Fluphenazine plasma level monitoring for patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate.

BACKGROUND: Finding a dose of an antipsychotic for maintenance therapy that is both safe and effective can be difficult because clinicians are unable to titrate dose against clinical response in patients who are already stable. Therapeutic monitoring of antipsychotic plasma levels has the potential for helping clinicians in dosage selection. With this in mind, we evaluated the usefulness of monitoring fluphenazine plasma levels for patients with schizophrenia who were receiving maintenance treatment with fluphenazine decanoate. METHOD: Thirty-one patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to low, medium, or high (0.1-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-1.0 ng/ml) plasma levels of fluphenazine. The dose of fluphenazine decanoate was adjusted in order to maintain patients in their assigned range. Side effects, psychopathology, and psychotic exacerbations were measured during the year following randomization. RESULTS: All of the psychotic exacerbations occurred during the first eight weeks following randomization, before patients had adequate time to reach their plasma level assignments. We did not find a relationship between plasma levels of fluphenazine and clinical outcomes or side effects. CONCLUSION: Our results do not provide support for the usefulness of monitoring fluphenazine plasma levels for patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate.

Clozapine and haloperidol in moderately refractory schizophrenia: a 6-month randomized and double-blind comparison.

BACKGROUND: Despite the demonstrated efficacy of clozapine in severely refractory schizophrenia, questions remain regarding its efficacy for primary negative symptoms, comparison with a moderate dose of a first-generation antipsychotic, and adverse effects during a longer-term trial. This study examined its efficacy in partially responsive, community-based patients, compared clozapine with moderate-dose haloperidol, and extended treatment to 6 months. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, 29-week trial comparing clozapine (n = 37) with haloperidol (n = 34). Subjects with schizophrenia who were being treated in community settings at 3 collaborating clinical facilities were enrolled. RESULTS: Subjects treated with haloperidol were significantly more likely to discontinue treatment for lack of efficacy (51%) than were those treated with clozapine (12%). A higher proportion of clozapine-treated subjects met an a priori criterion of improvement (57%) compared with haloperidol-treated subjects (25%). Significantly greater improvement was seen in symptoms of psychosis, hostile-suspiciousness, anxiety-depression, thought disturbance, and total score measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. No differences were detected in negative symptoms using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Subjects treated with clozapine experienced more excess salivation, dizziness, and sweating and less dry mouth and decreased appetite than those treated with haloperidol. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a first-generation antipsychotic given in a moderate dose, clozapine offers substantial clinical benefits to treatment-refractory subjects who can be treated in the community. Advantages are seen in a broad range of symptoms but do not extend to negative symptoms.

Movement disorders associated with neuroleptic treatment.

Neuroleptic-induced movement disorders, or extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), can be classified into acute and tardive syndromes. Among the former are parkinsonism, dystonia, and akathisia. Conventional neuroleptics that have traditionally been used to treat psychiatric disorders are often associated with EPS. The newer atypical antipsychotics provide a more promising treatment strategy for psychiatric disorders and have a lower potential for producing EPS than conventional neuroleptics.

Scales to assess efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Advances in the assessment of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) have been employed in large-scale clinical trials of new antipsychotic medications such as risperidone. These scales can be used to assess drug efficacy and to compare different treatment regimens. We review 3 valid and reliable scales, the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD), the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) associated with the treatment of BPSD have also been assessed using a number of rating instruments. The design of the most comprehensive of these, the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), is exhaustive, and it successfully quantifies EPS and distinguishes toxic from nontoxic medications. This publication serves as an aid to researchers and clinicians in their interpretation of qualitative and quantitative data from trials evaluating antipsychotic agents in the treatment of BPSD.

Risperidone-associated new-onset diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain, and its associated complications such as the development of diabetes, is becoming increasingly recognized as an important potential side effect of the novel antipsychotic drugs. METHODS: Two retrospective cases are described in which patients with schizophrenia developed diabetes while taking the antipsychotic medication risperidone. RESULTS: Both patients had preexisting risk factors for diabetes and developed insulin resistance in the context of weight gain. Both cases necessitated medical intervention and one patient requires ongoing treatment with insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the exact mechanism of antipsychotic induced diabetes remains obscure, weight gain appears to be a significant risk factor. Careful monitoring of weight and fasting glucoses is recommended for any patient taking novel antipsychotic medications.

Bromocriptine reduces cigarette smoking.

AIMS: Animal studies have shown that nicotine releases dopamine, a neurotransmitter implicated in drug reinforcement. We hypothesized that bromocriptine would decrease smoking behavior in humans. DESIGN: The study was conducted double blind and subjects' order of dose exposure was randomized. PARTICIPANTS: The smoking behavior of 20 heavy smokers was recorded for 5 hours after ingesting placebo or one of two doses of bromocriptine (2.50 mg, 3.75 mg) over three sessions (one dose per session). FINDINGS: There was a significant negative linear trend by dosage indicating shorter total puffing time with increasing bromocriptine dosages (p < 0.02). Other significant negative linear trends by increasing dosage include fewer number of puffs, fewer number of cigarettes smoked and mean latency to smoke after 3 hours (expected CMAX on the drug (all ps < 0.05). There was a negative significant linear trend showing decreased plasma nicotine (p < 0.02) and cotinine (p < 0.005) with increasing dosages of bromocriptine. Shiffman/Jarvik Withdrawal Scale (SJWS) cigarette craving subscale scores decreased significantly across increasing dosages (linear trend p < 0.02). There was a significant negative linear trend (p < 0.05) on the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Vigor and Depression subscales, with subjects reporting decreased vigor and depression with increasing bromocriptine doses. No other mood effects were observed. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that dopaminergic mechanisms mediate cigarette smoking reinforcement.

Risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of risperidone compared to haloperidol in patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. METHOD: Sixty-seven medication-unresponsive subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with risperidone (N = 34) or haloperidol (N = 33). After a 3-7 day-placebo washout period, there was a 4-week, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison trial that was followed by a 4-week, flexible-dose phase. Measures of clinical change were quantified by standard psychopathologic and neuromotor instruments. RESULTS: Risperidone demonstrated clinical efficacy superior to that of haloperidol on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) after the first 4 weeks of treatment. Risperidone did not show any advantage over haloperidol after an additional 4 weeks. Overall improvement on the BPRS at 4 weeks was significantly better for the risperidone group (24%) than for the haloperidol group (11%). Risperidone-treated subjects were significantly less likely than haloperidol-treated subjects to require concomitant anticholinergic medication after 4 weeks (20% versus 63%); they also had significantly les observable akathisia (24% versus 53%) and significantly less severe tardive dyskinesia. Baseline characteristics that correlated significantly with risperidone response were positive symptoms, conceptual disorganization, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was better tolerated and more effective in a subset of patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Positive psychotic symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects at baseline appear to be powerful predictors of subsequent response to risperidone.

Risperidone versus haloperidol on secondary memory: can newer medications aid learning?

The introduction of the new generation of antipsychotic medications for the treatment of schizophrenia has been accompanied by a growing interest in the neurocognitive effects of these drugs. The present study compared the effects of risperidone and haloperidol on secondary memory in a group of treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. The study design included a baseline phase and two double-blind phases in which patients were randomly assigned to medication under two different dose conditions (fixed dose and flexible dose). Secondary memory was assessed at baseline, fixed-dose, and flexible-dose phases, using the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Six measures were selected, which formed three factors (general verbal learning ability, retention, and learning strategy). Risperidone-treated patients showed greater improvement than haloperidol-treated patients in general verbal learning ability, a finding characterized by significant treatment effects on CVLT measures of learning acquisition, recall consistency, and recognition memory. After controlling for benztropine status, differences on the measures of learning acquisition and recall consistency remained significant, and differences in recognition memory weakened slightly (p = 0.07). No significant treatment effects were noted on retention or learning strategy. These findings suggest that risperidone may exert a facilitating effect on the acquisition of new verbal information, an effect that does not appear to be due to the activation of semantic encoding strategies.

