Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 37(1): 799-807, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32620055

RESUMEN

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare intra-procedural radiofrequency (RF) and microwave ablation appearance on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and ultrasound to the zone of pathologic necrosis.Materials and methods: Twenty-one 5-min ablations were performed in vivo in swine liver with (1) microwave at 140 W, (2) microwave at 70 W, or (3) RF at 200 W (n = 7 each). CT and US images were obtained simultaneously at 1, 3, and 5 min during ablation and 2, 5, and 10 min post-ablation. Each ablation was sectioned in the plane of the ultrasound image and underwent vital staining to delineate cellular necrosis. CT was reformatted to the same plane as the ultrasound transducer and transverse diameters of gas and hypoechoic/hypoattenuating zones at each time point were measured. CT, ultrasound and gross pathologic diameter measurements were compared using Student's t-tests and linear regression.Results: Visible gas and the hypoechoic zone on US images were more predictive of the pathologic ablation zone than on NCCT images (p < 0.05). The zone of necrosis was larger than the zone of visible gas on US (mean 3.2 mm for microwave, 6.4 mm for RF) and NCCT (7.6 mm microwave, 13.9 mm RF) images (p < 0.05). The zone of visible gas and hypoechoic zone on US are more predictive of pathology with microwave ablations when compared with RF ablations (p < 0.05).Conclusion: When evaluating images during energy delivery, US is more accurate than CT and microwave- more predictable than RF-ablation based on correlation with in-plane pathology.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Animales , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/cirugía , Microondas , Porcinos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Radiology ; 275(1): 119-26, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25426772

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare dual-energy computed tomography (CT) with conventional CT for the detection of small-bowel ischemia in an experimental animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the animal care and use committee and was performed in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the National Research Council. Ischemic bowel segments (n = 8) were created in swine (n = 4) by means of surgical occlusion of distal mesenteric arteries and veins. Contrast material-enhanced dual-energy CT and conventional single-energy CT (120 kVp) sequences were performed during the portal venous phase with a single-source fast-switching dual-energy CT scanner. Attenuation values and contrast-to-noise ratios of ischemic and perfused segments on iodine material-density, monospectral dual-energy CT (51 keV, 65 keV, and 70 keV), and conventional 120-kVp CT images were compared. Linear mixed-effects models were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The attenuation difference between ischemic and perfused segments was significantly greater on dual-energy 51-keV CT images than on conventional 120-kVp CT images (mean difference, 91.7 HU vs 47.6 HU; P < .0001). Conspicuity of ischemic segments was significantly greater on dual-energy iodine material-density and 51-keV CT images than on 120-kVp CT images (mean contrast-to-noise ratios, 4.9, 4.3, and 2.1, respectively; P < .0001). Although attenuation differences on dual-energy 65- and 70-keV CT images were not significantly different from those on 120-kVp images (55.0 HU, 45.8 HU, and 47.6 HU, respectively; 65 keV vs 120 kVp, P = .15; 70 keV vs 120 kVp, P = .46), the contrast-to-noise ratio was greater for the 65- and 70-keV images than for the 120-kVp images (4.4, 4.1, and 2.1 respectively; P < .0005). CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT significantly improved the conspicuity of the ischemic bowel compared with conventional CT by increasing attenuation differences between ischemic and perfused segments on low-kiloelectron volt and iodine material density images.


Asunto(s)
Intestino Delgado , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Animales , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Estudios Cruzados , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Intestino Delgado/irrigación sanguínea , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Yohexol/administración & dosificación , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Porcinos , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 25(12): 1965-1971.e2, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25255704

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate and model the risk of in vivo thrombosis in each hepatic vessel type during hepatic microwave ablation as a function of vessel diameter, velocity, and vessel-antenna spacing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single microwave ablation antenna was inserted into a single porcine lobe (n = 15 total) adjacent to a hepatic artery, hepatic vein, or portal vein branch. Conventional ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound were used to measure the vessel diameter, blood flow velocity, and vessel-antenna spacing. A microwave ablation zone was created at 100 W for 5 minutes. Thrombus formation was evaluated on ultrasound performed immediately after the procedure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictive value of vessel diameter, blood flow velocity, and vessel-antenna spacing on vascular thrombosis. RESULTS: Thrombosis was identified in 53% of portal veins, 13% of hepatic veins, and 0% of hepatic arteries. The average peak blood flow rate of the hepatic artery was significantly greater than the average peak blood flow rate of the hepatic vein and portal vein. Peak blood flow velocity < 12.45 cm/s, vessel diameter < 5.10 mm, and vessel-antenna spacing < 3.75 mm were strong predictors of hepatic vein thrombosis. However, these individual factors were not predictive of the more common portal vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic arteries do not appear to be at risk for thrombosis during microwave ablation procedures. Portal vein thrombosis was more common than hepatic vein thrombosis during microwave ablation treatments but was not as predictable based on vessel diameter, flow velocity, or vessel-antenna spacing alone.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/etiología , Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Venas Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Hepáticas/cirugía , Hígado/cirugía , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Porcinos , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA