The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer.

Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients' function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility.

Understanding the Major Factors Affecting Response Shift Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life: What the Then-Test Measures in a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Registry.

BACKGROUND: Localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatments provide high survival rates, with patients often surviving a decade or longer after treatment. Therefore, treatment options are progressively based on quality of life. The objective of this research was to investigate magnitude of response shift (RS) in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) responses in men with clinically localized PCa using a generic questionnaire and a disease-specific questionnaire in an observational longitudinal patient registry study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort study was conducted using the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database. Patients were annually surveyed using the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) HRQOL measures. A total of 3161 active patients were eligible for a one-off supplemental study asking retrospective HRQOL scores (then-test). We calculated RS, observed change, and RS adjusted change. Statistical difference was determined by t test. RESULTS: Patients consistently reported higher recalled pretreatment HRQOL compared to baseline scores for SF-36 and PCI, confirming the existence of a RS (P < .05). On average, PCI demonstrated larger RS by a factor of 2 than SF-36. More specific, RS was greater especially in SF-36 physical domains compared to mental health items. PCI measured PCa-specific physical adverse effects only. Patients whose cancer had recurred reported slightly lower SF-36 RS than those whose cancer had not recurred. CONCLUSION: RS occurrence was measured in both the disease-specific questionnaire and the generic HRQOL questionnaire, demonstrating continued low health and symptom scores after RS adjustment. Therefore, health professionals should adjust for this phenomenon when assessing patient's HRQOL treatment responses, and clinicians should address their continued sexual and urinary functional loss.

Robust Health Utility Assessment Among Long-term Survivors of Prostate Cancer: Results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Valid health utility values are essential for comparative effectiveness analyses. However, subjective utilities in long-term survivors of prostate cancer (PCa) with various oncological and functional outcomes have not been well described. OBJECTIVE: To quantify utilities in long-term survivors of PCa using the standard gamble method, generally regarded as the approach best grounded in economic theory. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a cross-sectional study nested within a prospective cohort-Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). Overall, 1884 (59.7%) of 3155 active participants across all disease states returned the questionnaire. INTERVENTION: Various primary treatments for PCa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Utility values for PCa health, sexual function, urinary function, bowel function, and overall health were measured, based on patients' conditions at the time of the survey. Bias correction methods were employed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After exclusion of incomplete or disqualified data, 1740 (92.3% of responding) patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 73.1 ±â€¯8.2 yr at a median of 9 yr (interquartile range: 6-11) since diagnosis. Mean utilities for PCa health and overall health were 0.934 ±â€¯0.120 and 0.960 ±â€¯0.100, respectively. After bias correction by probability weighting function, utilities were 0.866 ±â€¯0.154 and 0.897 ±â€¯0.142, and by mixed model correction, 0.845 ±â€¯0.186 and 0.884 ±â€¯0.176, respectively. Measured utilities were similarly high for specific functional outcomes, even with bias corrections. Survivorship bias and skewed proportion of disease status due to natural history of PCa were potential limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Standard gamble-based utilities in long-term survivors of PCa were much higher than those determined previously. The results indicate substantial human resilience: most PCa patients adapt to their health status over time even if they experience incomplete functional recovery and would not take risk in pursuit of better quality of life. PATIENT SUMMARY: We elicited health utilities (measures of quality of life) among long-term survivors of prostate cancer using the most robust method. These were much higher than previously reported values that were based on theoretical scenarios or indirect methods. Long-term survivors of prostate cancer may adapt well to their health conditions over time even if they experience disease-specific or functional problems.

