Clinical Deterioration and Neurocritical Care Utilization in Pediatric Patients With Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 9-13 After Traumatic Brain Injury: Associations With Patient and Injury Characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: To define the clinical characteristics of hospitalized children with moderate traumatic brain injury and identify factors associated with deterioration to severe traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Children's Hospital with Level 1 Trauma Center designation. PATIENTS: Inpatient children less than 18 years old with an International Classification of Diseases code for traumatic brain injury and an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9-13. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We queried the National Trauma Data Bank for our institutional data and identified 177 patients with moderate traumatic brain injury from 2010 to 2017. These patients were then linked to the electronic health record to obtain baseline and injury characteristics, laboratory data, serial Glasgow Coma Scale scores, CT findings, and neurocritical care interventions. Clinical deterioration was defined as greater than or equal to 2 recorded values of Glasgow Coma Scale scores less than or equal to 8 during the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Thirty-seven patients experienced deterioration. Children who deteriorated were more likely to require intubation (73% vs 26%), have generalized edema, subdural hematoma, or contusion on CT scan (30% vs 8%, 57% vs 37%, 35% vs 16%, respectively), receive hypertonic saline (38% vs 7%), undergo intracranial pressure monitoring (24% vs 0%), were more likely to be transferred to inpatient rehabilitation following hospital discharge (32% vs 5%), and incur greater costs of care ($25,568 vs $10,724) (all p < 0.01). There was no mortality in this cohort. Multivariable regression demonstrated that a higher Injury Severity Score, a higher initial international normalized ratio, and a lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score were associated with deterioration to severe traumatic brain injury in the first 48 hours (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial subset of children (21%) presenting with moderate traumatic brain injury at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center experienced deterioration in the first 48 hours, requiring additional resource utilization associated with increased cost of care. Deterioration was independently associated with an increased international normalized ratio higher Injury Severity Score, and a lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score.

Low Health Literacy Is Associated With Frailty and Reduced Likelihood of Liver Transplant Listing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The effect of low health literacy (HL) on outcomes in end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is largely unknown. The association of low HL on clinical outcomes was investigated in a prospective cohort of outpatients with ESLD undergoing liver transplantation (LT) evaluation. From 2014 to 2017, 276 patients underwent LT evaluation with assessments of liver disease severity, medical and psychosocial comorbidities, physical frailty, and malnutrition. Literacy was measured with the Newest Vital Sign, a brief validated assessment. Multivariate models assessed relationships between HL and clinical outcomes adjusting for clinical and psychosocial variables. The median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium score of the study sample was 15 (interquartile range, 11-19), 71 (25.7%) of candidates were frail, 117 (42.4%) had malnutrition, 151 (54.7%) had hepatic encephalopathy, 104 (37.7%) had low HL, and 85 (39.2%) had marginal or poor social support. Adjusting for education level, socioeconomic factors, and severity of illness, low HL was independently associated with physical frailty (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-8.59; P = 0.004) and not being wait-listed (aOR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.03-3.75; P = 0.04). Strong social support attenuated the relationship between low HL and not being wait-listed (aOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.74-3.36; P = 0.24). Low HL is common and a largely unrecognized risk factor for poor health outcomes among patients with ESLD. Patient-oriented infrastructure and support are needed at the health system level to ensure all patients can successfully navigate the complex process of LT evaluation and wait-listing.

Parent Dosing Tool Use, Beliefs, and Access: A Health Literacy Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To assess parent decision-making regarding dosing tools, a known contributor to medication dosing errors, by evaluating parent dosing tool use, beliefs, and access, and the role of health literacy, with a focus on dosing cups, which are associated with an increased risk of multifold overdose. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected for randomized controlled study in 3 urban pediatric clinics. English/Spanish-speaking parents (n = 493) of children ≤8 years of age enrolled. OUTCOMES: reported tool use, beliefs, and access. Predictor variable: health literacy (Newest Vital Sign; limited [0-3], adequate [4-6]). Multiple logistic regression analyses conducted. RESULTS: Over two-thirds of parents had limited health literacy. Oral syringes (62%) and dosing cups (22%) were most commonly used. Overall, 24% believed dosing cups were the best tool type for dosing accuracy; 99% reported having access to ≥1 dosing tools with standard measurement markings. Parents with limited health literacy had greater odds of dosing cup use (limited vs adequate: aOR = 2.4 [1.2-4.6]). Parents who believed that dosing cups are best for accuracy had greater odds of dosing cup use (aOR = 16.3 [9.0-29.3]); this belief mediated health literacy-effects on dosing cup use. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with dosing tool choice, including parent health literacy and beliefs are important to consider in the design of interventions to reduce dosing errors; future larger-scale studies addressing this issue are needed.