Performance of an automated total body mapping algorithm to detect melanocytic lesions of clinical relevance.

IMPORTANCE: Total body photography for skin cancer screening is a well-established tool allowing documentation and follow-up of the entire skin surface. Artificial intelligence-based systems are increasingly applied for automated lesion detection and diagnosis. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: In this prospective observational international multicentre study experienced dermatologists performed skin cancer screenings and identified clinically relevant melanocytic lesions (CRML, requiring biopsy or observation). Additionally, patients received 2D automated total body mapping (ATBM) with automated lesion detection (ATBM master, Fotofinder Systems GmbH). Primary endpoint was the percentage of CRML detected by the bodyscan software. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of correctly identified "new" and "changed" lesions during follow-up examinations. RESULTS: At baseline, dermatologists identified 1075 CRML in 236 patients and 999 CRML (92.9%) were also detected by the automated software. During follow-up examinations dermatologists identified 334 CRMLs in 55 patients, with 323 (96.7%) also being detected by ATBM with automated lesions detection. Moreover, all new (n = 13) or changed CRML (n = 24) during follow-up were detected by the software. Average time requirements per baseline examination was 14.1 min (95% CI [12.8-15.5]). Subgroup analysis of undetected lesions revealed either technical (e.g. covering by clothing, hair) or lesion-specific reasons (e.g. hypopigmentation, palmoplantar sites). CONCLUSIONS: ATBM with lesion detection software correctly detected the vast majority of CRML and new or changed CRML during follow-up examinations in a favourable amount of time. Our prospective international study underlines that automated lesion detection in TBP images is feasible, which is of relevance for developing AI-based skin cancer screenings.

Assessment of Diagnostic Performance of Dermatologists Cooperating With a Convolutional Neural Network in a Prospective Clinical Study: Human With Machine.

Importance: Studies suggest that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform equally to trained dermatologists in skin lesion classification tasks. Despite the approval of the first neural networks for clinical use, prospective studies demonstrating benefits of human with machine cooperation are lacking. Objective: To assess whether dermatologists benefit from cooperation with a market-approved CNN in classifying melanocytic lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective diagnostic 2-center study, dermatologists performed skin cancer screenings using naked-eye examination and dermoscopy. Dermatologists graded suspect melanocytic lesions by the probability of malignancy (range 0-1, threshold for malignancy ≥0.5) and indicated management decisions (no action, follow-up, excision). Next, dermoscopic images of suspect lesions were assessed by a market-approved CNN, Moleanalyzer Pro (FotoFinder Systems). The CNN malignancy scores (range 0-1, threshold for malignancy ≥0.5) were transferred to dermatologists with the request to re-evaluate lesions and revise initial decisions in consideration of CNN results. Reference diagnoses were based on histopathologic examination in 125 (54.8%) lesions or, in the case of nonexcised lesions, on clinical follow-up data and expert consensus. Data were collected from October 2020 to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dermatologists alone and dermatologists cooperating with the CNN. Accuracy and receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) were considered as additional measures. Results: A total of 22 dermatologists detected 228 suspect melanocytic lesions (190 nevi, 38 melanomas) in 188 patients (mean [range] age, 53.4 [19-91] years; 97 [51.6%] male patients). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity significantly improved when dermatologists additionally integrated CNN results into decision-making (mean sensitivity from 84.2% [95% CI, 69.6%-92.6%] to 100.0% [95% CI, 90.8%-100.0%]; P = .03; mean specificity from 72.1% [95% CI, 65.3%-78.0%] to 83.7% [95% CI, 77.8%-88.3%]; P < .001; mean accuracy from 74.1% [95% CI, 68.1%-79.4%] to 86.4% [95% CI, 81.3%-90.3%]; P < .001; and mean ROC AUC from 0.895 [95% CI, 0.836-0.954] to 0.968 [95% CI, 0.948-0.988]; P = .005). In addition, the CNN alone achieved a comparable sensitivity, higher specificity, and higher diagnostic accuracy compared with dermatologists alone in classifying melanocytic lesions. Moreover, unnecessary excisions of benign nevi were reduced by 19.2%, from 104 (54.7%) of 190 benign nevi to 84 nevi when dermatologists cooperated with the CNN (P < .001). Most lesions were examined by dermatologists with 2 to 5 years (96, 42.1%) or less than 2 years of experience (78, 34.2%); others (54, 23.7%) were evaluated by dermatologists with more than 5 years of experience. Dermatologists with less dermoscopy experience cooperating with the CNN had the most diagnostic improvement compared with more experienced dermatologists. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective diagnostic study, these findings suggest that dermatologists may improve their performance when they cooperate with the market-approved CNN and that a broader application of this human with machine approach could be beneficial for dermatologists and patients.