Assigning value to preparation for prostate cancer decision making: a willingness to pay analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) is a web-based decision support system for men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer that has demonstrated efficacy in reducing decisional conflict. Our objective was to estimate willingness-to-pay (WTP) for men's decisional preparation activities. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized trial of P3P, usual care group participants received typical preparation for decision making plus referral to publicly-available, educational websites. Intervention group participants received the same, plus online P3P educational media specific to the user's personal preferences and values, and a communication coaching component tailored to race\ethnicity, age and language. WTP data were collected one week after physician consultation. An iterative bidding direct contingent valuation survey format was used, randomly assigning participants to high or low starting values (SV). Tobit models were used to explore associations between SV-adjusted WTP and age, education, marital and work-status, insurance, decision-control preference and decision-making stage. RESULTS: Of 392 participants enrolled, 141 P3P and 107 usual care (UC) provided a WTP value. Men were willing to pay a median $25 (IQR $10-100) for P3P in addition to usual care preparation materials. In the final multivariable tobit regression model, SV, marital status, stage of decision making and income were significantly associated with WTP for P3P. Decision control preference was considered marginally significant (p = 0.11). Men were WTP a median $30 (IQR $10-$200) for usual care material alone. In the final multivariable model, SV, education, and stage of decision making were significantly associated with WTP in usual care. CONCLUSION: WTP was similar for UC and for the addition of P3P to UC decision preparation. The WTP values were associated with demographic and preference variables. Findings can help focus decision support on future patients who would benefit most: those without strong support systems, at earlier stages of decision making, and open to a shared-decision style. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT NCT01844999 . Registered May 3, 2013.

Cost Effectiveness of Sequencing 34 Cancer-Associated Genes as an Aid for Treatment Selection in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 34 cancer-associated genes would cost-effectively aid in the treatment selection for patients with metastatic melanoma, compared with a single-site BRAF V600 mutation test. METHODS: A decision model was developed to estimate the costs and health outcomes of the two test strategies. The cost effectiveness of these two strategies was analyzed from a payer perspective over a 2-year time horizon with model parameters taken from the literature. RESULTS: In the base case, the gene sequencing panel strategy resulted in a cost of US$120,022 and 0.721 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient, whereas the single-site mutation test strategy resulted in a cost of US$128,965 and 0.704 QALYs. Thus, the gene sequencing panel strategy cost US$8943 less per patient and increased QALYs by 0.0174 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that, compared with the single-site mutation test strategy, the gene sequencing panel strategy had a 90.9% chance of having reduced costs and increased QALYs, with the cost of the gene sequencing panel test having minimal effect on the incremental cost. CONCLUSION: Compared with the single-site mutation test, the use of an NGS panel of 34 cancer-associated genes as an aid in selecting therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma reduced costs and increased QALYs. If the base-case results were applied to the 8900 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma in the USA each year, the gene sequencing panel strategy could result in an annual savings of US$79.6 million and a gain of 155 QALYs.

Patient preferences for attributes of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: development and results of a ratings-based conjoint analysis.

BACKGROUND: Timely individualized treatment is essential to improving relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patient health outcomes, yet little is known about how patients make treatment decisions. We sought to evaluate RRMS patient preferences for risks and benefits of treatment. METHODS: Fifty patients with RRMS completed conjoint analysis surveys with 16 hypothetical disease-modifying therapy (DMT) medication profiles developed using a fractional factorial design. Medication profiles were assigned preference ratings from 0 (not acceptable) to 10 (most favorable). Medication attributes included a range of benefits, adverse effects, administration routes, and market durations. Analytical models used linear mixed-effects regression. RESULTS: Participants showed the highest preference for medication profiles that would improve their symptoms (ß = 0.81-1.03, P < .001), not a proven DMT outcome. Preventing relapses, the main clinical trial outcome, was not associated with significant preferences (P = .35). Each year of preventing magnetic resonance imaging changes and disease symptom progression showed DMT preferences of 0.17 point (ß = 0.17, P = .002) and 0.12 point (ß = 0.12, P < .001), respectively. Daily oral administration was preferred over all parenteral routes (P < .001). A 1% increase in death or severe disability decreased relative DMT preference by 1.15 points (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient preference focused on symptoms and prevention of progression but not on relapse prevention, the proven drug outcome. Patients were willing to accept some level of serious risk for certain types and amounts of benefits, and they strongly preferred daily oral administration over all other options.

