A methanotrophic bacterium to enable methane removal for climate mitigation.

The rapid increase of the potent greenhouse gas methane in the atmosphere creates great urgency to develop and deploy technologies for methane mitigation. One approach to removing methane is to use bacteria for which methane is their carbon and energy source (methanotrophs). Such bacteria naturally convert methane to CO2 and biomass, a value-added product and a cobenefit of methane removal. Typically, methanotrophs grow best at around 5,000 to 10,000 ppm methane, but methane in the atmosphere is 1.9 ppm. Air above emission sites such as landfills, anaerobic digestor effluents, rice paddy effluents, and oil and gas wells contains elevated methane in the 500 ppm range. If such sites are targeted for methane removal, technology harnessing aerobic methanotroph metabolism has the potential to become economically and environmentally viable. The first step in developing such methane removal technology is to identify methanotrophs with enhanced ability to grow and consume methane at 500 ppm and lower. We report here that some existing methanotrophic strains grow well at 500 ppm methane, and one of them, Methylotuvimicrobium buryatense 5GB1C, consumes such low methane at enhanced rates compared to previously published values. Analyses of bioreactor-based performance and RNAseq-based transcriptomics suggest that this ability to utilize low methane is based at least in part on extremely low non-growth-associated maintenance energy and on high methane specific affinity. This bacterium is a candidate to develop technology for methane removal at emission sites. If appropriately scaled, such technology has the potential to slow global warming by 2050.

A Computational Framework for Identifying Promoter Sequences in Nonmodel Organisms Using RNA-seq Data Sets.

Engineering microorganisms into biological factories that convert renewable feedstocks into valuable materials is a major goal of synthetic biology; however, for many nonmodel organisms, we do not yet have the genetic tools, such as suites of strong promoters, necessary to effectively engineer them. In this work, we developed a computational framework that can leverage standard RNA-seq data sets to identify sets of constitutive, strongly expressed genes and predict strong promoter signals within their upstream regions. The framework was applied to a diverse collection of RNA-seq data measured for the methanotroph Methylotuvimicrobium buryatense 5GB1 and identified 25 genes that were constitutively, strongly expressed across 12 experimental conditions. For each gene, the framework predicted short (27-30 nucleotide) sequences as candidate promoters and derived -35 and -10 consensus promoter motifs (TTGACA and TATAAT, respectively) for strong expression in M. buryatense. This consensus closely matches the canonical E. coli sigma-70 motif and was found to be enriched in promoter regions of the genome. A subset of promoter predictions was experimentally validated in a XylE reporter assay, including the consensus promoter, which showed high expression. The pmoC, pqqA, and ssrA promoter predictions were additionally screened in an experiment that scrambled the -35 and -10 signal sequences, confirming that transcription initiation was disrupted when these specific regions of the predicted sequence were altered. These results indicate that the computational framework can make biologically meaningful promoter predictions and identify key pieces of regulatory systems that can serve as foundational tools for engineering diverse microorganisms for biomolecule production.

Predicting bioprocess targets of chemical compounds through integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interactions.

Chemical-genetic interactions-observed when the treatment of mutant cells with chemical compounds reveals unexpected phenotypes-contain rich functional information linking compounds to their cellular modes of action. To systematically identify these interactions, an array of mutants is challenged with a compound and monitored for fitness defects, generating a chemical-genetic interaction profile that provides a quantitative, unbiased description of the cellular function(s) perturbed by the compound. Genetic interactions, obtained from genome-wide double-mutant screens, provide a key for interpreting the functional information contained in chemical-genetic interaction profiles. Despite the utility of this approach, integrative analyses of genetic and chemical-genetic interaction networks have not been systematically evaluated. We developed a method, called CG-TARGET (Chemical Genetic Translation via A Reference Genetic nETwork), that integrates large-scale chemical-genetic interaction screening data with a genetic interaction network to predict the biological processes perturbed by compounds. In a recent publication, we applied CG-TARGET to a screen of nearly 14,000 chemical compounds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, integrating this dataset with the global S. cerevisiae genetic interaction network to prioritize over 1500 compounds with high-confidence biological process predictions for further study. We present here a formal description and rigorous benchmarking of the CG-TARGET method, showing that, compared to alternative enrichment-based approaches, it achieves similar or better accuracy while substantially improving the ability to control the false discovery rate of biological process predictions. Additional investigation of the compatibility of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction profiles revealed that one-third of observed chemical-genetic interactions contributed to the highest-confidence biological process predictions and that negative chemical-genetic interactions overwhelmingly formed the basis of these predictions. We also present experimental validations of CG-TARGET-predicted tubulin polymerization and cell cycle progression inhibitors. Our approach successfully demonstrates the use of genetic interaction networks in the high-throughput functional annotation of compounds to biological processes.

Engineering Genomes with Genotype Specification Language.

High quality DNA design tools are becoming increasingly important as synthetic biology continues to increase the rate and throughput of building and testing genetic constructs. To make effective use of expanded build and test capacity, genotype design tools must not only be efficient enough to allow for many designs to be easily created, but also expressive enough to support the complex design patterns required by scientists on the frontier of genome engineering. Genotype Specification Language (GSL) is a language-based design tool invented at Amyris that enables scientists to quickly create DNA designs using a familiar syntax. This syntax provides a layer of abstraction that moves users away from reading and writing raw DNA sequences toward composing designs in terms of functional parts . GSL increases the speed at which scientists can design DNA constructs, provides a precise and reproducible representation of parts, and achieves these goals while maintaining design flexibility. Finally, the GSL compiler can emit information such as the exact final DNA sequence of the design as well as the reagents (primers and template information) required to physically build the constructs. Since its open-source release in February 2016, the GSL compiler can be freely downloaded and used by genome engineers to efficiently specify genetic designs. This chapter briefly introduces GSL syntax and design principles before examining specific examples of genome engineering tasks with accompanying GSL code.

Genotype Specification Language.

We describe here the Genotype Specification Language (GSL), a language that facilitates the rapid design of large and complex DNA constructs used to engineer genomes. The GSL compiler implements a high-level language based on traditional genetic notation, as well as a set of low-level DNA manipulation primitives. The language allows facile incorporation of parts from a library of cloned DNA constructs and from the "natural" library of parts in fully sequenced and annotated genomes. GSL was designed to engage genetic engineers in their native language while providing a framework for higher level abstract tooling. To this end we define four language levels, Level 0 (literal DNA sequence) through Level 3, with increasing abstraction of part selection and construction paths. GSL targets an intermediate language based on DNA slices that translates efficiently into a wide range of final output formats, such as FASTA and GenBank, and includes formats that specify instructions and materials such as oligonucleotide primers to allow the physical construction of the GSL designs by individual strain engineers or an automated DNA assembly core facility.