Observational study investigating the level of support from a convolutional neural network in face and scalp lesions deemed diagnostically 'unclear' by dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of face and scalp lesions (FSL) is challenging due to overlapping features. Dermatologists encountering diagnostically 'unclear' lesions may benefit from artificial intelligence support via convolutional neural networks (CNN). METHODS: In a web-based classification task, dermatologists (n = 64) diagnosed a convenience sample of 100 FSL as 'benign', 'malignant', or 'unclear' and indicated their management decisions ('no action', 'follow-up', 'treatment/excision'). A market-approved CNN (Moleanalyzer-Pro®, FotoFinder Systems, Germany) was applied for binary classifications (benign/malignant) of dermoscopic images. RESULTS: After reviewing one dermoscopic image per case, dermatologists labelled 562 of 6400 diagnoses (8.8%) as 'unclear' and mostly managed these by follow-up examinations (57.3%, n = 322) or excisions (42.5%, n = 239). Management was incorrect in 58.8% of 291 truly malignant cases (171 'follow-up' or 'no action') and 43.9% of 271 truly benign cases (119 'excision'). Accepting CNN classifications in unclear cases would have reduced false management decisions to 4.1% in truly malignant and 31.7% in truly benign lesions (both p < 0.01). After receiving full case information 239 diagnoses (3.7%) remained 'unclear' to dermatologists, now triggering more excisions (72.0%) than follow-up examinations (28.0%). These management decisions were incorrect in 32.8% of 116 truly malignant cases and 76.4% of 123 truly benign cases. Accepting CNN classifications would have reduced false management decisions to 6.9% in truly malignant lesions and to 38.2% in truly benign cases (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologists mostly managed diagnostically 'unclear' FSL by treatment/excision or follow-up examination. Following CNN classifications as guidance in unclear cases seems suitable to significantly reduce incorrect decisions.

[Artificial intelligence-based classification for the diagnostics of skin cancer]. / Bilderkennung mittels künstlicher Intelligenz in der Hautkrebsdiagnostik.

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) achieve a level of performance comparable or even superior to dermatologists in the assessment of pigmented and nonpigmented skin lesions. In the analysis of images by artificial neural networks, images on a pixel level pass through various layers of the network with different graphic filters. Based on excellent study results, a first deep learning network (Moleanalyzer pro, Fotofinder Systems GmBH, Bad Birnbach, Germany) received market approval in Europe. However, such neural networks also reveal relevant limitations, whereby rare entities with insufficient training images are classified less adequately and image artifacts can lead to false diagnoses. Best results can ultimately be achieved in a cooperation of "man with machine". For future skin cancer screening, automated total body mapping is evaluated, which combines total body photography, automated data extraction and assessment of all relevant skin lesions.

Metabolic Signature of Atypical Fibroxanthoma and Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma: Expression of Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1α and Several of Its Downstream Targets.

Metabolic reprogramming mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors play a crucial role in many human cancers. HIF-1α is activated under hypoxic conditions and is considered a key regulator of oxygen homoeostasis during tumor proliferation under hypoxia. Aim of this research was to analyze the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α, VEGF-A, Glut-1, MCT4, and CAIX in atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS). 21 paraffin-embedded AFX and 22 PDS were analysed by immunohistochemistry, namely HIF-1α, VEGF-A (referred to as VEGF throughout the manuscript), Glut-1, MCT4, and CAIX. To quantify the protein expression, we considered the percentage of positive tumor cells (0: 0%, 1: up to 1%, 2: 2-10%, 3: 11-50%, 4: >50%) in relation to the staining intensity (0: negative, 1: low, 2: medium, 3: strong). HIF-1α expression (mean ± SD) in AFX (9.33±2.92) was significantly stronger than that in PDS (5.90±4.38; P= 0.007), whereas the expression of VEGF, Glut-1, MCT4, and CAIX did not show differences between AFX and PDS. When comparing all tumors without subgroup stratification, the expression of HIF-1α (P= 0.044) and MCT4 (P= 0.036) was significantly stronger in ulcerated tumors than in tumors without ulceration. Our findings provide the first evidence that HIF-1α-induced metabolic reprogramming may contribute to the pathogenesis of AFX and PDS. HIF-1α expression seems to be higher in AFX than in PDS, and ulcerated tumors show higher expression levels of HIF-1α and MCT4 irrespective of the diagnosis.