Measurement equivalence using a mixed-mode approach to administer health-related quality of life instruments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of mode, order of administration, and the interaction of mode and order on health-related quality of life scales when self-administered by mixed mode (paper-mode and web-mode) for measurement equivalence. METHODS: Health-related quality of life data was analyzed from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor using the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI). A randomized crossover design assigned participants to two groups with a preferred 2-5-day washout period. Cognitive debriefing evaluated participants' mode preference. RESULTS: Of the 245 men enrolled, 85 % completed both modes. The majority were White (97 %), college educated (66 %), reported an annual income >$75,000 (46 %), and a median age of 69 years. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for each item on both instruments (r = .54-.97). Exact percentage agreement for yes/no items was high (≥.88). For the SF-36, significant differences were observed for order of administration (physical component and physical function scores) and for the interaction between mode and order (mental component, role emotional, social function, vitality, and mental health scores). For the UCLA-PCI, the largest difference was 12.8 points lower for sexual bother for order of administration by web-mode first (p = .03). Seventy percent preferred the web-mode, 21 % had no preference, and 9 % preferred the paper-mode. CONCLUSION: Web-mode and paper-mode administrations of the SF-36 and UCLA-PCI are equivalent in men with prostate cancer, implying that mixed-mode survey administration is warranted.

Fee comparisons of treatments for nonmelanoma skin cancer in a private practice academic setting.

OBJECTIVE: To compare fees for biopsy, treatment procedure, repair, and 2-month follow-up for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) treatments: electrodesiccation and curettage (ED&C), excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). METHODS: A cost comparison of 936 primary NMSCs diagnosed in 1999/2000 at a University affiliated dermatology practice. Clinical data was from medical record review. 2007 Medicare Fee Schedule costs determined fees for surgical care. Pearson chi-square tests, t-tests and analysis of variance compared fee differences. Linear regression determined independent effects of tumor and treatment characteristics on fees. RESULTS: Mean fees/lesion were $463 for ED&C, $1,222 for excision, and $2,085 for MMS (p < .001). For all treatments, primary procedure costs were highest (38%, 45%, and 41%). Total repair fees were higher with MMS ($735) vs excisions ($197). Fees were higher for head and neck tumors (p < .001), H-zone tumors (p < .001), and tumors smaller than 10 mm in diameter (p = .04). Regression models predicted that the treatment fees would be $2,109 for MMS and $1,252 for excision (p < .001). Tumor size greater than 10 mm in diameter (added $128), tumors on the head and neck (added $966), and MMS (added $857 vs excision) were independently related to higher fees (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for risk factors, MMS has higher fees than excision for primary NMSC. Repairs accounted for the majority of this difference. These fee comparisons provide a basis for comparative effectiveness studies of treatments for this common cancer.

The effect of prophylaxis on pediatric HIV costs.

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the cost to treat HIV(+) and HIV(-) pediatric patients both before and after HIV prophylaxis became the standard of care. Retrospective chart review of a pediatric HIV/AIDS specialty clinic's medical charts was conducted for clinical and healthcare utilization data on 125 children diagnosed from 1986 to 2007. Mean HIV-related costs were compared using bootstrapped t-tests for children born in the pre-prophylaxis (1979-1993) and prophylaxis eras (1994-2007). Patients were also stratified into two categories based on death during the follow-up period. Lastly, national cost-savings were estimated using mean costs, national number of at-risk births, and national perinatal HIV transmission rates in each era. For HIV(+) children, mean annual per patient treatment cost was $15,067 (95% CI: $10,169-$19,965) in the pre-prophylaxis era (n = 40) and $14,959 (95% CI: $9140-$20,779) in the prophylaxis era (n = 14); difference not statistically significant (p > 0.05). For HIV(-) children, mean annual per patient treatment cost was $204 (95% CI: $219-$627) for the pre-prophylaxis era (n = 2) and $427 (95% CI: $277-$579) for the prophylaxis era (n = 69); difference statistically significant (p < 0.05). A projected cost-savings of $16-23 million annually in the USA was observed due to the adoption of prophylaxis treatment guidelines in pediatric HIV care. The prophylaxis era of pediatric HIV treatment has been successful in decreasing perinatal HIV transmission and mortality, as reflected by clinical trials and national cost-savings data, and emphasizes the value of the rapid adoption of evidence-based practice guidelines.

Pediatric HIV costs across three treatment eras from 1986 to 2007.

