Assessment of the relevance of midwifery competencies in academic education in Germany from the midwives' perspective: A structural analysis of cross-sectional survey data.

INTRODUCTION: The acquisition of academic competencies is one of the main outcomes of the academization of midwifery education. To analyze midwives' views on the key academic competencies of the recently reformed midwifery education in Germany, an existing assessment instrument was adapted to the German context of care and psychometrically analyzed. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the relevance assessments of academic and non-academic midwives differ from each other. METHODS: The study design was cross-sectional. A total of 193 (prospective) midwives answered the items on the assessed relevance of midwifery competencies in academic education (59 items); 3 items were added (referring to evidence-based practice and digital literacy). Construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis. Item and reliability analysis as well as unpaired t-tests were performed. RESULTS: Considering insufficient item-construct associations (20 items), a single factorial solution best fits the data (eigenvalue: 18.36; explained variance: 29.60%). Internal reliability was demonstrated to be very good with Cronbach's α=0.954. The assessed relevance of academic midwifery competencies from academic and non-academic midwives did not differ significantly from each other for students and trainee midwives (t=0.18; df=6.66; p=0.86), and for for midwives educated at vocational school and university (t= -0.035; df=106; p=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The adapted assessment tool can be used with minor modifications to reliably and validly measure the assessed relevance of academic competence from the midwives' perspective. Combined with data on the assessments of medical practitioners and laypersons, the assessment provides a substantial data basis for the development of a competence profile for academic midwifery education in Germany.

Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ratings of physician-patient communication are an important indicator of the quality of health care delivery and provide guidance for many important decisions in the health care setting and in health research. But there is no gold standard to assess physician-patient communication. Thus, depending on the specific measurement condition, multiple sources of variance may contribute to the total score variance of ratings of physician-patient communication. This may systematically impair the validity of conclusions drawn from rating data. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which different measurement conditions and rater perspectives, respectively contribute to the variance of physician-patient communication ratings. METHODS: Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication gained from 32 general practitioners and 252 patients from 25 family practices in Germany were analyzed using generalizability theory. The communication dimensions "shared decision making", "effective and open communication" and "satisfaction" were considered. RESULTS: Physician-patient communication ratings most substantially reflect unique rater-perspective and communication dimension combinations (32.7% interaction effect). The ratings also represented unique physician and rater-perspective combinations (16.3% interaction effect). However, physicians' communication behavior and the observed communication dimensions revealed only a low extent of score variance (1% physician effect; 3.7% communication dimension effect). Approximately half of the variance remained unexplained (46.2% three-way interaction, confounded with error). CONCLUSION: The ratings of physician-patient communication minimally reflect physician communication skills in general. Instead, these ratings exhibit primarily differences among physicians and patients in their tendency to perceive shared decision making and effective and open communication and to be satisfied with communication, regardless of the communication behavior of physicians. Rater training and assessing low inferential ratings of physician-patient communication dimensions should be considered when subjective aspects of rater perspectives are not of interest.

Handling Missing Data in the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12): Concordance of Real Patient Data and Data Estimated by Missing Data Imputation Procedures.

If information on single items in the Short Form-12 health survey (SF-12) is missing, the analysis of only complete cases causes a loss of statistical power and, in case of nonrandom missing data (MD), systematic bias. This study aimed at evaluating the concordance of real patient data and data estimated by different MD imputation procedures in the items of the SF-12 assessment. For this ends, MD were examined in a sample of 1,137 orthopedic patients. Additionally, MD were simulated (a) in the subsample of orthopedic patients exhibiting no MD (n = 810; 71%) as well as (b) in a sample of 6,970 respondents representing the German general population (95.8% participants with complete data) using logistic regression modelling. Simulated MD were replaced by mean values as well as regression-, expectation-maximization- (EM-), and multiple imputation estimates. Higher age and lower education were associated with enhanced probabilities of MD. In terms of accuracy in both data sets, the EM-procedure (ICC2,1 = .33-.72) outperformed alternative estimation approaches substantially (e.g., regression imputation: ICC2,1 = .18-.48). The EM-algorithm can be recommended to estimate MD in the items of the SF-12, because it reproduces the actual patient data most accurately.

Agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical encounters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interrater agreement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical face-to-face consultations. METHODS: A systematic search of twelve databases was conducted. Studies investigating agreement between physician and patient ratings of communication in medical face-to-face encounters and reporting interrater agreement were included. Methodological quality was assessed, and study characteristics and physician-patient agreement were narratively summarized. Meta-analysis was conducted for a subsample of the included studies investigating shared decision making. RESULTS: Of the 17 included studies, ten studies did not demonstrate any correspondence between physician and patient ratings. The remaining seven studies revealed poor to fair absolute agreement (κ between .13 and .42; κw between .31 and .49; 95% CI 0.13 - 0.76) and poor to moderate consistency (r = .17 and .06; rpolyc between .39 and .63; p < .05). Meta-analysis of six studies yielded small association (rpolyc = .15). CONCLUSION: Physicians and patients evaluate communication differently and at best, only slightly agree in their ratings, indicating that the construct of communication is not measurable in a stable manner. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Decision makers and researchers should be aware that they assess different aspects of communication, depending on the perspective examined. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019120065.

Psychoeducational group intervention for breast cancer survivors: a non-randomized multi-center pilot study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate an outpatient psychoeducational group program for breast cancer patients aimed to improve various psychosocial parameters, enhancing the patients' competence and reducing fear of recurrence. METHODS: The study is based on a multi-center, non-randomized control group design with three measurement time points (T1 baseline, T2 end of the intervention, T3 6-week follow-up). Breast cancer patients were assessed with various standardized questionnaires including fear of progression, self-efficacy, depression, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 50 breast cancer patients participated (intervention group n = 27, control group n = 23). The results show a significant reduction in the fear of progression/recurrence (FoPR) (p = 0.003) and a significant increase in self-efficacy (SE) (p = 0.007) for the intervention group with a large (FoPR, Eta2 = .178) and medium (SE, Eta2 = .113) effect size, respectively. For all other outcome criteria such as depressive symptoms, social support, or quality of life, no significant changes over time or differences between both groups were found. CONCLUSIONS: The psychoeducational program has been proven to be effective for breast cancer survivors, but further investigation based on a randomized trial is necessary. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: To improve participation rate assessment of patient's needs and close cooperation with rehabilitation centers, psychosocial counseling services, and medical oncologists are recommended.

Sensitivity to change of the EORTC quality of life module measuring cancer-related fatigue (EORTC QlQ-Fa12): Results from the international psychometric validation.

OBJECTIVE: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (EORTC QLG) has developed a multidimensional instrument measuring cancer-related fatigue, the EORTC QLQ-FA12. The analysis of sensitivity to change is an essential part of psychometric validation. With this study, we investigated the EORTC QLQ-FA12's sensitivity to change. METHODS: The methodology follows the EORTC guidelines of EORTC QLG for phase IV validation of modules. We included cancer patients undergoing curative and palliative treatment at t1 and followed them up prospectively over the course of their treatment (t2) and 4 weeks after completion of treatment (t3). Data were collected prospectively at 17 sites in 11 countries. Sensitivity to change was investigated using analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total sample of 533 patients was enrolled with various tumour types, different stages of cancer, and receiving either curative treatment (n=311) or palliative treatment (n=222). Over time all fatigue scores were significantly higher in the palliative treatment group compared with the curative group (p < .001). Physical fatigue increased with medium effect size over the course of treatment in the curative group (standardized response mean [SRM] (t1,t2) = 0.44]. After treatment physical [SRM (t2,t3) = 0.39], emotional [SRM (t2,t3)= 0.28] and cognitive fatigue (SRM [t2,t3] = 0.22) declined significantly in the curative group. In the palliative group, emotional (SRM [t2,t3] = 0.18) as well as cognitive [SRM [t2,t3] = 0.26) fatigue increases significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The EORTC-QLQ-FA12 proved to identify clinically significant changes in fatigue in the course of curative and palliative cancer treatment.

Psychometric evaluation of the Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ) in a large sample of German rehabilitation patients.

OBJECTIVE: Structural analysis of the German translation of the "Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire" (CCRQ). DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study. SETTING: Ten inpatient rehabilitation centers in Germany. SUBJECTS: The CCRQ was completed by patients in the ten rehabilitation centers. MAIN MEASURES: The psychometric analysis of the CCRQ was conducted using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The CCRQ was completed by 496 patients (average age: 59 years; 59.7% women). The CCRQ's 7-factor structure could not be confirmed. Factor analysis showed that the three latent constructs "decision-making/communication", "self-management/empowerment", and "psychosocial well-being" (60.73% variance explained) adequately represent patient-centeredness in medical rehabilitation assessed by the CCRQ. The scales possess good reliability (Cronbach's α = .83 to .87) and convergent criterion validity (r = 0.48 to 0.68). The three-factorial model exhibited good local and global data fit (RMSEA: 0.063, CFI 0.962, TLI 0.954) and proved to have a better data fit than concurring models (e.g. a model assuming an underlying factor). CONCLUSIONS: A validated short form of the Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire, CCRQ-15, could be identified. Three scales based on 15 items allow assessing the key aspects of patient-centeredness in German medical rehabilitation.

Relationship of organizational culture, teamwork and job satisfaction in interprofessional teams.

BACKGROUND: Team effectiveness is often explained on the basis of input-process-output (IPO) models. According to these models a relationship between organizational culture (input = I), interprofessional teamwork (process = P) and job satisfaction (output = O) is postulated. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between these three aspects using structural analysis. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional study with a survey of 272 employees was conducted in fifteen rehabilitation clinics with different indication fields in Germany. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was carried out using AMOS software version 20.0 (maximum-likelihood method). RESULTS: Of 661 questionnaires sent out to members of the health care teams in the medical rehabilitation clinics, 275 were returned (41.6%). Three questionnaires were excluded (missing data greater than 30%), yielding a total of 272 employees that could be analyzed. The confirmatory models were supported by the data. The results showed that 35% of job satisfaction is predicted by a structural equation model that includes both organizational culture and teamwork. The comparison of this predictive IPO model (organizational culture (I), interprofessional teamwork (P), job satisfaction (O)) and the predictive IO model (organizational culture (I), job satisfaction (O)) showed that the effect of organizational culture is completely mediated by interprofessional teamwork. The global fit indices are a little better for the IO model (TLI: .967, CFI: .972, RMSEA .052) than for the IPO model (TLI: .934, CFI: .943, RMSEA: .61), but the prediction of job satisfaction is better in the IPO model (R(2) = 35%) than in the IO model (R(2) = 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results underpin the importance of interprofessional teamwork in health care organizations. To enhance interprofessional teamwork, team interventions can be recommended and should be supported. Further studies investigating the organizational culture and its impact on interprofessional teamwork and team effectiveness in health care are important.

The health literate health care organization 10 item questionnaire (HLHO-10): development and validation.

BACKGROUND: While research on individual health literacy is steadily increasing, less attention has been paid to the context of care that may help to increase the patient's ability to navigate health care or to compensate for their limited health literacy. In 2012, Brach et al. introduced the concept of health literate health care organizations (HLHOs) to describe the organizational context of care. This paper presents our effort in developing and validating an HLHO instrument. METHOD: Ten items were developed to represent the ten attributes of HLHO (HLHO-10) based on a literature review, an expert workshop, a focus group discussion, and qualitative interviews. The instrument was applied in a key informant survey in 51 German hospitals as part of a larger study on patient information and training needs (PIAT-study). Item properties were analyzed and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the instrument's unidimensionality. To investigate the instrument's predictive validity, a multilevel analysis was performed that used the HLHO-10 score to predict the adequacy of information provided to 1,224 newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients treated at the sample hospitals. RESULTS: Cronbach's α of the resulting scale was 0.89. CFA verified the one-factor structure after allowing for the correlation for four pairs of error terms. In the multilevel model, HLHO-10 significantly predicted the adequacy of information as perceived by patients. CONCLUSION: The instrument has satisfactory reliability and validity. It provides a useful tool to assess the degree to which health care organizations help patients to navigate, understand, and use information and services. Further validation should include participant observation in health care organizations and a sample that is not limited to breast cancer care.

Development and psychometric properties of a scale for measuring internal participation from a patient and health care professional perspective.

BACKGROUND: Effective patient-centred health care requires internal participation, which is defined as interprofessional patient-centred teamwork. Many scales are designed for measuring teamwork from the perspective of one type of health care professional (e.g. physician or nurse), rather than for the use for all health care professionals as well as patients. Hence, this paper's purpose is to develop a scale for measuring internal participation from all relevant perspectives and to check its psychometric properties. METHODS: In a multicentre cross-sectional study, a 6-item Internal Participation Scale (IPS) was developed and administered to 661 health care professionals (staff) and 1419 patients in 15 rehabilitation clinics to test item characteristics, acceptance, reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity. Additionally, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the factorial structure and explained variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the theoretically assumed one-dimensional factorial structure. RESULTS: A total of 275 health care professionals and 662 patients participated, and the complete data sets of 272 staff members and 536 patients were included in the final analysis. The discrimination index was above .4 for all items in both samples. Internal consistency was very good, with Cronbach's alpha equalling .87 for the staff and .88 for the patient sample. EFA supported a one-dimensional structure of the instrument (explained variance: 61.1% (staff) and 62.3% (patients)). CFA verified the factorial structure, with the factor loadings exceeding .4 for five of six items in both samples. Global goodness-of-fit indices indicated a good model fit, with a Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) of .974 (staff) and .976 (patients) and a comparative fit index (CFI) of .988 (staff) and .989 (patients). The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) amounted to .068 for the patient sample and .069 for the staff sample. There is evidence of construct validity for both populations. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the scale's psychometric properties resulted in good values. The scale is a promising instrument to assess internal participation from the perspective of both patients and staff. Further research should investigate the scale's psychometric properties in other interprofessional health care settings to examine its generalizability as well as its sensitivity to change.

