Digital constriction bands in pseudoainhum: morphological radiographic, and histological analysis.

Pseudoainhum is a rare condition of unknown etiology that produces digital constricting rings, most commonly on the small fingers. A thorough discussion of pseudoainhum in the plastic surgical literature is apparently lacking at this time. The authors describe the gross morphology, radiographic and laboratory features, and surgical pathology of the disease, and provide well-defined guidelines for its treatment.

Composite grafting and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in pediatric nasal tip reconstruction after avulsive dog-bite injury.

It is estimated that more than four million people are bitten by dogs in the United States each year. The majority of such injuries are minor, and their treatment does not usually require surgical consultation. However, the authors report a case in which a Rottweiler inflicted a mutilating nasal tip/alar rim avulsion on a 5-year-old boy. They report their experience with immediate reconstruction of the nasal defect using a large ipsilateral auricular cartilage composite graft (crus helix). Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (without sedation or anesthesia) was used to maximize the stimulus for graft revascularization. Reconstructive goals were achieved while avoiding the need for a central facial donor site defect.

The evolution of velopharyngeal imaging.

Currently, functional visualization of the velopharynx requires tests that are either invasive (endoscopy) or that impart ionizing radiation (speech videofluoroscopy). The overall intrusiveness of endoscopy may limit its clinical utility, especially in young children. As a resut of growing awareness of the long-range effects of radiation exposure associated with X-ray imaging, radiographic research on subjects and studies not judged to be clinically necessary have been all but abandoned. The static nature of lateral radiographs precludes temporal assessment, and the two dimensionally of images derived from both of these diagnostic modalities may limit understanding of spatial anatomic relationships and may preclude quantitative analysis. The need for a noninvasive, rapid, and easily repeatable method for examination of the velopharynx has fomented the innovative application of existing technologies, especially magnetic resonance imaging. We present an updated overview of techniques for imaging the velopharyngeal mechanism, with a focus on residual velopharyngeal dysfunction after initial palatoplasty. We provide a comprehensive perspective of the role of currently available instrumentation, summarize the work in our center regarding the technological developments of magnetic resonance imaging, and speculate about future applications of magnetic resonance imaging systems for evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction. The limitations of each of these measures discussed are emphasized.

Confirmation of linkage of Van der Woude syndrome to chromosome 1q32: evidence of association with STR alleles suggests possible unique origin of the disease mutation.

Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) is an autosomal dominant craniofacial disorder with high penetrance and variable expression. Its clinical features are variably expressed, but include cleft lip and/or cleft palate, lip pits and hypodontia. All VWS families studied to date map the disease gene to a < 2 cM region of chromosome 1q32, with no evidence of locus heterogeneity. The aim of this study is to refine the localization of the VWS gene and to further assess possible heterogeneity. We analyzed four multiplex VWS families. All available members were clinically assessed and genotyped for 19 short tandem repeat markers on chromosome 1 in the VWS candidate gene region. We performed two-point and multipoint limit of detection (LOD) score analyses using a high penetrance autosomal dominant model. All families showed positive LOD scores without any recombination in the candidate region. The largest two-point LOD score was 5.87. Our assay method for short tandem repeat (STR) markers provided highly accurate size estimation of marker allele fragment sizes, and therefore enabled us to determine the specific alleles segregating with the VWS gene in each of our four families. We observed a striking pattern of STR allele sharing at several closely linked loci among our four Caucasian VWS families recruited at three different locations in the US. These results suggest the possibility of a unique origin for a mutation responsible for many or most cases of VWS.

Surgical treatment of pseudosyndactyly of the hand in epidermolysis bullosa: histological analysis of an acellular allograft dermal matrix.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is an inherited mechanobullous disorder of skin and mucous membranes. The most striking clinical characteristic of the disease is the formation of blisters following trivial trauma. Repeated cycles of blistering and scarring result in gradual encasement of the hand in an epidermal "cocoon." The authors treated an 11-year-old boy with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa who presented with hand contractures and interdigital pseudosyndactyly. Treatment included release of contractures and application of a biosynthetic dermal analog. This report is a histological analysis of the dermal matrix 1 year after initial placement of the allograft. Fibroblasts repopulating the dermal allograft had a normal synthetic phenotype and lacked the myofibroblastic features seen in the ungrafted control biopsy. Collagen and elastin in the repopulated dermal allograft had normal dermal orientation and maturity in contrast to the sparse, immature collagen and lack of elastin compared with the dermis of an ungrafted control region. Results of this histological study indicate that treatment of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with an acellular human dermal allograft may restore some features of normal dermal architecture. Although the initial results are encouraging, longer follow-up is required before definitive conclusions can be made.

Long-term stability of postpalatoplasty perceptual speech ratings: a prospective study.

This prospective study was undertaken to assess the long-term stability of velopharyngeal perceptual speech ratings of patients with repaired cleft palate. All patients were evaluated and managed at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Institute, St. Louis Children's Hospital. Patients alternately received palatoplasty with or without intravelar veloplasty. Two senior surgeons standardized their operative procedures and performed or supervised directly all operations. Perceptual speech and language evaluations were conducted by the same experienced speech pathologist when the children were 6 years old and 12 years or older. Data were analyzed from the 28 patients available for long-term follow-up. The intravelar veloplasty (N = 14) and nonintravelar veloplasty (N = 14) groups were similar with respect to cleft anatomy and mean age at palatoplasty and at the second perceptual speech evaluation. Evaluation of the 12-year-old and older ratings indicated that the overwhelming majority of patients improved or maintained clinical stability in perceptual ratings of velopharyngeal function. When assessing direction and magnitude of change (i.e., incremental improvement vs. deterioration), the intravelar veloplasty and nonintravelar veloplasty groups had a similar distribution of perceptual speech ratings at both the 6-year and 12-year or older speech evaluations. Results were consistent with previously published data from our center, that the intravelar veloplasty procedure did not affect demonstrably the incidence of postpalatoplasty auditory perceptual symptoms of velopharyngeal dysfunction.

The effect of surgeon experience on velopharyngeal functional outcome following palatoplasty: is there a learning curve?

There is little information in the cleft palate literature concerning the relationship between surgeon volume and clinical outcomes. It is unknown whether such a relationship applies specifically to velopharyngeal dysfunction and the need for secondary physical management of the velopharynx. The purpose of this paper was to explore the concept of an operative learning curve for different surgeons with respect to palatoplasty. Impact of case volume and procedure type on the occurrence of secondary palatal management (the main outcome measure) was assessed. The charts of 472 consecutive palatoplasty patients were reviewed by one speech and language pathologist to determine when the palatoplasty was performed, which surgeon (n = 9) performed the palatoplasty, whether velopharyngeal status was documented at a minimum of 6 years of age, and whether secondary palatal management was prescribed. The results were analyzed by year of palatoplasty, by surgeon, and by number of operations per surgeon to determine total and individual surgeon rates of secondary palatal management. There were 401 palatoplasties (85 percent recovery) with adequate documentation of velopharyngeal status by at least 6 years of age. Palatoplasty rates ranged between 1 and 258 palatoplasties per surgeon. Over the 12 years reviewed, secondary palatal management was performed for 92 patients (23 percent) of the study population. Examination of the proportion of palatoplasty patients receiving secondary palatal management by surgeon and by year showed only one surgeon with a pattern suggesting a learning curve. The proportion of patients receiving secondary palatal management was plotted against the total number of surgeries the surgeon performed. There was a strong relationship between experience and success. The number of procedures this surgeon performed per year increased at approximately the same time as the success rate improved. The categories of "total procedures" and "procedure per year" were highly correlated with each other. Success rates were analyzed by number of procedures performed per year, and there was a clear association between the two variables. To separate the effect of the two variables, a multiple regression model was constructed. The category of "total procedures" was statistically significant in the model, whereas procedures per year was not, suggesting that the key to the dominant surgeon's improvement was cumulative experience rather than frequency of performance of the operation. Palatoplasties performed by high-volume surgeons are more likely to result in better postoperative outcomes (i.e., lower rates of secondary palatal management) as compared with palatoplasties performed by low-volume surgeons. The influence of the surgeon's cumulative experience on improvement seems to be more important than the frequency of performance of primary palatoplasty.

Salvaging the failed pharyngoplasty: intervention outcome.

OBJECTIVE: This paper reports on the rates of failure of operations (pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty) performed for management of velopharyngeal dysfunction, and outcome following their revision. DESIGN: Anatomic abnormalities associated with unacceptable vocal resonance and nasal air escape following pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty were critiqued. The results of primary pharyngeal flap were evaluated for 65 patients, and the results of primary sphincter pharyngoplasty were evaluated for 123 patients. All patients were treated for velopharyngeal dysfunction. The definition of surgical failure was based on persistent hypernasality and/or nasal turbulence on perceptual speech evaluation, and incomplete velopharyngeal closure on instrumental evaluation, at least 3 months postoperatively. SETTING: All patients were evaluated and managed at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Deformities Institute, St. Louis Children's Hospital, a tertiary cleft care center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: All patients had failed surgical management initially, either with pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty, and all underwent repeat preoperative and postoperative perceptual speech evaluations; real-time lateral phonation fluoroscopy including still reference views; and flexible nasendoscopy of the velopharynx using standard speech protocols. INTERVENTIONS: Revisional surgery for both procedures consisted of either tightening of the sphincter pharyngoplasty or pharyngeal flap port(s) or reinsertion of the sphincter pharyngoplasty or pharyngeal flaps following dehiscence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was normalcy of velopharyngeal function, i.e., elimination of perceptual hypernasality and instrumental evidence of complete velopharyngeal closure. The rates of pharyngeal flap failure and sphincter pharyngoplasty failure were determined for those patients requiring surgical revision. RESULTS: Thirteen of 65 patients (20%) who underwent primary pharyngeal flap required revisional surgery. Of these 13 patients, eight were managed successfully with a single revisional operation. The remaining five patients (38%) continued to exhibit velopharyngeal dysfunction and underwent a second revision consisting of tightening or augmentation of the lateral ports. Speech results were satisfactory in all patients so treated; however, hyponasality with no other airway morbidity occurred in all five. Twenty of 123 patients (16%) who underwent primary sphincter pharyngoplasty required surgical revision. Of these 20 patients, 17 were managed successfully. For both procedures, the principal cause of failure was partial or complete flap dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of primary pharyngeal flap failure are roughly equivalent to rates of primary sphincter pharyngoplasty failure. Pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty failures can be salvaged with revisional surgery, which can provide a velopharyngeal mechanism capable of complete closure. Revisional surgery is usually associated with denasal speech.

Does preexisting posterior pharyngeal wall motion drive the dynamism of sphincter pharyngoplasty?

Lateral speech videofluoroscopic evaluations were videotaped preoperatively and postoperatively for 20 patients who underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty. Randomized videotapes were constructed and subsequently evaluated by speech/language pathologists experienced in assessing patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction. Rating forms assessing various motion parameters of the posterior pharyngeal wall were completed and analyzed statistically. Results showed that the posterior pharyngeal wall configuration postoperatively was less likely to be rated as smooth relative to the preoperative configuration (p = 0.019). No other statistically significant data were obtained, although there was a trend for posterior pharyngeal wall movement rated as discrete preoperatively to be described as generalized postoperatively. We conclude that when comparing preoperative and postoperative parameters, sphincter pharyngoplasty does not significantly affect posterior pharyngeal wall motion. Posterior pharyngeal wall configuration is less likely to be categorized as smooth after sphincter pharyngoplasty relative to the preoperative condition. Although sphincter pharyngoplasty has been shown to improve velopharyngeal function, there is little evidence from this study to suggest that preexisting posterior pharyngeal wall motion causes sphincteric movement.

Limited value of preoperative cervical vascular imaging in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome.

The purpose of this two-part study was to evaluate the safety of surgical management of speech production disorders in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome without preoperative cervical vascular imaging studies. Anomalous internal carotid arteries have been shown to be a frequent feature of velocardiofacial syndrome. These vessels pose a potential risk for hemorrhage during velopharyngeal narrowing procedures. Magnetic resonance angiography, and other forms of cervical vascular imaging studies such as computerized tomography, have been advocated as aids to surgery by defining the preoperative vascular anatomy. However, it remains unclear whether these studies alter either the conduct or outcome of operations on the velopharynx. In the first part of this study, we reviewed the charts and videonasendoscopic evaluations of 39 consecutive patients with confirmed or suspected velocardiofacial syndrome who underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty or pharyngeal flap from 1978 to 1996. The charts were reviewed to determine (1) the frequency of identification of abnormal pharyngeal pulsations; (2) whether such pulsations affected the conduct of the operative procedure; and (3) whether the presence of pulsations affected surgical morbidity and/or surgical outcome. None of the patients underwent any type of cervical vascular imaging study. In the second part of this study, we surveyed plastic surgeons with numerous years of experience participating on cleft-craniofacial teams, to ascertain practice patterns relating to the management of patients with velocardiofacial syndrome. The questions related specifically to the surgeons' behavior in relation to angiography and their awareness of any cases of surgical morbidity related to the cervical vascular system in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome. We were interested in discerning both how commonly this situation arises clinically and the distribution of the various types of operative procedures in common use. Of our 39 patients, 10 patients (26 percent) had detectable pulsations on preoperative nasendoscopy. Of these, five patients underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty and five underwent pharyngeal flap procedures. Preoperative instrumental and intraoperative clinical assessment of pulsatile vessels allowed velopharyngeal reconstruction in all patients without surgical morbidity. Results of the questionnaire indicated that most cleft surgeons do not routinely order cervical vascular imaging studies for all of their patients with velocardiofacial syndrome. About half of the respondents indicated that their operative approach was influenced by information obtained from angiographic studies. None of the surgeons queried were aware of any cases of surgical morbidity related to the cervical vascular system in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome. Nearly 50 percent of surgeons use pharyngeal flap procedures most frequently, whereas 22 percent of surgeons use sphincter pharyngoplasty most frequently. Results of this study support the safety of sphincter pharyngoplasty or pharyngeal flap procedures in patients with velocardiofacial syndrome without preparatory angiography. These procedures can be performed safely, even in patients having aberrant velopharyngeal pulsations. Given the market cost of magnetic resonance angiography ($1600), one must question the cost-efficacy of magnetic resonance angiography for routine use in the velocardiofacial syndrome population.

Quantification of dynamic velopharyngeal port excursion following sphincter pharyngoplasty.

The sphincter pharyngoplasty is a surgical procedure designed to correct velopharyngeal dysfunction. Its advocates cite the theoretical advantage of its induction of dynamic activity of the neovelopharyngeal port, but this dynamic activity has yet to be quantitatively demonstrated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to quantify postoperative velopharyngeal dynamism and to document the results of intervention outcome on sphincteric excursion measurements from minimal-to-maximal orifice closure. We conducted a 7-year retrospective review of speech videofluoroscopy evaluations in patients who had undergone sphincter pharyngoplasty in our center. Between 1989 and 1994, there were 58 patients so treated for postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal dysfunction by two surgeons using the same operative technique. Patients for whom sphincter pharyngoplasty was recommended fulfilled both of the following criteria: (1) velopharyngeal dysfunction caused by an anatomic, myoneural, or combined deficiency of the velopharyngeal sphincter that would not be expected to be managed by speech therapy alone, and (2) preoperative videonasendoscopy and speech videofluoroscopic studies that demonstrated large-gap coronal, circular, or bow-tie closure patterns or velopharyngeal hypodynamism. Of the original 58 patients, 24 underwent postoperative speech videofluoroscopic evaluations with basal views. Of these, 20 of the evaluations (83 percent) were of adequate quality to be included in a research study. Still images showing maximum and minimum excursion of the sphincter in basal view were obtained. To test for observer reliability, the speech videofluoroscopic studies were randomized and presented for measurement to the same individual on two occasions, each session separated by a 1-month time interval. Topographic imaging software was used to obtain maximum and minimum measurements to within 0.1 mm. Partitioning the variance of the data showed that measurement variability was a very small portion of the total, and that difference between the minimum and maximum values was the largest source of variability. Of the total variability in the data, 64.0 percent originated in the minimum/maximum difference, 34.3 percent came from patient variability, and only 1.7 percent resulted from original or repeat measurements. The patient variability may be exaggerated because of variability in the scale of measurement. Results of this study indicate a quantifiable and statistically significant difference in maximum-to-minimum excursion of sphincteric closure. Sphincter pharyngoplasty appears to be dynamic in the majority of cases.

Perception of postpalatoplasty speech differences in school-age children by parents, teachers, and professional speech pathologists.

The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to test the ability of parents and teachers to discriminate the speech of children with repaired cleft palate from that of their unaffected peers and (2) to compare these lay assessments of speech acceptability with the critical perceptual assessments of expert clinicians. The subjects for this study were 20 children of school age (age range, 8 to 12 years) who were drawn from a large population (n = 1282) of patients. All subjects had been referred for palatoplasty to the same tertiary cleft center between 1978 and 1991. There were 16 matched controls. The listening team included parents of subjects (n = 32) and teachers of age-matched school children (n = 12). Randomized master audiotape recordings of the study group were presented in blinded fashion to both groups of the adult raters, who were inexperienced in the evaluation of patients with speech dysfunction. An experienced panel of three extramural speech pathologists evaluated the same recordings. In all parameters rated, both parents and teachers showed a consistent tendency to give the subject children more negative ratings than the control children. Expert raters were sensitive to differences in resonance and intelligibility in the control and cleft palate groups. Results of this study differ from similar previous research, indicating that naive peer raters (similar-age children) were insensitive to speech differences in the cleft palate and control groups.

Personality attributions based on speech samples of children with repaired cleft palates.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether or not assumptions made about personality characteristics based on speech samples differed for children with repaired cleft palates (CP) versus unaffected children. DESIGN: Audiotapes of speech samples were presented in random order to blind raters. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: The subjects were 20 children (10 females, 10 males) with repaired CP and 16 control (i.e., unaffected) children (8 females, 8 males). All children were 8 to 12 years of age, Caucasian, living in the St. Louis area, and lower-middle to upper-middle class. The raters were 20 (13 females, 7 males) 6th grade Caucasian students who attend a private school in the area. SETTING: Raters heard tapes in a group setting, but with individual headphones, in their school's cafeteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Each speech sample was rated (7-point Likert scale) by each student rater on a variety of personality characteristics based on the "Big Five" personality factors. RESULTS: A factor analysis of the items revealed a two-factor solution, although the factors were highly negatively correlated. No significant differences were found between ratings for the CP sample and the control sample for either factor scale (ANOVA, p = .93; p = .67). Similarly, when the two factors were combined to form a single factor, no significant differences were found between the ratings for the CP sample and the control sample (ANOVA, p = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, it does not appear that children differentially associated personality characteristics based on speech to children with repaired CP versus unaffected children, in the absence of visual input.

Need for velopharyngeal management following palatoplasty: an outcome analysis of syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with Robin sequence.

The Robin sequence is a pathogenetically and etiologically heterogeneous condition that can be a nonsyndromic anomaly or one feature of many syndromes. Little information is available regarding the distribution of patients having Robin sequence, with or without associated syndromes, who develop velopharyngeal dysfunction. In order to discern whether patients with Robin sequence, nonsyndromic and/or syndromic, have different velopharyngeal dysfunction rates from those observed among all patients undergoing palatoplasty during the same time period, a retrospective study was undertaken. The charts of 873 patients with overt clefts of the secondary palate managed at a single cleft center between 1978 and 1992 were reviewed. Diagnostic criteria for Robin sequence included cleft palate without cleft lip, microretrognathia, and perinatal respiratory and/or feeding difficulties; 79 such patients (9 percent) were identified from the initial group of 873. Of these, 58 patients (7 percent) were at least 3 years of age and had sufficient follow-up to allow for evaluation of speech outcome by an experienced speech pathologist through a variety of methodologies (videonasendoscopy, speech videofluoroscopy, perceptual speech characteristics). This group comprised the Robin sequence study population. All Robin sequence patients' charts were reviewed by a medical geneticist to confirm the presence or absence of a syndrome. Of the original 873 patients, there were 127 non-Robin sequence patients who were sufficiently cooperative in diagnostic testing to yield definitive information. This group comprised the non-Robin sequence study population. Among nonsyndromic Robin sequence patients, 15 of 34 (44 percent) developed velopharyngeal dysfunction and required velopharyngeal management, while 2 of 24 syndromic patients (8 percent) developed velopharyngeal dysfunction (p = 0.003). Of the 127 non-Robin sequence isolated cleft palate patients, 113 were nonsyndromic, of whom 18 percent (20 of 113) required velopharyngeal dysfunction management, and 14 were syndromic, of whom 64 percent (9 of 14) required velopharyngeal dysfunction management (p = 0.00009). We conclude that nonsyndromic Robin sequence patients have a higher rate of postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal dysfunction than the nonsyndromic non-Robin sequence cleft population. Outcome analysis of velopharyngeal function in cleft patients should take into account patients who have cleft palate in association with Robin sequence, with or without a recognizable syndrome.

