Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 2(1): 27-30, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660216

RESUMEN

There is a paucity of educational resources for potential clinical trial participants, particularly resources in plain language, attentive to health literacy principles and translated into native languages. The New England Research Subject Advocacy Group was formed to explore common issues, interests, and concerns related to the experience of participation in clinical research and research participant safety. Specifically, the group sought to increase community awareness and trust through the development and distribution of publicly accessible informational resources. In support of these aims, the group developed a robust library of high-quality, plain-language educational materials covering topics in health research, research participation, and common research procedures, and translated the majority of the materials into an additional 15 languages. These resources have been downloaded over 130,000 times. After English, the most common languages downloaded are Vietnamese, Spanish, and Korean.

3.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 10(3): 471-477, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28230554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Engaging community partners as co-investigators in community-based participatory research (CBPR) requires certification in the rules, ethics, and principles governing research. Despite developments in making human research protection trainings more convenient and standardized (eg, self-paced Internet modules), time constraints and the structure of the content (which may favor academic audiences) may hinder the training of community partners. OBJECTIVES: This paper is motivated by a case example in which academic and community partners, and stakeholders of a community-based organization actively engaged the leadership of a pediatric hospital-based institutional review board (IRB) in implementing a brief, community-responsive human subjects training session. METHODS: A 2-hour, discussion-based human subjects training was developed via collaborations between the IRB and the community and academic partners. Interviews with trainees and facilitators after the training were used to evaluate its acceptability and possible future applications. CONCLUSIONS: Local IRBs have the potential to assist community partners in building sufficient knowledge of human subjects research protections to engage in specific projects, thereby expediting the progress of vital research to address community needs. We propose the need for developing truncated human subjects education materials to train and certify community partners, and creating formally organized entities within academic and medical institutions that specialize in community-based research to guide the development and implementation of alternative human subjects training certification opportunities for community partners.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/organización & administración , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Comités de Ética en Investigación , Experimentación Humana , Investigadores/educación , Ética en Investigación , Humanos
4.
Clin Transl Sci ; 8(1): 57-66, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25196592

RESUMEN

Reduction of duplicative Institutional Review Board (IRB) review for multiinstitutional studies is a desirable goal to improve IRB efficiency while enhancing human subject protections. Here we describe the Harvard Catalyst Master Reciprocal Common IRB Reliance Agreement (MRA), a system that provides a legal framework for IRB reliance, with the potential to streamline IRB review processes and reduce administrative burden and barriers to collaborative, multiinstitutional research. The MRA respects the legal autonomy of the signatory institutions while offering a pathway to eliminate duplicative IRB review when appropriate. The Harvard Catalyst MRA provides a robust and flexible model for reciprocal reliance that is both adaptable and scalable.


Asunto(s)
Comités de Ética en Investigación , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Innovación Organizacional , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Facultades de Medicina , Control Social Formal
5.
Clin Transl Sci ; 7(4): 329-35, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24841488

RESUMEN

The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center ("Harvard Catalyst") Research Subject Advocacy (RSA) Program has reengineered subject advocacy, distributing the delivery of advocacy functions through a multi-institutional, central platform rather than vesting these roles and responsibilities in a single individual functioning as a subject advocate. The program is process-oriented and output-driven, drawing on the strengths of participating institutions to engage local stakeholders both in the protection of research subjects and in advocacy for subjects' rights. The program engages stakeholder communities in the collaborative development and distributed delivery of accessible and applicable educational programming and resources. The Harvard Catalyst RSA Program identifies, develops, and supports the sharing and distribution of expertise, education, and resources for the benefit of all institutions, with a particular focus on the frontline: research subjects, researchers, research coordinators, and research nurses.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos , Modelos Teóricos , Defensa del Paciente , Desarrollo de Programa , Sujetos de Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Conducta Cooperativa , Curriculum , Humanos , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/educación
6.
Clin Transl Sci ; 7(2): 150-5, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24455986

RESUMEN

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations require sponsors of clinical investigations involving an investigational drug or device to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) or Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application. Strict adherence to applicable regulations is vital to the success of clinical research. Unlike most major pharmaceutical sponsors, investigator sponsors often do not fully appreciate their regulatory obligations nor have resources to ensure compliance. As a result they can place themselves and their institutions at risk. Nevertheless, investigator-initiated clinical trials are vital to the further development of innovative drugs, biologics, and medical devices. The IND/IDE Subcommittee under the Regulatory Knowledge and Support Program at Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center worked in collaboration with Harvard and Harvard affiliated institutions to create and launch an IND/IDE Consult Service in a decentralized network of collaborating Academic Healthcare Centers (AHC). The IND/IDE Consult Service offers expertise, resources, and shared experiences to assist sponsor-investigators and IRBs in meeting regulatory requirements for conducting and reviewing investigator-initiated IND/IDE studies. The scope of the services provided by the Harvard Catalyst IND/IDE Consult Service are described, including the specifics of the service, lessons learned, and challenges faced, in a scalable model that builds inter-institutional capacity.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Drogas en Investigación , Equipos y Suministros , Servicios de Salud , Política , Derivación y Consulta , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Retroalimentación , Internet
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA