Monetized health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States in 2025.

By-products of mobile source combustion processes, such as those associated with gasoline- and diesel-powered engines, include direct emissions of particulate matter as well as precursors to particulate matter and ground-level ozone. Human exposure to fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) is associated with increased incidence of premature mortality and morbidity outcomes. This study builds upon recent, detailed source-apportionment air quality modeling to project the health-related benefits of reducing PM2.5 from mobile sources across the contiguous U.S. in 2025. Updating a previously published benefits analysis approach, we develop national-level benefit per ton estimates for directly emitted PM2.5, SO2/pSO4, and NOX for 16 mobile source sectors spanning onroad vehicles, nonroad engines and equipment, trains, marine vessels, and aircraft. These benefit per ton estimates provide a reduced-form tool for estimating and comparing benefits across multiple mobile source emission scenarios and can be applied to assess the benefits of mobile source policies designed to improve air quality. We found the benefit per ton of directly emitted PM2.5 in 2025 ranges from $110,000 for nonroad agriculture sources to $700,000 for onroad light duty gas cars and motorcycles (in 2015 dollars and based on an estimate of PM-related mortality derived from the American Cancer Society cohort study). Benefit per ton values for SO2/pSO4 range from $52,000 for aircraft sources (including emissions from ground support vehicles) to $300,000 for onroad light duty diesel emissions. Benefit per ton values for NOX range from $2100 for C1 and C2 marine vessels to $7500 for "nonroad all other" mobile sources, including industrial, logging, and oil field sources. Benefit per ton estimates increase approximately 2.26-fold when using an alternative concentration response function to derive PM2.5-related mortality. We also report benefit per ton values for the eastern and western U.S. to account for broad spatial heterogeneity patterns in emissions reductions, population exposure and air quality benefits.

Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter in 2025.

The contribution of precursor emissions from 17 mobile source sectors to ambient ozone and fine particulate matter levels across the U.S. were evaluated, using the CAMx photochemical model, to identify which mobile source sectors are projected to have the largest impacts on air pollution in 2025. Both onroad and nonroad sectors contribute considerably to projected air pollution across much of the country. Summer ozone season ozone contributions between 2 and 5 ppb, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are largely found in the southeast United States from the onroad sectors, most notably light-duty and heavy-duty vehicles, and along the coastline from the Category 3 (C3) marine sector. Annual average PM2.5 contributions between 0.5 to 0.9 µg/m3, which are among the highest levels presented on the maps of mobile source sectors, are found throughout the Midwest and along portions of the east and west coast from onroad sectors as well as nonroad diesel and rail sectors. Additionally, contributions of precursor emissions to ambient ozone and PM2.5 levels were evaluated to understand the range of impacts from precursors in the various mobile source sectors. For most mobile source sectors, in most locations, NOX emissions contributed more to ozone than VOC emissions, and secondary PM2.5 contributed more to ambient PM2.5 than primary PM2.5. The largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source NOX emissions tended to be between 2 and 5 ppb, while the largest ozone levels on the maps showing contributions from mobile source VOC emissions tended to be between 0.9 and 2 ppb, except for southern California where ozone contributions from VOC emissions from onroad light duty vehicles were between 2 and 5 ppb. The largest contributions to ambient PM2.5 on the maps showing primary and secondary contributions from mobile source sectors tended to be between 0.1 and 0.5 µg/m3. The contribution from primary PM2.5 extended over localized areas (urban-scale) and the contribution from secondary PM2.5 extended over more regional (multi-state) areas.

Costs of IQ Loss from Leaded Aviation Gasoline Emissions.

In the United States, general aviation piston-driven aircraft are now the largest source of lead emitted to the atmosphere. Elevated lead concentrations impair children's IQ and can lead to lower earnings potentials. This study is the first assessment of the nationwide annual costs of IQ losses from aircraft lead emissions. We develop a general aviation emissions inventory for the continental United States and model its impact on atmospheric concentrations using the community multi-scale air quality model (CMAQ). We use these concentrations to quantify the impacts of annual aviation lead emissions on the U.S. population using two methods: through static estimates of cohort-wide IQ deficits and through dynamic economy-wide effects using a computational general equilibrium model. We also examine the sensitivity of these damage estimates to different background lead concentrations, showing the impact of lead controls and regulations on marginal costs. We find that aircraft-attributable lead contributes to $1.06 billion 2006 USD ($0.01-$11.6) in annual damages from lifetime earnings reductions, and that dynamic economy-wide methods result in damage estimates that are 54% larger. Because the marginal costs of lead are dependent on background concentration, the costs of piston-driven aircraft lead emissions are expected to increase over time as regulations on other emissions sources are tightened.

Impact of aviation non-CO2 combustion effects on the environmental feasibility of alternative jet fuels.

Alternative fuels represent a potential option for reducing the climate impacts of the aviation sector. The climate impacts of alternatives fuel are traditionally considered as a ratio of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to those of the displaced petroleum product; however, this ignores the climate impacts of the non-CO(2) combustion effects from aircraft in the upper atmosphere. The results of this study show that including non-CO(2) combustion emissions and effects in the life cycle of a Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene (SPK) fuel can lead to a decrease in the relative merit of the SPK fuel relative to conventional jet fuel. For example, an SPK fuel option with zero life cycle GHG emissions would offer a 100% reduction in GHG emissions but only a 48% reduction in actual climate impact using a 100-year time window and the nominal climate modeling assumption set outlined herein. Therefore, climate change mitigation policies for aviation that rely exclusively on relative well-to-wake life cycle GHG emissions as a proxy for aviation climate impact may overestimate the benefit of alternative fuel use on the global climate system.