Development of Rasch-based item banks for the assessment of work performance in patients with musculoskeletal diseases.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a self-description assessment instrument to measure work performance in patients with musculoskeletal diseases. In terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), work performance is defined as the degree of meeting the work demands (activities) at the actual workplace (environment). To account for the fact that work performance depends on the work demands of the job, we strived to develop item banks that allow a flexible use of item subgroups depending on the specific work demands of the patients' jobs. METHODS: Item development included the collection of work tasks from literature and content validation through expert surveys and patient interviews. The resulting 122 items were answered by 621 patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Exploratory factor analysis to ascertain dimensionality and Rasch analysis (partial credit model) for each of the resulting dimensions were performed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis resulted in four dimensions, and subsequent Rasch analysis led to the following item banks: 'impaired productivity' (15 items), 'impaired cognitive performance' (18), 'impaired coping with stress' (13) and 'impaired physical performance' (low physical workload 20 items, high physical workload 10 items). The item banks exhibited person separation indices (reliability) between 0.89 and 0.96. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of work performance adds the activities component to the more commonly employed participation component of the ICF-model. The four item banks can be adapted to specific jobs where necessary without losing comparability of person measures, as the item banks are based on Rasch analysis.

Burnout in nurses - the relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between a hospital's social capital, individual decision latitude, workload and emotional exhaustion in nurses, controlling for age, sex, years of professional experience and job tenure. BACKGROUND: In western countries between 15-45% of nurses working in hospitals suffer from burnout, characterised by emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and decreased personal performance. The prevention of burnout constitutes a great challenge to those responsible for the health care system, not least because burnout may cause increasing turnover rates in nurses and lead to medical mistakes. DESIGN: Survey. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to 1325 nurses working at four hospitals in east and west Germany in 2002. Nine hundred and fifty nine nurses responded (response rate: 72.4%). RESULTS: Logistic regression identified three significant predictors of emotional exhaustion in nurses: workload (OR: 4.523, CI: 3.230-6.333) was positively associated with emotional exhaustion. Decision latitude (OR: 0.376, CI: 0.254-0.557) and social capital in the hospitals (OR: 0.549, CI: 0.403-0.746) were negatively associated with emotional exhaustion. Emotional exhaustion was not affected by age, sex, years of professional experience and job tenure. Nagelkerke's Pseudo R(2) was 0.225. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underline the importance of social capital and organisational development in hospital management. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Efforts to create a good working atmosphere with readiness to provide mutual support and the pursuit of joint values in a hospital, the reduction of workload and increased decision latitude may prevent the development of emotional exhaustion in nurses.

The international classification of functioning, disability and health-orientated Occupational Therapy Assessment: a Rasch analysis of its domains.

The aim of the study was to evaluate and improve the psychometric properties of the Occupational Therapy Assessment (OTA) by means of Rasch analysis. The OTA is a tool developed to enhance diagnostics, documentation, therapy planning and evaluation of the individual client process in occupational therapy for adult clients. To assess the central aspects concerning patients' activities and the consequences of their impairments on these activities, therapists rated 50 items relating to the five domains 'activities for self-care', 'activities for independent living', 'consequences of sensory-motor functions in everyday life', 'consequences of neuropsychological functions in everyday life' and 'consequences of psychosocial functions in everyday life'. The study sample consisted of 785 patients consecutively admitted to 44 institutions. These patients participated in occupational therapy and suffered from functional, neurological, psychiatric or multiple impairments (geriatrics). For each OTA domain, unidimensional item groups could be identified. Psychometric properties were satisfactory in all medical fields except for psychiatric patients. Between different medical fields, for all domains, differential item functioning exists, indicating field-specific definitions of the latent dimensions. The OTA provides a psychometrically well developed and tested basis for diagnostic and evaluative purposes in occupational therapy settings.