Design and characterization of a prototype tertiary device for proton beam stereotactic radiosurgery.

Though potentially beneficial, proton beam stereotactic radiosurgery has not been adopted widely secondary to the technical challenge of safely delivering multiple focused beams of proton radiation. In this study, we describe the design and characterization of a proton beam stereotactic radiosurgery system that can be adopted by existing passive scattering systems. This system utilizes a helmet-like device in which patient-specific brass apertures required for final beam collimation are positioned on a scaffold that is separate from the treatment gantry. The proton snout is then fitted with a generic aperture to focus the primary proton beam onto the patient specific apertures that are in the helmet-like device. The patient-specific apertures can all be placed at the start of the treatment, thus treatment with multiple beams can be accomplished without the delay of switching the apertures. In this report we describe a prototype design of this collimation system and dosimetric testing to verify efficacy. Subsequently, we describe a custom 3D printing of a prototype device and report on overall localization accuracy using Winston-Lutz tests. Our results show that it is possible to develop an add-on device for proton beam radiosurgery that is safe and efficient and capable of wide adoption on existing proton delivery systems.

Proton vs Hyperarc™ radiosurgery: A planning comparison.

For many patients, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers a minimally invasive, curative option when surgical techniques are not possible. To date, the literature supporting the efficacy and safety of SRS treatment techniques uses photon beams. However, with the number of proton therapy facilities exponentially growing and the favorable physical properties of proton beam radiation therapy, there is an opportunity to develop proton therapy techniques for SRS. The goal of this paper is to determine the ability of clinical proton treatment planning systems to model small field dosimetry accurately and to compare various planning metrics used to evaluate photon SRS to determine the optimum beam configurations and settings for proton SRS (PSRS) treatment plans. Once established, these plan settings were used to perform a planning comparison on a variety of different SRS cases and compare SRS metrics between the PSRS plans and HyperArc™ (VMAT) SRS plans.

Evaluation of a diode array for QA measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit.

A helical tomotherapy system is used in our clinic to deliver intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments. Since this machine is designed to deliver IMRT treatments, the traditional field flatness requirements are no longer applicable. This allows the unit to operate without a field flatness filter and consequently the 400 mm wide fan beam is highly inhomogeneous in intensity. The shape of this beam profile is mapped during machine commissioning and for quality assurance purposes the shape of the beam profile needs to be monitored. The use of a commercial diode array for quality assurance measurements is investigated. Central axis beam profiles were acquired at different depths using solid water built-up material. These profiles were compared with ion chamber scans taken in a water tank to test the accuracy of the diode array measurements. The sensitivity of the diode array to variations in the beam profile was checked. Over a seven week period, beam profiles were repeatedly measured. The observed variations are compared with those observed with an on-board beam profile monitor. The diode measurements were in agreement with the ion chamber scans. In the high dose, low gradient region the average ratio between the diode and ion chamber readings was 1.000 +/- 0.005 (+/- 1 standard deviation). In the penumbra region the agreement was poorer but all diodes passed the distance to agreement (DTA) requirement of 2 mm. The trend in the beam profile variations that was measured with the diode array device was in agreement with the on-board monitor. While the calculated amount of variation differs between the devices, both were sensitive to subtle variations in the beam profile. The diode array is a valuable tool to quickly and accurately monitor the beam profile on a helical tomotherapy unit.

The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.

Megavoltage CT (MVCT) images of patients are acquired daily on a helical tomotherapy unit (TomoTherapy, Inc., Madison, WI). While these images are used primarily for patient alignment, they can also be used to recalculate the treatment plan for the patient anatomy of the day. The use of MVCT images for dose computations requires a reliable CT number to electron density calibration curve. In this work, we tested the stability of the MVCT numbers by determining the variation of this calibration with spatial arrangement of the phantom, time and MVCT acquisition parameters. The two calibration curves that represent the largest variations were applied to six clinical MVCT images for recalculations to test for dosimetric uncertainties. Among the six cases tested, the largest difference in any of the dosimetric endpoints was 3.1% but more typically the dosimetric endpoints varied by less than 2%. Using an average CT to electron density calibration and a thorax phantom, a series of end-to-end tests were run. Using a rigid phantom, recalculated dose volume histograms (DVHs) were compared with plan DVHs. Using a deformed phantom, recalculated point dose variations were compared with measurements. The MVCT field of view is limited and the image space outside this field of view can be filled in with information from the planning kVCT. This merging technique was tested for a rigid phantom. Finally, the influence of the MVCT slice thickness on the dose recalculation was investigated. The dosimetric differences observed in all phantom tests were within the range of dosimetric uncertainties observed due to variations in the calibration curve. The use of MVCT images allows the assessment of daily dose distributions with an accuracy that is similar to that of the initial kVCT dose calculation.

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life.

PURPOSE: To present our preliminary observations on the late toxicity and quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-one patients were treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between October 1998 and May 1999. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a dynamic multileaf collimator. A total of 70.0 Gy was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 and a half weeks. The location of the prostate gland was verified and adjusted daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system. The median follow-up was 18 months (range: 11 to 26 months). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scales were used to evaluate late toxicity. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was used to evaluate QOL. A total of 24 patients completed the EPIC questionnaire at approximately 2 years after therapy (median time from treatment to questionnaire administration: 24 months; range: 21 to 26 months). The results from the EPIC questionnaires were compared to scores from 46 patients treated during the same time period with conformal radiotherapy (CRT) to 78 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction. RESULTS: The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). To date, only 1 patient had Grade 1 late urinary toxicity. To date, only 4 patients had Grade 1 late rectal toxicity. No Grade 2 or 3 late urinary or rectal complications have occurred. The actuarial rectal bleeding rate observed at 18 months was 7%. There were no differences in scores from the urinary, bowel, hormonal, and overall QOL domains between SCIM-RT patients and patients treated with CRT. The overall physical and mental QOL scores were also nearly identical to scores reported for the general U.S. population. CONCLUSION: Preliminary late toxicity results up to 2 years after SCIM-RT are encouraging, with a median follow-up of 18 months (range 11 to 26 months). Late toxicity assessed by the physicians using RTOG late toxicity scores has been excellent. QOL reported by the patients using the EPIC questionnaire reveals no difference between patients treated with high-dose CRT at standard fractionation and patients treated with SCIM-RT. SCIM-RT is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule significantly increases convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time.

Short-course, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicity, particularly rectal, between short-course, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT) delivering 70 Gy in 28 fractions and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) delivering 78 Gy in 39 fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 191 patients were treated with SCIM-RT. Seventy Gy was delivered using five intensity-modulated fields via a Varian dynamic multileaf collimator. The BAT transabdominal ultrasound system was used for localization. The comparison group consisted of 101 contemporary cases treated with 3D-CRT to 78.0 Gy (2.0 Gy per fraction). The study sample therefore comprised 292 cases. Seventy Gy in 28 fractions was equivalent to 78 Gy in 39 fractions for late-reacting tissues, according to the linear quadratic model. The median follow-up was 9 months. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity scores were used. RESULTS: The rates of acute rectal Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity scores 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 30%, 55%, 14%, and 0%, respectively, with SCIM-RT, versus 14%, 67%, 19%, and 0%, respectively, with 3D-CRT. The rates of acute urinary toxicity scores 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 17%, 62%, 20%, and 1%, respectively, with SCIM-RT, versus 22%, 58%, 20%, and 0%, respectively, with 3D-CRT. To date, only two patients who underwent SCIM-RT had grade 2 late urinarytoxicity. No grade 3 late urinary or rectal complications occurred with SCIM-RT. The actuarial late rectal grade 2 toxicity observed at 18 months was 10% after SCIM-RT, versus 12% after 3D-CRT. Only three patients had grade 3 late rectal toxicity; all of them had undergone 3D-CRT. A multivariate analysis of factors affecting grade 2-3 late rectal toxicity was performed by use of the following: age (continuous), race (black vs white), androgen deprivation (yes vs no), technique (SCIM-RT vs 3D-CRT), grade 2-3 acute rectal toxicity (yes vs no), and volume of rectum receiving the prescription dose (VrPr) (< or = 15 mL vs >15 mL). Only the VrPr was a significant independent factor predicting grade 2-3 late rectal toxicity. Only 15 SCIM-RT (7%) and 20 3D-CRT cases (20%) had a VrPr > 15 mL. With SCIM-RT, the grade 2-3 late rectal toxicity rate at 18 months with a VrPr > 15 mL was 29%, versus 5% with a VrPr < or = 15 mL. With 3D-CRT, the grade 2-3 late rectal toxicity rate at 18 months with a VrPr > 15 mL was 25%, versus 8% with a VrPr < or = 15 mL. CONCLUSIONS: SCIM-RT, delivering 70.0 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction, had an acute and late toxicity profile up to 18 months after therapy that was similarto that of 3D-CRT delivering 78.0 Gy at 2.0 Gy per fraction. The grade 2 actuarial combined rectal toxicity rate is low (10%) at 18 months, although it increased when rectal volumes > 15 mL received 70 Gy with SCIM-RT. Only 7% of SCIM-RT cases received 70 Gy to > 15 ml of the rectum. If longer follow-up confirms the low late toxicity rates, SCIM-RT will be an alternative and more convenient method of dose-escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate gland.