Surgical management of velopharyngeal dysfunction: outcome analysis of autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.

Posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation has been advocated for patients having velopharyngeal dysfunction with a small coronal gap. Nonautogenous augmentation has not been accepted widely because of migration or extrusion of alloplastic implants and resorption of injected materials. Autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation has been performed for decades by Italian surgeons. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure. Autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation, using a rolled superiorly based pharyngeal myomucosal flap, was performed on 14 patients, between November of 1989 and June of 1992, who fulfilled two criteria: velopharyngeal dysfunction unresponsive to speech therapy and a small (< 20 percent) coronal gap on velopharyngeal nasendoscopy. Of these, 3 patients had prior prosthetic velopharyngeal management, including 2 patients with Robin sequence. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively with recorded (audio-videotape) perceptual, nasendoscopic, and fluoroscopic standardized speech and airway evaluations. The tapes were used for construction of a randomized master tape that was presented in blinded fashion and random order to three skilled raters for independent assessment of numerous perceptual and instrumental parameters of speech. The raters were uninvolved in the care of the patients or this study, and their intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were known. Preoperatively, the majority of patients had nasal turbulence. All patients had variable degrees of hypernasality ranging from intermittent to pervasive. Parameters rated included (1) resonance (hypernasality, hyponasality, mixed), (2) auditory nasal emission (including nasal turbulence), and (3) visual characteristics regarding velopharyngeal closure. The visual parameters consisted of questions about whether a pharyngeal bulge was present or absent, descriptions of posterior pharyngeal wall movements with speech, level of closure, completeness of velopharyngeal closure, and quantitative descriptions of the percentage of velopharyngeal closure postoperatively. Examiners were instructed to look for a static and/or dynamic projection or bulge (i.e., Passavant's ridge) and, if a bulge was present, whether the level of velopharyngeal closure was on the same plane as the neoposterior pharyngeal bulge. Results of the extramural judgments of these parameters showed that there was no statistically significant tendency for patients' speech to be rated as more normal after the augmentation procedure than before it. We conclude that (1) autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation does not result in speech improvement and (2) autogenous posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation does not impair the nasal airway.

Speech outcome following palatoplasty in primary school children: do lay peer observers agree with speech pathologists?

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to test the ability of normal children to discriminate the speech of children with repaired cleft palate from the speech of unaffected peers and (2) to compare these naive assessments of speech acceptability with the sophisticated assessments of speech pathologists. The study group (subjects) was composed of 21 children of school age (aged 8 to 12 years) who had undergone palatoplasty at a single cleft center and 16 matched controls. The listening team (student raters) was composed of 20 children who were matched to the subjects for age, sex, and other variables. Randomized master audio-tape recordings of the children who had undergone palatoplasty were presented in blinded fashion and random order to student raters who were inexperienced in the evaluation of patients with speech dysfunction. The same sound recordings were evaluated by an experienced panel of extramural speech pathologists whose intrarater and interrater reliabilities were known; they were not direct care providers. Additionally, the master tape was presented in blinded fashion and random order to the velopharyngeal staff at the cleft center for intramural assessment. Comparison of these assessment methodologies forms the basis of this report. Naive raters were insensitive to speech differences in the control and cleft palate groups. Differences in the mean scores for the groups never approached statistical significance, and there was adequate power to discern a difference of 0.75 on a 7-point scale. Expert raters were sensitive to differences in resonance and intelligibility in the control and cleft palate groups but not to other aspects of speech. The expert raters recommended further evaluation of cleft palate patients more often than control patients. Speech pathologists discern differences that the laity does not. Consideration should be given to the utilization of untrained listeners to add real-life significance to clinical speech assessments. Peer group evaluations of speech acceptability may define the morbidity of cleft palate speech in terms that are most relevant to the patients themselves and may safeguard against the possibility of offering treatment that may be unnecessary.