Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 15(1): 71-6, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24201858

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost and safety of placement of Broviac catheters in children by pediatric intensivists in a sedation suite versus placement by pediatric surgeons in the operating room. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective analysis. SETTING: Pediatric sedation suite and operating rooms in a tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: All pediatric patients with Broviac catheters placed (n = 253) at this institution over a 3-year period from 2007 to 2009. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of all pediatric patients with Broviac catheters placed, either by intensivists or surgeons, and compared cost and outcomes. Procedure safety was assessed and categorized into immediate, short-term (within 2 wk of procedure), and long-term outcomes. Anesthetic safety and billing data for the procedure were also collected. Among similar patient populations, immediate complications, such as pneumothorax, procedure failure (p > 0.999), and anesthetic complications (p = 0.60), were not significantly different. Short-term outcomes, including infection (p = 0.27) and catheter malfunction (p > 0.999), were not different. Long-term outcomes, including mean indwelling catheter days (p = 0.60) and removal due to catheter infection (p = 0.09), were not different between the groups. Overall cost of the procedure was significantly different: $7,031 (± $784) when performed by surgeons and $3,565 (± $311) when performed by intensivists (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric critical care physicians can place Broviac catheters as safely as pediatric surgeons and at a lower cost in a defined patient population.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Pediatría/economía , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/economía , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/economía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Preescolar , Falla de Equipo , Humanos , Lactante , Quirófanos , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Crit Care Nurse ; 31(1): 64-71, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21285465

RESUMEN

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) allows gradual, precise removal of excess fluid and solutes. Special considerations are necessary for children who require CRRT because of their smaller circulating blood volumes and the potential for hemodynamic instability associated with the initiation of CRRT. In critically ill children, the CRRT circuit is often primed with blood rather than saline to prevent excessive hemodilution. Two innovative techniques have been designed to limit repeated exposure to donated blood, reduce hemodynamic instability associated with priming of the circuit with blood, and limit interruptions in CRRT. A circuit-to-circuit exchange technique offers a safe, effective alternative method for CRRT circuit changes in small children and infants. A concurrent technique that combines CRRT with plasmapheresis is effective in preventing interruptions of therapy when patients require multiple modes of supportive treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Difusión de Innovaciones , Hemofiltración/métodos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea , Niño , Preescolar , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pediatría , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA