Systematic review: Defining, diagnosing and monitoring small bowel strictures in Crohn's disease on intestinal ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Stricturing Crohn's disease (CD) occurs most commonly in the terminal ileum and poses a clinical problem. Cross-sectional imaging modalities such as intestinal ultrasound (IUS), computed tomography enterography (CTE), and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) allow for assessment of the entire bowel wall and associated peri-enteric findings. Radiologic definitions of strictures have been developed for CTE and MRE; their reliability and responsiveness are being evaluated in index development programs. A comprehensive assessment strategy for strictures using IUS is needed. AIMS: To provide a detailed summary of definitions, diagnosis and monitoring of strictures on IUS as well as technical aspects of image acquisition. METHODS: We searched four databases up to 6 January 2024. Two-stage screening was done in duplicate. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: There were 56 studies eligible for inclusion. Definitions for strictures on IUS are heterogeneous, but the overall accuracy for diagnosis of strictures is high. The capability of IUS for characterising inflammation versus fibrosis in strictures is not accurate enough to be used in clinical practice or trials. We summarise definitions for improvement of strictures on IUS, and discuss parameters for image acquisition and standardisation. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review is the first step for a structured program to develop a stricture IUS index for CD.

LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Crivellaro in this issue.

Synoptic Reporting of Focal Liver Masses in at Risk Patients: Algorithmic Diagnosis and CEUS LI-RADS.

OBJECTIVES: Reporting contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for focal liver masses in at risk patients is a challenging task. Traditionally used prose reporting (PR) is inconsistent and lacks standardization. We propose synoptic reporting (SR), encompassing algorithmic interpretation and liver imaging and reporting data system (LI-RADS) categorization. METHODS: A software worksheet from Kailo Medical (Melbourne, AU), incorporates the CEUS algorithm for liver interpretation and CEUS LI-RADS categorization. Part 1. Feasibility of SR: twenty participants of varying experience were presented a brief lecture on SR, algorithmic approach to liver mass interpretation, and CEUS LI-RADS categorization. Ten representative liver masses were shown as unknown cases. Participants inputted data into SR worksheets. Results and LI-RADS category were generated solely by SR. Data were categorized as "correct" or "incorrect." Part 2. Prospective Analysis: Ninety-one patients for SR and 56 for PR, all were tested for completeness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. RESULTS: Part 1: Junior participants, pass rate 81.6%, and senior participants, pass rate 83.3% showed no difference in performance. Part 2: Completeness: SR 98.4% and PR 87.0%. Efficiency: Average total time to completion: SR 11 minutes and PR 20 minutes. User satisfaction: Ultrasound technologists, all referring physicians, and six out of seven radiologists preferred SR over PR. Major benefits cited were total time saved, consistency and accuracy in documentation, and report completeness. CONCLUSIONS: SR is a reliable and useful tool in clinical practice to report liver masses on ultrasound and assign an appropriate LI-RADS categorization and management pathway. This ultimately improves communication with referring clinicians and leads to better patient outcomes.

Unique portal venous phase imaging discordance between CEUS and MRI: a valuable predictor of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma?

PURPOSE: We have long noted unique portal venous phase (PVP) imaging discordance of focal liver masses between CEUS, showing rapid marked washout, and MRI, showing progressive or sustained enhancement. We postulate association of this unique discordance with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and causal relationship to different contrast agent behavior. We investigate this unique discordance, propose its clinical significance for ICC diagnosis, and confirm further histologic associations. METHODS: Cases were collected within our CEUS department and from pathology records over a ten-year interval. This retrospective review includes 99 patients, 73 with confirmed ICC and 26 other diagnoses, showing unique PVP discordance. The CEUS and MRI enhancement characteristics were compared for all patients. RESULTS: Unique discordance is identified in 67/73 (92%) ICC and difference between the PVP appearance on MRI and CEUS is statistically significant (p <  0.0001). Arterial phase enhancement did not show statistically significant difference between CEUS and MRI, p >  0.05. Other diagnoses showing unique discordance include especially lymphoma (n = 7), sclerosed hemangioma (n = 6), HCC (n = 4), metastases (n = 2), and other rare entities. CONCLUSION: ICC shows this discrepant intermodality enhancement pattern in a statistically significant number of cases and should be considered along with other LR-M features in at-risk patients. Discordance is also rarely seen in a number of other liver lesions.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: clinical validation in a prospective multinational study in North America and Europe.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System LR-5 characterization for HCC diagnosis in North American or European patients. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A prospective multinational cohort study was performed from January 2018 through November 2022 at 11 academic and nonacademic centers in North America and Europe. Patients at risk for HCC with at least 1 liver observation not previously treated, identified on ultrasound (US), or multiphase CT or MRI performed as a part of standard clinical care were eligible for the study. All participants were examined with CEUS of the liver within 4 weeks of CT/MRI or tissue diagnosis to characterize up to 2 liver nodules per participant using ACR CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. Definite HCC diagnosis on the initial CT/MRI, imaging follow-up, or histology for CT/MRI-indeterminate nodules were used as reference standards. A total of 545 nodules had confirmed reference standards in 480 patients, 73.8% were HCC, 5.5% were other malignancies, and 20.7% were nonmalignant. The specificity of CEUS LR-5 for HCC was 95.1% (95% CI 90.1%-97.7%), sensitivity 62.9% (95% CI 57.9%-67.7%), positive predictive value 97.3% (95% CI 94.5%-98.7%), and negative predictive value 47.7% (95% CI 41.7%-53.8%). In addition, benign CEUS characterization (LR-1 or LR-2) had 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value for nonmalignant liver nodules. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System provides an accurate categorization of liver nodules in participants at risk for HCC.

A Novel Technology for Resolution of CEUS Imaging Problems in Patients With High BMI and Fatty Liver.

OBJECTIVES: In high-BMI patients with and without fatty liver, we evaluate performance of a commercially available specially designed ultrasound probe (SDP) for scanning at depth. Greyscale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) capability of SDP for parenchymal assessment and liver mass characterization, emphasizing HCC, is compared with standard curvilinear probes. METHODS: This retrospective study included 60 patients. Fifty-five with measured BMI included 46/55 (84%) overweight or obese, and 9/55(16%) in the normal range with severe fatty liver. Fifty-six patients with focal liver abnormality included 37 with a mass and 19 with post-ablative treatment site. Masses included 23 confirmed malignancies, 15 HCC, 4 ICC, and 4 metastases. SDP followed suboptimal ultrasound using a standard probe. Images with varying fat content were compared for depth of penetration on greyscale and ability of CEUS to diagnose tumors. RESULTS: SDP showed statistically significant improvement P = <.05 in CEUS penetration for all degrees of fatty liver (mild, moderate, and severe). In malignant tumors, SDP improved detection of lesion washout in the portal venous/late phase (PVP/LP) at depth >10 cm, and in all malignant masses (P < .05). Fifteen confirmed deep HCC showed arterial phase hyperenhancement on standard probe in 10/15 (67%) and 15/15 (100%) on SDP. PVP/LP washout on standard probe was shown in 4/15 (26%) and on SDP, 14/15, (93%). Therefore, 93% of LR-5 tumors were diagnosed with SDP. Removing necessity for biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome and obesity challenge ultrasound, especially CEUS. SDP overcame limitations of standard probes for CEUS penetration especially in fatty liver. SDP was optimal for the liver mass characterization by detecting washout.

Nodules Identified on Surveillance Ultrasound for HCC: CEUS or MRI as the Initial Test?

OBJECTIVES: Following positive surveillance ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended for further characterization. We propose contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) shows equivalent efficacy. METHODS: This prospective institutional review board approved study recruited 195 consecutive at-risk patients with a positive surveillance US. All had CEUS and MRI. Biopsy (n = 44) and follow-up are gold standard. MRI and CEUS results are classified according to liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) and patient outcome. RESULTS: As an US-based modality, CEUS is superior in confirming findings from surveillance US, correlation in 189/195 (97%) on CEUS compared to 153/195 (79%) on MRI. Within these negative MRI examinations, there are 2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1 cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) diagnosed on CEUS and proven by biopsy. From 195 patients, there are 71 malignant diagnoses from all sources, including 58 LR-5 (45 on MRI and 54 on CEUS) and 13 others, including HCC outside of LR-5 category, and LR-M with biopsy proven iCCA (3 on MRI and 6 on CEUS). CEUS and MRI show concordant results in the majority of patients (146/195, 75%), including 57/146 malignant and 89/146 benign diagnoses. There are 41/57 concordant LR-5 and 6/57 concordant LR-M. When CEUS and MRI are discordant, CEUS upgraded 20 (10 biopsy-proven) from MRI LR-3/4 to CEUS LR-5 or LR-M by showing washout (WO) that MRI failed to show. Additionally, CEUS characterized time and intensity of WO and diagnosed 13/20 LR-5 by showing late and weak WO and 7 LR-M by showing fast and marked WO. CEUS is 81% sensitive and 92% specific in diagnosing malignancy. MRI is 64% sensitive and 93% specific. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS performance is at least equivalent if not superior to MRI for initial evaluation of lesions from surveillance US.

Increasing CEUS utilization in the USA: a call to action for the adult and pediatric body imaging community.

Despite its well-established benefits and a powerful body of scientific literature supporting the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), it has faced challenges in being fully adopted as a diagnostic and problem-solving tool within the USA. This effort, written by experts in performance of and interpretation of CEUS, acts as a roadmap, for those interested in expanding CEUS within their facility. CEUS benefits from a Champion who is knowledgeable and passionate about its performance and who is capable of transferring evidence-based enthusiasm to others. They must be willing to do the legwork required for the successful implementation of a CEUS program, including increasing referrals, expanding applications, and encouraging the inclusion of CEUS into current and established guidelines. The ability of CEUS to resolve a wide range of indeterminate results which come from CT and MR scan represents one of the most compelling arguments for the use of CEUS, decreasing down-stream testing, and reducing time to diagnosis. As utilization grows, the benefits of CEUS will become apparent to other healthcare teams. However, the ultimate beneficiary of improved CEUS utilization will be the patients themselves, who will have greater access to a safe, speedy, cost effective, reliable, and radiation-free diagnostic imaging tool.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Evolution: Correlation with CEUS LI-RADS.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver with a high incidence worldwide and a high associated mortality. Well-recognized risk factors that cause a predisposition to the development of HCC include chronic infection with the hepatitis B or C virus, alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related fatty liver disease, and cirrhosis. In these chronically diseased livers, benign regenerative nodules can increase in size and develop cellular atypia that progress into dysplastic nodules and ultimately HCC. This sequence of hepatocarcinogenesis is coupled with changes in nodule vascularity, including progressive decreased density of portal triads and induced neoangiogenesis, resulting in increased hepatic arterial recruitment. Changes in vascularity result in an array of patterns of nodule enhancement and washout, which can be sensitively depicted with dynamic real-time contrast-enhanced US. Regenerative nodules are isoenhancing relative to the liver with all phases, while HCC classically shows avid arterial phase hyperenhancement with late mild washout. In between, there is great variation as nodules evolve through progressive grades of dysplasia toward HCC. Observed patterns of enhancement and washout can be used to diagnose or stratify the risk of malignancy in liver nodules by using the diagnostic algorithm described by the American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). This facilitates the detection and close monitoring of potential early-stage disease. LI-RADS categorizes nodules according to a probabilistic likelihood for HCC with criteria for LR-5 nodules that are highly specific for the diagnosis of HCC, allowing treatment without exposing the patient to invasive biopsy. An invited commentary by Fetzer is available online. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Defining Transabdominal Intestinal Ultrasound Treatment Response and Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus Statement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No consensus exists on defining intestinal ultrasound response, transmural healing, or transmural remission in inflammatory bowel disease, nor clear guidance for optimal timing of assessment during treatment. This systematic review and expert consensus study aimed to define such recommendations, along with key parameters included in response reporting. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from inception to July 26, 2021, using pre-defined terms. Studies were eligible if at least two intestinal ultrasound [IUS] assessments at different time points during treatment were reported, along with an appropriate reference standard. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to examine study-level risk of bias. An international panel of experts [n = 18] rated an initial 196 statements [RAND/UCLA process, scale 1-9]. Two videoconferences were conducted, resulting in additional ratings of 149 and 13 statements, respectively. RESULTS: Out of 5826 records, 31 full-text articles, 16 abstracts, and one research letter were included; 83% [40/48] of included studies showed a low concern of applicability, and 96% [46/48] had a high risk of bias. A consensus was reached on 41 statements, with clear definitions of IUS treatment response, transmural healing, transmural remission, timing of assessment, and general considerations when using intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Response criteria and time points of response assessment varied between studies, complicating direct comparison of parameter changes and their relation to treatment outcomes. To ensure a unified approach in routine care and clinical trials, we provide recommendations and definitions for key parameters for intestinal ultrasound response, to incorporate into future prospective studies.

CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Background The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) assigns a risk category for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to imaging observations. Establishing the contributions of major features can inform the diagnostic algorithm. Purpose To perform a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to establish the probability of HCC for each LI-RADS major feature using CT/MRI and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) LI-RADS in patients at high risk for HCC. Materials and Methods Multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 2014 to September 2019 that evaluated the accuracy of CT, MRI, and CEUS for HCC detection using LI-RADS (CT/MRI LI-RADS, versions 2014, 2017, and 2018; CEUS LI-RADS, versions 2016 and 2017). Data were centralized. Clustering was addressed at the study and patient levels using mixed models. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were determined for each major feature using multivariable stepwise logistic regression. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (PROSPERO protocol: CRD42020164486). Results A total of 32 studies were included, with 1170 CT observations, 3341 MRI observations, and 853 CEUS observations. At multivariable analysis of CT/MRI LI-RADS, all major features were associated with HCC, except threshold growth (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 0.7, 3.6; P = .07). Nonperipheral washout (OR, 13.2; 95% CI: 9.0, 19.2; P = .01) and nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR, 10.3; 95% CI: 6.7, 15.6; P = .01) had stronger associations with HCC than enhancing capsule (OR, 2.4; 95% CI: 1.7, 3.5; P = .03). On CEUS images, APHE (OR, 7.3; 95% CI: 4.6, 11.5; P = .01), late and mild washout (OR, 4.1; 95% CI: 2.6, 6.6; P = .01), and size of at least 20 mm (OR, 1.6; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.5; P = .04) were associated with HCC. Twenty-five studies (78%) had high risk of bias due to reporting ambiguity or study design flaws. Conclusion Most Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System major features had different independent associations with hepatocellular carcinoma; for CT/MRI, arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout had the strongest associations, whereas threshold growth had no association. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

A new proposal for secondary surveillance following potentially curative therapy of HCC: alternating MRI and CEUS.

PURPOSE: A high recurrence rate following ablative therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) necessitates routine follow-up imaging (secondary surveillance) to facilitate early re-treatment. We evaluate our unique secondary surveillance algorithm (with use of alternating MRI and CEUS) by assessment of the relative diagnostic accuracy of MRI and CEUS in detection of residual/recurrent tumor. Potential benefits of alternating surveillance are compared to the use of MRI alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational IRB approved study included 231 patients with 354 treated tumors between January 2017 and June 2020. Treated lesions underwent secondary surveillance for a minimum of 7 months and up to 3 years, median follow-up 14 months. Secondary surveillance involved MRI performed at 1 month after treatment, followed by CEUS and MRI at alternate 3-month intervals (i.e., CEUS at month 4, MRI at month 7, etc.), for a total of 2 years. An equivocal finding on one imaging modality triggered expeditious evaluation with the alternate modality. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout comprise the classic features of recurrent tumor on both modalities. RESULTS: A total of 746 MRI and 712 CEUS examinations were performed, and a total of 184 tumor recurrences detected, MRI (n = 82) and CEUS (n = 102) (p = 0.19). There was no difference in the sensitivity (71.0-85.0% and 80.9-92.0%), specificity (97.4-99.2% and 98.5-99.9%), and area under the ROC curve (0.85-0.92 and 0.91-0.96) between MRI and CEUS, respectively. 23 of 82 recurrent tumors identified on MRI were equivocal and confirmed with expedited CEUS. 9 equivocal cases on MRI were disproved by expedited CEUS. On CEUS, 1 of the 102 recurrent tumors was equivocal and confirmed on MRI, and 2 equivocal CEUS cases were disproved by MRI. CONCLUSION: MRI and CEUS performed similarly in our secondary surveillance algorithm for HCC in their ability to detect tumor recurrence, and showed no significant difference in their relative diagnostic test accuracy measures. Of greater interest, equivocal results on MRI (typically due to difficulty in distinguishing tumor recurrence from post-treatment change/shunting) were either confirmed or disproven by CEUS in all cases. Secondary surveillance of treated HCC with alternating MRI and CEUS shows equivalent performance of each modality. CEUS resolves equivocal MRI and optimally demonstrates APHE and washout in tumor recurrence.

Pediatric contrast-enhanced ultrasound: shedding light on the pursuit of approval in the United States.

For two decades, pediatric contrast US has been well accepted throughout Europe and other parts of the world outside the United States because of its high diagnostic efficacy and extremely favorable safety profile. This includes intravenous (IV) administration, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and the intravesical application, contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS). However, the breakthrough for pediatric contrast US in the United States did not come until 2016, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first pediatric indication for a US contrast agent. This initial approval covered the use of Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe Township, NJ) for the evaluation of focal liver lesions via IV administration in children. A second pediatric indication followed shortly thereafter, when the FDA extended the use of Lumason for assessing known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux via intravesical application in children. Both initial pediatric approvals were granted without prospective pediatric clinical trials, based instead on published literature describing favorable safety and efficacy in children. Three years later, in 2019, the FDA approved Lumason for pediatric echocardiography following a clinical trial involving a total of 12 subjects at 2 sites. The story of how we achieved these FDA approvals spans more than a decade and involves the extraordinary dedication of two professional societies, namely the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). Credit also must be given to the FDA staff for their commitment to the welfare of children and their openness to compelling evidence that contrast US is a safe, reliable, radiation-free imaging option for our pediatric patients. Understanding the history of this approval process will impact the practical application of US contrast agents, particularly when expanding off-label indications in the pediatric population. This article describes the background of the FDA's approval of pediatric contrast US applications to better illuminate the potential pathways to approvals of future indications.

Standardisation of intestinal ultrasound scoring in clinical trials for luminal Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a valuable tool for assessment of Crohn's disease (CD). However, there is no widely accepted luminal disease activity index. AIMS: To identify appropriate IUS protocols, indices, items, and scoring methods for measurement of luminal CD activity and integration of IUS in CD clinical trials. METHODS: An expert international panel of adult and paediatric gastroenterologists (n = 15) and radiologists (n = 3) rated the appropriateness of 120 statements derived from literature review and expert opinion (scale of 1-9) using modified RAND/UCLA methodology. Median panel scores of 1 to ≤3.5, >3.5 to <6.5 and ≥6.5 to 9 were considered inappropriate, uncertain and appropriate ratings respectively. The statement list and survey results were discussed prior to voting. RESULTS: A total of 91 statements were rated appropriate with agreement after two rounds of voting. Items considered appropriate measures of disease activity were bowel wall thickness (BWT), vascularity, stratification and mesenteric inflammatory fat. There was uncertainty if any of the existing IUS disease activity indices were appropriate for use in CD clinical trials. Appropriate trial applications for IUS included patient recruitment qualification when diseased segments cannot be adequately assessed by ileocolonoscopy and screening for exclusionary complications. At outcome assessment, remission endpoints including BWT and vascularity, with or without mesenteric inflammatory fat, were considered appropriate. Components of an ideal IUS disease activity index were identified based upon panel discussions. CONCLUSIONS: The panel identified appropriate component items and applications of IUS for CD clinical trials. Empiric evidence, and development and validation of an IUS disease activity index are needed.

Characterization of Focal Liver Masses: A Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the evaluation of focal liver masses via a direct comparison to standard ultrasound and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). METHODS: A cohort of 214 patients with previously undiagnosed focal liver masses were included from 5 different centers. Each patient was imaged using CEUS and CT and/or MRI. Anonymized and randomized images were interpreted by 4 separate blind readers from 3 of the participating centers (2 readers for CEUS and 2 readers for CT/MRI). Readers were blinded to patient demographics and past medical history. Readers were asked to decide if the lesion was benign or malignant, provide a final diagnosis for the lesion, and provide a confidence interval. Results were compared to truth standard from pathology or expert consensus. RESULTS: In determination of malignancy, CEUS had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 82%, NPV of 95%, statistically better than standard ultrasound (sensitivity 82%, specificity 56%, PPV 60%, NPV 78%) with P < .01 and not statistically different from CT (sensitivity 90%, specificity 73% PPV 81%, NPV 86%) or MRI (sensitivity 85%, specificity 79%, PPV 68%, NPV 91%) with P ≥ .01. In assigning a final diagnosis, CEUS had an accuracy of 78% statistically better than standard ultrasound (46%) with P < .01 and not statistically different from CT (68%) or MRI (71%) with P > .01. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of focal liver lesions, both for determination of malignancy and in accuracy of final diagnosis, CEUS performs better than standard ultrasound and at least equivalent to both CT and MRI.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound-State of the Art in North America: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound White Paper.

On October 24, 2017, in Chicago, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a panel of specialists in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to arrive at a white paper regarding the use of CEUS in noncardiac applications in North America. Recommendations are based on analysis of the current literature and common practice strategies. They represent a reasonable approach to introduce the advantages of this safe and noninvasive technique for the benefit of our patients. Characterization of liver nodules with CEUS, as the approval indication worldwide, is the major focus of this endeavor. In addition, many off label uses are reviewed and literature supporting these indications provided.Key Points(1) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) allows cross-sectional imaging of the liver, kidneys and multiple other solid and hollow viscera, providing excellent characterization of identified focal mass lesions.(2) Performed with the injection of a microbubble contrast agent, CEUS provides a safe and readily available imaging technique which requires no ionizing radiation, making it appropriate for use in all ages, in those with renal insufficiency and when a portable examination is needed.(3) The CEUS can be considered in abdominal imaging whenever blood flow information is of value to diagnosis.(4) Dynamic real-time acquisition and the use of a purely intravascular contrast agent are the 2 most essential technical aspects of CEUS imaging which distinguish it from both computed tomography and magnetic resonance scan.

Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages-A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is now broadly used clinically for liver lesion detection and characterization. Obstacles to the efforts to quantify perfusion with CEUS have been the lack of a standardized approach and undocumented reproducibility. The use of multiple scanners and different analysis software packages compounds the degree of variability. Our objectives were to standardize a CEUS-based approach for quantification of perfusion-related parameters of liver lesions and to evaluate the variability of bolus transit parameters (rise time [RT], mean transit time [MTT], peak intensity, and area under the curve) obtained from various clinical ultrasound scanners and analysis software. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bolus transit as a way of evaluating perfusion has been investigated both in vivo and in vitro in the past but without establishing its reproducibility. We developed a tissue flow phantom that produces time-intensity curves very similar to those extracted from clinical cine loops of liver lesions. We evaluated the variability of the bolus transit parameters with 4 commercial scanners (Philips iU22, Philips EPIQ, GE LOGIQ E9, and Siemens Acuson Sequoia) and 3 different analysis software packages in multiple trials (15 per scanner). RESULTS: The variability (coefficient of variation) from repeated trials and while using a single scanner and software was less than 8% for RT, less than 12% for MTT, less than 49% for peak intensity, and less than 50% for area under the curve. Currently, it is not possible to directly compare amplitude values from different scanners and analysis software packages owing to the arbitrary linearization algorithm used among manufacturers; however, it is possible for time parameters (RT and MTT). The variability when using a different scanner with the same analysis software package was less than 9% for RT and less than 21% for MTT. The variability when using a different analysis software with the same scanner was less than 9% for RT and less than 15% for MTT. In all the evaluations we have performed, RT is the least variable parameter, while MTT is only slightly more variable. CONCLUSIONS: The present study will lay the groundwork for multicenter patient evaluations with CEUS quantification of perfusion-related parameters with the bolus transit technique. When using the protocol and method developed here, it is possible to perform perfusion quantification on different scanners and analysis software and be able to compare the results. The current work is the first study that presents a comparison of bolus transit parameters derived from multiple systems and software packages.