PURPOSE: To present our initial observations on the clinical feasibility of the technique of short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SCIM-RT) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer coupled with daily transabdominal ultrasound localization of the prostate. The proposed regimen consists of a hypofractionated course delivering 70.0 Gy in 28 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The treatment data of the first 51 patients treated with SCIM-RT at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation are presented in this report. The technique consisted of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 5 static fields (anterior, 2 laterals, and 2 anterior obliques). Inverse plans were generated by the Corvus treatment-planning system. The treatment delivery was performed with a Varian Dynamic Multileaf Collimator. The target was the prostate only in patients with low-risk disease (stage T1-T2, pretreatment PSA < or =10, and biopsy Gleason < or =6). The target was the prostate and seminal vesicles in patients with high-risk disease (stage T3 or pretreatment PSA > 10 or biopsy Gleason > or =7). In the Corvus planning system, the margins for the planning target volume (PTV) were 4 mm posteriorly, 8 mm laterally, and 5 mm in all other directions. A total of 70.0 Gy (mean prostate dose approximately 75 Gy) was prescribed in all cases at 2.5 Gy per fraction to be delivered in 28 fractions over 5 1/2 weeks. Prior to treatment delivery, the patients were minimally immobilized on the treatment table, only using lasers and skin marks. The location of the prostate gland was verified daily with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system and patient position adjustments were performed accordingly. Fifty-one patients completed therapy between October 1998 and May 1999. RESULTS: The dose was prescribed to an isodose line ranging from 82.0% to 90.0% (mean: 87.2%). The range of the individual prostate mean doses was 73.5 to 78.5 Gy (average: 75.3 Gy). The range of the maximum doses was 77.4 to 84.5 Gy (average: 80.2 Gy). The range of the minimum doses was 64.3 to 69.2 Gy (average: 67.5 Gy). The average time for the prostate position verification and alignment of the prostate using the BAT system was 5 minutes. The entire localization/alignment process was performed by the radiation therapists. The daily alignment images were automatically saved and reviewed by the radiation oncologist, a process similar to port film checks. The total treatment (beam-on) time was around 6 minutes using the 5 static intensity-modulated fields. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of bladder volumes irradiated to 50, 60, and 70 Gy were as follows: 24 +/- 11 cc, 16 +/- 8 cc, and 8 +/- 6 cc. The mean and SD of rectal volumes irradiated to 50, 60, and 70 Gy were as follows: 22 +/- 11 cc, 15 +/- 8 cc, and 7 +/- 5 cc. The RTOG acute bladder toxicity scores were as follows: 0 in 3 (6%), 1 in 38 (74%), and 2 in 10 (20%). The RTOG acute rectal toxicity scores for SCIM-RT cases were as follows: 0 in 10 (20%), 1 in 33 (65%), and 2 in 8 (16%). No Grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: The delivery of our proposed hypofractionated-schedule SCIM-RT in combination with daily target localization/alignment with the BAT transabdominal ultrasound system is clinically feasible. It is an alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The proposed schedule would significantly increase convenience to patients due to the decrease in overall treatment time. Preliminary acute toxicity results are extremely encouraging. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess late complications and treatment efficacy.

Successful conversion from a linear accelerator-based program to a Gamma Knife radiosurgery program: the Cleveland Clinic experience.

From August 1989 to January 1997, 307 treatments in 293 patients were performed with a linear accelerator-based (LINAC) stereotactic radiosurgery system. Because of the program s success, the need for a dedicated radiosurgery unit in Ohio and the desire to treat functional disorders, the Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) obtained the first Gamma Knife in the state of Ohio. Based on the previous volume of patients for radiosurgery, it was estimated that 75-100 patients would be treated during the first year of operation. However, during the first calendar year, 214 treatments were performed on 205 patients, which far exceeded expectations. The success of the CCHS Gamma Knife Center can be attributed to an increase in a number of factors. These included marketing efforts, patient awareness, increased use for functional disorders, physician understanding of radiosurgery, use by qualified nonaffiliated radiation oncologists and neurosurgeons, and outpatient delivery (95% with the Gamma Knife vs <5% with the LINAC). With proper planning, education, and awareness, the opening of a Gamma Knife Center can greatly increase the volume of radiosurgery performed when compared with a LINAC-based program.

Evaluation and scoring of radiotherapy treatment plans using an artificial neural network.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to demonstrate the feasibility of using an artificial neural network to predict the clinical evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Approximately 150 treatment plans were developed for 16 patients who received external-beam radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas of the lower extremity. Plans were assigned a figure of merit by a radiation oncologist using a five-point rating scale. Plan scoring was performed by a single physician to ensure consistency in rating. Dose-volume information extracted from a training set of 511 treatment plans on 14 patients was correlated to the physician-generated figure of merit using an artificial neural network. The neural network was tested with a test set of 19 treatment plans on two patients whose plans were not used in the training of the neural net. RESULTS: Physician scoring of treatment plans was consistent to within one point on the rating scale 88% of the time. The neural net reproduced the physician scores in the training set to within one point approximately 90% of the time. It reproduced the physician scores in the test set to within one point approximately 83% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: An artificial neural network can be trained to generate a score for a treatment plan that can be correlated to a clinically-based figure of merit. The accuracy of the neural net in scoring plans compares well with the reproducibility of the clinical scoring. The system of radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation using an artificial neural network demonstrates promise as a method for generating a clinically relevant figure of merit.