[Steel or titanium for osteosynthesis : A mechanobiological perspective]. / Stahl oder Titan bei der Osteosynthese : Eine mechanobiologische Perspektive.

BACKGROUND: An implant used for stabilizing a fracture creates a mechanical construct, which directly determines the biology of bone healing. The stabilization of fractures places high mechanical demands on implants and therefore steel and titanium are currently almost exclusively used as the materials of choice. OBJECTIVES: The possible range of attainable mechanobiological stimulation for mechanotherapy as a function of plate stiffness depending on the selection of the plate material and the physical and mechanical properties of the material options are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An overview of the material properties of steel and titanium is given. For dynamically fixed long bone fractures as examples, various finite element models of plate osteosynthesis (steel/titanium) are created and the plate working length (PWL, screw configuration close to fracture) is varied. The interfragmentary movement (IFM) as a measure of mechanobiological stimulation is evaluated. RESULTS: Stimulation in the form of IFM varies across the fracture and also as a function of the osteosynthesis material and the configuration. The influence of the material appears to be notably smaller than the influence of PWL but both lose their influence largely over a bridged fracture situation (contact). With a flexible titanium plate and large PSS, a greater mechanobiological stimulation is produced. CONCLUSION: An essential prerequisite for the secondary fracture healing is an appropriate mechanobiological environment, which can be controlled by the osteosynthesis material and the configuration and is also affected by the type of fracture and load.

Biomechanical investigation of a minimally invasive posterior spine stabilization system in comparison to the Universal Spinal System (USS).

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive posterior spine implant systems have been introduced, clinical studies reported on reduced quality of spinal column realignment due to correction loss. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically two minimally invasive spine stabilization systems versus the Universal Spine Stabilization system (USS). METHODS: Three groups with 5 specimens each and 2 foam bars per specimen were instrumented with USS (Group 1) or a minimally invasive posterior spine stabilization system with either polyaxial (Group 2) or monoaxial (Group 3) screws. Mechanical testing was performed under quasi-static ramp loading in axial compression and torsion, followed by destructive cyclic loading run under axial compression at constant amplitude and then with progressively increasing amplitude until construct failure. Bending construct stiffness, torsional stiffness and cycles to failure were investigated. RESULTS: Initial bending stiffness was highest in Group 3, followed by Group 2 and Group 1, without any significant differences between the groups. A significant increase in bending stiffness after 20'000 cycles was observed in Group 1 (p = 0.002) and Group 2 (p = 0.001), but not in Group 3, though the secondary bending stiffness showed no significant differences between the groups. Initial and secondary torsional stiffness was highest in Group 1, followed by Group 3 and Group 2, with significant differences between all groups (p ≤ 0.047). A significant increase in initial torsional stiffness after 20'000 cycles was observed in Group 2 (p = 0.017) and 3 (p = 0.013), but not in Group 1. The highest number of cycles to failure was detected in Group 1, followed by Group 3 and Group 2. This parameter was significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2 (p = 0.001), between Group 2 and Group 3 (p = 0.002), but not between Group 1 and Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: These findings quantify the correction loss for minimally invasive spine implant systems and imply that unstable spine fractures might benefit from stabilization with conventional implants like the USS.

[Biomechanics of implant augmentation]. / Biomechanik der Implantataugmentation.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of osteoporotic fractures requires novel treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: Implant augmentation with bone cement is considered to be a promising approach but the benefits and risks need to be carefully evaluated. METHODS: Experimental investigation of the biomechanical potential and the associated risks with special reference to the osteoporotic proximal femur and proximal humerus. RESULTS: Even small amounts of bone cement (3 ml) applied to the proximal femur in combination with intramedullary nailing led to more than a 50% increase in the number of test cycles before failure. The heat and pressure generated in the bone did not exceed critical thresholds. Short to midterm effects of subchondral cement placement on the adjacent cartilage can be excluded. The risk for cement leakage needs to be considered. CONCLUSION: Implant augmentation offers high biomechanical potential to prevent mechanical complications after fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Early and confident mobilization of elderly patients therefore appears to be possible. With appropriate handling, associated risks seem controllable; however, implant augmentation cannot be applied as a routine concept for osteoporotic fracture management. The application requires careful evaluation on a case by case basis under comprehensive consideration of mechanical and biological factors.

End caps prevent nail migration in elastic stable intramedullary nailing in paediatric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study using synthetic and cadaveric bones.

