Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 108(10): 1942-8, 2013 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23681186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP) aims to transfer hospice principles of care for dying patients to other health-care sectors. This post-bereavement survey explored the LCP's effectiveness in improving quality of care for cancer patients. METHODS: Postal self-completion questionnaires were sent to 778 next-of-kin to consecutive deceased patients who had died an 'expected' cancer death in a hospice and acute tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Following exclusions (n=53), 255 of the 725 next-of-kin agreed to participate (35.2% response rate). Overall hospice participants reported the best quality of care, and hospital participants, for whom care was not supported by the LCP, reported the worst quality of care. Multivariate analysis showed the hospice was an independent predictor for patients being treated with dignity (OR 8.46) and receiving adequate family support (OR 7.18) (P<0.0001). Care supported by the LCP and the hospital specialist palliative care team were both associated with good family support, but neither was an independent predictor. CONCLUSIONS: From the bereaved relatives' perspective, within the hospital, the LCP is effective in improving specific aspects of care, such as symptom control for dying patients. Further improvement is required, however, to attain the hospice standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Neoplasias/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Cuidado Terminal/organización & administración , Enfermo Terminal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vías Clínicas/normas , Vías Clínicas/tendencias , Femenino , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/organización & administración , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Reino Unido
2.
Gut ; 54(2): 268-73, 2005 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15647193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population based colorectal cancer survival among patients diagnosed in 1985-89 was lower in Europe than in the USA (45% v 59% five year relative survival). AIMS: To explain this difference in survival using a new analytic approach for patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1991. SUBJECTS: A total of 2492 European and 11 191 US colorectal adenocarcinoma patients registered by 10 European and nine US cancer registries. METHODS: We obtained clinical information on disease stage, number of lymph nodes examined, and surgical treatment. We analysed three year relative survival, calculating relative excess risks of death (RERs, referent category US patients) adjusted for age, sex, site, surgery, stage, and number of nodes examined, using a new multivariable approach. RESULTS: We found that 85% of European patients and 92% of US patients underwent surgical resection. Three year relative survival was 69% for US patients and 57% for European patients. After adjustment for age, sex, and site, the RER was significantly high in all 10 European populations, ranging from 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.86-1.32) (Modena, Italy) to 2.22 (1.79-2.76) (Thames, UK). After further adjustment for stage, surgical resection, and number of nodes examined (a determinant of stage), RERs ranged from 0.77 (0.62-0.96) to 1.59 (1.28-1.97). For some European registries the excess risk was small and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: US-Europe survival differences in colorectal cancer are large but seem to be mostly attributable to differences in stage at diagnosis. There are wide variations in diagnostic and surgical practice between Europe and the USA.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Br J Cancer ; 91(7): 1263-8, 2004 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15365566

RESUMEN

We analysed the 5-year relative survival among 4473 breast cancer cases diagnosed in 1990-1992 from cancer registries in Estonia, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and the UK. Among eight categories based on ICD-O codes (infiltrating ductal carcinoma, lobular plus mixed carcinoma, comedocarcinoma, 'special types', medullary carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) carcinoma, other carcinoma and cancer without microscopic confirmation), the 5-year relative survival ranged from 66% (95% CI 61-71) for NOS carcinoma to 95% (95% CI 90-100) for special types (tubular, apocrine, cribriform, papillary, mucinous and signet ring cell); 27% (95% CI 18-36) for cases without microscopic confirmation. Differences in 5-year relative survival by tumor morphology and hormone receptor status were modelled using a multiple regression approach based on generalised linear models. Morphology and hormone receptor status were confirmed as significant survival predictors in this population-based study, even after adjusting for age and stage at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Lobular/patología , Receptores de Estrógenos/análisis , Receptores de Progesterona/análisis , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
Br J Cancer ; 89(5): 828-30, 2003 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12942112

RESUMEN

Analysis of population-based registry data (n=7393) showed that more deprived colon cancer patients had lower risk of the mucin-producing adenocarcinoma subtype, proximal subsite (to the descending colon), and no greater risk of high-grade tumours. Tumour factors therefore appear unlikely to account for socioeconomic gradients in survival.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Reino Unido
5.
Endocr Relat Cancer ; 10(4): 469-81, 2003 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713260

RESUMEN

Many clinicians prefer to avoid surgery in patients with carcinoid neoplasia, because of its slow growth and relatively favourable prognosis. Nevertheless, the commonest cause of death in patients with carcinoid is advanced metastatic disease, and both clinical and epidemiological data indicate that the more effectively the disease is ablated, the more long-lasting the benefit. Multidisciplinary management of patients with carcinoid must consider inherited risk, possible multiple carcinoids and/or synchronous non-carcinoid cancer, and the use of a range of investigations that also evaluate the 10% of patients with carcinoid syndrome with or without valvular heart disease. Although primary size is correlated with the presence of nodal with or without liver metastases, carcinoid tumours <1 cm in diameter may be metastatic at presentation, particularly those arising within the small intestine. In the jejunum and ileum, resection of all sizes of carcinoid with local and regional nodes is preferred, to prevent nodal dissemination causing mesenteric ischaemia with or without infarction. Resection of nodal metastases should be undertaken in those with persistent or recurrent nodal disease if possible. Appendiceal and right colonic carcinoids are most effectively treated by right hemicolectomy with local and regional nodal clearance, as for adenocarcinoma. However, for most appendiceal carcinoids which are <1 cm in diameter and non-invasive, appendicectomy alone is sufficient. For appendiceal carcinoids 1-2 cm in diameter, histopathological assessment helps to determine the need for hemicolectomy. Liver resection has been followed by prolonged 5 year survival in several series and is recommended in appropriate patients to attempt cure or to debulk metastatic disease. Liver transplantation has had only qualified success in highly selected patients without extra-hepatic disease in whom other therapies have failed.


Asunto(s)
Tumor Carcinoide/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumor Carcinoide/epidemiología , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Humanos
6.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 26(4): 421-30, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11914619

RESUMEN

The hypothetical multistep model of carcinogenesis indicates that breast cancer develops via a series of intermediate hyperplastic lesions through in situ to invasive carcinoma. To identify the risk inherent within the different morphologic lesions, we have analyzed the data from 674 benign biopsy specimens comprising 120 cases who subsequently developed breast cancer and 382 controls (matched for age and date of biopsy) spanning a period up to 20 years of follow-up (mean 66.95 months). In this series we have confirmed an increased risk associated with certain types of benign breast lesions. Atypical lobular hyperplasia was the most significant risk factor for breast cancer with more unfavorable outcome in patients <50 years of age (p = 0.003) and a relative risk (RR) of 4.55 (confidence interval [CI] 1.77-11.69). Hyperplasia of usual type showed an RR of 1.53 (CL 1.10-2.13) with a statistically worse probability of survival (cancer-free time) for patients >50 years. For atypical ductal hyperplasia the RR was 2.03 (CI 0.80-1.39). Blunt duct adenosis was significantly more common in cases progressing to breast cancer compared with controls, showing an RR of 2.08 (CI 1.12-2.85). We describe in detail the criteria of morphologic changes observed in blunt duct adenosis and define, for the first time, the level of risk associated with each of its six subtypes. Improved knowledge of breast carcinogenesis will provide insight for defining high-risk groups thus resulting in improved screening and management regimens.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades de la Mama/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA