Methadone and a Clinical Pathway in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Historically Controlled Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Historically controlled clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: Patients presenting for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by posterior spinal fusion may benefit from structured clinical pathways. We studied the effects of implementing a published clinical pathway for the perioperative care of patients with AIS that required intraoperative use of methadone at our institution. METHODS: We performed a historically controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by comparing a retrospectively collected control group of 25 patients with a prospective experimental group of 14 patients receiving methadone, gabapentin, propofol, and remifentanil as part of a new clinical pathway. RESULTS: Use of the pathway decreased average pain scores evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale in the 24 hours following surgery (4.8 [4-6] to 3.4 [2-4], P = .03 [-2.6 to -0.2; t = -2.3]) and postoperative opioid consumption by 76% (41 [29-51] mg to 10 [4-17] mg, P < .001 [-45 to -15; Welch's t = 4.9]) during the same period. Improved analgesia and reduced reliance on opioids facilitated other postoperative elements of the clinical pathway and shortened the average hospital length of stay by 1 day (4 [3-6] days to 3 [3-5] days, P = .001 [-2 to -1; U = 67, Z = -3.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia and a clinical pathway add value in the perioperative care of patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS by improving analgesia and shortening hospitalization. The prospective arm of the trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT02481570.

Incorporating airway examination photography into the electronic record.

BACKGROUND: Photography of the airway has been used in research to validate preoperative airway assessment and the likelihood of identifying the difficult-to-mask ventilate and/or intubate patient. Up till now, no study has demonstrated the perceived utility of incorporation of airway photographs into the anesthesia preassessment. METHODS: The University of Florida Health Presurgical Clinic routinely incorporates three photographs of all adult patients during their preanesthesia visit. The first is a head-on view of the patient opening the mouth widely as part of a Mallampati examination, and the second and third are side views of the patient prognathing and with the neck in maximal extension, respectively. After IRB approval, providers of anesthesia were surveyed regarding their opinions on the perceived value of the new process. Chi-square tests were used to determine if the responses to each question significantly differed from the distribution that would be predicted by chance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The survey was emailed to 180 individuals, with 145 responding. The responses significantly (P < 0.0001) indicated that the photographs helped the providers plan care for their patients and improved their satisfaction with the preoperative assessment. Technical and educational barriers were overcome using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and coaching, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Photographs of the airway assessment can successfully be taken and incorporated into an electronic medical record in a busy presurgical clinic. The pictures provide additional perceived value to the traditional written assessment of a patient's airway examination by someone else.

Patient-Centered Anesthesia Triage System Predicts ASA Physical Status.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to validate a patient-centered anesthesia triage system (PCATS) by examining its association with, and predictive value of, ASA physical status (PS) classification. ASA PS classification is a widely used indicator of health status and the predictor of risk of perioperative complications. Thus, ASA PS is a good triage point such that healthy surgical patients (ASA PS I and II) undergoing low-complexity surgery are assessed by telephone, whereas less-healthy patients (ASA PS III and IV) or those patients undergoing highly complex surgery are seen in person at a presurgical clinic. However, ASA PS is not commonly available in electronic health records or easily determined by nonanesthesiologists. PCATS criteria, including the number of prescription medications used daily, body mass index (BMI), age, and surgical complexity, are readily available in electronic health records. Nonclinical scheduling personnel can use PCATS to make appropriate preassessment appointments for elective surgical patients before surgery. METHODS: After getting approval from the University of Florida IRB for an exempt study, 300 consecutive patients scheduled in the presurgical clinic over a 1-week span were retrospectively enrolled. Each of the records was reviewed and collated for study identification number, number of prescription medications, BMI, and ASA PS classification assigned on the day of surgery. In addition, a surgical complexity score was assigned to each procedure (high, moderate, minimal).The association between PCATS and individual PCATS criteria and ASA PS was assessed by χ test. The utility of PCATS to discriminate between ASA PS classifications was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves as well as other indicators of clinical validity: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive clinical utility index ([CIU+] = sensitivity × PPV) and negative CIU ([CIU-] = specificity × PPV). RESULTS: BMI (P = .002), age (P = .01), surgical complexity (P < .0001), and number of prescriptions (P < .001) were significantly associated with ASA PS. Definitions included as PCATS criteria were BMI > 35, age > 80 years, 5 or more prescriptions, and high surgical complexity. Eighty-seven percent of patients with any PCATS criterion were ASA PS classification III or IV. From ROC curve analysis, PCATS emerged as a significant, and moderately good, predictor of ASA PS class (area under the curve = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.83). PCATS was highly sensitive (0.88, 95% CI, 0.84-0.92) and specific (0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.86), and had excellent utility in confirmation/case finding (CUI+ = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.82-0.84) and moderate utility in screening out cases (CUI- = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.41-0.44). CONCLUSIONS: PCATS serves as a useful, and valid, predictor of ASA PS classification. Thus, it may also serve as a tool to triage patients to an appropriate venue for preoperative assessment that can be utilized by nonclinical schedulers. Using a simple tool such as PCATS may help streamline the presurgical patient experience and improve clinic staff utilization.