Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 1954, 2022 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35145134

RESUMEN

Other than repaired fractures, osteoarthritis, and periosteal reaction, the vertebrate fossil record has limited evidence of non-osseous diseases. This difficulty in paleontological diagnoses stems from (1) the inability to conduct medical testing, (2) soft-tissue pathologic structures are less likely to be preserved, and (3) many osseous lesions are not diagnostically specific. However, here reported for the first time is an avian-style respiratory disorder in a non-avian dinosaur. This sauropod presents irregular bony pathologic structures stemming from the pneumatic features in the cervical vertebrae. As sauropods show well-understood osteological correlates indicating that respiratory tissues were incorporated into the post-cranial skeleton, and thus likely had an 'avian-style' form of respiration, it is most parsimonious to identify these pathologic structures as stemming from a respiratory infection. Although several extant avian infections produce comparable symptoms, the most parsimonious is airsacculitis with associated osteomyelitis. From actinobacterial to fungal in origin, airsacculitis is an extremely prevalent respiratory disorder in birds today. While we cannot pinpoint the specific infectious agent that caused the airsacculitis, this diagnosis establishes the first fossil record of this disease. Additionally, it allows us increased insight into the medical disorders of dinosaurs from a phylogenetic perspective and understanding what maladies plagued the "fearfully great lizards".


Asunto(s)
Evolución Biológica , Dinosaurios/fisiología , Paleontología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/fisiopatología , Animales , Aves/fisiología , Fósiles/patología , Osteología , Filogenia
2.
J Vet Intern Med ; 34(2): 607-615, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32017235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No gold standard assay for serum total thyroxine (TT4) concentration in small animals exists. The Microgenics DRI TT4 (MTT4) assay is used by most reference laboratories. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: IDEXX Catalyst Total T4 (CTT4) and Immulite 2000 TT4 (ITT4) results will agree with MTT4 results. ANIMALS: Residual small animal sera were randomized before reanalysis (dogs, CTT4 versus MTT4: n = 176, ITT4 versus MTT4: n = 74; cats, CTT4 versus MTT4: n = 319, ITT4 versus MTT4: n = 79). METHODS: Validation and method comparison study. Serum TT4 concentration was measured on all analyzers. Pairwise Pearson correlation, cumulative sum linearity test, regression, and Bland-Altman method were performed. RESULTS: CTT4 versus MTT4 in dogs: constant bias (y-intercept) was 0.10 µg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.15), proportional bias (slope) was 0.86 µg/dL (95% CI, 0.83-0.89); in cats, constant bias was 0.13 µg/dL (95% CI, 0.08-0.20) and proportional bias was 1.01 µg/dL (95% CI, 0.98-1.03), but the test for linearity failed. Bland-Altman plots identified increasing disagreement with increasing serum TT4 concentrations. ITT4 versus MTT4 in dogs, constant bias was 0.14 µg/dL (95% CI, 0.04-0.22) and 0.22 µg/dL (95% CI, 0.09-0.33) for cats; proportional bias was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) for dogs and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) for cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Differences in CTT4 and MTT4 results affect interpretation at higher serum TT4 concentrations. The ITT4 proportional bias will underestimate serum TT4 concentrations in dogs and cats, compared to MTT4. Serial TT4 measurements should be done using the same assay.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/sangre , Enfermedades de los Perros/sangre , Hipertiroidismo/veterinaria , Hipotiroidismo/veterinaria , Pruebas de Función de la Tiroides/veterinaria , Tiroxina/sangre , Animales , Bioensayo , Gatos , Perros , Hipertiroidismo/sangre , Hipertiroidismo/diagnóstico , Hipotiroidismo/sangre , Hipotiroidismo/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función de la Tiroides/métodos
3.
PLoS One ; 4(9): e7288, 2009 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19789646

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tyrannosaurus rex and other tyrannosaurid fossils often display multiple, smooth-edged full-thickness erosive lesions on the mandible, either unilaterally or bilaterally. The cause of these lesions in the Tyrannosaurus rex specimen FMNH PR2081 (known informally by the name 'Sue') has previously been attributed to actinomycosis, a bacterial bone infection, or bite wounds from other tyrannosaurids. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted an extensive survey of tyrannosaurid specimens and identified ten individuals with full-thickness erosive lesions. These lesions were described, measured and photographed for comparison with one another. We also conducted an extensive survey of related archosaurs for similar lesions. We show here that these lesions are consistent with those caused by an avian parasitic infection called trichomonosis, which causes similar abnormalities on the mandible of modern birds, in particular raptors. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This finding represents the first evidence for the ancient evolutionary origin of an avian transmissible disease in non-avian theropod dinosaurs. It also provides a valuable insight into the palaeobiology of these now extinct animals. Based on the frequency with which these lesions occur, we hypothesize that tyrannosaurids were commonly infected by a Trichomonas gallinae-like protozoan. For tyrannosaurid populations, the only non-avian dinosaur group that show trichomonosis-type lesions, it is likely that the disease became endemic and spread as a result of antagonistic intraspecific behavior, consumption of prey infected by a Trichomonas gallinae-like protozoan and possibly even cannibalism. The severity of trichomonosis-related lesions in specimens such as Tyrannosaurus rex FMNH PR2081 and Tyrannosaurus rex MOR 980, strongly suggests that these animals died as a direct result of this disease, mostly likely through starvation.


Asunto(s)
Dinosaurios/fisiología , Paleontología/métodos , Tricomoniasis/diagnóstico , Animales , Evolución Biológica , Fósiles , Infecciones , Paleopatología
4.
PLoS One ; 4(1): e4252, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19172995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The horns and frill of Triceratops and other ceratopsids (horned dinosaurs) are interpreted variously as display structures or as weapons against conspecifics and predators. Lesions (in the form of periosteal reactive bone, healing fractures, and alleged punctures) on Triceratops skulls have been used as anecdotal support of intraspecific combat similar to that in modern horned and antlered animals. If ceratopsids with different cranial morphologies used their horns in such combat, this should be reflected in the rates of lesion occurrence across the skull. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used a G-test of independence to compare incidence rates of lesions in Triceratops (which possesses two large brow horns and a smaller nasal horn) and the related ceratopsid Centrosaurus (with a large nasal horn and small brow horns), for the nasal, jugal, squamosal, and parietal bones of the skull. The two taxa differ significantly in the occurrence of lesions on the squamosal bone of the frill (P = 0.002), but not in other cranial bones (P > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This pattern is consistent with Triceratops using its horns in combat and the frill being adapted as a protective structure for this taxon. Lower pathology rates in Centrosaurus may indicate visual rather than physical use of cranial ornamentation in this genus, or a form of combat focused on the body rather than the head.


Asunto(s)
Dinosaurios/fisiología , Conducta Predatoria/fisiología , Animales , Callo Óseo/patología , Fracturas Óseas/patología , Periostio/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...