Diagnosis to Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Postmeal Walking in Women with Gestational Diabetes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether advice to perform postmeal walking could be an effective and feasible alternate to standard care continuous walking for the management of gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: Forty women with GDM were randomized between 28 and 30 wk of gestation into either standard care (CTL; 30-min continuous walking, most days per week) or standard care with advice to PMW (daily 10-min walks after three main meals) for ~7 wk. The primary outcome for this randomized controlled trial was postprandial glucose assessed by continuous glucose monitors. Continuous glucose monitor and ActivPAL inclinometers (physical activity parameters) were each worn for 7 d at ~28 and ~35 wk gestation. Delivery outcomes were also collected. A linear mixed model compared the changes across time between groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six women (PMW: n = 12, CTL: n = 14; age 34 ± 5 y) completed the trial. Mean 3 h postprandial glucose at dinner was higher in the PMW versus CTL group at baseline and across the intervention (main effect group, P = 0.04). Twenty-four hours, nocturnal, and fasting glucose were similar between groups. The PMW group spent ~57 min·d -1 more time sedentary and ~11 min·d -1 less time stepping versus CTL (main effect group: P = 0.02 and 0.05). Adherence to the prescribed 30 min·d -1 of physical activity was high, regardless of whether accumulated as 3 × 10-min or one single bout of walking. CONCLUSIONS: Distributing activity as 10-min bouts after main meals did not improve postprandial glucose outcomes compared with standard-care control. More research on the optimal duration and intensity of postmeal walks to improve postprandial responses are needed. Strategies that mitigate sedentary time and increase the minutes of physical activity accumulated across the day in pregnancy are also warranted.

Can a low-glycemic index diet reduce the need for insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus? A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: A low-glycemic index diet is effective as a treatment for individuals with diabetes and has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes when used from the first trimester. A low-glycemic index diet is commonly advised as treatment for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, the efficacy of this advice and associated pregnancy outcomes have not been systematically examined. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prescribing a low-glycemic index diet for women with GDM could reduce the number of women requiring insulin without compromise of pregnancy outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All women with GDM seen over a 12-month period were considered for inclusion in the study. Women (n = 63) were randomly assigned to receive either a low-glycemic index diet or a conventional high-fiber (and higher glycemic index) diet. RESULTS: Of the 31 women randomly assigned to a low-glycemic index diet, 9 (29%) required insulin. Of the women randomly assigned to a higher-glycemic index diet, a significantly higher proportion, 19 of 32 (59%), met the criteria to commence insulin treatment (P = 0.023). However, 9 of these 19 women were able to avoid insulin use by changing to a low-glycemic index diet. Key obstetric and fetal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Using a low-glycemic index diet for women with GDM effectively halved the number needing to use insulin, with no compromise of obstetric or fetal outcomes.