Novel antipsychotics: comparison of weight gain liabilities.

BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective analysis of 122 clinical records of 92 male patients with DSM-III-R schizophrenia to examine the relative weight gain liabilities of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and sertindole compared with haloperidol. We hypothesized that the unique pharmacodynamic profiles of these agents would contribute to different amounts and patterns of weight gain. METHOD: Data were analyzed to determine differences in weight gain during treatment among patients receiving 5 different drug treatments (clozapine [N = 20], olanzapine [N = 13], risperidone [N = 38], haloperidol [N = 43], and sertindole [N = 8]). Measures of maximal weight gain, final weight, and duration to maximal weight gain were calculated. RESULTS: Repeated measures analyses of variance controlling for age, treatment duration, and initial weight revealed statistically significant differences between groups on all 3 measures. Clozapine and olanzapine had the greatest maximal weight gain liability (F = 4.13, df = 4,23; p = .01). Weight gain with clozapine, but not olanzapine or risperidone, appears to persist (as reflected by final weight) despite behavioral interventions (e.g., nutritional consultation, suggested exercise regimen; F = 5.69, df = 4,23; p = .003). Clozapine- and olanzapine-treated subjects appeared to gain weight over a prolonged period of time, whereas risperidone-and sertindole-treated subjects had a more limited period of weight gain (F = 2.95, df = 4,25; p = .04). CONCLUSION: Clozapine and olanzapine caused the most weight gain, risperidone was intermediate, and sertindole had less associated weight gain than haloperidol. The relative receptor affinities of the novel antipsychotics for histamine H1 appear to be the most robust correlate of these clinical findings.

The effects of dopaminergic D2 stimulation and blockade on smoking behavior.

Researchers have hypothesized that dopamine mediates the reinforcing effects of stimulant drugs, including nicotine. Three experiments tested whether manipulating dopamine would alter human smoking behavior. Experiments used double-blind, repeated measures designs. In Experiment 1, 4 participants were given haloperidol (a dopamine antagonist; placebo, 0.5, and 1.0 mg) on 3 occasions. The smoking rate was faster in the 1.0 mg versus the placebo condition. In Experiment 2, 12 participants were given haloperidol (2.0 mg) and placebo on 2 occasions. The intercigarette interval was shorter at the expected time of peak drug concentration. In Experiment 3, 5 participants were given bromocriptine (a dopamine agonist, 2.5 mg) and placebo on 2 occasions. The smoking rate was significantly slower with bromocriptine. These results suggest that blockade of D2 receptors increases smoking whereas their stimulation decreases smoking.

Risperidone vs. haloperidol on reaction time, manual dexterity, and motor learning in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients.

BACKGROUND: The present study compared the effects of risperidone vs. haloperidol on reaction time, manual dexterity, and two types of motor learning in a sample of treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. METHODS: Fifty-six DSM-III-R diagnosed schizophrenia inpatients participated in a randomized, double-blind comparison of risperidone vs. haloperidol. Measures of reaction time, manual dexterity, motor sequence learning, and gross motor learning were administered at baseline, after 4 weeks of fixed-dose medication, and after 4 weeks of flexible-dose medication. RESULTS: The results indicated that patients receiving risperidone showed greater improvement in reaction time and manual dexterity than patients receiving haloperidol. After covarying symptom changes and movement disorder ratings, the results remained significant. The two treatment groups did not differ on either measure of motor learning. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in performance in reaction time and manual dexterity may be due to a specific beneficial effect of risperidone, as opposed to a general reduction in extrapyramidal symptom liability, compared to haloperidol.

Novel antipsychotics and new onset diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The new antipsychotics induce minimal extrapyramidal side effects, probably due to their relatively greater affinity for certain nondopaminergic receptors than their older, conventional counterparts; however, this polyreceptor affinity may be responsible for the development of other adverse effects. One serious adverse effect that may be linked to these effects is non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We summarize 6 new cases of clozapine- and olanzapine-associated diabetes that we have documented in our clinic. We compare our cases to previous reports and tabulate the pertinent similarities among cases. RESULTS: Two of the cases were olanzapine-associated and 4 were clozapine-associated diabetes. Five of our 6 patients had risk factors for diabetes, as have 7 of the 9 previously reported in the literature. Four of our 6 patients, and 2 of the 4 prior cases in which such data were reported, experienced substantial weight gain after starting their antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Novel antipsychotics should be administered with great care to patients with risk factors for diabetes. Although the precise mechanism of the novel antipsychotic-associated diabetes is unclear, we hypothesize that histaminic and possibly serotonergic antagonism induces weight gain, which in turn leads to changes in glucose homeostasis. Additionally, serotonin1A antagonism might decrease pancreatic beta-cell responsiveness, resulting in inappropriately low insulin and hyperglycemia.

Informed consent: assessment of comprehension.

OBJECTIVE: The authors designed and evaluated a structured and rigorous informed consent procedure involving subjects with schizophrenia. METHOD: Informed consent forms were read and explained to 49 schizophrenic patients participating in ongoing clinical treatment research trials. The subjects answered a questionnaire relating to each research protocol. Protocol procedures were reiterated until the patients answered 100% of the questions correctly. Subjects were asked the same questions 7 days later to ascertain how much of the information they had retained. RESULTS: The patients' median score on the first trial of the informed consent questionnaire was 80% correct. To achieve 100% correct responses, 53% of the patients required a second trial of the questionnaire, and 37% of them required three or more trials. Scores improved between the first trial and the trial on day 7. Ninety-six percent of the subjects felt adequately informed, 66% reported participating in the research protocol for personal reasons, and 34% reported participating at the suggestion of others. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that when adequate informed consent procedures are established, schizophrenic research subjects are able to understand and retain critical components of informed consent information.

Tardive dyskinesia and serum iron indices.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to evaluate whether peripheral (serum) markers of iron status are associated with severity of the choreoathetoid movements seen in tardive dyskinesia (TD). METHODS: Serum iron indices (ferritin, iron, and total iron binding capacity) and fluphenazine levels were measured in a group of 30 male DSM-III diagnosed schizophrenic patients chronically treated with fluphenazine decanoate. The severity of choreoathetoid movements was assessed with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and akathisia was assessed with the Barnes scale. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was observed between AIMS scores and serum ferritin. This relationship remained significant after controlling for age and plasma fluphenazine levels. No significant correlations were observed between serum iron or total iron binding capacity and choreoathetoid movement ratings. There were no significant associations between serum iron indices and akathisia ratings. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that choreoathetoid movements are associated with serum ferritin levels in chronically medicated male schizophrenic patients. This relationship does not seem to be caused by an association of these variable with age or plasma fluphenazine levels. In addition, the relationship seems to be specific, since other iron indices and another extrapyramidal side effect (akathisia) do not demonstrate a similar relationship. In view of reports that antipsychotic medications change normal iron metabolism and increase iron uptake into the brain, the current results could be interpreted to suggest that serum ferritin levels may be a risk factor for TD in patients treated with "classic" antipsychotic medications.

Plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxy metabolite and their relationship to dose in schizophrenic patients: simultaneous determination by a high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

A simple, sensitive and accurate method for the simultaneous determination of risperidone (RSP) and its 9-hydroxy metabolite (9-OH-RSP) in human plasma is described. The relationship between dose of RSP and the plasma concentration of RSP and 9-OH-RSP in a clinical situation is discussed. Both compounds were isolated from plasma by a simple one-step liquid-liquid extraction with 15% methylene chloride in pentane. High-performance liquid chromatography separations were made on a cyano column and the compounds were detected by electrochemical detector. The method had sufficient sensitivity to determine RSP and 9-OH-RSP accurately at concentrations as low as 0.25 ng/ml when 1 ml of plasma is used for the analysis. The assay determinations were accurate, precise and consistent with a coefficient of variation less than 15%. Commonly co-administered drugs and other antipsychotics did not interfere with the analysis of either RSP or 9-OH-RSP There were large variations in inter- and intra-individual values of plasma concentrations of RSP and 9-OH-RSP. The 9-OH-RSP appears to be the major circulating active moiety and its plasma concentrations were, on the average 22 fold higher than that of RSP in schizophrenic patients treated with RSP. The ratio of RSP/9-OH-RSP concentrations suggested that three of the patients may have deficiency in cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP 2D6. The plasma concentrations of RSP showed a weak relationship with the administered daily oral dose (r = 0.4684, p = 0.01, n = 215). However, there was a good relationship between the daily dose of RSP and the plasma concentration of 9-OH-RSP (r = 0.6654, p = 0.01, n = 280) or the total active moiety, sum of RSP and 9-OH-RSP concentrations (r = 0.7041, p = 0.0005, n = 280). The measurement of the total active moiety in plasma of schizophrenic patients may be useful for assessing the relationship between dose and plasma concentration and dose and clinical outcome of patients rather than measuring RSP alone.

Does risperidone improve verbal working memory in treatment-resistant schizophrenia?

OBJECTIVE: Treatment efficacy in schizophrenia is typically defined in terms of symptom reduction. However, new antipsychotic medications could potentially have an impact on aspects of disability, such as neurocognitive deficits. The authors evaluated the effects of risperidone on verbal working memory, a memory component of theoretical interest because of its link to prefrontal activity and of practical interest because of its link to psychosocial rehabilitation. METHOD: Verbal working memory of 59 treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients was assessed as part of a randomized, double-blind comparison of treatment with risperidone and haloperidol. Verbal working memory was measured under both distracting and nondistracting conditions at baseline and after 4 weeks of both fixed- and flexible-dose pharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Risperidone treatment had a greater beneficial effect on verbal working memory than haloperidol treatment across testing conditions (with and without distraction) and study phases (fixed and flexible dose). The treatment effect remained significant after the effects of benztropine cotreatment, change in psychotic symptoms, and change in negative symptoms were controlled. Neither benztropine status nor symptom changes were significantly related to memory performance. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with risperidone appears to exert a more favorable effect on verbal working memory than treatment with a conventional neuroleptic. The beneficial effect appears to be due, at least partially, to a direct effect of the drug, possibly through antagonism of the 5-HT2A receptor. Results from this study suggest that pharmacotherapeutic efficacy in schizophrenia treatment could be broadened to include impact on neurocognitive abilities.

Plasma level monitoring of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia: determination by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

A sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method with electrochemical detection for the determination of olanzapine in human plasma is described. Olanzapine from plasma samples was isolated by a simple one-step liquid--liquid extraction with 15% methylene chloride in pentane with an extraction recovery of approximately 94% of the total olanzapine in plasma. The compound was separated on a cyano column. Under the conditions described, commonly coadministered drugs and other common antipsychotic drugs did not interfere with the analysis of olanzapine. The lower limit of determination of the assay was 0.25 ng of olanzapine per ml when 1 ml of plasma was used for the analysis. The interaassay and intraassay variance was (CV%) less than 10%. The standard curve was linear within the range of 0.25 to 50 ng/ml of olanzapine. This method has been used for the determination of plasma levels of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia who were treated with daily oral doses of 10, 15, and 20 mg of olanzapine. The results indicate that the plasma level of olanzapine increases linearly with the administered daily oral dose (r = 0.6889, p = 0.01).