OBJECTIVE: Life has changed dramatically for infants exposed perinatally to HIV to HIV primarily because of a successful translational research program that has also affected treatment costs. We compared treatment costs among HIV+ patients in an HIV/AIDS specialty clinic across 3 treatment eras: monotherapy (pre-1990), combination therapy (1990-1996), and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (1997-2007). We also estimated cumulative health care costs among pediatric HIV/AIDS patients born in each era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on health care use were collected from medical records of 126 infants born to HIV+ mothers during a 21-year period (1986-2007) (728 person-years). The Drug Topics Red Book 1999 was used for drug costs, the Current Procedural Terminology Medicare Fee Schedule codes for outpatient costs, and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database for inpatient costs. Generalized estimating equations and bootstrapped ordinary least-squares models were used to determine 2007 costs, cumulative costs, and cost savings. RESULTS: Lifetime cost savings with HAART were $6.7 to $23.3 million, depending on incidence. Average total costs per HIV+ person per month were $1306 ($318 for drugs, $896 for total medical) in the monotherapy era, $2289 ($891 for drugs, $1180 for total medical) in the combination-therapy era, and $1814 ($1241 for drugs, $320 for total medical) in the HAART era. Total costs during the HAART era were 25.2% lower than costs during the combination-therapy era, because the 34% higher HAART drug costs were compensated for by total medical costs (inpatient+outpatient) that were 57% lower, which was a significant change (P<.001). The cumulative costs for treatment of an HIV+ patient were highest during the monotherapy era ($196,860) and lowest during the HAART era ($181,436). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the cost burden for the treatment of HIV+ pediatric patients has decreased over time. This historical examination of treatment-era costs demonstrates the value of technologic advances in treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of implementation methods for ELISA serology testing of Trypanosoma cruzi in California blood banks.

The first U.S. ELISA test for T. cruzi antibodies was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on December 13, 2006. Blood banks have begun screening in absence of FDA recommendations for best implementation methods. We surveyed 2,029 blood donors at five California sites with three risk-based Chagas risk-screening questions. Semi-Markov models compared the cost-effectiveness of three testing strategies. 30% of donors screened positively. Screening all dominated doing nothing, being less costly, and saving more lives. The choice to "screen and test" compared with "testing all" varied by Chagas prevalence, "screening and testing" being cost-effective for high (0.004) and low (0.00004) prevalences, and "testing all" cost-effective for moderate risk (0.0004). It is cost-effective to screen by ELISA rather than do nothing. The best strategy depends on site-specific risk. Census estimates of Hispanics do not predict donor risk well. We suggest using our screening questions to determine risk level and most cost-effective testing strategy.

Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancer treatments.

BACKGROUND: Studies that compare prostate cancer treatment costs show wide variation. None compare all contemporary treatment costs, and most focus on initial treatment costs. The authors compared healthcare utilization and cost patterns of prostate cancer treatments over a span of 5.5 years in 4553 newly diagnosed patients stratified by age and risk group. METHODS: Contemporary treatment and evaluation patterns for prostate cancer were identified by using CaPSURE, a national disease registry of men with prostate cancer that included ongoing clinical data collection from 31 academic and community urology practices and biennial patient-reported outcome questionnaires that included demography, medical condition, comorbidity, risk measures, and healthcare utilization. Costs of outpatient visits, medications, and hospitalizations were applied from various national sources. Recurrent events analysis (MCF) accounted for left and right censorship. A mixed effects regression model with bootstrapping for skewed cost data quantified the relation between MCF cost, age, and risk. RESULTS: Prostate-related costs in the first 6 months after treatment were 11,495 dollars, (from 2586 dollars for watchful waiting (WW) to 24,204 dollars for external beam radiation. After 6 months, average cost was only 3044 dollars. Annual cost is 7740 dollars, highest for androgen deprivation therapy (12,590 dollars) and lowest for watch waiting (5843 dollars). Risk and age were significantly related to initial treatment choice. Cumulative cost (42,570 dollars) allowed a better estimate of treatment pattern costs. CONCLUSIONS: The cost burden of prostate cancer is high, but it varies by treatment type even when controlling for disease, age, and stage. Cumulative cost analysis allowed inclusion of adverse events and disease recurrence costs, making new cost comparisons evident among treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of Chagas disease interventions in latin america and the Caribbean: Markov models.

Chagas disease is a parasitic disease in Latin America. Despite vector control programs that have reduced incidence by 70%, there are at least 12-14 million prevalent cases. We used a Markov model to examine strategies for control and treatment of Chagas disease that compared annual costs, life expectancies, and cost-effectiveness of three vector control and drug treatment strategies. Vector control programs alone and vector control plus drug treatment are dominant over no vector control (i.e., less costly and save more lives), and vector control plus drug is highly cost-effective compared with vector control alone. We demonstrated expected changes in deaths over time resulting from various prevention approaches. Vector control affects primarily incidence, not decreasing deaths and prevalence for 30 years, while drug treatment affects prevalence and deaths immediately. The best strategy to combat Chagas disease is combinations of vector control and a potential new drug.

The economic burden of home care for children with HIV and other chronic illnesses.

OBJECTIVES: We compared types, amounts, and costs of home care for children with HIV and chronic illnesses, controlling for the basic care needs of healthy children to determine the economic burden of caring for and home care of chronically ill children. METHODS: Caregivers of 97 HIV-positive children, 101 children with a chronic illness, and 102 healthy children were surveyed regarding amounts of paid and unpaid care provided. Caregiving value was determined according to national hourly earnings and a market replacement method. RESULTS: Chronically ill children required significantly more care time than HIV-positive children (7.8 vs 3.9 hours per day). Paid care accounted for 8% to 16% of care time. Annual costs were $9300 per HIV-positive child and $25,900 per chronically ill child. Estimated national annual costs are $86.5 million for HIV-positive children and $155 to $279 billion for chronically ill children. CONCLUSIONS: Informal caregiving represents a substantial economic value to society. The total care burden among chronically ill children is higher than that among children with HIV.

Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) is becoming standard care and it is cost-effective compared with no genetic testing. However, the best strategy for detection of HNPCC gene carriers is unknown. METHODS: We use a decision analytic model to evaluate the effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness of four commonly used testing strategies to detect HNPCC gene carriers. The model starts with a population of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients and measures costs, the number of gene carriers detected, and incremental costs per gene carrier detected. RESULTS: We found that germline testing on only those CRC probands who meet the Amsterdam criteria detects the fewest gene carriers and has the lowest cost whereas tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) testing of all CRC patients and families has the highest cost and detects the most gene carriers. When cost-effectiveness is considered, the mixed strategy (MSH2 and MLH1 testing on those who meet the Amsterdam criteria and germline testing for the remainder who meet less stringent modified criteria and are MSI-High) seems superior. The mixed strategy detects 59.6 mutation carriers per 1000 CRC cases and costs much less than the test all strategy, which has an incremental cost-effectiveness of $51,151. The mixed strategy often other strategies and when compared to the Amsterdam strategy, has a cost-effectiveness of only $6441 per gene carrier detected. CONCLUSIONS: It is not very effective to limit genetic testing to only individuals who meet the Amsterdam criteria, as many gene carriers are missed. However, testing all CRC patients for tumor MSI-H, although effective, may be prohibitively expensive. A mixed strategy is the more cost-effective approach.

The direct cost and incidence of systemic fungal infections.

OBJECTIVES: In this study we determined the incidence and direct inpatient and outpatient costs of systemic fungal infections (candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis) in 1998. METHODS: Using primarily the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) for incidence and the Maryland Hospital Discharge Data Set (MDHDDS) for costs, we surveyed four systemic fungal infections in patients who also had HIV/AIDS, neoplasia, transplant, and all other concomitant diagnoses. Using a case-control method, we compared the cases with controls (those without fungal infections with the same underlying comorbidity) to obtain the incremental hospitalization costs. We used the Student's t-test to determine significance of incremental hospital costs. We modeled outpatient costs on the basis of discharge status to calculate the total annual cost for systemic fungal infections in 1998. RESULTS: For 1998, the projected average incidence was 306 per million US population, with candidiasis accounting for 75% of cases. The estimated total direct cost was $2.6 billion and the average per-patient attributable cost was $31,200. The most commonly reported comorbid diagnoses with fungal infections (HIV/AIDS, neoplasms, transplants) accounted for only 45% of all infections. CONCLUSIONS: The cost burden is high for systemic fungal infections. Additional attention should be given to the 55% with fungal disease and other comorbid diagnoses.