Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
6.
MedEdPORTAL ; 18: 11271, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36157358

RESUMEN

Introduction: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a complication of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for infertility. Given the potential for significant morbidity, it is important for emergency medicine (EM) residents to be able to recognize and initiate treatment for this disorder. Methods: A high-fidelity human patient simulator was used, with availability of bedside ultrasound. PGY 1-4 EM residents participated in this case of a 28-year-old female patient undergoing treatment for infertility who presented to the emergency department with shortness of breath and near syncope. Workup revealed a diagnosis of OHSS. After the simulation, we surveyed residents on their knowledge of OHSS prior to participation in the simulation. We also asked about their confidence in caring for a patient with OHSS pre- and postsimulation based on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 24 EM residents completed this simulation case. Prior to participating in the simulation experience, 62% of residents reported that they had heard of OHSS, and 17% of residents had previously managed a patient with OHSS. After participating in the simulation, residents' comfort with managing a patient with OHSS increased from 1.7 to 3.7 points (1 = not at all comfortable, 5 = extremely comfortable; p < .001). Discussion: OHSS is a rare but important complication of ART that many EM residents have not treated in the clinical environment. As the presenting symptoms may mimic other diagnoses, obtaining a detailed history and utilizing bedside ultrasonography are essential to diagnosing and correctly treating these patients.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Infertilidad , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad/complicaciones , Infertilidad/terapia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/complicaciones , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/terapia , Ultrasonografía
8.
J Emerg Med ; 62(4): 575-578, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35063317

RESUMEN

Dr. Patrick Lowe: Our case today is that of a 47-year-old woman who was referred to our emergency department (ED) due to bloody urine, dark tarry stools, red spots on her skin, and bruising throughout her body. Fourteen days prior to presentation, she began exhibiting intermittent fevers, headache, shortness of breath, and a dry cough, and she tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19 pneumonia). Over the 3 days prior to her ED presentation, she experienced a headache that was more intense than the headaches she had been having in the preceding 2 weeks. She reported episodes of both dark urine as well as bright red blood in her urine. In addition, she had multiple dark stools described as tar-like when asked. On the day of her ED presentation, the patient noted a red rash throughout her body. In addition, earlier in the day, she had atraumatic self-limited epistaxis. She denied any falls or head strikes, vision changes, focal weakness or numbness, shortness of breath, chest pain, abdominal pain, or peripheral swelling.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicaciones , Tos , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Cefalea , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2
11.
AEM Educ Train ; 5(3): e10582, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34124526

RESUMEN

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, most in-person visiting clerkship opportunities have been canceled. Many institutions have developed virtual experiences to fill this void; however, the format and objectives of these experiences are variable. This article describes an education intervention for visiting students where both learner-oriented and program-oriented outcomes of a nonclerkship virtual student experience are explored. This intervention consisted of five 1-hour case-based teaching sessions in addition to attendance at weekly residency conference over a 1-week period. The primary outcomes were student ratings of how the experience impacted their 1) perception of the program's educational environment and culture, 2) medical knowledge, and 3) program ranking before and after the experience. Of 24 participants, 15 students (63%) completed the final evaluation, all with positive summative rankings in every domain measured. Of the 15 respondents, 12 (80%) reported an increase in where they would rank the program after the experience compared to before, and nine of 15 (60%) stated that they would rank the program #1 if making a list at the time they completed the final evaluation. Future study should examine long-term outcomes of these interventions including decisions regarding where students apply, who programs interview, and ranking decisions of students and programs.

12.
MedEdPORTAL ; 17: 11151, 2021 04 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948486

RESUMEN

Introduction: Medical students are positioned to observe, document, and explore opportunities to improve patient safety and quality in their institutions. Medical schools are introducing quality improvement (QI) knowledge and skills in the preclinical classrooms, yet few provide opportunities to apply these tools in the clinical setting. Methods: Clerkship students participated in two 1-hour sessions, organized in groups of 12-15 students, led by faculty with QI expertise. The sessions in the module introduced core concepts in QI and patient safety, while drawing on students' own clinical experiences. Students identified a system failure they encountered in their own clinical setting/practice and analyzed contributing factors using the 5 Whys Tool. We evaluated the efficacy of the two-session module with a pre- and postsurvey of students' self-reported change in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Surveys also assessed students' satisfaction with module content and format. Faculty perspectives were solicited by email. Results: In April-May 2019, 59 students at a large US medical school participated. Of students, 73% and 53% completed pre- and postsurveys, respectively. All students submitted a report of an identified systems failure and their analysis of contributing factors. Students' self-rated knowledge and skills increased significantly. Students preferred active engagement compared to passive learning. Students and faculty identified areas for future module improvement. Discussion: The educational program was well received and increased students' knowledge and confidence in core concepts of QI and safety. The module addressed the requirement for graduating students to identify safety incidents and contribute to a culture of QI.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Curriculum , Humanos , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
15.
J Emerg Med ; 59(4): 593-596, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732134
16.
J Emerg Med ; 59(3): 435-438, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800638
17.
J Emerg Med ; 59(5): 705-709, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828602

Asunto(s)
Medicaid , Humanos
19.
J Emerg Med ; 59(2): 294-297, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359915
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA