A randomised trial of primary tamoxifen versus mastectomy plus adjuvant tamoxifen in fit elderly women with invasive breast carcinoma of high oestrogen receptor content: long-term results at 20 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Long-term analysis of a randomised trial in Nottingham comparing tamoxifen versus surgery as initial treatment demonstrated that in oestrogen receptor (ER)-unselected cases, surgery achieved better local control, with no difference in overall survival. It was suggested that for patients with ER-rich tumours, local control and survival may be comparable. We now present long-term follow-up of a randomised trial designed to address this clinical scenario. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty three fit elderly (≥70 years) women with clinically node-negative primary invasive breast carcinoma <5 cm of high ER content [histochemical (H) score ≥100] were randomised 2:1 to primary tamoxifen (Tam) (N = 100) or mastectomy with adjuvant tamoxifen (Mx + Tam) (N = 53). RESULTS: With median follow-up of 78 months, there was no statistically significant difference in 10-year rates of regional recurrence (9.0% versus 7.5%), metastasis (8.0% versus 13.2%), breast cancer-specific survival (89.0% versus 86.8%) or overall survival (64.0% versus 66.0%) between Tam and Mx + Tam; however, local control was inferior with Tam (local failure rates 43.0% versus 1.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the degree of ER positivity, surgery achieved better local control. However, there was excellent and similar survival in both groups. Tam could be considered in those who are 'frail', refuse or prefer not to initially undergo surgery.

Long-term (37 years) clinical outcome of older women with early operable primary breast cancer managed in a dedicated clinic.

BACKGROUND: A dedicated clinic for older women with early primary breast cancer, established in 1973, has recently evolved into a combined surgical/oncology facility. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome across these periods. METHODS: From 1973 to 2010, 1758 women were managed. Analysis was carried out based on retrospective review and continued update of patient records. RESULTS: In the recent decade, 56.3% had surgery, followed by primary endocrine therapy (PET; 41.1%) and primary radiotherapy (1.5%). Before 1999, 42.8%, 55.6% and 1% of patients had surgery, PET and primary radiotherapy, respectively. The use of adjuvant endocrine therapy and radiotherapy has increased from 33.6% to 54.9% and 5.8% to 34.6%, respectively. A significant improvement was seen in the annual rates of local (2.2% versus 0.5%, P < 0.001), regional (1.8% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001) and distant (2.9% versus 1.9%, P = 0.002) recurrences. Similarly, the 5-year breast cancer-specific and overall survival rates showed improvement [81% versus 91% (P < 0.001) and 56% versus 71% (P < 0.001), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: In the recent decade, while surgery became the predominant treatment, a significant proportion of patients had non-operative therapies, selection of which was based on multidisciplinary assessment in the clinic. This management approach appears to produce excellent clinical outcome, which is significantly better than that in earlier period.

Optimising the management of primary breast cancer in older women - a report of a multi-disciplinary study day.

PURPOSE: The objectives of the study day were to (i) develop an in-depth understanding around the biology and treatment options; (ii) explore the specific physical and psychosocial needs and consideration including patients perspective; and (iii) gain insight into the development of a dedicated, holistic and multi-disciplinary clinic service and the importance of supporting research, for older women with primary breast cancer. DESIGN: The format included presentations (with lectures from external and local faculty, and short research papers from Nottingham) with a number of interactive discussions, and sharing of patients' experience. RESULTS: Four sessions were held covering (i) pathological features, (ii) role of radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, (iii) role of surgery, geriatric assessment and quality of life issues, and (iv) challenges in running research trials. CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated and joint team approach is required to improve clinical service and support research, in order to optimise the management of primary breast cancer in older women.

Long-term clinical outcome of oestrogen receptor-positive operable primary breast cancer in older women: a large series from a single centre.

INTRODUCTION: A Cochrane review of seven randomised trials (N=1571) comparing surgery and primary endocrine therapy (PET) (oestrogen receptor (ER) unselected) shows no difference in overall survival (OS). We report outcome of a large series with ER-positive (ER+) early invasive primary breast cancer. METHODS: Between 1973 and 2009, 1065 older (≥ 70 years) women (median age 78 years (70-99)) had either surgery (N=449) or PET (N=616) as initial treatment. RESULTS: At 49-month median follow-up (longest 230 months), the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS were 90 and 62%, respectively. Majority (74.2%) died from causes other than breast cancer. The rates (per annum) of local/regional recurrence (<1%) (following surgery), contralateral tumour (<1%) and metastases (<3%) were low. For patients on PET, 97.9% achieved clinical benefit (CB) at 6 months, with median time to progression of 49 months (longest 132 months) and significantly longer BCSS when compared with those who progressed (P<0.001). All patients with strongly ER+ (H-score >250) tumours achieved CB and had better BCSS (P<0.01). Patients with tumours having an H-score >250 were found to have equivalent BCSS regardless of treatment (surgery or PET; P=0.175), whereas for those with H-score ≤ 250, surgery produced better outcome (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Older women with ER+ breast cancer appear to have excellent long-term outcome regardless of initial treatment. Majority also die from non-breast cancer causes. Although surgery remains the treatment of choice, patients with ER-rich (H-score >250) tumours tend to do equally well when treated by PET. This should be taken into account when therapies are considered.

Early primary breast cancer in the elderly - pattern of presentation and treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of primary breast cancer in elderly patients is increasing. However, little is known about their biological profile and most appropriate clinical management, as most studies have been conducted in the younger population. This study aimed to identify a profile of characteristics in elderly women with operable primary breast cancer and investigate the dynamics influencing the treatment decision-making process. METHODS: A review of 268 consecutive female patients >70 years of age, diagnosed with early operable primary breast cancer (<5 cm) over a 30-month period at the Nottingham Breast Institute, was conducted. Age, co-morbidity, cancer characteristics, treatment offered and undertaken, and reason for patient choice were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: The median age was 78 (range 70-100) years. In our study, 82% of the patients had one or more co-morbidities, with 34% of them having three or more co-morbidities. The commonest pathological diagnosis (from needle core biopsies) was invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (76%) with histological grade 2 (64%). Majority of them were oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive (84%) and had a high histochemical (H)-score (83% with H-score >200). Most of the patients (60%) underwent primary surgical management, of which 45.4% received breast-conserving surgery. Among the patients who had breast-conserving surgery, 68% of them received adjuvant radiotherapy. When offered genuine choice in treatment options, most patients chose non-operative treatment. Patients who underwent non-operative treatment were on average seven years older and had significantly more co-morbidities than those who had surgery. CONCLUSION: The elderly population evidently have demographic and cancer characteristics distinct from their younger counterparts, with less patients receiving surgical management. Further work is underway to correlate this with their clinical outcomes and to examine the factors behind the treatment decision-making process.

Suppression of ovarian function in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as treatment for advanced breast cancer in pre-menopausal women.

Trials have shown superiority of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) over tamoxifen for post-menopausal oestrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (ER+ABC). We previously reported the use of goserelin plus anastrozole (G+A) as second-line endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal ER+ABC. We report clinical and endocrine data from G+A as first-line systemic therapy. Thirty-six patients (median age=44 years) with metastatic (N=28) and locally advanced disease were administered G+A for ≥6 months (unless progressed prior). Some (N=13) received further therapy with goserelin plus another AI (steroidal), exemestane (G+E). Serial serum hormone assays (oestradiol, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone) were performed. Twenty-four patients (67%) derived clinical benefit (CB) (5% complete response, 31% partial response, 31% stable disease for ≥6 months) with median time to progression and duration of CB of 12 (2-47) and 24+(7-78+) months respectively. Ten patients were still receiving first-line G+A at analysis. Amongst 13 patients who went onto receive G+E, 38% achieved CB with a mean duration of 13+(7-32) months. Therapy was well tolerated with no withdrawals. The combination of G+A resulted in 98% reduction (from pre-treatment to 6-month) in median levels of oestradiol (from 574.5 pmol/L; inter-quartile range (IQR)=209-1426; (N=6) to 13.45 pmol/L; IOQ=5.5-31.5 (N=4) whilst the levels of other hormones had minimal fluctuations during therapy. The combinations of ovarian function suppression (using G) and AIs produce sustained CB and minimal side effects in pre-menopausal ER+ABC with significant reduction in oestradiol levels. Within the limitations of being a non-randomised study, they should be considered in appropriate patients with hormone-sensitive ABC.

A vision to optimise the management of primary breast cancer in older women.

Majority of breast cancer are diagnosed at >65 years. Efforts to develop clinical service and research are spent mainly on younger patients. Little is known about the biology and long-term clinical outcome of breast cancer in the elderly. However there is data suggesting that there are differences. Knowledge related to breast cancer in the elderly is urgently needed and we need to optimise their management - not 'over' or 'under' treating them, taking into account of both physical and psychosocial dimensions. The Nottingham Breast Services established a dedicated elderly primary breast cancer service from its inception over 30 year ago, which has recently developed into a combined surgical/oncology facility. A joint effort and team approach are required in both developing clinical service and research, in order to optimise management. There is an immense need to develop a dedicated elderly breast cancer service and to support ongoing research.

Biological profile of oestrogen receptor positive primary breast cancers in the elderly and response to primary endocrine therapy.

Aromatase inhibitors have been shown to be superior to Tamoxifen in several settings. It is unclear whether this superiority extends to their use as primary endocrine therapy in elderly patients with early operable primary breast cancer. Biological characteristics of the tumours may aid in selecting the most suitable agent. Primary endocrine therapy with Anastrozole in 64 women >70 years with oestrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERalpha+) breast cancer was compared to that in 84 treated with Tamoxifen during the same period. Biomarkers were assessed by immunohistochemistry on diagnostic core biopsies. There was no significant difference between the two groups (Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen) in terms of clinical benefit rates at 6 months (97% vs 100%) or median progression free survival (16.5 vs 22.5 months). There were no withdrawals due to adverse events from Anastrozole, compared to four with Tamoxifen. 46%, 99%, 8% and 5% of all patients were positive for progesterone receptor, ERbeta2, HER2 and EGFR, respectively, and 64% of patients had a moderate Ki-67 index. Positive HER2 status (18 vs 21 months, p=0.003) and moderate Ki-67 index (17.5 vs 23 months, p=0.042) were associated with significantly shorter progression free survival. Results thus far show that primary endocrine therapy with Anastrozole in elderly patients with early operable ERalpha+ breast cancer is similar to Tamoxifen in terms of efficacy, but appears to be associated with less adverse events leading to withdrawals. In this population, ERalpha+ breast cancer also appears to have a less aggressive biological profile favouring better hormone sensitivity.

Pathological features of primary breast cancer in the elderly based on needle core biopsies--a large series from a single centre.

Most breast cancer patients are diagnosed at>65 years but research efforts are mainly focussed on younger patients. Knowledge related to elderly breast cancer is urgently needed. Patients>70 years presenting with early operable primary breast cancer were studied. Pathological features of diagnostic needle core biopsies taken from 2078 tumours from 2061 consecutive patients managed under a dedicated elderly breast cancer service, in 1987-2006, were reviewed. There were 1996 invasive carcinoma of mammary type (96%) with (N=200) or without associated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 81 were DCIS only (3.9%). One malignant adenomyoepithelioma was seen. Among the invasive carcinomas, ductal carcinoma of no special type was seen in 87.1% while lobular and mucinous features were noted in 6.9% and 3.1%, respectively. Histological grades and oestrogen receptor (ER) status were assessed respectively in 826 and 1557 invasive carcinomas. Majority were grade 2 (62.7%), followed by grade 1. Around 82% were ER-positive. Their pattern was compared with that in 2674 tumours from younger (< or =70 years) counterparts. In all age groups there was a marked biphasal distribution of ER-positivity, but in patients>70 years this distribution was more marked, with a great preponderance of highly ER-positive tumours, and a substantial minority being ER-negative, with very few in intermediate groups. We believe that this is the largest dataset of pathological features of elderly primary breast cancer from one institution. We have clearly confirmed the high frequency of ER-positive tumours in elderly patients. Further work is underway to assess long-term outcome and clinical relevance.

Onapristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist, as first-line therapy in primary breast cancer.

The progesterone receptor antagonist, Onapristone, is an effective endocrine agent in experimental breast cancer models. This study aimed to investigate this agent as first-line endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer. However, owing to the recognition in this and other clinical studies that some patients on Onapristone developed liver function test abnormalities, the development of this drug and recruitment to the study stopped in 1995. 19 patients either with locally advanced breast cancer (n = 12) or who were elderly, unfit patients with primary breast cancer (n = 7) received Onapristone 100 mg/day. Seventeen of the 19 tumours expressed oestrogen receptors (ER) whilst 12 of the 18 tumours tested expressed progesterone receptors (PgR). Tumour remission was categorised by International Union Against Cancer criteria. One patient was withdrawn after 4.5 months while her disease was static. Of the remaining 18 patients, 10 (56%) showed a partial response and 2 (11%) durable static disease (> or = 6 months), giving an overall tumour remission rate of 67%. The median duration of remission was 70 weeks. Transient liver function test abnormalities developed in a number of patients, mainly during the first 6 weeks of treatment. In conclusion Onapristone can induce tumour responses in human breast cancer.

Effects of amlodipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist in aging hypertension: pharmacodynamics in relation to disposition.

Pharmacodynamics and disposition of amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, were compared between elderly and young patients with hypertension. Elderly (mean +/- SD; age, 68 +/- 3 years) and young (35 +/- 5 years) patients received single intravenous amlodipine doses followed by oral administration once daily for a total of 12 weeks. After intravenous administration, elderly patients had prolonged elimination half-life values (58 +/- 11 versus 42 +/- 8 hours; p less than 0.01) caused by decreased clearance (19 +/- 5 versus 25 +/- 7 L/hr; p less than 0.01). After a 3-months oral treatment washout period, half-life tended to be prolonged in the elderly patients (69 +/- 20 hours for the elderly patients versus 53 +/- 14 hours for the young patients; difference not significant) and was not markedly different from the short-term intravenous measurement. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased from baseline throughout the treatment period, with greater decreases in elderly patients for both systolic and diastolic pressure. When amlodipine plasma concentration was correlated to change in mean blood pressure after short-term intravenous doses, elderly patients had a greater decrease than young patients at a given drug concentration. However, after long-term oral administration, elderly and young patients had comparable decreases in mean blood pressure at a given drug concentration, and the increased antihypertensive effect in the elderly was associated with somewhat higher amlodipine plasma concentration. Amlodipine administered once daily is an effective antihypertensive agent in elderly patients and young patients with essential hypertension.

Forearm vascular alpha 1-adrenergic blockade by verapamil.

With use of direct brachial artery infusion and measurement of forearm blood flow and vascular resistance by strain gauge plethysmography, the effect of verapamil on phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction was determined. Seven healthy men (age range, 19 to 47 years; weight range, 68 to 108 kg; mean blood pressure, 74 to 100 mm Hg; five nonsmokers) were systemically beta-blocked with intravenous administrations of 10 mg propranolol. Each subject then received ascending doses of phenylephrine (0.191 to 7.6 micrograms/min) alone and with concurrent verapamil (19.1 micrograms/min) by brachial arterial infusion. Dose-ratio during verapamil infusion compared with control was 8.1 (p less than 0.05). No change in slope of the phenylephrine dose-response curve was noted; however, consistent with the dose ratio, verapamil shifted the curve to the right with a decrease in the y intercept determined by linear regression (60.0 versus 40.3 mm Hg ml/100 ml forearm volume/min; p less than 0.05). Verapamil-induced attenuation of forearm vasoconstriction elicited by phenylephrine indicates that, in humans, in vivo verapamil forearm vasodilating effects are, in part, a result of alpha 1-adrenergic blockade.