when adequate training and supervision are provided.