End caps are intended to prevent nail migration (push-out) in elastic stable intramedullary nailing. The aim of this study was to investigate the force at failure with and without end caps, and whether different insertion angles of nails and end caps would alter that force at failure. Simulated oblique fractures of the diaphysis were created in 15 artificial paediatric femurs. Titanium Elastic Nails with end caps were inserted at angles of 45°, 55° and 65° in five specimens for each angle to create three study groups. Biomechanical testing was performed with axial compression until failure. An identical fracture was created in four small adult cadaveric femurs harvested from two donors (both female, aged 81 and 85 years, height 149 cm and 156 cm, respectively). All femurs were tested without and subsequently with end caps inserted at 45°. In the artificial femurs, maximum force was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.613). Push-out force was significantly higher in the cadaveric specimens with the use of end caps by an up to sixfold load increase (830 N, standard deviation (SD) 280 vs 150 N, SD 120, respectively; p = 0.007). These results indicate that the nail and end cap insertion angle can be varied within 20° without altering construct stability and that the risk of elastic stable intramedullary nailing push-out can be effectively reduced by the use of end caps.

Cortical bone loss at the tibia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is associated with incident non-vertebral fractures: results of a randomized controlled ancillary study of HORIZON.

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal women, yearly intravenous zoledronate (ZOL) compared to placebo (PLB) significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) and decreased fracture risk. The effects of ZOL on BMD at the tibial epiphysis (T-EPI) and diaphysis (T-DIA) are unknown. METHODS: A randomized controlled ancillary study of the HORIZON trial was conducted at the Department of Osteoporosis of the University Hospital of Berne, Switzerland. Women with ≥1 follow-up DXA measurement who had received ≥1 dose of either ZOL (n=55) or PLB (n=55) were included. BMD was measured at LS, FN, TH, T-EPI, and T-DIA at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Morphometric vertebral fractures were assessed. Incident clinical fractures were recorded as adverse events. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable with those in HORIZON and between groups. After 36 months, BMD was significantly higher in women treated with ZOL vs. PLB at LS, FN, TH, and T-EPI (+7.6%, +3.7%, +5.6%, and +5.5%, respectively, p<0.01 for all) but not T-DIA (+1.1%). The number of patients with ≥1 incident non-vertebral or morphometric fracture did not differ between groups (9 ZOL/11 PLB). Mean changes in BMD did not differ between groups with and without incident fracture, except that women with an incident non-vertebral fracture had significantly higher bone loss at predominantly cortical T-DIA (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: ZOL was significantly superior to PLB at T-EPI but not at T-DIA. Women with an incident non-vertebral fracture experienced bone loss at T-DIA.

Cement augmentation of hip implants in osteoporotic bone: how much cement is needed and where should it go?

Several studies proved the beneficial effect of cement augmentation of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) blades on implant purchase in osteoporotic bone. We investigated the effect of different localizations and amounts of bone cement. Polyurethane foam specimens were instrumented with a PFNA blade and subsequently augmented with PMMA bone cement. Eight study groups were formed based on localization and amount of cement volume related to the blade. All specimens underwent cyclic loading with physiological orientation of the force vector until construct failure. Foam groups were compared between each other and to a cadaveric control group. The experiments revealed a significant dependency of implant purchase on localization and amount of cement. Biomechanically favorable cement positions were found at the implant tip and at the cranial side. However, none of the tested augmentation patterns performed significantly inferior to the cadaveric benchmark. These findings will allow surgeons to further reduce the amount of injected PMMA, decreasing the risk of cement leakage or cartilage damage.

Feasibility study on the potential of a spiral blade in osteoporotic distal femur fracture fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur (primary as well as periprosthetic) are a growing problem in today's trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Therefore, this feasibility study should identify the biomechanical potential of a (commercially available) spiral blade in the distal femur as compared to a single screw without any additional plate fixation. Additionally, the influence of cement augmentation was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An artificial low density bone model was either instrumented with a perforated spiral blade or a 5 mm locking screw only. Additionally, the influence of 1 ml cement augmentation was investigated. All specimens were tested with static pull-out and cyclic loading (50 to 250 N with an increment of 0.1 N/cycle). RESULTS: In the non-augmented groups, the mean pull-out force was significantly higher for the blade fixation (p < 0.001). In the augmented groups, the difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.217). Augmentation could increase pull-out force significantly by 72 % for the blade and 156 % for the screw, respectively (p = 0.001). The mean number of cycles to failure in the non-augmented groups was 12,433 (SD 465) for the blade and 2,949 (SD 215) for the screw, respectively (p < 0.001). In the augmented group, the blade reached 13,967 (SD 1,407) cycles until failure and the screw reached 4,413 (SD 1,598), respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The investigated spiral blade was mechanically superior, significantly, as compared to a screw in the distal femur. These results back up the further development of a distal femoral blade with spiral blade fixation for the treatment of osteoporotic distal femur fractures.

Biomechanical comparison of three types of bone graft for anterior spondylodesis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior spondylodesis with bone grafting for fusion of spinal motion segments is a common procedure in clinical routine. Bone grafts for fusion include autologous, allogenic and xenogenic grafts that are inserted in the unstable spinal motion segment. Nevertheless, biomechanical data for autologous, allogenic and xenogenic grafts are rare. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct biomechanical comparison of native and conserved bone grafts used in spondylodesis of the spine. METHODS: Grafts examined were native ovine tricortical iliac crest grafts, bovine cancellous bone blocks and ovine, tricortical iliac crest grafts, conserved in the same way as the bovine cancellous bone blocks. The grafts were tested biomechanically to failure. Compared parameters were maximum torque, maximum rotation angle and graft stiffness at failure. The Mann-Whitney-U test with Bonferroni adjustment was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Maximum torque at failure of the bovine cancellous bone graft did not differ significantly from that of the native ovine tricortical graft. Comparison of the conserved ovine tricortical graft revealed significantly lower values compared to the native ovine tricortical bone graft.Maximum rotation angle at failure of the untreated ovine tricortical bone grafts was significantly higher compared to the other grafts tested. Regarding graft stiffness no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the functional demands exerted on the spinal motion segment, our results suggest that torsional strength and deformational behavior of the bone graft influence the stability of the spondylodesis. The native tricortical graft best fulfills this requirement.

Tension band wiring of the olecranon: is it really a dynamic principle of osteosynthesis?

The tension band principle as applied to transverse olecranon fractures fixed by tension band wiring is based on the premise that distraction forces on the outer cortex of the ulna during elbow flexion are converted to compression forces on the articular surface of the olecranon at the fracture site. In view of some clinical outcomes, where hardware failure and secondary dislocations occur, the question arises if the dynamic compression theory is correct. Compressive forces during active flexion and extension after tension band wiring of a transverse osteotomy of the olecranon were measured in 6 fresh frozen human cadaveric models using a pressure-sensor in the osteotomy gap. We could collect 30 measurements during active flexion and 30 during active extension. Active flexion did not cause any compressive forces in the osteotomy gap. Extension with the humerus in an upright position and the elbow actively extended causes some compression (0.37-0.51 MPa) at the articular surface comparing with active flexion (0.2 MPa) due to gravity forces. Posterior, there was no significant pressure difference observed (0.41-0.45 versus 0.36-0.32 MPa) between active flexion and extension. The tension band wiring principle only exists during active extension in a range of 30-120° of flexion of the elbow. Postoperative exercise programs should be modified in order to prevent loss of compression at the fracture site of transverse olecranon fractures, treated with tension band wiring when the elbow is mobilised.

Cement augmentation of lag screws: an investigation on biomechanical advantages.

BACKGROUND: In trauma surgery, lag screws are commonly used. However, in osteoporotic bone, anchorage can be considerably compromised. This study investigates the biomechanical potential of cement augmentation in terms of improved fixation. METHODS: 36 Surrogate osteoporotic bone specimens were utilised in three biomechanical experiments, each comparing 6 augmented with 6 non-augmented samples. Standard partially-threaded lag screws (Synthes) were placed following surgical standard. For the augmented groups, 0.4 ml of polymethylmethacrylate was injected into the pre-drilled hole prior to screw placement. Interfragmentary compression was determined using a cannulated ring compression sensor. Maximum torque was recorded with a torque wrench. Compressive relaxation after 24 h, relaxation after loosening and re-tightening the screw as well as maximum compression and torque at failure were measured. FINDINGS: Mean relaxation was significantly lower for the augmented group (p < 0.01). After 24 h, a remaining fragmental compression of 62 % for the augmented and 52 % for the non-augmented specimens was found. Loosening and re-tightening of the screw did not affect the compressive relaxation when augmentation was applied (p = 0.529), compared to an increased relaxation after re-tightening in the non-augmented group (p = 0.04). The mean maximum compression and torque until failure were significantly higher for the augmented group (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Cement augmentation of lag screws can improve fixation stability in terms of installing and maintaining interfragmentary compression. Effects of relaxation can be reduced and re-tightening of screws is possible without compromising the fixation. Particularly in reduced bone mass, augmentation of lag screws can markedly increase the security of the technique.

Biomechanical evaluation of bone-cement augmented Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades in a polyurethane foam model with low density.

BACKGROUND: Helically shaped cephalic implants have proven their benefit to provide an improved stabilization of unstable hip fractures. However, cut out ratios up to 3.6% still occur. This in vitro study evaluated the biomechanical performance of a novel cement augmentation technique of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in surrogate femora. METHODS: Four study groups were formed out of 24 polyurethane foam specimens with low density. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades were implanted, either non-augmented, or augmented using 3ml of injectable Polymethylmethacrylate bone-cement. The influence of implant mal-positioning was investigated by placing the blade either centered in the femoral head or off-centric in an anteroposterior direction. All specimens underwent cyclic loading under physiological conditions. Starting at 1000 N, the load was monotonically increased by 0.1N/cycle until construct failure. Movement of the head was identified by means of optical motion tracking. Non-parametric test statistics were carried out on the cycles to failure, to compare between study groups. FINDINGS: Compared to control samples; augmented samples showed a significantly increased number of cycles to failure (P=0.012). In the groups with centric position of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade, cement augmentation led to an increase in loading cycles of 225%. In the groups with off-centric positioning of the blade, this difference was even more accentuated (933%). INTERPRETATION: Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blade with small amounts of bone-cement for treatment of osteoporotic hip fractures clearly enhances fixation stability and carries high potential for clinical application.

A comparison of parallel and diverging screw angles in the stability of locked plate constructs.

We investigated the static and cyclical strength of parallel and angulated locking plate screws using rigid polyurethane foam (0.32 g/cm(3)) and bovine cancellous bone blocks. Custom-made stainless steel plates with two conically threaded screw holes with different angulations (parallel, 10° and 20° divergent) and 5 mm self-tapping locking screws underwent pull-out and cyclical pull and bending tests. The bovine cancellous blocks were only subjected to static pull-out testing. We also performed finite element analysis for the static pull-out test of the parallel and 20° configurations. In both the foam model and the bovine cancellous bone we found the significantly highest pull-out force for the parallel constructs. In the finite element analysis there was a 47% more damage in the 20° divergent constructs than in the parallel configuration. Under cyclical loading, the mean number of cycles to failure was significantly higher for the parallel group, followed by the 10° and 20° divergent configurations. In our laboratory setting we clearly showed the biomechanical disadvantage of a diverging locking screw angle under static and cyclical loading.

Cerclage, evolution and potential of a Cinderella technology. An overview with reference to periprosthetic fractures.

Periprosthetic fractures are increasingly frequent. The fracture may be located over the shaft of the prosthesis, at its tip or below. The treatment of explosion fractures is difficult because the shaft blocks the application of implants, like screws, which need to penetrate the medullary cavity. The cerclage, as a simple periosteal loop, made of wire or more recently cable, does not only avoid the medullary cavity. Its centripetal mode of action is well suited for reducing and maintaining radially displaced fractures. Furthermore, the cerclage lends itself well for minimally invasive internal fixation. New insight challenges the disrepute of which the cerclage technology suffered for decades. The outcome of cerclage fixation benefits from an improved understanding of its technology, mechano-biology and periosteal blood supply. Preconceived and generally accepted opinions like "strangulation of blood supply" need to be re-examined. Recent mechanical evaluations demonstrate that the wire application may be improved but cable is superior in hand- ling, maintenance of tension and strength. Beside the classical concepts of absolute and relative stability a defined stability condition needs consideration. It is typical for cerclage. Called "loose-lock stability" it specifies the situation where a loosened implant allows first unimpeded displacement changing abruptly into a locked fixation preventing further dislocation.

Cerclage handling for improved fracture treatment. A biomechanical study on the twisting procedure.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Twisting is clinically the most frequently applied method for tightening and maintaining cerclage fixation. The twisting procedure is controversially discussed. Several factors during twisting affect the mechanical behaviour of the cerclage. This in vitro study investigated the influence of different parameters of the twisting procedure on the fixation strength of the cerclage in an experimental setup with centripetal force application. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cortical half shells of the femoral shaft were mounted on a testing fixture. 1.0 mm, 1.25 mm and 1.5 mm stainless ste- el wire cerclages as well as a 1.0mm cable cerclage were applied to the bone. Pretension of the cerclage during the installation was measured during the locking procedure. Subsequently, cyclic testing was performed up to failure. RESULTS: Higher pretension could be achieved with increasing wire diameter. However, with larger wire diameter the drop of pre- tension due to the bending and cutting the twist also increased. The cable cerclage showed the highest pretension after locking. Cerclages twisted under traction revealed significantly higher initial cerclage tension. Plastically deformed twists offered higher cerclage pretension compared to twists which were deformed in the elastic region of the material. Cutting the wire within the twist caused the highest loss of cerclage tension (44% initial tension) whereas only 11 % was lost when cutting the wire ends separately. The bending direction of the twist significantly influenced the cerclage pretension. 45% pretension was lost in forward bending of the twist, 53% in perpendicular bending and 90% in backward bending. CONCLUSION: Several parameters affect the quality of a cerclage fixation. Adequate installation of cerclage wires could markedly improve the clinical outcome of cerclage.