Does sex matter? Analysis of sex-related differences in the diagnostic performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network for skin cancer detection.

BACKGROUND: Advances in biomedical artificial intelligence may introduce or perpetuate sex and gender discriminations. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have proven a dermatologist-level performance in image classification tasks but have not been assessed for sex and gender biases that may affect training data and diagnostic performance. In this study, we investigated sex-related imbalances in training data and diagnostic performance of a market-approved CNN for skin cancer classification (Moleanalyzer Pro®, Fotofinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany). METHODS: We screened open-access dermoscopic image repositories widely used for CNN training for distribution of sex. Moreover, the sex-related diagnostic performance of the market-approved CNN was tested in 1549 dermoscopic images stratified by sex (female n = 773; male n = 776). RESULTS: Most open-access repositories showed a marked under-representation of images originating from female (40%) versus male (60%) patients. Despite these imbalances and well-known sex-related differences in skin anatomy or skin-directed behaviour, the tested CNN achieved a comparable sensitivity of 87.0% [80.9%-91.3%] versus 87.1% [81.1%-91.4%], specificity of 98.7% [97.4%-99.3%] versus 96.9% [95.2%-98.0%] and ROC-AUC of 0.984 [0.975-0.993] versus 0.979 [0.969-0.988] in dermoscopic images of female versus male origin, respectively. In the sample at hand, sex-related differences in ROC-AUCs were not statistically significant in the per-image analysis nor in an additional per-individual analysis (p ≥ 0.59). CONCLUSION: Design and training of artificial intelligence algorithms for medical applications should generally acknowledge sex and gender dimensions. Despite sex-related imbalances in open-access training data, the diagnostic performance of the tested CNN showed no sex-related bias in the classification of skin lesions.

[Immunohistochemical analysis of a hypoxia-associated signature in melanomas with positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes : Hypoxia-associated signature of primary cutaneous melanomas]. / Immunhistochemische Analyse einer Hypoxie-assoziierten Signatur in Melanomen mit positivem und negativem Schildwächterlymphknoten : Hypoxie-assoziierte Signatur primär kutaner Melanome.

Metabolic reprogramming mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors and its downstream targets plays a crucial role in many human malignancies. Excessive proliferation of tumor cells under hypoxic conditions leads to metabolic reprogramming and altered gene expression enabling tumors to adapt to their hypoxic environment. Here we analyzed the metabolic signatures of primary cutaneous melanomas with positive and negative sentinel node status in order to evaluate potential differences in their metabolic signature. We found a positive correlation of the expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) with tumor thickness and ulceration in all melanomas with subgroup analyses as well as in the subgroup with a negative sentinel node. Furthermore, the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was positively correlated with the presence of ulceration in melanomas with positive sentinel node.

Monitoring patients at risk for melanoma: May convolutional neural networks replace the strategy of sequential digital dermoscopy?

BACKGROUND: Sequential digital dermoscopy (SDD) is applied for early melanoma detection by uncovering dynamic changes of monitored lesions. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are capable of high diagnostic accuracies similar to trained dermatologists. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the capability of CNN to correctly classify melanomas originally diagnosed by mere dynamic changes during SDD. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study using image quartets of 59 high-risk patients each containing one melanoma diagnosed by dynamic changes during SDD and three nevi (236 lesions). Two validated CNN classified quartets at baseline or after SDD follow-up at the time of melanoma diagnosis. Moreover, baseline quartets were rated by 26 dermatologists. The main outcome was the number of quartets with correct classifications. RESULTS: CNN-1 correctly classified 9 (15.3%) and CNN-2 8 (13.6%) of 59 baseline quartets. In baseline images, CNN-1 attained a sensitivity of 25.4% (16.1%-37.8%) and specificity of 92.7% (87.8%-95.7%), whereas CNN-2 of 28.8% (18.8%-41.4%) and 75.7% (68.9%-81.4%). Expectedly, after SDD follow-up CNN more readily detected melanomas resulting in improved sensitivities (CNN-1: 44.1% [32.2%-56.7%]; CNN-2: 49.2% [36.8%-61.6%]). Dermatologists were told that each baseline quartet contained one melanoma, and on average, correctly classified 24 (22-27) of 59 quartets. Correspondingly, accepting a baseline quartet to be appropriately classified whenever the highest malignancy score was assigned to the melanoma within, CNN-1 and CNN-2 correctly classified 28 (47.5%) and 22 (37.3%) of 59 quartets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The tested CNN could not replace the strategy of SDD. There is a need for CNN capable of integrating information on dynamic changes into analyses.

Collective human intelligence outperforms artificial intelligence in a skin lesion classification task.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) enable accurate diagnosis of medical images and perform on or above the level of individual physicians. Recently, collective human intelligence (CoHI) was shown to exceed the diagnostic accuracy of individuals. Thus, diagnostic performance of CoHI (120 dermatologists) versus individual dermatologists versus two state-of-the-art CNN was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional reader study with presentation of 30 clinical cases to 120 dermatologists. Six diagnoses were offered and votes collected via remote voting devices (quizzbox®, Quizzbox Solutions GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany). Dermatoscopic images were classified by a binary and multiclass CNN (FotoFinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany). Three sets of diagnostic classifications were scored against ground truth: (1) CoHI, (2) individual dermatologists, and (3) CNN. RESULTS: CoHI attained a significantly higher accuracy [95 % confidence interval] (80.0 % [62.7 %-90.5 %]) than individual dermatologists (75.7 % [73.8 %-77.5 %]) and CNN (70.0 % [52.1 %-83.3 %]; all P < 0.001) in binary classifications. Moreover, CoHI achieved a higher sensitivity (82.4 % [59.0 %-93.8 %]) and specificity (76.9 % [49.7 %-91.8 %]) than individual dermatologists (sensitivity 77.8 % [75.3 %-80.2 %], specificity 73.0 % [70.6 %-75.4 %]) and CNN (sensitivity 70.6 % [46.9 %-86.7 %], specificity 69.2 % [42.4 %-87.3 %]). The diagnostic accuracy of CoHI was superior to that of individual dermatologists (P < 0.001) in multiclass evaluation, with the accuracy of the latter comparable to multiclass CNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that the majority vote of an interconnected group of dermatologists (CoHI) outperformed individuals and CNN in a demanding skin lesion classification task.

Auswirkungen des "dunklen Rand-Artefakts" in dermatoskopischen Bildern auf die diagnostische Leistungsfähigkeit eines deep learning neuronalen Netzwerkes mit Marktzulassung.

HINTERGRUND UND ZIELE: Systeme künstlicher Intelligenz (durch "deep learning" faltende neuronale Netzwerke; engl. convolutional neural networks, CNN) erreichen inzwischen bei der Klassifikation von Hautläsionen vergleichbar gute Ergebnisse wie Dermatologen. Allerdings müssen die Limitationen solcher Systeme vor flächendeckendem klinischem Einsatz bekannt sein. Daher haben wir den Einfluss des "dunklen Rand-Artefakts" (engl. dark corner artefact; DCA) in dermatoskopischen Bildern auf die diagnostische Leistung eines CNN mit Marktzulassung zur Klassifikation von Hautläsionen untersucht. PATIENTEN UND METHODEN: Ein Datensatz aus 233 Bildern von Hautläsionen (60 maligne und 173 benigne) ohne DCA (Kontrolle) wurde digital so modifiziert, dass kleine, mittlere oder große DCA zu sehen waren. Alle 932 Bilder wurden dann mittels CNN mit Marktzulassung (Moleanalyzer-Pro® , FotoFinder Systems) auf Malignitätsscores hin analysiert. Das Spektrum reichte von 0-1; ein Score von > 0,5 wurde als maligne klassifiziert. ERGEBNISSE: In der Kontrollserie ohne DCA erreichte das CNN eine Sensitivität von 90,0 % (79,9 %-95,3 %), eine Spezifität von 96,5 % (92,6 %-98,4 %) sowie eine Fläche unter der Kurve (AUC, area under the curve) der "receiver operating characteristic" (ROC) von 0,961 (0,932-0,989). In den Datensätzen mit kleinen beziehungsweise mittleren DCA war die diagnostische Leistung vergleichbar. In den Bildersätzen mit großen DCA wurden allerdings signifikant höhere Malignitätsscores erzielt. Dies führte zu einer signifikant verminderten Spezifität (87,9 % [82,2 %-91,9 %], P < 0,001) sowie einer nicht signifikant erhöhten Sensitivität (96,7 % [88,6 %-99,1 %]). Die ROC-AUC blieb mit 0,962 (0,935-0,989) unverändert. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Die Klassifizierung mittels des CNN war bei dermatoskopischen Bildern mit kleinen oder mittleren DCA nicht beeinträchtigt, das System zeigte jedoch Schwächen bei großen DCA. Wenn Ärzte solche Bilder zur Klassifikation mittels CNN einreichen, sollten sie sich dieser Grenzen der Technologie bewusst sein.

Dark corner artefact and diagnostic performance of a market-approved neural network for skin cancer classification.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have proven dermatologist-level performance in skin lesion classification. Prior to a broader clinical application, an assessment of limitations is crucial. Therefore, the influence of a dark tubular periphery in dermatoscopic images (also called dark corner artefact [DCA]) on the diagnostic performance of a market-approved CNN for skin lesion classification was investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective image set of 233 skin lesions (60 malignant, 173 benign) without DCA (control-set) was modified to show small, medium or large DCA. All 932 images were analyzed by a market-approved CNN (Moleanalyzer-Pro® , FotoFinder Systems), providing malignancy scores (range 0-1) with the cut-off > 0.5 indicating malignancy. RESULTS: In the control-set the CNN achieved a sensitivity of 90.0 % (79.9 % - 95.3 %), a specificity of 96.5 % (92.6 % - 98.4 %), and an area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of 0.961 (0.932 - 0.989). Comparable diagnostic performance was observed in the DCAsmall-set and DCAmedium-set. Conversely, in the DCAlarge-set significantly increased malignancy scores triggered a significantly decreased specificity (87.9 % [82.2 % - 91.9 %], P < 0.001), non-significantly increased sensitivity (96.7 % [88.6 % - 99.1 %]) and unchanged ROC-AUC of 0.962 (0.935 - 0.989). CONCLUSIONS: Convolutional neural network classification was robust in images with small and medium DCA, but impaired in images with large DCA. Physicians should be aware of this limitation when submitting images to CNN classification.

Association between different scale bars in dermoscopic images and diagnostic performance of a market-approved deep learning convolutional neural network for melanoma recognition.

BACKGROUND: Studies systematically unravelling possible causes for false diagnoses of deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are scarce, yet needed before broader application. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to investigate whether scale bars in dermoscopic images are associated with the diagnostic accuracy of a market-approved CNN. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis applied a CNN trained with more than 150,000 images (Moleanalyzer-pro®, FotoFinder Systems Inc., Bad Birnbach, Germany) to investigate seven dermoscopic image sets depicting the same 130 melanocytic lesions (107 nevi, 23 melanomas) without or with digitally superimposed scale bars of different manufacturers. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for the CNN's binary classification of images with or without superimposed scale bars were assessed. RESULTS: Six dermoscopic image sets with different scale bars and one control set without scale bars (overall 910 images) were submitted to CNN analysis. In images without scale bars, the CNN attained a sensitivity [95% confidence interval] of 87.0% [67.9%-95.5%] and a specificity of 87.9% [80.3%-92.8%]. ROC AUC was 0.953 [0.914-0.992]. Scale bars were not associated with significant changes in sensitivity (range 87%-95.7%, all p ≥ 1.0). However, four scale bars induced a decrease of the CNN's specificity (range 0%-43.9%, all p < 0.001). Moreover, ROC AUC was significantly reduced by two scale bars (range 0.520-0.848, both p ≤ 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Superimposed scale bars in dermoscopic images may impair the CNN's diagnostic accuracy, mostly by increasing the rate of the false-positive diagnoses. We recommend avoiding scale bars in images intended for CNN analysis unless specific measures counteracting effects are implemented. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This study was registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-Study-ID: DRKS00013570; URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/).

[Successful treatment of chronic prurigo with dupilumab]. / Erfolgreiche Behandlung einer chronischen Prurigo mit Dupilumab.

Chronic prurigo is characterized by persistent itching und partly accompanied by secondary skin excoriation. Diagnostic evaluation is of special relevance and atopic diathesis is a frequent pathogenic factor. We present a patient with prurigo of multifactorial etiology (atopic diathesis, impaired kidney function, diabetes and polyneuropathy). After several unsuccessful prior treatment approaches, the patient was treated with dupilumab, which resulted in a tremendous improvement of itching, skin lesions, and quality of life.