Improving the management and outcomes of complex non-pedunculated colorectal polyps at a regional hospital in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer arises from precancerous lesions, primarily adenomatous and serrated polyps. Some polyps pose significant technical endoscopic challenges due to their size, location, and/or morphology. A standardized protocol for documentation and management of these polyps can optimize clinical outcomes. METHODS: A Quality Improvement project compared patients with a complex polyp (non-pedunculated, > 2 cm), for 12 months prior and 12 months after protocol introduction. Documentation and polyp management details were compared pre- and post-implementation using the Chi-square test. RESULTS: 69 patients were diagnosed with complex polyps prior to the protocol introduction and 72 after. 79% (112/141) of patients underwent endoscopic mucosal resections (EMR) locally, and 14.9% (21/141) underwent surgery locally. After protocol introduction, there was significant improvement in documentation of suspicious appearing polyps (21.7% to 47.2%, P = 0.001), luminal circumference (14.5% to 34.7%, P = 0.005), and management plans (87.0% to 97.2%, P = 0.023); other elements of documentation were similar. The number of patients reviewed at multidisciplinary conference (MDC) increased from 1 to 61% (P < 0.005). Patients rebooked in a 1 h endoscopy time slot increased from 19 to 58% (P < 0.005), as did specific consent for EMR from 22 to 57% (P < 0.005). Among patients with polyps 3 cm or greater (23 pre, 36 post), MDC review increased from 4 to 67% (P < 0.005), primary polypectomy decreased from 72 to 23% (P = 0.001), patients rebooked in a double endoscopy slot increased from 33 to 75% (P = 0.005), and specific consent increased from 39 to 75% (P = 0.014). There were less polyp recurrences (12/42 pre and 1/50 post) among the post-protocol cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a formalized protocol for complex polyp adjudication and management has led to improved documentation, multidisciplinary discussion, and optimal complex polyp management with dedicated time for EMR, particularly for polyps over 3 cm. There is room for improvement, and this can be approached in a collaborative manner.

Evaluation of crown-root angulation of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to explore differences in crown-to-root angulation between lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines (PICs) and lateral incisors adjacent to normally erupted canines (NECs). METHODS: Orthodontic records of 100 subjects (51 with PICs and 49 with NECs) were reviewed. Crown-to-root angulations of all lateral incisors were measured manually on the final panoramic radiographs. Also, three experienced orthodontists were asked to visually inspect the morphology of the lateral incisors on the panoramic radiographs. A mixed model was used to test the difference in crown-to-root angulation of the lateral incisor between the experimental and the control groups. The association between the examiners' observations and the presence of a canine impaction was assessed by means of a chi-square test. All analyses were performed at the 0.05 level of statistical significance. RESULTS: A significant (p = 0.009) difference of 2.3° in crown-to-root angulation was found between groups. Also, 66.7% of the lateral incisors that were identified as "abnormal" by the panel of orthodontists were adjacent to a PIC. A percentage of 65.2 of lateral incisors that were identified as "normal" were located adjacent to NECs. CONCLUSIONS: The root of lateral incisors adjacent to PICs is angulated more mesially compared to lateral incisors adjacent to NECs. In addition, clinicians are somewhat able to predict if a canine is palatally impacted by visually observing the crown-to-root angulation of the adjacent lateral incisor. Evaluating the crown-to-root angulation of a lateral incisor on a panoramic image might facilitate an early diagnosis of palatally impacted canines.

Ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer: improving the accuracy of pathologic staging?

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with colon cancer staged by conventional methods have occult micrometastases and do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and staining by immunohistochemistry is a technique that may identify such occult micrometastases, thereby upstaging patients with positive findings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ex vivo SLN mapping in colon cancer could be applied successfully to patients at our institution. METHODS: Seventeen patients with intraperitoneal colon tumors undergoing resection were studied prospectively. SLNs were identified as the first blue stained node(s) after ex vivo peritumoral injection of isosulfan blue dye. Additional lymph nodes were harvested and processed in accordance with standard pathologic evaluation for colon cancer. All nodes were examined after routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. SLNs that were negative on H&E were analyzed further by multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry staining using anticytokeratin monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: Of the 17 study patients, SLNs were identified in 16 (94%) cases. The SLN was the only positive node in 3 patients. An identified SLN was positive (by H&E) in all patients with associated positive non-SLN nodes. The average number of nodes retrieved per patient was 16 (range, 4-54). Overall, SLNs accurately reflected the status of the entire lymph node basin in 16 (94%) patients. Two (12%) patients with negative nodes by H&E potentially were upstaged after further SLN analysis. The negative predictive value for SLN mapping was 89%. CONCLUSIONS: The ex vivo technique of SLN mapping for colon cancer is feasible. In the current study, SLN results were concordant with non-SLNs in the majority of patients. Furthermore, this technique may have upstaged 2 (12%) patients. Whether this ultimately will affect overall survival has yet to be determined.

Epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of choledochal cysts in adults in an urban environment.

BACKGROUND: Choledochal cysts (CDC) are rare congenital cystic lesions of the biliary tract. In North America the incidence of CDC is estimated as 1/150,000; it is not clear that the disease pattern in North America is similar to that in Asia. METHODS: Retrospective chart review. Statistical analysis was under taken using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, and outcome were evaluated in 51 patients with CDC. Malignant transformation was identified in 4 patients presenting uniformly with jaundice (P = .027). Type 4a cysts (54.9%) were the most common cyst identified. Four (14%) type IVa and two (13%) type I cysts developed postoperative stricture. No patient developed cholangiocarcinoma after complete resection of their cyst. CONCLUSIONS: Types I and IVa cysts can be treated similarly with excellent outcome. However, our observation of a high proportion of type 4a cysts may represent a specific North American pattern of this disease requiring a re-evaluation of the classification system.

Surgeons' anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injuries remain one of the most devastating injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Few studies target surgeons who have experienced bile duct injuries for their insight, their perspective, and their suggestions concerning this problem. METHODS: A confidential questionnaire was sent to all practicing general surgeons under the age of 65 years in British Columbia, Canada. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of surgeons responded to the survey. Of the 114 questionnaires completed, more than 97% of respondents had completed formal training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One half of surgeons reported experience with laparoscopic bile duct injury. A significant difference in years in practice between surgeons with injury and surgeons without injury was noted. The majority of injuries occurred after the surgeons's first 100 cholecystectomies performed. The first thoughts of surgeons after injury uniformly concerned the patient's well being. The next most common thoughts were in relation to obtaining help or a second opinion from another surgeon. Surgeons cited inflammation and short or anomalous cystic ducts as the most responsible factors contributing to injury. The majority of surgeons felt that these injuries are unavoidable and less than half felt that it was always a surgical error. Fewer than 15% thought injuries could be avoided by performing a cholangiogram. Surgeons suggested meticulous dissection and less haste to divide structures may prevent an injury. Surgeons recommend educating colleagues to remove the stigma of failure associated with conversion to laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: General surgeons in British Columbia have a one in two chance of experiencing a bile duct injury in their career. There were more injuries in surgeons who had already been in practice for 10 years at the time of introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The injuries are likely to occur despite high volumes of procedures and increased experience. The incidence of bile duct injuries does not seem to be different in surgeons who perform routine cholangiography and most surgeons feel that cholangiography would have little effect on injury incidence. Surgeons tend to have patient-centered concerns after injury and little concern for medicolegal issues. The majority of surgeons felt that these injuries could not be anticipated and as such it is an inherent risk of this procedure.