[The use of DensiProbe™ in hindfoot arthrodesis. Can fusion failure be predicted by mechanical bone strength determination?]. / Zur Nutzung von DensiProbe™ bei der Rückfußarthrodese. Kann das Versagen durch eine mechanische Bestimmung der Knochenfestigkeit vorhergesagt werden?

AIM: Bone quality is a main factor in implant fixation. After having shown promising results, we have further investigated the use of the DensiProbe™ as an intraoperative measurement tool for evaluation of calcaneal bone quality and prediction of nailed hindfoot arthrodesis failure. METHOD: In this add-on study 19 nail arthrodeses were performed using a conventional screw plus a locked blade (n = 6) or plus a locked screw (n = 13) in the calcaneus. A specially devised tool was inserted at the fixation sites of the screws and the cancellous break-away torque was measured. The constructs were then cyclically loaded to failure. RESULTS: We saw a wide range of BMD (1.9-185.9 mgHA/cm³, mean 102.4 mg/cm³, SD 53.5). The peak torque was 0.47-1.78 Nm (mean 0.92 Nm, SD 0.46) at the proximal screw site (PSS) and 0.24 and 1.2 Nm (mean 0.63 Nm, SD 0.37) at the distal screw site (DSS), respectively, and 0.42 and 1.52 Nm (mean 1.00 Nm, SD 0.36) in the screw plus blade group (PSS). The number of cycles correlated with peak torque (two screws group PSS: p = 0.002, r² = DSS: 0.61 p = 0.001, r² = 0.90; screw plus blade group PSS: p = 0.001, r² = 0.99). Peak torque also correlated with BMD in both groups (two screws group PSS: p = 0.01, r² = 0.71; DSS: p = 0.001; r² = 0.83; screw plus blade group PSS: 0.42 and 1.52 Nm, mean 1.00 Nm, SD 0.36). CONCLUSION: A mechanical bone measurement tool like the DensiProbe™ seems to be suitable for predicting tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis failure in a biomechanical test set-up. As a restriction in clinical practice failure is multifactorial and prediction cannot be based upon these measurements only.

Ankle joint pressure in pes cavovarus.

A cavovarus foot deformity was simulated in cadaver specimens by inserting metallic wedges of 15 degrees and 30 degrees dorsally into the first tarsometatarsal joint. Sensors in the ankle joint recorded static tibiotalar pressure distribution at physiological load. The peak pressure increased significantly from neutral alignment to the 30 degrees cavus deformity, and the centre of force migrated medially. The anterior migration of the centre of force was significant for both the 15 degrees (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), p = 0.021) and the 30 degrees (repeated measures ANOVA, p = 0.007) cavus deformity. Differences in ligament laxity did not influence the peak pressure. These findings support the hypothesis that the cavovarus foot deformity causes an increase in anteromedial ankle joint pressure leading to anteromedial arthrosis in the long term, even in the absence of lateral hindfoot instability.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures.

A biomechanical investigation on eight pairs of human cadaver proximal femurs was performed to evaluate the impact of a new augmentation method on the internal fixation of osteoporotic proximal femur fractures. The study focused on enhancing implant purchase to reduce the incidence of implant cut-out in osteoporotic bone. In a left-right comparison, a conventional hip screw fixation (control) was compared to the new cement augmentation method. After bone bed preparation through high pressure irrigation to remove fat, blood, and bone debris, the bones were augmented with low viscosity polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Step-wise fatigue testing was performed by cyclically loading the femoral heads in a physiological manner, beginning at 1,500 N and increasing 500 N every 5,000 cycles to 4,000 N, and continuously monitoring head displacement. Failure was defined as >5.0 mm head displacement. The head displacement at 2,000 N was significantly smaller (p=0.018) for the augmented group as compared to the conventionally treated bones (0.09+/-0.01 mm vs. 0.90+/-0.32 mm; mean+/-SEM). The displacement rate at the second load step was significantly higher (p=0.018) for the conventionally treated bones as compared to the augmented ones. All of the nonaugmented specimens failed during testing, where 50% of the augmented specimens did not fail. The promising results of these experiments suggest that this new standardized irrigation/augmentation method enhances the implant anchorage and offers a potential solution to the problem of implant cut-out in osteoporotic metaphyseal bone.